Abstract
In our previous work (Ndiaye and Schätzle, 2014), we proved that the flat constant mean curvature tori
minimize the Willmore energy in their conformal class in codimension one when \(r \approx 1 / \sqrt{2}\), that is \(T_r\) is close to the Clifford torus \(T_{Cliff} = T_{1/\sqrt{2}}\). In this article, we extend this to arbitrary codimension. Moreover we prove that the Clifford torus minimizes the Willmore energy in an open neighbourhood of its conformal class, again in arbitrary codimension, but the neighbourhood may depend on the codimension.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allard, W.K.: On the first variation of a varifold. Ann. Math. 95, 417–491 (1972)
Fischer, A., Tromba, A.: On a purely “Riemannian” proof of the structure and dimension of the unramified moduli space of a compact Riemann surface. Math. Ann. 267(3), 311–345 (1984)
Kirillov, A.: An Introduction to Lie Groups and Lie Algebras. In: Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 113. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)
Kuwert, E., Schätzle, R.: Gradient flow for the Willmore functional. Commun. Anal. Geom. 10(2), 307–339 (2002)
Kuwert, E., Schätzle, R.: Removability of point singularities of Willmore surfaces. Ann. Math. 160(1), 315–357 (2004)
Kuwert, E., Schätzle, R.: Minimizers of the Willmore functional under fixed conformal class. J. Differ. Geom. 93, 471–530 (2013)
Li, P., Yau, S.T.: A new conformal invariant and its applications to the Willmore conjecture and the first eigenvalue on compact surfaces. Invent. Math. 69, 269–291 (1982)
Marques, F., Neves, A.: Min-Max Theory and the Willmore Conjecture, arXiv:math.DG/1202.6036v1 (2012)
Montiel, S., Ros, A.: Minimal immersions of surfaces by the first eigenfunctions and conformal area. Invent. Math. 83, 153–166 (1986)
Ndiaye, C.B., Schätzle, R.M.: New examples of conformally constrained Willmore minimizers of explicit type. Adv. Calc. Var. (2014, to appear)
Schätzle, R.M.: Conformally constrained Willmore immersions. Adv. Calc. Var. 6, 375–390 (2013)
Schätzle, R.M.: Estimation of the conformal factor under bounded Willmore energy. Mathematische Zeitschrift 274, 1341–1383 (2013)
Simon, L.: Lectures on geometric measure theory. In: Proceedings of the Centre for Mathematical Analysis Australian National University, vol. 3 (1983)
Simon, L.: Existence of surfaces minimizing the Willmore functional. Commun. Anal. Geom. 1(2), 281–326 (1993)
Simons, J.: Minimal varities in Riemannian manifolds. Ann. Math. 88, 62–105 (1968)
Tromba, A.: Teichmüller Theory in Riemannian Geometry. Birkhäuser, Basel (1992)
Weiner, J.: On a problem of Chen, Willmore, et al. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 27, 18–35 (1978)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by G. Huisken.
C. B. Ndiaye and R. M. Schätzle were supported by the DFG Sonderforschungsbereich TR 71 Freiburg—Tübingen.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Convergence in Teichmüller space
In this appendix, we establish convergence in Teichmüller space under weak convergence in \(W^{2,2}\), as it was used in Theorem 1.3.
Proposition 5.1
Let \(f_m, f: {\Sigma }\rightarrow {\mathbb R}^n\) be smooth immersions of a closed, orientable surface with
where
Then the pull-back metrics \(g_m := f_m^* { g_{{\mathbb R}^n} }\) differ from unit volume constant curvature metrics \({ g_{{ poin },m} }:= e^{-2 u_m} g_m\) by a bounded conformal factor for \(m\) large, more precisely
and
Proof
By the weak convergence in \(W^{2,2}({\Sigma },{\mathbb R}^n)\) we get in local charts
after passing to an appropriate subsequence. By Egoroff’s theorem, we can select for any \(\varepsilon > 0\) a Borel subset \(B_\varepsilon \subseteq \Sigma \) with
Then
and
hence
and by (5.1)
By the Li–Yau inequality, see [7, Theorem 6], we get that \(f_m \hbox { and } f\) are embeddings for large \(m\). Again by the weak convergence in \(W^{2,2}({\Sigma },{\mathbb R}^n)\)
and hence we may assume
for some \(R < \infty \). Clearly \(f\) is not constant, hence \(0 < osc\ f \leftarrow osc\ f_m \le 2 R\) and by [14, Lemma 1.1]
for some \(0 < c_0 \le C(n) < \infty \). After passing to a subsequence, we get
and again by monotonicity formula, we get as in [14, Theorem 3.1]
hence by (5.4)
Next by Allard’s integral compactness theorem, see [1, Theorem 6.4] or [13, Remark 42.8], and (5.1), we get that \(\mu \) is an integral varifold and has weak mean curvature in \(L^2(\mu )\), more precisely by lower semicontinuity
Then by the Li–Yau inequality in [7] or [5, (A.17)]
hence \(\theta ^2(\mu ) = 1 \hbox { alomost everywhere with respect to } \mu \). Then by (5.5) we get \({ \mathcal{H}^2 }\lfloor f(\Sigma ) = \mu \) and
Combining (5.1), (5.5) and (5.6), we see
and obtain from [11, Proposition 2.4] that the smooth unit volume constant curvature metrics \({ g_{{ poin },m} }= e^{-2 u_m} g_m\) conformal to \(g_m\) satisfy
for \(m\) large, which establishes (5.2).
Then by standard weak compactness, see [11, Proposition 6.1], there exist diffeomorphisms \(\phi _m: {\Sigma }\mathop {\longrightarrow }\limits ^{\approx } {\Sigma }\), such that for \(\tilde{f}_m := f_m \circ \phi _m, \tilde{g}_m := \tilde{f}_m^* { g_{{\mathbb R}^n} }= e^{2 \tilde{u}_m} { \tilde{g}_{{ poin },m} }, { \tilde{g}_{{ poin },m} }\) a unit volume constant curvature metric,
to some smooth unit volume constant curvature metric \({ \tilde{g}_{{ poin }} }\), and in particular
For \(\tilde{p}_m \rightarrow \tilde{p} \in {\Sigma }\), we get by compactness of \({\Sigma }\) that \(\phi _m(\tilde{p}_m) \rightarrow p \in {\Sigma }\) for a subsequence, hence with (5.4),
Firstly for \(\tilde{p}_m = \tilde{p}\), we get \(\tilde{f}({\Sigma }) \subseteq f({\Sigma })\). Secondly for \(\tilde{p}_m := \phi _m^{-1}(p) \hbox { and } \tilde{p}_m \rightarrow \tilde{p}\) for a subsequence, we get \(\tilde{f}({\Sigma }) \supseteq f({\Sigma })\), and together
We have already seen that \(f\) is an embedding, in particular it is injective and \(f^{-1}: f({\Sigma }) \rightarrow {\Sigma }\) is smooth. Then \(\phi := f^{-1} \circ \tilde{f}: {\Sigma }\rightarrow {\Sigma }\in W^{2,2}({\Sigma }) \cap W^{1,\infty }({\Sigma })\) and \(p = (f^{-1} \circ \tilde{f})(\tilde{p}) = \phi (\tilde{p})\) is uniquely determined in (5.8), hence
and \(\tilde{f} = f \circ \phi \). For the smooth unit volume constant curvature metric \({ g_{{ poin }} }= e^{-2u} g = e^{-2u} f^* { g_{{\mathbb R}^n} }\) for some smooth \(u\), we calculate by above
Then \(\phi : ({\Sigma },{ \tilde{g}_{{ poin }} }) \rightarrow ({\Sigma },{ g_{{ poin }} })\) is conformal, in particular satisfies the Cauchy–Riemann equations in local conformal charts with respect to \({ g_{{ poin }} }\hbox { and } { \tilde{g}_{{ poin }} }\), hence is harmonic and smooth. Then \(\tilde{f} = f \circ \phi \) is smooth as well, hence an immersion. As \({{\mathcal {W}}}(\tilde{f}) = {{\mathcal {W}}}(f) < 8 \pi \), we see that \(\tilde{f}\) is an embedding by an inequality of Li and Yau [7], in particular \(\tilde{f} \hbox { and hence } \phi \) are injective. Clearly by (5.9), we see
and \(\phi \) is also surjective, hence \(\phi \) is bijective. As \(u, \tilde{u} \in L^\infty ({\Sigma })\) and \(D \phi \) is continuous, we conclude further that \(D \phi \) is of full rank everywhere on \({\Sigma }\), hence \(\phi \) is a diffeomorphism. By (5.11),
Then we can replace \(\phi _m \hbox { by } \phi _m \circ \phi ^{-1}\) and get by (5.10) that \(\phi _m \rightarrow id_{\Sigma }\hbox { uniformly on } {\Sigma }\), in particular \(\phi _m \simeq id_{{\Sigma }} \hbox { for } m\) large and \({ \tilde{g}_{{ poin }} }= { g_{{ poin }} }\) by (5.12). This yields
which establishes (5.3). \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ndiaye, C.B., Schätzle, R.M. Explicit conformally constrained Willmore minimizers in arbitrary codimension. Calc. Var. 51, 291–314 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-013-0675-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-013-0675-8