Skip to main content
Log in

Hybridization of rough set–wrapper method with regularized combinational LSTM for seasonal air quality index prediction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to survive, mankind needs air. The quality of life depends on the purity of the air we breathe in. Hazardous pollutants are stirred up in our environment by various activities everyday. In a developing country like India, which has huge population, protecting public health is important. In general, air quality is measured using the air quality index, which records the pollutants level in the air. These recordings are to be mentioned across various places, to know about the air quality level. The advancement of the recent artificial intelligence can be replaced by the human efforts and to automate the system in flowless manner. Hence, an effort has been taken in this paper, by proposing a framework of predicting the air quality seasonally using regularized combinational LSTM (REG-CLSTM). For an efficient air quality level prediction with an improved error rate, time, and accuracy, the study has implemented Reg-CLSTM with a large amount of real-time dataset. To improvise the comprehensiveness and the potentiality of the proposed model, the significant feature is extracted by the rough set-wrapper method. The significant challenge is to provide a seasonal limit range for each considered pollutant in place of a generalized range partition. Aiming at this problem, the proposed model is able to identify the highest concerning pollutants occurrence in individual seasons. Through this study, pyramid learning-based hybridized deep learning framework is developed which can play a crucial role in warning the policy maker to reduce the activities that instigate air pollution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Algorithm 1
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Used Web sources and cited in the body of the paper wherever necessary.

References

  1. Zhang Y, Wang Y, Gao M, Ma Q, Zhao J, Zhang R, Wang Q, Huang L (2019) A predictive data feature exploration based air quality prediction approach. IEEE Access 7:30732–30743. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2897754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen MH, Nguyen PL, Nguyen K, Le VA, Nguyen TH (2021) PM2.5 prediction using genetic algorithm based feature selection and encoder-decoder model. IEEE Access 9:57338–57350. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3072280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang B, Zhang Y, Jiang X (2022) Feature selection for global tropospheric ozone prediction based on the BO-XGBoost-RFE algorithm. Sci Rep 12:9244. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13498-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu H, Chen C (2020) Spatial air quality index prediction model based on decomposition, adaptive boosting, and three-stage feature selection: A case study in China. J Cleaner Prod 265:121777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao Z, Wu J, Cai F, Zhang S, Wang YG (2022) A statistical learning framework for spatial-temporal feature selection and application to air quality index forecasting. Ecolog Indicat 144:109416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sethi JK, Mittal M (2019) A new feature selection method based on machine learning technique for air quality dataset. J Statist Manag Syst 22:697–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2019.1609726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Acharjya DP, Anitha A (2017) A comparative study of statistical and rough computing models in predictive data analysis. Int J Amb Comput Intell 8:32–51. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJACI.2017040103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tella A, Balogun AL (2022) GIS-based air quality modeling: spatial prediction of PM10 for Selangor State, Malaysia using machine learning algorithms. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:86109–86125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16150-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sethi JK, Mittal M (2021) An efficient correlation based adaptive LASSO regression method for air quality index prediction. Earth Sci Informatics 14:1777–1786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00618-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ketu S (2022) Spatial air quality index and air pollutant concentration prediction using linear regression based recursive feature elimination with random forest regression (RFERF): a case study in India. Natural Hazards 114:2109–2138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05463-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang Y, Xiang Y, Zhao R, Cheng Z (2020) Air quality prediction using improved PSO-BP neural network. IEEE Access 8:99346–99353. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shishegaran A, Saeedi M, Kumar A, Ghiasinejad H (2020) Prediction of air quality in Tehran by developing the nonlinear ensemble model. J Cleaner Prod 259:120825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang YN, Kong T (2019) Air quality predictive modeling based on an improved decision tree in a weather-smart grid. IEEE Access 7:172892–172901. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2956599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee M, Lin L, Chen CY, Tsao Y, Yao TH, Fei MH, Fang SH (2020) Forecasting air quality in Taiwan by using machine learning. Sci Rep 10:4153. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61151-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu B, Jin Y, Li C (2021) Analysis and prediction of air quality in Nanjing from autumn 2018 to summer 2019 using PCR-SVR-ARMA combined model. Sci Rep 11:348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79462-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Anitha A, Acharjya DP (2021) Agriculture crop suitability prediction using rough set on intuitionistic fuzzy approximation space and neural network. Fuzzy Information Eng 11:64–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/16168658.2021.1886813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anitha A, Acharjya DP (2016) Customer choice of super markets using fuzzy rough set on two universal sets and radial basis function neural network. Int J Intell Information Technol 12:20–37. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJIIT.2016070102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao Z, Qin J, He Z, Li H, Yang Y, Zhang R (2020) Combining forward with recurrent neural networks for hourly air quality prediction in Northwest of China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:28931–28948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08948-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang J, Jin L, Li X, He S, Huang M, Wang H (2022) A hybrid air quality index prediction model based on CNN and attention gate unit. IEEE Access 10:113343–113354. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3217242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim D, Han H, Wang W, Kang Y, Lee H, Kim HS (2022) Application of deep learning models and network method for comprehensive air-quality index prediction. Appl Sci 12:6699. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang J, Li H, Yang H, Wang Y (2021) Intelligent multivariable air-quality forecasting system based on feature selection and modified evolving interval type-2 quantum fuzzy neural network. Environ Pollut 274:116429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Janarthanan R, Partheeban P, Somasundaram K, Elamparithi PN (2021) A deep learning approach for prediction of air quality index in a metropolitan city. Sustain Cities Soc 67:102720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang Y, Ying JJC, Tseng VS (2021) Spatio-attention embedded recurrent neural network for air quality prediction. Knowl Based Syst 233:107416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Song C, Wang L, Hou J, Xu Z, Huang Y (2021) The optimized GRNN based on the FDS-FOA under the hesitant fuzzy environment and its application in air quality index prediction. Appl Intell 51:8365–8376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02350-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaya K, Gunduz Oguducu S (2020) Deep flexible sequential (DFS) model for air pollution forecasting. Sci Rep 10:3346. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60102-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiao F, Yang F, Fan H, Fan G, Al-qaness MAA (2020) An improved deep learning model for predicting daily PM2.5 concentration. Sci Rep 10:20988. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77757-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chae S, Shin J, Kwon S, Lee S, Kang S, Lee D (2020) PM10 and PM2.5 real-time prediction models using an interpolated convolutional neural network. Sci Rep 11:11952. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91253-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang J, Li X, Jin L, Li J, Sun O, Wang H (2022) An air quality index prediction model based on CNN-ILSTM. Sci Rep 12:8373. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12355-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tishya M, Anitha A (2023) Forecasting Air Quality Index based on Stacked LSTM in IEEE 7th international conference on recent advances and innovations in engineering (ICRAIE) Mangalore, India, 7:326–330. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRAIE56454.2022.10054260

  30. Tishya M, Anitha A (2023) Deep ensemble-based approach using randomized low-rank approximation for sustainable groundwater level prediction. Appl Sci 13:3210. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tishya M, Anitha A (2023) Precipitation prediction by integrating rough set on Fuzzy approximation space with deep learning techniques. Appl Soft Comput 139:110253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Information Sci 11:341–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01001956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Anitha A, Acharjya DP (2015) Neural network and rough set hybrid scheme for prediction of missing associations. Int J Bioinform Res Appl 11:503–524. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBRA.2015.073237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao Z, Wu J, Cai F, Zhang S, Wang YG (2023) A hybrid deep learning framework for air quality prediction with spatial autocorrelation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Rep 13:1015. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28287-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang J, Yan R, Nong M, Liao J, Li F, Sun W (2021) PM2.5 concentrations forecasting in Beijing through deep learning with different inputs, model structures and forecast time. Atmos Pollut Res 12(9):101168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2021.101168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Du W, Chen L, Wang H, Shan Z, Zhou Z, Li W, Wang Y (2023) Deciphering urban traffic impacts on air quality by deep learning and emission inventory. J Environ Sci 124:745–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.12.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ahmed M, Shen Y, Ahmed M, Xiao Z, Cheng P, Ali N, Ghaffer A, Ali S (2022) AQE-net: a deep learning model for estimating air quality of Karachi City from mobile images. Remote Sensng 14:5732. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu Z, Zhao W, Lv Y (2022) An ensemble LSTM-based AQI forecasting model with decomposition-reconstruction technique via CEEMDAN and fuzzy entropy. Air Quality Atmos Health 15:2299–2311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-022-01252-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cheng X, Zhang W, Wenzel A, Chen J (2022) Stacked ResNet-LSTM and CORAL model for multi-site air quality prediction. Neural Comput Appl 34(16):13849–13866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07175-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Luo J, Gong Y (2023) Air pollutant prediction based on ARIMA-WOA-LSTM model. Atmos Pollut Res 14(6):101761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2023.101761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Drewil GI, Al-Bahadili RJ (2022) Air pollution prediction using LSTM deep learning and metaheuristics algorithms. Measure Sens 24:100546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2022.100546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wu H, Yang T, Li H, Zhou Z (2023) Air quality prediction model based on mRMR-RF feature selection and ISSA-LSTM. Sci Rep 13(1):12825. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39838-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both the authors have equal contribution.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Anitha.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

Not Applicable.

Consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manna, T., Anitha, A. Hybridization of rough set–wrapper method with regularized combinational LSTM for seasonal air quality index prediction. Neural Comput & Applic 36, 2921–2940 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-09220-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-09220-6

Keywords

Navigation