Skip to main content
Log in

Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar screw-plate fixation versus posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) followed by posterior pedicle screw fixation (PSF) in a second procedure is mostly used to implement lumbar spine fusion. ALIF followed by anterior lumbar screw-plate has a lot of advantages, but its biomechanical stability requires confirmation. This study evaluated the biomechanical stability of a novel anterior lumbar locked screw-plate (ALLSP) by comparison with posterior lumbar PSF. Twelve fresh human cadaveric lumbar specimens (L4–L5) were assigned to four groups: ALIF+PSF group, ALIF+ALLSP (both fixed) group, ALIF group and an untreated control (both non-fixed) group. The first three groups received implantation of a rectangular titanium cage. Tests under axial compression, flexion, extension, lateral bending, or rotation showed that the fixed groups had significantly stronger stability than the non-fixed groups (P=0.000 for all). The ALIF+ALLSP group had significantly greater axial stiffness under applied axial compression and significantly less angular displacement under rotational forces than the ALIF+PSF group. The angular displacement of the ALIF+ALLSP group was less under flexion than that of the ALIF+PSF, and the angular displacement under lateral bending and extension was greater, but these differences were not statistically significant. In summary, the ALLSP conforms to the anterior lumbar spine and has good biomechanical stability. It is a reliable choice for enhancing the stability of ALIF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Niosi CA, Oxland TR. Degenerative mechanics of the lumbar spine. Spine J, 2004,4(6 Suppl):202S–208S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kozak JA, O’Brien JP. Simultaneous combined anterior and posterior fusion. An independent analysis of a treatment for the disabled low-back pain patient. Spine, 1990,15(4):322–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, et al. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine, 2005,30(12):1441–1445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blumenthal SL, Ohnmeiss DD. Intervertebral cages for degenerative spinal diseases. Spine J, 2003,3(4):301–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tzermiadianos MN, Mekhail A, Voronov LI, et al. Enhancing the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison of anterior plate versus posterior transpedicular instrumentation. Spine, 2008,33(2): E38–E43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore KR, Pinto MR, Butler LM. Degenerative disc disease treated with combined anterior and posterior arthrodesis and posterior instrumentation. Spine, 2002, 7(15):1680–1686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomsen K, Christensen FB, Eiskjaer SP, et al. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Spine, 1997,22(24): 2813–2822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beaubien BP, Derincek A, Lew WD, et al. In vitro, biomechanical comparison of an nterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anteriorly placed, low-profile lumbar plate and posteriorly placed pedicle screws or translaminar crews. Spine, 2005,30(16):1846–1851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bendo J, Quirno, Errico T, et al. A comparson of two retroperitoneal surgical approaches for total disc arthroplasty of the lumbar spine. Spine, 2008,33(2):205–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mehren C, Korge A, Siepe C, et al. Minimal invasive anterior midline approach to L2–L5. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2010,22(5–6):573–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehren C, Mayer HM, Siepe C, et al. The minimal invasive anterolateral approach to L2–L5. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2010,22(2):221–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang H, Brown L, Blunt L, et al. Influence of femoral stem surface finish on the apparent static shear strength at the stem-cement interface. J Mech Beh Biomed Mater, 2008,1(1):96–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang HY, Blunt L, Jiang XQ, et al. Femoral stem wear in cemented total hip replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 2008,222(5):583–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang H, Blunt L, Jiang X, et al. The influence of bone cement type on production of fretting wear on the femoral stem surface. Clin Biomech, 2012,27(7):666–672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson WM, Nichols TA, Jethwani D, et al. In vitro biomechanical comparison of an anterior and anterolateral lumbar plate with posterior fixation following single-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007,7(3):332–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gerber M, Crawford NR, Chamberlain RH, et al. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model. Spine, 2006, 31(7):762–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Loguidice VA, Johnson RG, Guyer RD, et al. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine, 1988,13(3):366–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang JM, Kim DJ, Yun YH. Posterior pedicular screw instrumentation and anterior interbody fusion in adult lumbar spondylolysis or grade I spondylolisthesis with segmental instability. J Spinal Disord, 1996,9(2):83–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Madan SS, Harley JM, Boeree NR. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Does stable anterior fixation matter? Eur Spine J, 2003,12(4):386–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobs RR, Montesano PX, Jackson RP. Enhancement of lumbar spine fusion by use of transliminar facet joint screws. Spine, 1989,14(1):12–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Volkman T, Horton WC, Hutton WC. Transfacet screws with lumbar interbody reconstruction: biomechanical study of motion segment stiffness. J Spinal Disord, 1996,9(5):425–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schofferman J, Slosar P, Reynolds J, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of 270 degrees fusions to 360 degrees fusions (circumferential fusions). Spine, 2001,26(10):E207–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Suk KS, Jeon CH, Park MS, et al. Comparison between posterolateral fusion with pedicle screw fixation and anterior interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation in adult spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Yonsei Med J, 2001, 42(3):316–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cuningh BW, Stefter JC. Static and cyclical biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw spinal constructs. Spine, 1993,18(12):1677–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Min JH, Jang JS, Lee SH. Comparison of anterior- and posterior-approach instrumented lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007,7(1):21–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ferrara LA, Secor JL, Jin BH, et al. A biomechanical comparison of facet screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation: Effects of short-term and long-term repetitive cycling. Spine, 2003,28(12):1226–1234

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiang Zhou  (周 强).

Additional information

The authors contributed equally to this work.

This project was supported by the Chongqing Key Technologies R&D Program (CSTC, No. 2010AB5118-4).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Lh., Guo, Ct., Zhou, Q. et al. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar screw-plate fixation versus posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 34, 907–911 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-014-1372-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-014-1372-3

Key words

Navigation