Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic hazard assessment and mitigation in India: an overview

  • Review article
  • Published:
International Journal of Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Indian subcontinent is characterized by various tectonic units viz., Himalayan collision zone in North, Indo-Burmese arc in north-east, failed rift zones in its interior in Peninsular Indian shield and Andaman Sumatra trench in south-east Indian Territory. During the last about 100 years, the country has witnessed four great and several major earthquakes. Soon after the occurrence of the first great earthquake, the Shillong earthquake (M w: 8.1) in 1897, efforts were started to assess the seismic hazard in the country. The first such attempt was made by Geological Survey of India in 1898 and since then considerable progress has been made. The current seismic zonation map prepared and published by Bureau of Indian Standards, broadly places seismic risk in different parts of the country in four major zones. However, this map is not sufficient for the assessment of area-specific seismic risks, necessitating detailed seismic zoning, that is, microzonation for earthquake disaster mitigation and management. Recently, seismic microzonation studies are being introduced in India, and the first level seismic microzonation has already been completed for selected urban centres including, Jabalpur, Guwahati, Delhi, Bangalore, Ahmadabad, Dehradun, etc. The maps prepared for these cities are being further refined on larger scales as per the requirements, and a plan has also been firmed up for taking up microzonation of 30 selected cities, which lie in seismic zones V and IV and have a population density of half a million. The paper highlights the efforts made in India so far towards seismic hazard assessment as well as the future road map for such studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams RD (1976) The Haicheng, China, earthquake of 4 February 1975: the first successfully predicted major earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 4:423–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal YP, Sykes LR, Simpson DW, Richards PG (1975) Spatial and temporal variations in t p /t s and in P wave residuals at Blue mountain lake, New York: application to earthquake prediction. J Geophys Res 80:718–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2006) Earthquake ground-motion predictions for eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:2181–2205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu S, Nigam NC (1977) Seismic risk analysis of Indian peninsula. In: Proceedings of sixth world conference on earthquake engineering, New Delhi, vol 1, pp 782–788

  • Bettinelli P, Avouac JP, Flouzat M, Jouanne F, Bollinger L, Willis P, Chitrakar GR (2006) Plate motion of India and interseismic strain in the Nepal Himalaya from GPS and DORIS measurements. J Geodesy 80:567–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia SC, Kumar MR, Gupta HK (1999) A probabilistic seismic hazard map of India and adjoining regions. Ann Geofis 42:153–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW (1985) Strong motion attenuation relations: a ten-year perspective. Earthq Spectra 1(4):759–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshikacha SV (1974) A review of the tectonic and geological history of eastern India in terms of ‘plate tectonics’ theory. J Geol Soc India 15:37–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas J (2004) Ground motion estimation equations 1964–2003: reissue of ESEE Report No. 01–1: ‘A comprehensive worldwide summary of strong-motion attenuation relationships for peak ground acceleration and spectral ordinates (1969–2000)’ with corrections and additions. Technical Reports 04–001-SM, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK

  • Eremenko NA, Negi BS (1968) A guide to the tectonic map of India. Oil and Natural Gas Commission, India, pp 1–15

  • Gahalaut VK, Gahalaut K (2007) Burma plate motion. J Geophys Res112: No B10402. doi:10.1029/2007JB004928

  • Gahalaut VK, Kundu B, Laishram SS, Catherine JK, Kumar A, Devchandra M, Tiwari RP, Chadha RK, Samanta SK, Ambikapathy A, Mahesh P, Bansal A, Narsaiah M (2013) Aseismic plate boundary in the Indo-Burmese wedge, northwest Sunda Arc. Geology 41:235–238. doi:10.1130/G33771.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Gansser A (1964) Geology of the Himalayas. Interscience, New York, p 289

    Google Scholar 

  • Gansser A (1977) The suture zone between Himalaya and Tibet: a preliminary account, Himalaya: science de la Terre ed Jest C. Colloq. Int CNRS 268:181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha SK (1962) Seismic regionalization of India. In: Proceedings of second symposium on earthquake engineering, Roorkee, India, pp 191–207

  • Gupta ID (2010) Response spectral attenuation relations for in-slab earthquakes in Indo-Burmese subduction zone. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(5):368–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta HK, Singh HN (1986) Seismicity of the north-east India region. J Geol Soc India 28:367–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta HK, Shashidhar D, Metilda P, Rao NP, Nagesh DS, Satyanarayana HVS, Saha S, Naik RTB, Dimri VP (2007) Earthquake forecast appears feasible at Koyna, India. Curr Sci 93(6):843–848

    Google Scholar 

  • IS: 1893 Part-I (2002) Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Part 1, general provisions and buildings (Fifth Revision). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  • Iyengar RN, Raghukanth STG (2004) Attenuation of strong ground motion in peninsular India. Seismol Res Lett 75:530–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Roshan AD, Arlekar JN, Basu PC (2000) Empirical attenuation relationships for the Himalayan earthquakes based on Indian strong motion data. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on seismic zonation, November 12–15, Palm Springs, California, USA

  • Jaiswal K, Sinha R (2007) Probabilistic seismic hazard estimation for peninsular India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 7:318–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaila KL (1988) Mapping the thickness of Deccan trap flows in India from DSS studies and inferences about a hidden Mesozoic basin in the Narmada-Tapti region. Mem Geol Soc Ind 10:91–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattri KN (1987) Great earthquakes, seismicity gaps and potential for earthquake disaster along the Himalaya plate boundary. Tectonophysics 138:79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattri KN, Rogers AM, Perkins DM, Algermissen ST (1984) A seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas. Tectonophysics 108:93–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna J (1959) Seismic zoning of India. In: Earthquake engineering seminar, Roorkee University, India, pp 32–38

  • Krishnan MS (1968) Geology of India and Burma. Higginbothams, Madras, p 536

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevan TM (1994) Deep continental structure of India: a review. Geol Soc India Memoir 28:569

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan AK, Thakur VC, Sharma ML, Chauhan M (2010) Probabilistic seismic hazard map of NW Himalaya and its adjoining area, India. Nat Hazards 53:443–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahesh P, Catherine JK, Gahalaut VK, Kundu B, Ambikapathy A, Bansal A, Premkishore L, Narsaia M, Ghavri S, Chadha RK, Chaudhary P, Singh DK, Singh SK, Kumar S, Nagrajan B, Bhatt BC, Tiwari RP, Kumar A, Kumar A, Harsh B, Kalita S (2012) Rigid Indian plate: constraints from GPS measurements. Gondwana Res 22:1068–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal P, Kumar N, Satyamurthy C, Raju IP (2009) Ground-motion attenuation relation from strong-motion records of the 2001 M w 7.7 Bhuj earthquake sequence (2001–2006), Gujarat, India. Pure App Geophys 166:451–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK, Thingbaijam KKS (2009) Seismic hazard assessment—a holistic microzonation approach. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 09(4):1445–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK, Thingbaijam KKS (2011) Peak ground motion predictions in India: an appraisal for rock sites. J Seismol 15:295–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK, Thingbaijam KKS (2012) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of India. Seismol Res Lett 83(1):136–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK, Vyas M, Pal I, Sengupta P (2005) A seismic hazard scenario in the Sikkim Himalaya from Seismotectonics, spectral amplification, source parameterization, and spectral attenuation laws using strong motion seismometry. J Geophys Res 110(B1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham RD (1899) Report on the great earthquake of June 12, 1897. Mem Geol Surv India 29:1–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Parvez IA, Ram A (1999) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazards in the Indian subcontinent. Pure Appl Geophys 154:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parvez IA, Vaccari F, Panza GF (2003) A deterministic seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas. Geophys J Int 155:489–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen MD, Rastogi BK, Schweig ES, Harmsen SC, Gomberg JS (2004) Sensitivity analysis of seismic hazard for the northwestern portion of the state of Gujarat, India. Tectonophysics 390:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power M, Chiou B, Abrahamson N, Bozorgnia Y, Shantz T, Roblee C (2008) An overview of the NGA project. Earthq Spectra 24:3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajendra PB, Tewari HC, Rao VV, Dixit MM, Reddy PR (1998) Structure and tectonics of the Proterozoic Aravalli Delhi Fold Belts in the NW India from deep seismic reflection studies. Tectonophysics 288:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy PR, Venkateswarlu N, Rao PK, Prasad ASSSRS (1999) Crustal structure of Peninsular Shield, India from DSS studies. Curr Sci 77(12):1606–1611

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeber L, Armbruster J (1981) Great detachment earthquakes along the Himalayan Arc and long-term forecasting. In: Simpson DW, Richards PG (eds) Earthquake prediction, an international review. Maurice Ewing series, vol 4. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 259–277

  • Sharma ML (1998) Attenuation relationship for estimation of peak ground horizontal acceleration using data from strong motion array in India. Bull Seismol Sco Am 88:1063–1069

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma ML, Malik S (2006) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and estimation of spectral strong ground motion on bedrock in northeast India. Fourth International Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan, paper no. 15

  • Singh RP, Singh UK (1996) Evidence of fluid in the Lower Crust of Deccan trap region and its possible role in the observed seismicity. Himalayan Geol 17:105–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RP, Aman A, Prasad YJJ (1996) Attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in the Himalayan region. Pure Appl Geophys 147:161–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Mohanty WK, Bansal BK, Roonwal GS (2002) Ground motion in Delhi from future large/great earthquakes in the central seismic gaps of the Himalayan arc. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:555–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szeliga W, Bilham R, Kakar DM, Lodi SH (2012) Interseismic strain accumulation along the western boundary of the Indian subcontinent. J Geophys Res 117:B08404. doi:10.1029/2011JB008822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tandon AN (1956) Zones of India liable to earthquake damage. Ind J Meteorol Geophys 10:137–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdiya KS (1976) Himalayan transverse faults and folds and their parallelism with subsurface structures of north Indian plains. Tectonophysics 32:353–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma M, Bansal BK (2012a) Indian national GNSS programme: crustal deformation measurements in the Indian subcontinent. J Asian Earth Sci 50:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma M, Bansal BK (2012b) Earthquake precursor studies in India—scenario and future perspectives. J Asian Earth Sci 54:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadia DN (1975) Geology of India. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, p 508

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We express our sincere thanks to Secretary, Ministry of Earth Sciences for his consistent support and encouragement. Shri Anup Kumar Sutar helped in fixing the figures. We also thank Dr. S. K. Nath and Dr. V. K. Gahalaut for their critical comments and suggestions. Reviewer’s comments helped in improving the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geoscience Division, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Prithvi Bhavan, Lodhi Road, New Delhi, 110003, India

    Mithila Verma & Brijesh K. Bansal

Authors
  1. Mithila Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brijesh K. Bansal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brijesh K. Bansal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verma, M., Bansal, B.K. Seismic hazard assessment and mitigation in India: an overview. Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) 102, 1203–1218 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-013-0882-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-013-0882-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation