Introduction

The recent discovery of Late Triassic to Early Cretaceous km-scale vertical movements, subsidence and then exhumation, affecting substantial parts of Morocco which had hitherto been considered as stable (Ghorbal et al. 2008; Saddiqi et al. 2009; Barbero et al. 2011; Ruiz et al. 2011) represents a major development in Moroccan geology, opening new horizons for understanding the Mesozoic tectonic evolution of NW Africa. The exhumation component of these movements, in particular, is remarkable as it took place after the appearance of oceanic crust in the Central Atlantic, that is, during its passive margin development (e.g., Sahabi et al. 2004; Gouiza et al. 2010). Exhumation is clearly older than, and therefore, unrelated to Alpine contraction in the two orogens of NW Africa, namely the Rif and the Atlas. Upward movements are unusual during the drifting stage, but our discoveries are part of an increasing awareness that passive margins could be less passive than believed hitherto (e.g., Bache et al. 2011; Japsen et al. 2009).

In the recent past, a number of studies by different groups (e.g., Ghorbal et al. 2008; Saddiqi et al. 2009; Ghorbal 2009; Barbero et al. 2011; Ruiz et al. 2011) have concluded that rocks of the Meseta of N Morocco, the High Atlas and parts of the Anti-Atlas, have experienced >1 km of exhumation during Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous times. More low-temperature geochronology (low-T) work is ongoing on samples from the Anti-Atlas and areas of southern Morocco (Bertotti et al. 2010) and will undoubtedly result in new relevant information. The focus of the present study is on the tectonic regime driving the observed vertical movements. To reach this goal, we compile data on vertical movements along a roughly W–E trending, ~100-km-long section connecting areas of strong Jurassic to Early Cretaceous subsidence, the Essaouira-Agadir basin, with domains of strong coeval exhumation, the Massif Ancien de Marrakech (MAM) (Fig. 1). We compare these estimates with values predicted by numerical models of rifted margin evolution and conclude that a significant portion of such movements cannot be explained by current models. To constrain the nature of the tectonics driving these enigmatic vertical movements, we identify and interpret syn-tectonic deformation structures in the Mesozoic sediments of the Essaouira-Agadir basin cropping out to the W of the area experiencing Jurassic to Early Cretaceous exhumation. Finally, we integrate horizontal deformations and vertical movements to propose a tentative kinematic reconstruction for the Jurassic to Cretaceous evolution of the section from the Moroccan onshore in the Essaouira-Agadir basin region to the central part of the High Atlas.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic geological map of Morocco (simplified from Hafid et al. 2006). OB Ouarzazate basin; SB Souss basin; MAM massif ancien de marrakech. The inset shows the detailed trace of Fig. 3 and the position of the investigated samples

The geological framework

The main domains

The present-day geology of northern Morocco (Fig. 1) is characterized by two orogenic belts of Tertiary age, the Rif Mountains in the N and the Atlas Mountains in the S and E, both developed in association with the convergence between Europe and Africa. The area between the two orogens is the Moroccan Meseta. The Rif mountains, a mainly thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belt incorporating parts of the European and African passive margins and of the intervening oceanic crust (e.g., Chalouan et al. 2001), is not of significant interest to our study and will not be further considered.

Mesozoic sediments, recording phenomena taking place during the time span of interest to this contribution, are mainly found along the Central Atlantic and the High Atlas inverted rift systems, which developed in association with the opening of the Central Atlantic and Tethyan Oceans. The Mesozoic succession in the Meseta and other non-orogenic areas is much more discontinuous and typically characterized by a major unconformity separating Upper Cretaceous marine limestones from metamorphosed Hercynian basement.

The Meseta

The Meseta is a fairly flat-lying domain characterized by a Hercynian basement (e.g., Hoepffner et al. 2005; Michard et al. 2008) overlain by scattered Triassic continental sediments and extensive Upper Cretaceous shallow marine carbonates. The upper boundary of the Paleozoic basement at the contact with non-metamorphic sediments shows little palaeo-topography suggesting that the Hercynian orogen had been effectively peneplained prior to Mesozoic sedimentation (e.g., Michard 1976; Hoepffner et al. 2005). Triassic syn-rift structures, generally oriented N–S, host limited thicknesses of mainly terrigenous sediments.

The stratigraphic gap characterizing the central Meseta decreases toward the W, and in the offshore, the sedimentary succession is essentially continuous having experienced persisting subsidence throughout the syn- and post-rift stages of Central Atlantic opening (e.g., Hafid et al. 2008; Gouiza et al. 2010).

The Atlas system

The Atlas orogen begins in the W, offshore Essaouira-Agadir (e.g., Hafid et al. 2006) and continues onshore in ENE direction traversing Morocco, Algeria, and reaching eventually Tunisia (Frizon de Lamotte et al. 2000). The Atlas fold-and-thrust belt originates from the Eocene to Pliocene inversion of a Triassic–Jurassic graben system developed during the opening of the Central Atlantic and, somewhat later, of the Tethyan ocean in the NE. Northeast of Marrakech, the Middle Atlas splits away from the High Atlas and joins the Rif in NE Morocco (Fig. 1). Shortening has been estimated at <25 % accommodated by predominantly thick-skinned thrusts (e.g., Teixell et al. 2003; Arboleya et al. 2004).

The High Atlas is traditionally subdivided into a western and a central part separated by a large area of crystalline basement cropping out south of Marrakech known as the MAM (Michard 1976) (itself part of the West Moroccan Arc) (Fig. 1). The MAM is generally interpreted as a morphologic high resulting from the Hercynian orogeny that separates the two segments of the High Atlas from the Triassic to Present (e.g., Michard 1976). This interpretation was contested by German authors (e.g., Stets 1992) and has been recently disproven by low-T geochronology (see below).

The areas to the S of the High Atlas

Geographically, the High Atlas passes toward the S to the Anti-Atlas with the partial interposition of two shallow foredeep basins, the Sous basin in the west and the Ouarzazate basin in the east (Fig. 1). The two basins are separated by the Siroua plateau, which lies on the southern continuation of the MAM and forms a morphologic link between the High Atlas and the Anti-Atlas.

The Anti-Atlas is a high mountain belt with summits reaching elevations of >3,300 m. The rough and high topography are at odds with the generally assumed very old age of its dominant deformation and its subsequent stable character (e.g., Stets and Wurster 1982). Brittle deformation is ubiquitous but commonly attributed to (late) Hercynian episodes (e.g., Burkhard et al. 2006; Cerrina-Feroni et al. 2010). An Alpine age for at least part of the deformations has been proposed by Malusà et al. (2007) and Guimera et al. (2011). Unfortunately, dating is difficult because of the scarcity of Mesozoic to Tertiary sediments.

Kinematics of the NW Morocco rifted margin

The opening of the Central Atlantic and related basins was the most important process affecting Morocco during Triassic to Early Cretaceous times. Despite the substantial amount of studies dedicated to the topic, the ages of the onset and end of rifting are debated (e.g., Sahabi et al. 2004; Gouiza et al. 2010; Labails et al. 2010) and there exist only very few estimates on the amount of extension experienced by the margin through time.

In accordance with most studies, we assume that rift-related normal faulting began in Carnian times at ~225 Ma (e.g., Laville et al. 2004) and created two main extensional systems: a NNE–SSW trending one which led eventually to opening of the Central Atlantic and an ENE–WSW striking system, the Atlas rift, which was abandoned during the Early Jurassic. While normal faults in the Central Atlantic system are generally well imaged in seismic lines, this is less the case for extensional faults in the Atlas because of their subsequent reactivation during Tertiary contraction. Most normal faults were steep accommodating a total extension of <10 % (e.g., Gouiza et al. 2010). The Central Atlantic and Atlas systems come together in the area of the Essaouira-Agadir basin where faults of the two trends are encountered and where strong subsidence took place allowing for the deposition of a several kilometers thick Mesozoic sedimentary succession (e.g., Medina 1995; Hafid et al. 2008).

There is a general agreement that normal faulting ended before the late Liassic, at ~196 Ma (e.g., Hafid et al. 2008). This is well documented in seismic lines in the Essaouira basin and in the Central Atlantic margin. Depending on the interpretations, cessation of normal faulting coincides with or it is significantly older than the first appearance of oceanic crust in the Central Atlantic (Sahabi et al. 2004; Davison 2005, respectively). In our study, we will follow the traditional approach assuming an age of 175 Ma for break-up.

Vertical movements and passive margin evolution

In this section, we compile data on Mesozoic vertical movements along a ~100-km-long transect along the western part of the High Atlas from the Essaouira-Agadir basin in the W to the MAM in the East. We focus especially on the areas experiencing upward movements as the sedimentary record documenting subsidence have been extensively described in the literature (e.g., Hafid et al. 2008; Hafid et al. 2006; Zühlke et al. 2004; Le Roy and Piqué 2001; Bouatmani et al. 2007; Ellouz et al. 2003). These movements (Fig. 2) are then compared with those predicted by rifting models.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The sediments of the Essaouira-Agadir basin. a Schematic stratigraphic column (simplified from Hafid et al. 2008); b subsidence curves from 3 selected localities in the onshore portion of the Essaouira basin (from Bouatmani et al. 2007); position is indicated in Fig. 5

Observed movements

Upward movements in the MAM

A significant amount of low-T geochronological studies has been performed in the High Atlas during the last years (Missenard et al. 2008; Balestrieri et al. 2009; Ghorbal 2009). Because of the lithological limitations imposed by the Apatite Fission Track and (U–Th)/He methods, practically all samples measured by the different authors originate from the MAM and, more specifically, from the Paleozoic basement and its stratigraphic cover of Triassic continental deposits. The most complete data set has been presented in a PhD Thesis carried out at the VU University Amsterdam to which we refer for specific information (Ghorbal 2009). Samples have been taken from the northern foothills, the central domain around Jebel Toubkal and, further to the S, from the Siroua plateau (see inset in Fig. 1).

Apatite Fission Track and (U–Th)/He ages from all samples are Jurassic to Tertiary (Ghorbal 2009) (Fig. 3). Similarly to the Meseta, no Hercynian ages were found. Jurassic to Cretaceous fission track ages have been obtained from the northern and southern foothills of the High Atlas (Fig. 3). Tertiary ages are only found in the axial part of the mountain belt. The obtained values are systematically younger than the deposition of the sediments and the metamorphism affecting the rocks from which the apatites have been obtained. This implies that, following deposition, these sandstones and the stratigraphically underlying basement have been buried to depths where temperatures were high enough to cause full annealing of the apatite fission tracks and then moved upward experiencing cooling. Samples with Tertiary ages were exhumed only during the Atlas orogeny and bear no memory of their Mesozoic vertical movements (see Toubkal time–temperature path in the upper panel of Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Low-T geochronology data from a transect across the High Atlas (see inset in Fig. 1 for location of transect). Lower panel topographic profile with apatite fission track (triangles) and (U–Th)/He ages (squares). Upper panel time–Temperature curves for samples from the N Foothills, the axial domain and the Siroua Plateau. Modified and simplified from Ghorbal (2009)

Time–temperature paths from representative samples from the northern foothills and the Siroua plateau are shown in the upper panel of Fig. 3. The geological conditions that have been imposed on the modeling study are that the samples were close to the surface at the end of the Hercynian orogeny and immediately prior to the Late Cretaceous when they were covered by Upper Cretaceous marine carbonates. The t-T paths show that the samples started subsiding in Late Triassic times probably in association with continental rifting and reached a depth of >3 km where temperatures were high enough to cause annealing of the apatite fission track system. At 170–150 Ma, the same rocks started moving upward and reached the surface prior to 100 Ma. For these samples, as well as all other samples described by Ghorbal (2009), exhumation took place during the drifting stage of Central Atlantic evolution.

Downward movements in the Essaouira-Agadir basin

In a very schematic fashion, the Mesozoic sedimentary succession of the Essaouira-Agadir basin is characterized by an up to 8-km-thick sedimentary succession separated in a syn-rift and a post-rift part by an angular unconformity of Toarcian age, interpreted as the break-up unconformity associated with the opening of the Central Atlantic (Medina 1995) (Fig. 2a). The post-rift Jurassic to Cretaceous succession is up to 4 km thick and mainly composed of shallow water carbonates with episodes of continental sedimentation during the Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous (e.g., Hafid et al. 2008 and references therein).

Three of the numerous subsidence curves that have been proposed for different localities in the onshore part of the Essaouira-Agadir basin are shown in Fig. 2b. They describe vertical movements of Triassic rocks in the proximal, central and distal part of the Essaouira basin. These curves show a decrease in subsidence rates around ca. 200 Ma coinciding with the local termination of normal faulting. Subsidence however continues and even accelerates after 150 Ma.

Comparison with model predictions

In previous sections, we have shown that the early passive margin evolution of the Moroccan margin of the Central Atlantic was characterized by the coexistence of subsidence in the W (Essaouira-Agadir basin) and exhumation in the E (MAM). The question we address here is whether the sign and magnitude of these vertical movements can be explained by passive margin development.

Upward moving domain

The km-scale exhumation documented for the MAM is at odds with classical, McKenzie-type models of rifted margins evolution which predict gentle post-rift subsidence driven by lithospheric cooling (McKenzie 1978). In more recent years, dynamic models of post-rift margin development have highlighted the importance of processes such shoulder uplift, erosion-driven crustal flow (Burov and Cloetingh 1997) and mantle-seated processes of convection and magmatism (e.g., Steckler 1985; Lucazeau et al. 2008). These models typically predict localized uplift but provide little information about the movement of physical particles (geological bodies) and the associated exhumation and erosion, thereby making difficult a comparison with real-world cases. In an extensive study on the evolution of the Central Atlantic margins of Morocco and Canada, Gouiza et al. (2009) and Gouiza (2011) considered the effect of secondary convection cells but were unable to predict an uplift/exhumation comparable to what observed in the transect of interest. Even in the most optimistic case, the authors could attribute to secondary convection only an exhumation of few hundred meters that is an order of magnitude less than what observed. In addition, the wavelength of the predicted exhumation was significantly larger than the observed one. We conclude that a significant portion (>60 %) of the observed upward vertical movements cannot be explained by rift- or post-rift-related processes.

The downward moving domain

To quantify and interpret the origin of the subsidence in Essaouira basin, we compare the backstripped subsidence curves shown in Fig. 2 with modeled curves predicted for different crustal thinning factors. The predicted curves have been obtained using 2D numerical modeling of a lithospheric extension (Kooi 1991; Kooi et al. 1992; Gouiza et al. 2010), which initiated in the Late Triassic (~228 Ma) and ended in the Early Jurassic (~196 Ma) when normal faulting ceased in most rift basins. The models assume uniform crustal and subcrustal thinning during rifting and a flexural lithosphere characterized by (1) an effective elastic thickness defined by the 450 °C isotherm, and (2) a 15-km-deep level of necking (i.e., similar to the lithospheric strength used by Gouiza et al. (2010) in the Doukkala margin to the N).

Inspection of Fig. 4 shows that initially, between 228 and 170–160 Ma, the subsidence in Essaouira basin is in agreement with the models as the observed curves follow relatively well the ones predicted for thinning factors between 1.2 and 1.5. Although no quantitative analysis exists, these values seem to require an extension significantly larger than what documented in the Essaouira basin. In the Doukkala basin, to the North of the Essaouira basin, Gouiza et al. (2010) did perform such an analysis and concluded that the observed extension translated in thinning factors <1.2.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparison between observed and predicted subsidence curves in the Essaouira basin. Observed subsidence curves are from Fig. 2. Assumptions made for predicted subsidence curves are described in text. The vertical grey dashed lines marks the end of normal faulting; the thick grey bar the appearance of oceanic crust in the Central Atlantic

In accordance with classical models, subsidence rates are high during normal faulting and decrease after the cessation of extension (dashed grey line in Fig. 4). No significant change is observed at 175 Ma when the first oceanic crust appeared in the Central Atlantic. At 160–150 Ma, however, the subsidence curves display substantial deviation from predicted ones indicating renewed subsidence. During a time span of 40–50 Myr, rocks moved downward by an amount comparable to that experienced during rifting. The timing of renewed subsidence coincides with the onset of upward movements in the MAM and surrounding regions. The interpretation that the subsidence observed in the Essaouira basin could not be entirely explained by thermal relaxation had already been made by Piqué et al. (1998) but associated with regional transtension.

We conclude that realistic thinning models can only explain less than 50 % of the observed post-rift subsidence. The remaining part (1–2 km) must be driven by different tectonic processes. This is a conservative estimate as the modeling curves have been obtained assuming a moderate strength of the underlying lithosphere.

Linking upward and downward moving domains: the Imi-n-Tanout wedge

The region to the SW of Imi-n-Tanout (Figs. 5, 6) is of particular interest because of the map-view wedge formed by Triassic to Lower Cretaceous sediments. The wedge links the MAM in the E with the Essaouira-Agadir basin in the W thereby providing relevant information on the kinematics of coeval upward and downward vertical movements (e.g., Stets 1992). In contrast to other regions, no evaporites are documented in the area and differential vertical movements must have a tectonic origin rather than being driven by halokinesis.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Schematic geological map of the area between the MAM and the onshore part of the Essaouira basin (simplified from the sheet Marrakech of the 1:500,000 geological map of Morocco). TA Tidsi anticline, InTw Imi-n-Tanout wedge. The position of (synthetic) DKS1, PF18 and PF30 wells used for subsidence analysis (Fig. 4) is also shown. Names of wells are from Bouatmani et al. (2007)

Fig. 6
figure 6

Geological map of the NE part of the Imi-n-Tanout wedge. Simplified from sheet Marrakech of the 1:500,000 geological map of Morocco

The wedge geometry

In the eastern part of the area (Figs. 5, 6), Hercynian basement is unconformably overlain by Upper Permian to Lower Cretaceous sediments which typically show strikes changing from N–S to E–W moving up-section thereby forming a clear fan opening from NE to SW. The Upper Permian to Lower Cretaceous succession is divided in two parts by the Toarcian unconformity, a regional erosional surface gently cutting down-section from SW to NE generally interpreted as the breakup unconformity which formed when oceanic crust appeared in the Central Atlantic (e.g., Medina 1995).

Upper Permian to Liassic sediments are mainly red beds with intercalations of volcanic rocks of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (Verati et al. 2007) beautifully exposed along the Argana valley (Fig. 5) (e.g., Medina 1995; Baudon et al. 2009). Upper Permian to Liassic sediments pinch-out between Upper Cretaceous and basement rocks to the W of Imi-n-Tanout (Figs. 5, 6) and thicken to the SW reaching >6,000 m (Zühlke et al. 2004). The thickness changes are interpreted as associated with (1) a roughly N–S trending, E-dipping normal fault supposedly located to the W of the Argana valley (e.g., Fig. 2 of Medina (1995)) and (2) the Toarcian unconformity, which descends down-section to the NE (e.g., Medina 1995).

A wedge geometrically similar to the one just described is formed by the post-rift part of the succession, that is, by Middle Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous sediments which overly the break-up unconformity (e.g., Stets 1992). These sediments show a fan geometry with dips to the NW in the S, becoming northward in the N (Figs. 5, 6). The corresponding formations are basically continuous over the entire area and show a pattern of decreasing thicknesses from the SW to the NE (Stets 1992; Zühlke et al. 2004).

The Imi-n-Tanout wedge in Cretaceous times

The geometry of the post-rift portion of the Imi-n-Tanout wedge prior to Alpine shortening can be reconstructed using thickness measurements available from the literature (e.g., Zühlke et al. 2004; Bouaouda 2004) integrated with our own geological sections. Thicknesses for basically all post-rift formations increase gradually from NE to SW reaching >3,000 m toward the coastal areas (Fig. 7). Subsidence rates seem to be very high during the Late Jurassic. No fault is inferred along the section which could provide a significant contribution to the observed thickness changes (Hafid et al. 2008).

Fig. 7
figure 7

The Imi-n-Tanout wedge at the end of the Early Cretaceous. Greatly simplified from Zühlke et al. (2004). The thick dashed line corresponds to the syn- to post-rift transition

The direction of the profile of Fig. 7 is conditioned by the present outcrops distribution along and in the neighborhood of the Argana valley. We derive the original trend of the wedge by plotting strikes and dips of Middle Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous layers and compensating for Alpine deformation. The result (Fig. 8) shows that the Imi-n-Tanout wedge opened along a NNW–SSE to NW–SE trending axis. This axis must have roughly corresponded to the trend of boundary between the subsiding area in the W and the exhuming domain in the E. The NNW–SSE direction is significantly oblique with respect to the NE–SW general trend of older, Middle Triassic to Early Jurassic syn-rift faults mapped or inferred in the Argana area (e.g., Medina 1995; Hafid 2000) discarding a possible reactivation (inversion) of Triassic to Early Jurassic normal faults as a mechanism contributing to Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous vertical movements.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Geometry of the Imi-n-Tanout wedge. a Present-day position of sedimentary layers; b position of the same layers prior to Alpine folding. Poles have been rotated in a counter-clockwise sense looking W, around a E–W trending axis by 15°

Syn-sedimentary deformations in the Essaouira basin

To constrain the tectonics driving the Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous upward and downward vertical movements, which cannot be explained by models of rifted margins, we have investigated structures cropping out in the Essaouira-Agadir basin, which is the subsiding domain flanking the region experiencing exhumation (Fig. 5). Jurassic to Cretaceous sediments are present in these areas, and syn-sedimentary deformations can be identified and interpreted. Jurassic and Cretaceous anticlines have been described but their growth generally associated with diapirism rather than with regional tectonics (e.g., Hafid 2000).

Imi-n-Tanout

Middle Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous sediments to the South of the Imi-n-Tanout line are deformed by syn-sedimentary structures documenting the style of deformation during this times span. At the km-scale, fairly symmetric, NW–SE trending folds are observed in the northern part of the wedge, which are sealed by Lower Cretaceous strata (Fig. 9). At a smaller, meters to tens of meters scale, syn-sedimentary structures are not uncommon in the Imi-n-Tanout wedge and typically show folds and thrusts with a NW–SE trending axis (Fig. 10). All these structures document Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous NE–SW shortening approximately perpendicular to the axis of the Imi-n-Tanout wedge (see Sect. “The Imi-n-Tanout wedge in Cretaceous times”), suggesting that they developed within the same deformation regime.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Geological map of the NW part of the Imi-n-Tanout wedge showing syn-sedimentary folds sealed by Upper Cretaceous rocks. Simplified from sheet Tamnar of the 1:100,000 geological map of Morocco

Fig. 10
figure 10

Outcrop-scale syn-sedimentary structures in the Middle Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous formations of the INT wedge

Tidsi

The Tidsi anticline (Figs. 1, 11), exposed in the western High Atlas ca. 20 km east of the Atlantic coast, is a complex structure characterized by a main fold trending NNE–SSW, which interferes in the south with a shorter E–W to WSW–ENE trending anticline. The regional stratigraphy, the geometry of the fold and its predominantly Mesozoic age have been documented in previous studies (e.g., Amrhar 1995; Piqué et al. 1998; Hafid 2000) and interpreted as driven by halokinesis. No evaporites crop out in the Tidsi anticline, but a diapir-like body is imaged in seismic lines across the area (Hafid 2000).

Fig. 11
figure 11

Map of the Tidsi anticline. Representative stratigraphic columns for the western and eastern sides of the structure are shown in the insets, after the 1:100,000 geological map of Morocco (Tamnar sheet)

Growth of the Tidsi anticline

The Mesozoic age of the growth of the Tidsi structure is based on (1) an unconformity separating Triassic from Portlandian (i.e., uppermost Jurassic) strata, (2) a significant increase in the thickness of the Lower Cretaceous from the eastern to the western side of the Tidsi anticline (Fig. 11) and, (3) the sedimentary wedges exposed along the N–S trending flanks of the structures (Fig. 12).

Fig. 12
figure 12

Syn-sedimentary wedges along the N–S trending flanks of the Tidsi anticline. See Fig. 11 for location

The unconformity at the base of the Portlandian is well exposed along the foot of the relief forming the eastern side of the Tidsi structure (Fig. 12) and is formed by an erosional surface separating sub-vertical Triassic layers from Lower Cretaceous strata, which dip by 40–50° to the E. The base of Lower Cretaceous layers is generally parallel to the unconformity surface, showing that the relief formed during pre-Late Jurassic folding had been effectively peneplained and that the entire area experienced regional subsidence during the Early Cretaceous (Fig. 13a). Lower Cretaceous rocks, however, are thinner in the E than in the W of the Tidsi structure recording the beginning of differential vertical movements possibly related to the onset of west-vergent folding-thrusting. A re-activation of a syn-rift normal fault is unlikely because the main extensional fault in the area is located several kilometers to the E of the Tidsi structure and no significant inversion can be identified in seimic sections [see Fig. 14 in Hafid (2000)].

Fig. 13
figure 13

Evolutionary scheme of the Tidsi anticline in pre-Alpine times

Notwithstanding the poor constraints on the initial stages of the Tidsi structure, anticlinal folding was ongoing in the Late Cretaceous causing the formation of the well-known sedimentary wedges seen along sections perpendicular to the fold (Fig. 12). The growth of the Tidsi anticline took place during generalized, long wavelength subsidence (Fig. 13b), affecting the entire region W of the MAM and allowing for continuous sedimentation.

Tectonics during Tidsi folding

Notwithstanding the possible role of diapirism in controlling the growth of the Tidsi anticline, other structures observed in the area document the co-existence of tectonic deformations hitherto neglected.

The nicest structures are visible along a >1-km-long cliff in the southern part of the Tidsi anticline where Triassic to Aptian sediments crop out (Fig. 14). Two wedges formed by Lower Cretaceous rocks are visible, opening toward the south and bounded on the southern side by steeper layers. Strata geometry points to a NNE-ward vergence of the structure (Fig. 14). Aptian strata in the uppermost part of the outcrop are sub-horizontal thereby documenting the pre-Aptian age of deformation. The tectonic nature of these structures is not only suggested by their overall geometry but is proven by their vergence toward the core of the Tidsi anticline, which is incompatible with a halokinetic origin.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Line-drawing of the structures exposed in the southern part of the Tidsi anticline (see Fig. 11) for the position. The cliff is ca. 200 m high

The Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous tectonic evolution of central Western Morocco

Kinematics and tectonics of a section from the MAM to the Essaouira basin

Data and methods

To provide a kinematic frame for the evolution of western Morocco, we construct a ~100-km-long, E–W trending section from the MAM in the E to the coastal domains of the Essaouira-Agadir basin in the W depicting the situation at the end of the Early Cretaceous before the Cenomanian transgression. We then retrodeform the section compensating for vertical movements from the end of the Early Cretaceous to the Early Jurassic, which is the approximate age of the opening of the Central Atlantic. The section has a composite character and includes information from the northern and southern side of the High Atlas.

The geometry of Middle Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous sediments in the western part of the section is obtained from the literature data (Zühlke et al. 2004; Piqué et al. 1998; Bouatmani et al. 2007; Le Roy and Piqué 2001; Hafid 2000). Sediment thicknesses were not corrected for compaction during retrodeformation. Vertical movements in the MAM have been derived from the t-T paths obtained by Ghorbal (2009) for samples from the northern and southern foothills of the High Atlas (e.g., Fig. 2), translated into depths adopting a constant gradient of 25 °C/km.

Kinematic evolution

The upper panel of Fig. 15 shows a simplified geological transect along the western High Atlas toward the end of the Early Cretaceous. The section is characterized by an up to 6-km-thick succession of Triassic to Lower Cretaceous sediments thinning toward the E and essentially pinching-out against the MAM. The post-rift (post-Toarcian) part of the succession which accumulated following the end of normal faulting reaches thicknesses of >3 km. No significant normal fault is present at the scale of the transect. The eastern part of the section was probably occupied by a peneplain close to sea level resulting from the erosion of the mountain belt which must have formed during earlier exhumation stages.

Fig. 15
figure 15

Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous vertical movements along a section from the Essaouira basin in the W to the MAM in the E. The section trends roughly E–W and includes information from both sides of the High Atlas

The oldest snapshot of our kinematic scheme (at 170 Ma) depicts the situation at the end of the Liassic shortly after the cessation of normal faulting in the Essaouira basin. In the W, a ca. 3-km-thick succession was present, which was pinching-out toward the E. Toward the W, the Triassic wedge is interpreted to be controlled by a major, E-dipping listric fault presently covered by younger sediments (Medina 1995). In the E, the presently cropping out basement rocks of the MAM were at the end of the Liassic at depths of ca. 3 km. If the assumption is justified that they were close to the surface at the end of the Hercynian orogeny then one must envisage the presence of 2–3 km of sediments which were removed prior to the Late Cretaceous.

Starting from 170 to 150 Ma, the rocks of the MAM began moving upward, thereby probably generating a relief which was the source area for the thick terrigenous successions deposited in the Moroccan offshore (Price 1981; Le Roy and Piqué 2001). This upward movement was coeval with increased subsidence in the western parts of the section, and it is during this time frame that syn-sedimentary contractional structures developed, which have been described in chapter 4. Coeval subsidence in the W and exhumation in the E ended probably toward the end of the Early Cretaceous, beginning of the Late Cretaceous when the entire region, as well as North Africa, was covered by Cenomanian marine sediments (e.g., Luning et al. 2004) and followed by generalized subsidence.

The profiles of Fig. 15 show that no major fault existed during Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous times accommodating the differential movement between the subsiding Essaouira-Agadir basin and the exhuming MAM. These movements, on the contrary, were associated with generalized westward tilting of the pre- and syn-rift successions. The timing and geometry of such tilting is documented in the Imi-n-Tanout wedge. Because of the excessive subsidence and, more importantly, exhumation, this tilting cannot be the expression of post-rift thermal subsidence.

Our, admittedly speculative, working hypothesis is that the excessive subsidence in the Essaouira basin and exhumation in the MAM were caused by roughly E–W trending shortening active during Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous times. A contractional regime is compatible with the widespread occurrence of syn-sedimentary contractional structure in Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous successions. The E–W shortening could be accommodated either by deep W-vergent thrusting in the MAM or by folding, or a combination of the two (e.g., Cloetingh and Burov 2011).

Extrapolation to surrounding areas

The coexistence of subsidence in the W and exhumation in the E, as well as the occurrence of syn-sedimentary structures documenting shortening during Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous times, are not confined to the western High Atlas but are is observed also to the North and to the South of the chain.

The region N of the High Atlas

The exhumation we have reported in the MAM can be traced to the N of the High Atlas. Indeed, Mesozoic ages and t-T paths comparable to the ones discussed above have been obtained from rocks from the Jebilet Hills N of Marrakech to the Rabat area (e.g., Ghorbal et al. 2008; Saddiqi et al. 2009; Barbero et al. 2011). Subsidence along the Central Atlantic margin to the N of the Essaouira-Agadir basin has been quantified and modeled by Gouiza et al. (2010). The curves these authors produced document persisting post-rift subsidence compatible with what we have shown for the Eassouira-Agadir basin. Gouiza et al. (2010) could only fit the data from the best constrained part of the section by envisaging intense sub-crustal thinning during Middle Jurassic times.

Jurassic contractional structures similar to those described above in the Essaouira basin are observed in the Abda basin, located to the N of the High Atlas. Here, seismic data document gentle folded Triassic to Middle Jurassic layers sealed by Upper Jurassic(?)-Cretaceous strata (Echarfaoui et al. 2002).

The regions to the S of the High Atlas

The zone of exhumation inferred from the MAM continued also to the S of the High Atlas. Low-T geochronology results from the westernmost part of the Anti-Atlas have very recently become available (Ruiz et al. 2011). According to this study, rocks of the area have experienced continuous exhumation (in the order of 3–4 km) during Triassic to Early Cretaceous time followed by more limited subsidence and exhumation during Tertiary times. This pattern is not substantially different from that documented from the Meseta and the MAM. These results are compatible with previous, very limited geochronology data from Malusà et al. (2007) and illite maturity studies (Ruiz et al. 2008) and by maturity and geochronology work in the Tindouf basin (Zühlke et al. 2010), south of the Anti-Atlas. In both cases, rocks were found to be too mature/hot with respect to their geological evolution and present position.

Subsidence patterns have been analyzed by Gouiza (2011) in the Tarfaya basin which lies to the W of the Anti-Atlas region. Similarly to what is shown above, these curves show strong subsidence persisting through Middle to Late Jurassic times, that is, coeval with the subsidence reported for the Essaouira-Agadir basin.

The regions to the E of the High Atlas

At the regional scale, the vertical movements and deformations documented in Morocco are partly coeval with the Austrian orogeny (Barremian to Aptian), which resulted in a W–E directed shortening episode well-documented in the entire West Sahara domain in Algeria, Tunisia and Libya (Acheche et al. 2001; Mitra and Leslie 2003; Underdown and Redfern 2008). The origin of this tectonic stage remains enigmatic, a possible explanation could be the change in the rate and direction of opening of the Atlantic following the separation between West Africa and South America and the initiation of the South Atlantic drifting (Mitra and Leslie 2003). Shortening resulted in N–S oriented folding, reactivation and uplift of the already existent fault blocks (Mitra and Leslie 2003), and the Austrian unconformity which truncated the Barremian-Neocomian deposits in the region.

Conclusions

The Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous time interval is of particular interest for the evolution of Morocco and, indirectly, also for surrounding regions because of the coexistence of subsidence and exhumation along an E–W trending profile. The upward movements have allowed for the erosion of substantial amount of rocks, part of which was then transported toward the Central Atlantic Ocean and deposited on the Moroccan passive continental margin (e.g., Lancelot and Winterer 1976; von Rad and Sarti 1986; Price 1981).

A significant part of these movements, ca. 50 % for the subsiding domain and >70 % for the one experiencing exhumation, is incompatible with processes generally expected to take place during the post-rift of continental margins, namely thermal subsidence. Even more complex mechanisms indirectly related to rifted margin formation, such shoulder uplift and secondary convection cells are unable to explain the observed movements.

As an alternative, we tentatively propose a scenario in which vertical movements are driven roughly E–W trending shortening superimposed on the thermal subsidence of the margin. This picture is compatible with the widespread occurrence of contractional structures developed in Jurassic to Early Cretaceous times in the western parts of the High Atlas and surrounding areas.

Indeed, our findings are not unique, and larger-than-expected upward movements have been documented in other passive margins such as Brazil (Bonow et al. 2009), the Dhofar margin (e.g., Bache et al. 2011 and references therein) and Antarctica (Storti et al. 2008).