Abstract
We investigate the geometric properties of Steklov eigenfunctions in smooth manifolds. We derive the refined doubling estimates and Bernstein’s inequalities. For the real analytic manifolds, we are able to obtain the sharp upper bound for the measure of interior nodal sets.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aronszajn, N., Krzywicki, A., Szarski, J.: A unique continuation theorem for exterior differential forms on Riemannian manifolds. Arkiv för Matematik 34, 417–453 (1963)
Bakri, L., Casteras, J.B.: Quantitative uniqueness for Schrödinger operator with regular potentials. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 37, 1992–2008 (2014)
Bellova, K., Lin, F.-H.: Nodal sets of Steklov eigenfunctions. Calc. Var. PDE 54, 2239–2268 (2015)
Brüning, J.: Über Knoten von Eigenfunktionen des Laplace–Beltrami-operators. Math. Z. 158, 15–21 (1978)
Chanillo, S., Muckenhoupt, B.: Nodal geometry on Riemannian manifolds. J. Differ. Geom 34(1), 85–91 (1991)
Colding, T.H., Minicozzi II, W.P.: Lower bounds for nodal sets of eigenfunctions. Comm. Math. Phys. 306, 777–784 (2011)
Dong, R.-T.: Nodal sets of eigenfunctions on Riemann surfaces. J. Differ. Geom. 36, 493–506 (1992)
Donnelly, H., Fefferman, C.: Nodal sets of eigenfunctions on Riemannian manifolds. Invent. Math. 93, 161–183 (1988)
Donnelly, H., Fefferman, C.: Nodal sets for eigenfunctions of the Laplacian on surfaces. J. Am. Math. Soc. 3(2), 333–353 (1990)
Donnelly, H., Fefferman, C.: Nodal sets of eigenfunctions: Riemannian manifolds with boundary. In: Cetera, Et (ed.) Analysis, pp. 251–262. Academic Press, Boston (1990)
Donnelly, H., Fefferman, C.: Growth and Geometry of Eigenfunctions of the Laplacian. Analysis and Partial Differential Equations. Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, pp. 635–655. Dekker, New York (1990)
Georgiev, B., Roy-Fortin, G.: Polynomial upper bound on interior Steklov nodal sets. J. Spectr. Theory 9(3), 897–919 (2019)
Girouard, A., Polterovich, I.: Spectral geometry of the Steklov problem. J. Spectr. Theory 7(2), 321–359 (2017)
Han, Q.: Nodal sets of harmonic functions. Pure Appl. Math. Q. 3(3), 647–688 (2007). part 2
Han, Q., Lin, F.-H.: Nodal Sets of Solutions of Elliptic Differential Equations, book in preparation (online at http://www.nd.edu/qhan/nodal.pdf)
Han, X., Lu, G.: A geometric covering lemma and nodal sets of eigenfunctions. Math. Res. Lett. 18(2), 337–352 (2011)
Hardt, R., Simon, L.: Nodal sets for solutions of ellipitc equations. J. Differ. Geom. 30, 505–522 (1989)
Hezari, H., Sogge, C.D.: A natural lower bound for the size of nodal sets. Anal. PDE. 5(5), 1133–1137 (2012)
Lin, F.-H.: Nodal sets of solutions of elliptic equations of elliptic and parabolic equations. Comm. Pure Appl Math. 44, 287–308 (1991)
Logunov, A.: Nodal sets of Laplace eigenfunctions: polynomial upper estimates of the Hausdorff measure. Ann. Math. 187, 221–239 (2018)
Logunov, A.: Nodal sets of Laplace eigenfunctions: proof of Nadirashvili’s conjecture and of the lower bound in Yau’s conjecture. Ann. Math. 187, 241–262 (2018)
Logunov, A., Malinnikova, E.: Nodal sets of Laplace eigenfunctions: estimates of the Hausdorff measure in dimension two and three, 50 years with Hardy spaces, 333–344, Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., 261, Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham, (2018)
Logunov, A., Malinnikova, E.: Review of Yau’s conjecture on zero sets of Laplace eigenfunctions, Current Developments in Mathematics, Volume 2018, pp. 179–212
Lu, G.: Covering lemmas and an application to nodal geometry on Riemannian manifolds. Proc. Am. Math. Soc 117(4), 971–978 (1993)
Mangoubi, D.: A remark on recent lower bounds for nodal sets. Comm. Partial Differ. Equ. 36(12), 2208–2212 (2011)
Morrey, C.B., Nirenberg, L.: On the analyticity of the solutions of linear elliptic systems of partial differential equations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 10, 271–290 (1957)
Polterovich, I., Sher, D., Toth, J.: Nodal length of Steklov eigenfunctions on real-analytic Riemannian surfaces. J. Reine Angew. Math. 754, 17–47 (2019)
Steinerberger, S.: Lower bounds on nodal sets of eigenfunctions via the heat flow. Comm. Partial Differ. Equ. 39(12), 2240–2261 (2014)
Sogge, C.D., Wang, X., Zhu, J.: Lower bounds for interior nodal sets of Steklov eigenfunctions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 144(11), 4715–4722 (2016)
Sogge, C.D., Zelditch, S.: Lower bounds on the Hausdorff measure of nodal sets. Math. Res. Lett. 18, 25–37 (2011)
Sogge, C.D., Zelditch, S.: Lower bounds on the Hausdorff measure of nodal sets II. Math. Res. Lett. 19(6), 1361–1364 (2012)
Wang, X., Zhu, J.: A lower bound for the nodal sets of Steklov eigenfunctions. Math. Res. Lett. 22(4), 1243–1253 (2015)
Zelditch, S.: Local and global analysis of eigenfunctions on Riemannian manifolds. In: Handbook of Geometric Analysis, in: Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM), vol. 7(1), International Press, Somerville, pp. 545-658 (2008)
Zelditch, S.: Measure of nodal sets of analytic steklov eigenfunctions. Math. Res. Lett. 22(6), 1821–1842 (2015)
Zhu, J.: Doubling property and vanishing order of Steklov eigenfunctions. Comm. Partial Differ. Equ. 40(8), 1498–1520 (2015)
Zhu, J.: Interior nodal sets of Steklov eigenfunctions on surfaces. Anal. PDE 9(4), 859–880 (2016)
Acknowledgements
It is my pleasure to thank Professor Christopher D. Sogge, Joel Spruck, and Steve Zelditch for helpful discussions about the topic of eigenfunctions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by F.H. Lin.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Research is partially supported by the NSF Grant DMS 1656845.
Appendix
Appendix
In this section, we provide the proof of Lemma 1 and some arguments stated in the proof Proposition 2. Recall that
where
and
and
Modifying the arguments in [2] and [35], we can obtain the following lemma, which verifies the proof of (2.18) and (2.19) in Proposition 2.
Lemma 3
There holds that
Proof
We decompose \({\mathcal {A}}\) as
where
and
and
We first compute \({\mathcal {A}}'_1\). Let \({\hat{\alpha }}\) be some small positive constant. Recall that \(\phi (t)=t-e^{\epsilon t}\). Since \(|\phi ^{''}|\le 1\) and \(\beta \) is large enough, it is true that
where \({\mathcal {A}}^{''}_1\) is given by
We split \({\mathcal {A}}^{''}_1\) into three parts:
where
and
and
The expression \({\mathcal {K}}_1\) is considered to be a nonnegative term. We estimate \({\mathcal {K}}_2\). By the triangle inequality,
Using the fact that \(\beta >C(1+\Vert {{\bar{b}}}\Vert _{W^{1, \infty }}+\Vert \bar{q}\Vert ^{1/2}_{W^{1, \infty }})\), we have
Since t is close to negative infinity and then \(\phi '\) is close to 1, from (4.7) and (4.8), we obtain that
where we also used the fact that \(\phi '\) is close to 1. We derive a lower bound for \({\mathcal {K}}_3\). Integration by parts shows that
By the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality and the condition that \(\beta >C(1+\Vert {{\bar{b}}}\Vert _{W^{1, \infty }}+\Vert \bar{q}\Vert ^{1/2}_{W^{1, \infty }})\), we arrive at
Since \({\mathcal {K}}_1\) is nonnegative, the combination of (4.6), (4.9) and (4.11) yields that
From (4.5), it follows that
Recall that
By the triangle inequality, one has
It is obvious that
From the assumption that \(\beta >C(1+\Vert {{\bar{b}}}\Vert _{W^{1, \infty }}+\Vert \bar{q}\Vert ^{1/2}_{W^{1, \infty }})\), we obtain that
For the inner product \({\mathcal {A}}'_3\), using the arguments of integration by parts, since \(e^t \ll 1\) as \(t<T_0\) and \(|T_0|\) is large enough, we can show a lower bound of \({\mathcal {A}}'_3\),
Recall that \( {\mathcal {A}}={\mathcal {A}}'_1+{\mathcal {A}}'_2 +{\mathcal {A}}'_3 \). From (4.13), (4.14) and (4.15), it follows that
If we choose \({\hat{\alpha }}\) to be appropriately small and take the fact \(|\phi ^{''}|>e^t\) into account, we obtain that
Now we show \({\mathcal {B}}\) can be absorbed into \({\mathcal {A}}\) for large \(|T_0|\) and large \(\beta \). Since
then
Thus, the right hand side of (4.18) can be incorporated by the right hand side of (4.17). Hence the proof of the lemma is arrived. \(\square \)
Proof of Lemma 1
If we recall that \(u=e^{-\beta \varphi (x)} v\), the proof of Lemma 3 just implies Lemma 1 stated in Sect. 2. \(\square \)