Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental study and analysis of unimorph piezoelectric energy harvester with different substrate thickness and different proof mass shapes

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Microsystem Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experimental study of unimorph piezoelectric energy harvester with proof mass has been presented in this paper. The placement of the proof mass shift the operating frequency of an energy harvester to a lower range. The main advantage of placing a proof mass over an energy harvester other than frequency shift is to maximize the output power generation. Also analysis of an energy harvester with different substrate thickness is performed to find its effect on performance of energy harvester. The experimental results reveals that presence of proof mass and thickness of substrate affects the power generation of piezoelectric energy harvester.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali WG, Ibrahim SW (2012) Power analysis for piezoelectric energy harvester. Energy Power Eng 4(6):496–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eba Flora E, Lakshmi P, Sunithamani S (2013) Simulation of MEMS energy harvester with different geometries and cross section, Proceedings of IEEE conference on information and communication technologies (ICT 2013), pp 120–123

  • Lopes CMA, Gallo CA (2014) A review of piezo electrical energy harvesting and applications. 23rd international symposium on industrial electronics, pp 1286–1288

  • Manna N (2014) Study on piezoelectric elements for energy harvesting. International conference on non-conventional energy (ICONCE), pp 334–338

  • Mathers A, Moon KS, Yi J (2009) A vibration-based PMN 32 energy harvester. IEEE Sens J 9(7):731–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh Y, Joshi UK (2014) Effect of proof mass geometries and its position on power generation by piezoelectric harvester. Int J Emerg Trends Eng Dev 3(4):432–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunithamani S, Lakshmi P (2015) Simulation study on performance of MEMS piezoelectric energy harvester with optimized substrate to piezoelectric thickness ratio. J Microsyst Technol 21(4):733–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunithamani S, Lakshmi P, Eba Flora E (2014) PZT length optimization of MEMS piezoelectric energy harvester with a non-traditional cross section: simulation study. J Microsyst Technol 20(12):2165–2171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunithamani S, Lakshmi P, Senbagavalli S (2015a) Modelling and analysis of MEMS bimorph piezoelectric energy harvester for green energy source. J Chem Pharm Sci Spec Issue 7:258–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunithamani S, Lakshmi P, Senbagavalli S (2015b) Performance analysis of MEMS based bimorph piezoelectric energy harvester. Int J Appl Eng Res 10(20):15985–15988

    Google Scholar 

  • Usman A, Mukhtar M, Mohammed R (2014) MEMS based wireless energy harvesting mechanism for ECG and BCG application. International conference on emerging technology ICET, pp 142–146

  • Varadrajan E, Bhanusri M (2013) Design and simulation of unimorph piezoelectric energy harvesting system, COMSOL conference, Bangalore

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors want to thank National Program on Micro and Smart Systems group (NPMASS) for providing COMSOL Multiphysics software for academic use and for its help and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Sunithamani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sunithamani, S., Lakshmi, P. Experimental study and analysis of unimorph piezoelectric energy harvester with different substrate thickness and different proof mass shapes. Microsyst Technol 23, 2421–2430 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-016-2917-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-016-2917-0

Keywords

Navigation