Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Endotracheal intubation with Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA)™, C-Trach™, and Cobra PLA™ in simulated cervical spine injury patients: a comparative study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of our study was to evaluate the success rate of fiberoptic-guided endotracheal intubation through an Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA), a Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway (Cobra PLA), and a C-Trach Laryngeal Mask Airway (C-Trach) in patients whose necks are stabilized in a hard cervical collar.

Methods

One hundred and eighty ASA I–II patients were randomized to undergo endotracheal intubation after general anesthesia via an ILMA (group ILMA), a C-Trach (group C-Trach) or a Cobra PLA (group CPLA) with the application of an appropriately-sized hard cervical collar. A fiberoptic bronchoscope was used for intubation via the ILMA and Cobra PLA. Rate of successful insertion of an endotracheal tube through the three devices was the primary aim. Other parameters compared were time taken for device insertion, endotracheal intubation, hemodynamic changes, incidence of hypoxia, and mucosal injury during the procedure. The incidence of postoperative sore throat was also compared between the three groups.

Results

The success rates of intubation in the ILMA, C-Trach, and CPLA groups were 100, 100, and 98 % respectively. The first-attempt success rate was significantly better with the C-Trach compared to Cobra PLA (100 vs 85 %, p < 0.05). The time taken for device insertion was significantly more with the Cobra PLA as compared to that taken with an ILMA or a C-Trach (35.7 vs 30.3 and 27.5 s, respectively). Intubation through a C-Trach took the least amount of time (84.4 s) as compared to an ILMA (117.9 s) or a Cobra PLA (139.2 s). The incidence of hypoxia and airway morbidity was similar between the groups.

Conclusion

The success rates of fiberoptic-guided endotracheal intubation through an ILMA and a Cobra PLA are similar to the success rate of intubation using a C-Trach in patients whose cervical spines are immobilized with a hard cervical collar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goutcher CM, Lochhead V. Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(3):344–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thiboutot F, Nicole PC, Trepanier CA, Turgeon AF, Lessard MR. Effect of manual in-line stabilization of the cervical spine in adults on the rate of difficult orotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anesth. 2009;56:412–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Advanced trauma life support for doctors ATLS. 7th ed. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robitaille A. Airway management in the patient with potential cervical spine instability: continuing professional development. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58(12):1125–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Asai T, Eguchi Y, Murao K, Niitsu T, Shingu K. Intubating laryngeal mask for fibreoptic intubation—particularly useful during neck stabilization. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47(9):843–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Agrò F, Brimacombe J, Carassiti M, Marchionni L, Morelli A, Cataldo R. The intubating laryngeal mask. Clinical appraisal of ventilation and blind tracheal intubation in 110 patients. Anesthesia. 1998;53(11):1084–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brimacombe J, Berry A. A proposed fiber-optic scoring system to standardize the assessment of laryngeal mask airway position. Anesth Analg. 1993;76(2):457.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu EH, Goy RW, Lim Y, Chen FG. Success of tracheal intubation with intubating laryngeal mask airways: a randomized trial of the LMA Fastrach and LMA CTrach. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(4):621–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wakeling HG, Nightingale J. The intubating laryngeal mask airway does not facilitate tracheal intubation in the presence of a neck collar in simulated trauma. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84(2):254–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenblatt WH, Wagner PJ, Ovassapian A, Kain ZN. Practice patterns in managing the difficult airway by anesthesiologists in the United States. Anesth Analg. 1998;87(1):153–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Möller F, Andres AH, Langenstein H. Intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) seems to be an ideal device for blind intubation in case of immobile spine. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85(3):493–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferson DZ, Rosenblatt WH, Johansen MJ, Osborn I, Ovassapian A. Use of the intubating LMA-Fastrach in 254 patients with difficult-to-manage airways. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(5):1175–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Komatsu R, Nagata O, Kamata K, Yamagata K, Sessler DI, Ozaki M. Intubating laryngeal mask airway allows tracheal intubation when the cervical spine is immobilized by a rigid collar. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93(5):655–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Joo HS, Rose DK. The intubating laryngeal mask airway with and without fiberoptic guidance. Anesth Analg. 1999;88(3):662–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Joo HS, Kapoor S, Rose DK, Naik VN. The intubating laryngeal mask airway after induction of general anesthesia versus awake fiberoptic intubation in patients with difficult airways. Anesth Analg. 2001;92(5):1342–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakazawa K, Tanaka N, Ishikawa S, Ohmi S, Ueki M, Saitoh Y, Makita K, Amaha K. Using the intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA-Fastrach) for blind endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing cervical spine operation. Anesth Analg. 1999;89(5):1319–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Asai T, Shingu K. Tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask in patients with unstable necks. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45(7):818–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Asai T, Murao K, Tsutsumi T, Shingu K. Ease of tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask during manual in-line head and neck stabilisation. Anesthesia. 2000;55(1):82–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Timmermann A, Russo S, Graf BM. Evaluation of the CTrach—an intubating LMA with integrated fibreoptic system. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96(4):516–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bs Ng, Rw Goy, Ja Bain, Fg Chen, Liu Eh. The impact of manual in-line stabilisation on ventilation and visualisation of the glottis with the LMA CTrach: a randomised crossover trial. Anesthesia. 2009;64(8):894–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bilgin H, Yýlmaz C. Awake intubation through the Ctrach in the presence of an unstable cervical spine. Anesthesia. 2006;61(5):513–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arslan ZI, Yildiz T, Baykara ZN, Solak M, Toker K. Tracheal intubation in patients with rigid collar immobilisation of the cervical spine: a comparison of Airtraq and LMA CTrach devices. Anesthesia. 2009;64(12):1332–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Churasia S, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a comparison of the Airwayscope, LMA CTrach, and the Macintosh laryngoscopes. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(5):654–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pandit JJ, MacLachlan K, Dravid RM, Popat MT. Comparison of times to achieve tracheal intubation with three techniques using the laryngeal or intubating laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesia. 2002;57(2):128–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Langeron O, Semjen F, Bourgain JL, Marsac A, Cros AM. Comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask airway with the fiberoptic intubation in anticipated difficult airway management. Anesthesiology. 2001;94(6):968–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Darlong V, Chandrashish C, Chandralekha, Mohan VK. Comparison of the performance of ‘Intubating LMA’ and ‘Cobra PLA’ as an aid to blind endotracheal tube insertion in patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2011;49(1):7–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ms. M. Kalaivani, Scientist, Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India, for her contributions.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India

    Deepak G. Mathew, Vimi Rewari, Anjan Trikha &  Chandralekha

  2. Room No-5013, Teaching Block, Department of Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, Delhi, 110029, India

    Rashmi Ramachandran

Authors
  1. Deepak G. Mathew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rashmi Ramachandran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vimi Rewari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anjan Trikha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chandralekha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rashmi Ramachandran.

About this article

Cite this article

Mathew, D.G., Ramachandran, R., Rewari, V. et al. Endotracheal intubation with Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA)™, C-Trach™, and Cobra PLA™ in simulated cervical spine injury patients: a comparative study. J Anesth 28, 655–661 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-014-1794-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-014-1794-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation