Abstract
Under certain restrictions on s, p, q, the Triebel-Lizorkin spaces can be viewed as generalised fractional Sobolev spaces \(W^{s,p}_q\). In this article, we show that the Bourgain-Brezis-Mironescu formula holds for \(W^{s,p}_q\)-seminorms in arbitrary domain. This addresses an open question raised by Brazke-Schikorra-Yung (Calc Var Partial Differ Equ 62(2):41–33, (2023).
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Sobolev spaces arise naturally in the study of partial differential equations. They are defined in terms of weak derivatives. For an open set \(\Omega \subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^N\), and \(1\le p<\infty \), the Sobolev space \(W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) is defined to be \(\{f\in L^p(\Omega )\ |\ [f]_{W^{1,p}(\Omega )}<\infty \}\), where
Some closely related spaces are Triebel-Lizorkin spaces \(F^s_{p,q}(\Omega )\), which are defined to be \(\{f|_{\Omega }\ |\ f\in F^s_{p,q}({\mathbb {R}}^N) \}\), and are equipped with the norm \([\cdot ]_{F^s_{p,q}({\mathbb {R}}^N)}\). We shall not define the norm \([\cdot ]_{F^s_{p,q}({\mathbb {R}}^N)}\) as it will not be necessary for the present article. Instead, we refer the reader, for definition and classical results regarding Triebel-Lizorkin spaces, to [59], or more modern references like [36, 56]. For \(1\le p,q<\infty \), \(\max \{0,\frac{N(q-p)}{pq}\}<s<1\), we have the characterisation (see Theorem 1.2 of [55])
where
In the special case of \(p=q\), these spaces are related to the so-called fractional Sobolev spaces \(W^{s,p}(\Omega )\), defined by
where \([f]_{W^{s,p}(\Omega )}:=[f]_{W^{s,p}_p(\Omega )}\). Of course, when \(\Omega ={\mathbb {R}}^N\), or when \(\Omega \) is fractional extension domain (see [25]), we have \(W^{s,p}(\Omega )=F^s_{p,p}(\Omega )\).
Bourgain-Brezis-Mironescu [8] showed that for any smooth and bounded domain \(\Omega \), \(1\le p<\infty \), and any \(f\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\),
Conversely, for any \(f\in L^p(\Omega )\), if we have
then \(f\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) if \(p>1\) and \(f\in BV(\Omega )\) if \(p=1\). Later Dávila [23] extended this result and proved that for any \(f\in BV(\Omega )\), \(\lim _{s\rightarrow 1-}(1-s)[f]_{W^{s,1}(\Omega )}^p=K|\nabla f|(\Omega )\). This is commonly known as the Bourgain-Brezis-Mironescu formula (BBM formula for short). The subject was further developed in [9, 10, 18, 47, 48, 53]. The BBM formula has been generalised to Orlicz and generalised Orlicz setup in [1,2,3, 28, 31, 61], to variable exponent setup in [30, 39], to magnetic Sobolev spaces [29, 49, 50, 52, 57], to anisotropic setup [37, 45, 51], to Riemannian manifolds in [42], to metric spaces in [24, 35], to Banach function spaces in [22, 62]. Similar studies are possible in the context of Besov spaces also [41, 60]. More recent developments on this topic can be found in [14,15,16,17]. For further reading, we refer the reader to [4, 6, 7, 11, 19, 21, 26, 32,33,34, 38, 46, 54].
Our first interest lies in works regarding the domain. That is, how far the smooth-bounded condition, on the domain, can be relaxed. In this direction, we mention three works. The first is due to Lioni-Spector [43, 44]. They showed that for an arbitrary domain \(\Omega \), and \(f\in L^p(\Omega )\),
where
The second result is due to the author with Bal-Roy [5], where it has been shown that the BBM-formula [8], holds if we take \(\Omega \) to be a \(W^{1,p}\)-extension domain. The third result is due to Drelichman-Duran [27]. They showed that for \(1<p<\infty \), and an arbitrary bounded domain \(\Omega \), and any \(\tau \in (0,1)\), we have
The second direction of work regarding the BBM-formula, that we are interested in, is its extension for Triebel-Lizorkin spaces. The first work in this direction was done by Brazke-Schikorra-Yung [12]. They explained via examining thoroughly various constants of embeddings that although \(F^s_{p,p}=W^{s,p}\), when \(s\in (0,1)\) and \(F^s_{p,2}=W^{1,p}\) it makes sense for the scaled \(W^{s,p}\) seminorm to converge to \(W^{1,p}\)-seminorm, even when \(p\ne 2\). They posed the open problem (see [12, Question 1.12]) about the asymptotic constant in the identification of the \(\Vert \cdot \Vert _{W^{s,p}_q}\approx \Vert \cdot \Vert _{F^s_{p,q}}\).
The current article addresses this question by showing the asymptotic behaviour (as \(s\rightarrow 1-\)) of \(W^{s,p}_q\)-seminorms. Similar studies has been done, when \(1<q<p<\infty \), in [22] for \({\mathbb {R}}^N\), and in [62, Theorem 6.1] for a special class of bounded extension domains (called \((\varepsilon ,\infty )\)-domains).
We concentrate our focus on the following seminorm (for some \(\tau \in (0,1)\))
as one can then extend the above question for arbitrary bounded domains, motivated by [27]. We go one step further and show that the boundedness of the domain is not necessary. Our main results are the following:
Theorem 1
Let \(\Omega \subset {\mathbb {R}}^N\) be any open set \(\tau \in (0,1)\). Assume one of the following conditions
-
(1)
\(1\le q\le p<\infty \),
-
(2)
\(1<p<q<\infty \) with \(p\le N\) and \(q <\frac{Np}{N-p}\),
-
(3)
\(N<p<q<\infty \).
Then there is a constant \(K=K(N,p,q)>0\) such that for any \(f\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\), we have,
Theorem 2
Let \(\Omega \subset {\mathbb {R}}^N\) be an open set, \(\tau \in (0,1)\) and \(1\le p,q<\infty \). If \(f\in L^p(\Omega )\cap L^q(\Omega )\) is such that
then \(f\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) when \(p>1\), and \(f\in BV(\Omega )\) when \(p=1\).
Remark 3
Before proceeding further, let us discuss some difficulties that arise here, and strategies for overcoming them. The proof of the main results roughly follow the outline of [8]. However, there are certain obstacles to that path. The first obstacle arises when we want to apply dominated convergence theorem to interchange limit and integral. Similar difficulty was faced and overcome in [27], but we had to take a different route (see lemma 9) for this purpose. The introduction of the second exponent q forces us to deviate from the usual route again; The case \(q\le p\) is rather easy to handle, for the case \(p<q\), a careful use of Sobolev embedding is needed. To take into account the case where the domain \(\Omega \) is unbounded, we need to restrict the seminorm further and define some new fractional Sobolev spaces (see eq. 5) and prove a version of the main result theorem 1 in that context (see theorem 14), and then finally derive the proof of the main results from there.
The article is organised as follows: In section 2, we list some preliminary results, already known in literature, which shall be useful for the proof of our main results. In section 3, we introduce a variant of fractional Sobolev spaces and prove some relevant embedding results. In section 4 we prove the main results in the context of these new spaces (see theorems 14 and 15). Finally in section 5, we prove theorems 1 and 2.
2 Preliminary results
For the sake of completeness, we first state the well-known Sobolev inequality (also known as (q, p)-Poincaré inequality):
Lemma 4
Let \(1\le p,q\le \infty \), \(\tau \in (0,1)\), and one of the following hold
-
(1)
\(p<N\), and \(q \le \frac{Np}{N-p}\),
-
(2)
\(p=N\), and \(q <\infty \)
-
(3)
\(p>N\).
Then there is a constants \(C=C(p,q,N)>0\) such that the following holds for any \(f\in W^{1,p}(B(0,\frac{t}{\tau }))\):
The following lemma was established in [20] for \(1<p<\infty \); the \(p\ge 1\) case can be found in [58, Chapter-VI, Theorems 5 and 5’].
Lemma 5
Let \(\Omega \subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^N\) be an open set with Lipschitz boundary and \(1\le p<\infty \). Then for any \(f\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) there is some \({\tilde{f}}\in W^{1,p}({\mathbb {R}}^N)\) such that \({\tilde{f}}|_{\Omega }=f\) and for some constant \(C=C(N,\Omega ,p)\),
The following result can be found in Proposition 9.3 and Remark 6 of [13].
Lemma 6
Let \(\Omega \subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^N\) be open, \(1\le p<\infty \), \(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{p'}=1\), and \(f\in L^p(\Omega )\). Assume that there is constant \(C>0\) such that for any \(\varphi \in C_c^{\infty }(\Omega )\)
Then \(f\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) when \(1<p\), and \(f\in BV(\Omega )\) when \(p=1\).
Next we list a special case of Proposition 2/(ii) of [59, Chapter 2.3.3], combined with the fact that \(W^{1,p}({\mathbb {R}}^N)=F^1_{p,2}({\mathbb {R}}^N)\).
Lemma 7
Let \(1\le p,q<\infty \), \(s\in (0,1)\). Then
The following result is taken from Lemma 8 of [5].
Lemma 8
Let \(\Omega \subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^N\) be open and \(\lambda > 0\) be sufficiently small. Then there is a bounded open set \(\Omega _\lambda ^*\) with smooth boundary such that \(\Omega _\lambda \subseteq \Omega _\lambda ^* \subseteq \Omega \), where \(\Omega _\lambda \) is as in (2).
The next result can be found in Theorem 2.1 of [40]. It will play a crucial in this article.
Lemma 9
Let \(\Omega \subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^N\), \(\{\Omega _i\}_{i\in {\mathbb {N}}}\) be such that \(\Omega =\cup _i\Omega _i\), \(F_n,F\in L^1(\Omega )\) for \(n\in {\mathbb {N}}\) be such that for a.e. \(x\in \Omega \), \(F_n(x)\rightarrow F(x)\) as \(n\rightarrow \infty \). Assume that
-
(1)
$$\begin{aligned} \quad \quad \limsup _{n\rightarrow \infty }\sup _{x\in \Omega _i}\left| F_n(x)-F(x) \right| <\infty \quad \text{ for } \text{ all } i\in {\mathbb {N}}, \end{aligned}$$
-
(2)
$$\begin{aligned} \quad \quad \liminf _{i\rightarrow \infty }\limsup _{n\rightarrow \infty }\int _{\Omega \setminus \Omega _i} F_n(x)dx=0. \end{aligned}$$
Then
3 Fractional Sobolev space with restricted internal distance
Fix \(R>0\) and \(\tau \in (0,1)\) once and for all. Denote \(\delta _{x,R,\tau }= \min \{R,\tau \text{ dist }(x,\partial \Omega )\}\). We shall often drop the R and \(\tau \) in the above notation and write \(\delta _x\) to denote \(\delta _{x,R,\tau }\).
Remark 10
If the function \(x\mapsto \text{ dist }(x,\partial \Omega )\) is bounded in \(\Omega \), we can choose \(R>0\) large enough, so that \(\delta _x=\tau \text{ dist }(x,\partial \Omega )\). Then the particular case \(p=q\) of theorems 14 and 15 are similar to the results proved in [27], but here \(\Omega \) need not be a bounded domain; for example, it can be a cylindrical domain or any open subset of \({\mathbb {R}}^N\setminus {\mathbb {Z}}^N\).
Define, for any open set \(\Omega \subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^N\), \(1\le p,q<\infty \), \(0<s<1\), \({\hat{W}}^{s,p}_q(\Omega ):=\{f\in L^p(\Omega )\ |\ [f]_{{\hat{W}}^{s,p}_q(\Omega )}<\infty \}\) where
We shall need some embedding results for these new fractional Sobolev spaces for our purpose. As expected, the case \(q\le p\) and \(p<q\) are treated separately.
Lemma 11
Let \(\Omega \subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^N\) be open and \(1\le q\le p <\infty \). Assume either \(D={\tilde{D}}= \Omega \) or, for some \(\frac{1}{2R}>\alpha >0\), \(D= \{x\in \Omega \ |\ \text{ dist }(x,\partial \Omega )<\alpha \}\) with \({\tilde{D}}=\{x\in \Omega \ |\ \text{ dist }(x,\partial \Omega )<2\alpha \text{ or } |x|> \frac{1}{2\alpha } \}\). Then there is a constant \(C=C(p,q,R,\Omega ,N)\) such that for any f in \(W^{1,p}(\Omega )\),
Proof
We have
The last inequality follows from the absolute continuity on lines of the \(W^{1,p}\)-functions. We now have, after a change of variable \(y=x+th\), (using that \(B(x,t\delta _x) \subset B(x,\delta _x)\))
Note that in the above inequality, \(\nabla f\) is required to be defined only inside \({\tilde{D}}\). So, we shall take a 0-extension of \(\nabla f\) outside \({\tilde{D}}\). Since we have \(\frac{p}{q}\ge 1\), we can use Young’s convolution inequality to get
\(\square \)
Lemma 12
Let \(\Omega \subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^N\) be open, \(1<p<q<\infty \), and one of the following hold
-
(1)
\(p<N\), and \(q <\frac{Np}{N-p}\),
-
(2)
\(N\le p\).
Assume either \(D={\tilde{D}}= \Omega \) or, for some \(\frac{1}{2R}>\alpha >0\), \(D= \{x\in \Omega \ |\ \text{ dist }(x,\partial \Omega )<\alpha \}\) and \({\tilde{D}}=\{x\in \Omega \ |\ \text{ dist }(x,\partial \Omega )<2\alpha \text{ or } |x|> \frac{1}{2\alpha }\}\). Then there is a constant \(C=C(N,R,p,q)>0\) such that for any \(f\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\), eq. (6) holds.
Proof
Note that
which gives
So, we can write
According to either \(p<N\) or \(p\ge N\), fix \(\beta \in (0,1)\), depending on p, q, N, such that \((q,\beta p)\)-type Poincaré inequality (lemma 4) is satisfied. We use this to estimate \(I_1\) below. First, we change the order of integration between t and h, then apply lemma 4.
As in the proof of the previous lemma, we shall take a 0-extension of \(\nabla f\) outside \({\tilde{D}}\). Now using Hardy-Littelewood maximal inequality, we get
Again,
Combining eqs. (9) and (10), we get
Again, we can estimate \(I_2\), in similar way as above with \(\delta _x\) in place of t. We have a better estimate this time. Also, we can apply (q, p)-Poincaré inequality this time.
Combing eqs. (7), (11) and (12),
This proves the lemma. \(\square \)
4 BBM formula for \({\hat{W}}^{s,p}_q\)-seminorms
First, we state the following result whose proof can be found in the proof of Theorem of [8] as the quantity \(\delta _x\) is bounded by R.
Lemma 13
Let \(\Omega \subset {\mathbb {R}}^N\) be any open set, \(1\le q<\infty \), \(0<s<1\). Then for any \(f\in C^2(\Omega )\), we have for all \(x\in \Omega \),
We now prove the following BBM-type results which are closely related with theorems 1 and 2.
Theorem 14
Let \(\Omega \subset {\mathbb {R}}^N\) be any open set. Assume one of the following conditions
-
(1)
\(1\le q\le p<\infty \),
-
(2)
\(1<p<q<\infty \) with \(p\le N\) and \(q <\frac{Np}{N-p}\),
-
(3)
\(N<p<q<\infty \).
Then there is a constant \(K=K(N,p,q)>0\) such that for any \(f\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\), we have for all \(x\in \Omega \),
Proof of Theorem 14
Step-1: We show that it is enough to prove eq. (14) for \(f\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\cap C^2(\Omega )\).
Let \(f \in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) and \(\varepsilon >0\) be fixed. Since \(C^2(\Omega )\cap W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) is dense in \(W^{1,p}(\Omega )\), there exists \(g \in C^2(\Omega )\cap W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) such that
Since we have assumed that eq. (14) holds for functions in \(C^2(\Omega )\cap W^{1,p}(\Omega )\), for \(s>\frac{1}{2}\), we have
Using triangle inequality, and then eq. (16) followed by eq. (15) and either lemma 11 or lemma 12, we get
The proof of step-1 follows.
Step-2:
In view of the previous step, it is now enough to assume that \(f\in C^2(\Omega )\cap W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) and prove eq. (14). Let us take an arbitrary sequence \(s_n\in (0,1)\) such that \(s_n\rightarrow 1-\) as \(n\rightarrow \infty \). Set
and
Also note that, lemma 13 implies that \(F_n\rightarrow F\) pointwise a.e in \(\Omega \). To complete the proof, it is enough to show that
We shall apply lemma 9 on \(F_n\) to show that the interchange of limit and integral is valid.
For any \(i\in {\mathbb {N}}\), consider the sets \(\Omega _i:=\{x\in \Omega \ |\ \text{ dist }(x,\partial \Omega )>\frac{1}{i}\}\cap B(0,i)\). We need to verify the the hypotheses of lemma 9. First, note that for \(x\in \Omega _i\), \(h\in B(0,\delta _x)\), \(t\in (0,1)\), we have
Thus \(x+th\in \Omega _{i^2}\) for \(i>\frac{1}{(1-\tau )}\). Thus, we have using triangle inequality and then mean value inequality,
Since f is continuous in the closure of the bounded open set \(\Omega _{i^2}\), we have the hypothesis (1) of lemma 9 satisfied for sufficiently large \(i\in {\mathbb {N}}\).
Note that, to show that hypothesis (2) of lemma 9 is satisfied, it is enough to show that
We start with an arbitrary \(x\in \Omega \setminus \Omega _{2i}\), \(h\in B(0,\delta _x)\) and \(t\in (0,1)\). There can be two cases:
Case:1 \(\delta _x=\text{ dist }(x,\partial \Omega )<\frac{1}{2i}\).
We have \(\text{ dist }(x+th,\partial \Omega )\le |x+th-x|+\text{ dist }(x,\partial \Omega )<\frac{\tau }{2i}+\frac{1}{2i}<\frac{1}{i}\). Thus \(x+th\in \Omega \setminus \Omega _i\).
Case:2 \(|x|>2i\) and \(\frac{1}{2i}<\delta _x=R<\text{ dist }(x,\partial \Omega )\). Moreover, we can assume \(R<i\) without loss of generality.
We have \(|x+th|\ge |x|-\tau R \ge 2i-\tau R\ge i\). Thus \(x+th\in \Omega \setminus B(0,i)\subseteq \Omega \setminus \Omega _i\). Hence we always have
From eq. (17), we get
Now we apply lemma 11 or lemma 12 with \(D=\Omega \setminus \Omega _{2i}\) (so that \({\tilde{D}}=\Omega \setminus \Omega _{i}\)) to get
Hence we can integrate eq. (13) and interchange the limit and the integral to get the result. \(\square \)
Theorem 15
Let \(\Omega \subset {\mathbb {R}}^N\) be an open set. If \(f\in L^p(\Omega )\cap L^p(\Omega )\) is such that
then \(f\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) when \(p>1\), and \(f\in BV(\Omega )\) when \(p=1\).
Proof of Theorem 15
We divide the proof into two parts. First, we prove it for a particular case with a bit stronger assumptions, and then give the general proof.
Step-1: \(\Omega \) is bounded with \(\Omega \subseteq B(0,\lambda )\), and
Extend f by 0, outside \(\Omega \). From the proof of Theorem 2 and 3 in [8] we can see that for any \(i=1,2,\cdots ,N\), and \(\varphi \in C_c^{\infty }(\Omega )\),
where,
and
We estimate \(J_{1,s}\) using Fubuni’s theorem to change the order of integration, then using Hölder’s inequality twice, first with respect to the measure \(\frac{dx}{|x-y|^{N+sq-q}}\) and then with respect to dy. We get
Now using the hypothesis of Step-1, we have
Using Hölder’s inequality, we estimate \(J_{2,s}\) as in [8] to get
Using eqs. (18) to (20), we get
Hence by lemma 6, the result follows.
Step-2: We now prove the theorem in full generality.
For \(1< p<\infty \), define \(X^{1,p}(\Omega ):=W^{1,p}(\Omega )\), and \(X^{1,1}(\Omega ):=BV(\Omega )\). Using lemma 8, choose an increasing sequence of bounded open sets \(\{\Omega _n\}_n\) with smooth boundary such that \(\cup _n\Omega _n=\Omega \), and \(\text{ dist }(x,\partial \Omega )>\frac{1}{n}\), for \(x\in \Omega _n\). From the hypothesis, it follows that
We also have, for \(s>\frac{1}{2}\), and \(R>\frac{1}{n}\),
Since, we have \(f\in L^p(\Omega )\cap L^p(\Omega )\) frfom the hypotheses, and \(\Omega _n\) are bounded domains, we have
From Step-1, we can conclude that \(f\in X^{1,p}(\Omega _n)\) for all n. Further the \(X^{1,p}\)-seminorms are uniformly bounded (independent of n) as can be seen from the following calculation, where we use theorem 14,
The proof follows from the observation that \(K[f]_{X^{1,p}(\Omega )}^p =\sup _{n} K[f]_{X^{1,p}(\Omega _n)}^p\). \(\square \)
5 Proofs of Theorems 1 and 2
Note that theorem 2 is a straightforward consequence of theorem 15, as \(L_{p,q}(f)\le L^*_{p,q}(f)\). theorem 1 is also a consequence of theorem 14, but it requires a bit more work. To complete the proof of theorem 1, we only need the following lemma:
Lemma 16
Let \(\Omega \subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^N\) be an open set, \(1\le p <\infty \), \(\tau \in (0,1)\), \(f\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) and \(R>0\). Assume one of the following conditions
-
(1)
\(1\le q\le \frac{Np}{N-p}\) with \(p< N\),
-
(2)
\(1\le q<\infty \) with \(p\ge N\).
Then eq. (14) implies eq. (4).
In order to prove this, we first prove a bit more general result.
Proposition 17
Let \(\Omega \subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^N\) be an open set, \(1\le p,q<\infty \), \(\tau \in (0,1)\), \(f\in L^p(\Omega )\cap L^q(\Omega )\) and \(R>0\). Additionally, in the case \(p<q\), assume that for some \(s_0\in (0,1)\),
Then eq. (14) implies eq. (4).
Proof of Proposition 17
Note that, since
from eq. (14) we have
We focus on the reverse inequality. Observe that for \(x,y\in \Omega \), \(\delta _x< |x-y|\le \tau \text{ dist }(x,\partial \Omega )\) implies \(R< |x-y|\le \tau \text{ dist }(x,\partial \Omega )\). Hence we can write, using triangle inequality for \(L^p\)-norms,
In order to complete the proof, in view of eq. (14), we need to show that \(I_2\) is bounded as \(s\rightarrow 1-\). We estimate \(I_2\) in two separate cases.
Case-1: \(1\le q\le p<\infty \).
Using Minkowsky’s integral inequality and taking the 0-extension of f outside \(\Omega \), we have
Hence the proof follows in this case.
Case-2: \(1\le p\le q<\infty \).
From eq. (21) we get that there is some \(\lambda _f>0\) such that for \(s\in (s_0,1)\),
Using Hölder’s inequality, we get
Now we can proceed as in Case-1 to show that
This completes the proof. \(\square \)
Now we can prove lemma 16 and thereby complete the proof of theorem 1.
Proof of lemma 16
By the standard embedding theorems, we already know that \(f\in L^q(\Omega )\). In order to prove the statement, we need to show that when \(p<q\), eq. (21) holds. Let \(\Omega _1\) be a smooth domain such that
Clearly \(\Omega _1\) is a \(W^{1,p}\)-extension domain (by lemma 5). Let \({\tilde{f}}\in W^{1,p}({\mathbb {R}}^N)\) be an extension of \(f|_{\Omega _1}\), that is
This, along with lemma 7
\(\square \)
References
Alberico, Angela, Cianchi, Andrea, Pick, Luboš, Slavíková, Lenka: On the limit as \(s \rightarrow 1^-\) of possibly non-separable fractional Orlicz-Sobolev spaces. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. 31(4), 879–899 (2020)
Alberico, Angela, Cianchi, Andrea, Pick, Luboš, Slavíková, Lenka: Fractional Orlicz-Sobolev embeddings. J. Math. Pures Appl. 9(149), 216–253 (2021)
Alberico, Angela, Cianchi, Andrea, Pick, Luboš, Slavíková, Lenka: On fractional Orlicz-Sobolev spaces. Anal. Math. Phys. 11(2), 84, 21, (2021)
Arroyo-Rabasa, Adolfo, Bonicatto, Paolo: A Bourgain-Brezis-Mironescu representation for functions with bounded deformation. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 62(1), 33, 22, (2023)
Bal, Kaushik, Mohanta, Kaushik, Roy, Prosenjit: Bourgain-Brezis-Mironescu domains. Nonlinear Anal. 199, 111928, 10, (2020)
Barza, Sorina, Lind, Martin: A new variational characterization of Sobolev spaces. J. Geom. Anal. 25(4), 2185–2195 (2015)
Bojarski, B.: Remarks on the Bourgain-Brezis-Mironescu approach to Sobolev spaces. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Math. 59(1), 65–75 (2011)
Bourgain, Jean, Brezis, Haim, Mironescu, Petru, Another look at Sobolev spaces. In Optimal control and partial differential equations, 439–455. IOS, Amsterdam, (2001)
Bourgain, Jean, Brezis, Haïm, Mironescu, Petru, Limiting embedding theorems for \(W^{s,p}\) when \(s\uparrow 1\) and applications. 87, 77–101. (2002). Dedicated to the memory of Thomas H. Wolff
Bourgain, Jean, Nguyen, Hoai-Minh.: A new characterization of Sobolev spaces. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 343(2), 75–80 (2006)
Brasco, Lorenzo, Gómez-Castro, David, Vázquez, Juan Luis: Characterisation of homogeneous fractional Sobolev spaces. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 60(2), 60, 40 (2021)
Brazke, Denis, Schikorra, Armin, Yung, Po-Lam.: Bourgain-Brezis-Mironescu convergence via Triebel-Lizorkin spaces. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 62(2), 41, 33, (2023)
Brezis, Haim: Functional analysis. Sobolev spaces and partial differential equations. Universitext. Springer, New York (2011)
Brezis, Haïm., Nguyen, Hoai-Minh.: The BBM formula revisited. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. 27(4), 515–533 (2016)
Brezis, Haïm., Seeger, Andreas, Van Schaftingen, Jean, Yung, Po-Lam.: Sobolev spaces revisited. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. 33(2), 413–437 (2022)
Brezis, Haïm., Van Schaftingen, Jean, Yung, Po-Lam.: Going to Lorentz when fractional Sobolev, Gagliardo and Nirenberg estimates fail. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 60(4), 129, 12 (2021)
Brezis, Haïm., Van Schaftingen, Jean, Yung, Po-Lam.: A surprising formula for Sobolev norms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118(8), e2025254118, 6, (2021)
Brezis, Kh.: How to recognize constant functions A. connection with Sobolev spaces. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 57(4(346)), 59–74 (2002)
Buseghin, Federico, Garofalo, Nicola, Tralli, Giulio: On the limiting behaviour of some nonlocal seminorms: a new phenomenon (5). Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. 23(2), 837–875 (2022)
Calderón, A.-P.: Lebesgue spaces of differentiable functions and distributions. In Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. IV, pages 33–49. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., (1961)
Cui, Xiaoyue, Lam, Nguyen, Guozhen, Lu.: Characterizations of second order Sobolev spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 121, 241–261 (2015)
Dai, Feng, Grafakos, Loukas, Pan, Zhulei, Yang, Dachun, Yuan, Wen, Zhang, Yangyang: The Bourgain-Brezis-Mironescu formula on ball Banach function spaces. Math. Ann. (2023)
Dávila, J.: On an open question about functions of bounded variation. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 15(4), 519–527 (2002)
Di Marino, Simone, Squassina, Marco: New characterizations of Sobolev metric spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 276(6), 1853–1874 (2019)
Di Nezza, Eleonora, Palatucci, Giampiero, Valdinoci, Enrico: Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces. Bull. Sci. Math. 136(5), 521–573 (2012)
Domínguez, Oscar, Milman, Mario: Bourgain-Brezis-Mironescu-Maz’ya-Shaposhnikova limit formulae for fractional Sobolev spaces via interpolation and extrapolation. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 62(2), 43, 37, (2023)
Drelichman, Irene, Durán, Ricardo G.: The Bourgain-Brézis-Mironescu formula in arbitrary bounded domains. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 150(2), 701–708 (2022)
Bonder, Julián Fernández., Salort, Ariel M.: Fractional order Orlicz-Sobolev spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 277(2), 333–367 (2019)
Bonder, Julián Fernández., Salort, Ariel M.: Magnetic fractional order Orlicz-Sobolev spaces. Studia Math. 259(1), 1–24 (2021)
Ferrari, Gianluca, Squassina, Marco: Nonlocal characterizations of variable exponent Sobolev spaces. Asymptot. Anal. 127(1–2), 121–142 (2022)
Ferreira, Rita, Hästö, Peter, Ribeiro, Ana Margarida: Characterization of generalized Orlicz spaces. Commun. Contemp. Math. 22(2), 1850079, 25, (2020)
Foghem, Guy, L2-theory for nonlocal operators on domains. Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld, (2020)
Gounoue, Guy Fabrice Foghem.: A remake of Bourgain-Brezis-Mironescu characterization of Sobolev spaces. Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. 4(2), 16, 36, (2023)
Gounoue, Guy Fabrice Foghem., Kassmann, Moritz, Voigt, Paul: Mosco convergence of nonlocal to local quadratic forms. Nonlinear Anal. 193, 111504, 22, (2020)
Górny, Wojciech: Bourgain-Brezis-Mironescu approach in metric spaces with Euclidean tangents. J. Geom. Anal. 32(4), 128, 22, (2022)
Grafakos, Loukas: Classical and modern Fourier analysis. Pearson Education Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2004)
Qingsong, Gu., Huang, Qingzhong: Anisotropic versions of the Brezis-Van Schaftingen-Yung approach at \(s=1\) and \(s=0\). J. Math. Anal. Appl. 525(2), 127156, 15, (2023)
Hajł asz, Piotr, A new characterization of the Sobolev space. 159, pages 263–275. (2003). Dedicated to Professor Aleksander Pełczyński on the occasion of his 70th birthday (Polish)
Hästö, Peter: Ribeiro, Ana Margarida, Characterization of the variable exponent Sobolev norm without derivatives. Commun. Contemp. Math. 19(3), 1650022 (2017)
Kamihigashi, Takashi: Interchanging a limit and an integral: necessary and sufficient conditions. J. Inequal. Appl. 243, 9 (2020)
Kolyada, V.I., Lerner, A.K.: On limiting embeddings of Besov spaces. Studia Math. 171(1), 1–13 (2005)
Kreuml, Andreas, Mordhorst, Olaf: Fractional Sobolev norms and BV functions on manifolds. Nonlinear Anal. 187, 450–466 (2019)
Leoni, Giovanni, Spector, Daniel: Characterization of Sobolev and \(BV\) spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 261(10), 2926–2958 (2011)
Leoni, Giovanni, Spector, Daniel: Corrigendum to Characterization of Sobolev and \(BV\) spaces. [J. Funct. Anal. 261 (10) (2011) 2926–2958]. J. Funct. Anal. 266(2), 1106–1114 (2014)
Ludwig, Monika: Anisotropic fractional Sobolev norms. Adv. Math. 252, 150–157 (2014)
Milman, Mario: Notes on limits of Sobolev spaces and the continuity of interpolation scales. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 357(9), 3425–3442 (2005)
Nguyen, Hoai-Minh.: Some new characterizations of Sobolev spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 237(2), 689–720 (2006)
Nguyen, Hoai-Minh.: Further characterizations of Sobolev spaces. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 10(1), 191–229 (2008)
Nguyen, Hoai-Minh., Pinamonti, Andrea, Squassina, Marco, Vecchi, Eugenio: New characterizations of magnetic Sobolev spaces. Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 7(2), 227–245 (2018)
Nguyen, Hoai-Minh., Pinamonti, Andrea, Squassina, Marco, Vecchi, Eugenio: Some characterizations of magnetic Sobolev spaces. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 65(7), 1104–1114 (2020)
Nguyen, Hoai-Minh., Squassina, Marco: On anisotropic Sobolev spaces. Commun. Contemp. Math. 21(1), 1850017, 13, (2019)
Pinamonti, Andrea, Squassina, Marco, Vecchi, Eugenio: Magnetic BV-functions and the Bourgain-Brezis-Mironescu formula. Adv. Calc. Var. 12(3), 225–252 (2019)
Ponce, Augusto C.: A new approach to Sobolev spaces and connections to \(\Gamma \)-convergence. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 19(3), 229–255 (2004)
Ponce, Augusto C., Spector, Daniel: On formulae decoupling the total variation of BV functions. Nonlinear Anal. 154, 241–257 (2017)
Prats, Martí, Saksman, Eero: A \({\rm T}(1)\) theorem for fractional Sobolev spaces on domains. J. Geom. Anal. 27(3), 2490–2538 (2017)
Runst, Thomas, Sickel, Winfried: Sobolev spaces of fractional order, Nemytskij operators, and nonlinear partial differential equations. De Gruyter Series in Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, vol. 3. Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin (1996)
Squassina, Marco, Volzone, Bruno: Bourgain-Brézis-Mironescu formula for magnetic operators. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 354(8), 825–831 (2016)
Stein, Elias M.: Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions. Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 30. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., (1970)
Triebel, Hans: Theory of function spaces. Monographs in Mathematics, vol. 78. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel (1983)
Triebel, Hans: Limits of Besov norms. Arch. Math. (Basel) 96(2), 169–175 (2011)
Yang, Sibei, Yang, Dachun, Yuan, Wen: New characterizations of Musielak-Orlicz-Sobolev spaces via sharp ball averaging functions. Front. Math. China 14(1), 177–201 (2019)
Zhu, Chenfeng, Yang, Dachun, Yuan, Wen, Extension theorem and bourgain–brezis–mironescu-type characterization of ball banach sobolev spaces on domains. ArXiv preprintarXiv: 2307.11392, (2023)
Acknowledgements
I extend my heartfelt gratitude to Antti Vähäkangas for his invaluable discussions, meticulous review of the manuscript, and unwavering support throughout this project. I want to thank Pekka Koskela for his insightful contributions during the manuscript preparation. Additionally, my appreciation goes to Emiel Lorist for pointing out an error in the initial version of the article, and to the anonymous reviewer for his/her valuable comments and suggestions.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by University of Jyväskylä (JYU). The research is funded by Academy of Finland grant: Geometrinen Analyysi (21000046081).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by A. Mondino.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mohanta, K. Bourgain-Brezis-Mironescu formula for \(W^{s,p}_q\)-spaces in arbitrary domains. Calc. Var. 63, 31 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-023-02637-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-023-02637-w