Skip to main content
Log in

Inferior head resection of the pancreas for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

  • Topics
  • Organ-preserving resection for pancreatic neoplasms
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

Abstract

Background

Previous reports have suggested that patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) have a favorable prognosis after surgical resection. Thus, a variety of types of partial pancreatic resections have been advocated for treating these low-grade malignant tumors. However, the surgical outcome of IPMN after such limited pancreatectomy has not been fully clarified.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of the clinicopathologic features and surgical outcome in 15 patients who underwent inferior head resection for IPMN at the Chiba University Hospital and National Cancer Center Hospital East between July 1994 and January 2007.

Results

There were 13 patients with noninvasive IPMNs (10 adenomas and 3 noninvasive carcinomas) and 2 patients with minimally invasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (minimally invasive IPMN). Complete tumor removal (R0 resection) was performed in four patients (80%) with intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma. Subsequent pancreatoduodenectomy was performed in one patient because of noninvasive carcinoma with multiple mucous lakes in the pancreatic parenchyma. Values for N-benzoyl-l-tyrosyl-p-aminobenzoic acid excretion test results before (n = 13) and after (n = 13) the operation were 70.7 and 66.1, showing no significant difference. The 2-h glucose levels in the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test before (n = 13) and after (n = 13) the operation were 133 and 146 mg/dl, respectively, showing no significant difference. Pancreatic fistula occurred in 7 (47%) patients. Overall morbidity and mortality rates were 67 and 0%, respectively. The overall 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates for the 15 patients were 100, 79, 79, and 71%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates for patients with noninvasive IPMN (n = 13) and those with minimally invasive IPMN (n = 2) were 100, 92, 92, and 83%; and 100, 0, 0, and 0%, respectively. There was a significant difference in survival between patients with noninvasive IPMN and those with minimally invasive IPMN (p = 0.0005). No patient with noninvasive IPMN developed recurrent disease. One patient with minimally invasive IPMN died of recurrent peritoneal dissemination 18 months after margin-positive R1 resection. Two patients died of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, 30 and 78 months after inferior head resection.

Conclusions

Pancreatic endocrine and exocrine function was well preserved after inferior head resection. Pancreatic fistula occurred more frequently after inferior head resection than with conventional pancreatoduodenectomy. Patients with noninvasive IPMN had favorable survivals after this procedure. However, one patient with minimally invasive IPMN with margin-positive R1 resection died of recurrent disease. Thus, margin-negative R0 resection should be performed for IPMN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohhashi I, Takagi K, Kato Y. Four cases of “mucin-producing” cancer of the pancreas on specific findings of the papilla Vater. Prog Dig Endosc. 1982;20:348–51. (in Japanese; abstract in English).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Siech M, Tripp K, Schmidt-Rohlfing B, Mattfeldt T, Gorich J, Beger HG. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the pancreas. Am J Surg. 1999;177(2):117–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kobari M, Egawa S, Shibuya K, Shimamura H, Sunamura M, Takeda K, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas comprise 2 clinical subtypes: differences in clinical characteristics and surgical management. Arch Surg. 1999;134(10):1131–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakagohri T, Kenmochi T, Kainuma O, Tokoro Y, Asano T. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Am J Surg. 1999;178(4):344–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cuillerier E, Cellier C, Palazzo L, Deviere J, Wind P, Rickaert F, et al. Outcome after surgical resection of intraductal papillary and mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(2):441–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Falconi M, Salvia R, Bassi C, Zamboni G, Talamini G, Pederzoli P. Clinicopathological features and treatment of intraductal papillary mucinous tumour of the pancreas. Br J Surg. 2001;88(3):376–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Doi R, Fujimoto K, Wada M, Imamura M. Surgical management of intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the pancreas. Surgery. 2002;132(1):80–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adsay NV, Conlon KC, Zee SY, Brennan MF, Klimstra DS. Intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: an analysis of in situ and invasive carcinomas in 28 patients. Cancer. 2002;94(1):62–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chari ST, Yadav D, Smyrk TC, DiMagno EP, Miller LJ, Raimondo M, et al. Study of recurrence after surgical resection of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Gastroenterology. 2002;123(5):1500–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maire F, Hammel P, Terris B, Paye F, Scoazec JY, Cellier C, et al. Prognosis of malignant intraductal papillary mucinous tumours of the pancreas after surgical resection. Comparison with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gut. 2002;51(5):717–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. D’Angelica M, Brennan MF, Suriawinta AA, Klimstra D, Conlon KC. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: an analysis of clinicopathologic features and outcome. Ann Surg. 2004;239(3):400–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, Fukushima N, Campbell KA, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: an updated experience. Ann Surg. 2004;239(6):788–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakagohri T, Kinoshita T, Konishi M, Takahashi S, Gotohda N. Surgical outcome of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(11):3174–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wada K, Kozarek RA, Traverso LW. Outcomes following resection of invasive and noninvasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Am J Surg. 2005;189:632–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakagohri T, Konishi M, Inoue K, Tanizawa Y, Kinoshita T. Invasive carcinoma derived from intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma of the pancreas. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51(59):1480–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Raut CP, Cleary KR, Staerkel GA, Abbruzzese JL, Wolff RA, Lee JH, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: effect of invasion and pancreatic margin status on recurrence and survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:582–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nara S, Shimada K, Kosuge T, Kanai Y, Hiraoka N. Minimally invasive intraductal papillary-mucinous carcinoma of the pancreas: clinicopathologic study of 104 intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(2):243–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Takahashi H, Nakamori S, Nakahashi S, Tsujie M, Takahashi Y, Marubashi S, et al. Surgical outcomes of noninvasive and minimally invasive intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:955–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakagohri T, Asano T, Kenmochi T, Urashima T, Ochiai T. Long-term surgical outcome of noninvasive and minimally invasive intraductal papillary mucinous adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. World J Surg. 2002;26(9):1166–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Takada T. Ventral pancreatectomy: resection of the ventral segment of the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1993;1(1):36–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ryu M, Takayama W, Watanabe K, Honda I, Yamamoto H, Arai Y. Ventral pancreatic resection for adenoma and low-grade malignancies of the head of the pancreas. Surg Today. 1996;26(7):476–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakagohri T, Kenmochi T, Kainuma O, Tokoro Y, Kobayashi S, Asano T. Inferior head resection of the pancreas for intraductal papillary mucinous tumors. Am J Surg. 2000;179(6):482–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Talbot ML, Foulis AK, Imrie CW. Total dorsal pancreatectomy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in a patient with pancreas divisum. Pancreatology. 2005;5(2–3):285–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sata N, Koizumi M, Tsukahara M, Yoshizawa K, Kurihara K, Nagai H. Single-branch resection of the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12(1):71–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Japan Pancreas Society. Classification of pancreatic carcinoma. 2nd English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2003.

  26. Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Sano T, Kosuge T, Hiraoka N. Invasive carcinoma originating in an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: a clinicopathologic comparison with a common type of invasive ductal carcinoma. Pancreas. 2006;32:281–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gigot JF, Deprez P, Sempoux C, Descamps C, Metairie S, Glineur D, et al. Surgical management of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: the role of routine frozen section of the surgical margin, intraoperative endoscopic staged biopsies of the Wirsung duct, and pancreaticogastric anastomosis. Arch Surg. 2001;136:1256–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshio Nakagohri.

About this article

Cite this article

Nakagohri, T., Kinoshita, T., Konishi, M. et al. Inferior head resection of the pancreas for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17, 798–802 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0173-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0173-8

Keywords

Navigation