Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coupling artificial neural networks with the artificial bee colony algorithm for global calibration of hydrological models

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydrological models are widely used tools in water resources management. Their successful application requires an efficient calibration of the model parameters. Nowadays, there are very powerful global search methods applied to this end, but they have the disadvantage of presenting a high computational cost, because the numerical model to be calibrated needs to be evaluated a large number of times with different parameter sets. In this context, surrogate models can reduce significantly the run time of hydrological models, easing the total computational burden of global search methods. In the present work, we propose and explore the combination of a swarm intelligence-based optimization method, the artificial bee colony algorithm, with a surrogate model based on artificial neural networks in order to calibrate hydrological models. The proposed approach (ABC-ANN) is applied to the calibration and validation of a nine-parameter continuous hydrological model in two basins located in the northwest of Spain. Several aspects of the algorithm are evaluated, including its capability to calibrate the model parameters and its efficiency in terms of CPU time compared to a standard implementation of the ABC algorithm. Results show that the ABC-ANN algorithm is able to identify the location of suitable parameter sets with an accuracy rate within 89 and 99 %, and a reduction in CPU time of more than three orders of magnitude when compared to a sequential implementation. In addition, the frequency distribution of the parameter sets identified gives valuable information about the sensitivity of model output to the input parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The meteorological data were obtained from the agency MeteoGalicia. The discharge data have been provided by the regional water administration Augas de Galicia.

References

  1. Refsgaard JC, Storm B (1990) Construction, calibration and validation of hydrological models. In Distributed hydrological modelling, pp 41–54. Springer

  2. Jin Xiaoli, Chong-Yu Xu, Zhang Qi, Singh VP (2010) Parameter and modeling uncertainty simulated by glue and a formal bayesian method for a conceptual hydrological model. J Hydrol 383(3–4):147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang T, Hsu K, Duan Q, Sorooshian S, Wang C (2018) Method to estimate optimal parameters. Handbook of hydrometeorological ensemble forecasting

  4. Huo Jiuyuan, Liu Liqun (2019) Application research of multi-objective artificial bee colony optimization algorithm for parameters calibration of hydrological model. Neural Comput Appl 31(9):4715–4732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kavetski D (2018) Parameter estimation and predictive uncertainty quantification in hydrological modelling. In Handbook of hydrometeorological ensemble forecasting, Springer

  6. Li Zejun, Liu Pan, Deng Chao, Guo Shenglian, He Ping, Wang Caijun (2016) Evaluation of estimation of distribution algorithm to calibrate computationally intensive hydrologic model. J Hydrol Eng 21(6):04016012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Madsen H, Rosbjerg D (2006) Comparison of parameter estimation algorithms in hydrological modelling. Calibration Reliab Groundwater Model: From Uncertain Decis Making 1(304):67

    Google Scholar 

  8. Madsen Henrik (2000) Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. J Hydrol 235(3–4):276–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Holland John Henry et al (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. MIT press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang QJ (1991) The genetic algorithm and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour Res 27(9):2467–2471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirkpatrick Scott (1984) Optimization by simulated annealing: quantitative studies. J Stat Phys 34(5–6):975–986

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Granville Vincent, Krivánek Mirko, Rasson J-P (1994) Simulated annealing: a proof of convergence. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 16(6):652–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duan Qingyun, Sorooshian Soroosh, Gupta Vijai (1992) Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resou Res 28(4):1015–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Duan Qingyun, Sorooshian Soroosh, Gupta Vijai K (1994) Optimal use of the sce-ua global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. J Hydrol 158(3–4):265–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of ICNN’95-International Conference on Neural Networks, vol 4, pp 1942–1948. IEEE

  16. Eberhart Russell C, Shi Yuhui, Kennedy James (2001) Swarm intelligence. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kennedy J (2006) Swarm intelligence. In Handbook of nature-inspired and innovative computing, pp 187–219. Springer

  18. Dorigo Marco, Birattari Mauro, Stutzle Thomas (2006) Ant colony optimization. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 1(4):28–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Afshar Abbas, Massoumi Fariborz, Afshar Amin, Mariño Miquel A (2015) State of the art review of ant colony optimization applications in water resource management. Water Resour Manag 29(11):3891–3904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical report, Technical report-tr06, Erciyes university, engineering faculty, engineering department

  21. Karaboga Dervis, Basturk Bahriye (2007) A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (abc) algorithm. J Global Optim 39(3):459–471

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Razavi S, Tolson BA, Burn DH (2012) Review of surrogate modeling in water resources. Water Resour Res 48(7)

  23. Mugunthan P, Shoemaker CA (2006) Assessing the impacts of parameter uncertainty for computationally expensive groundwater models. Water Resour Res 42(10)

  24. Khu S-T, Savic D, Liu Y, Madsen H (2004) A fast evolutionary-based meta-modelling approach for the calibration of a rainfall-runoff model. paper presented at The First Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling Software Society, Osnabruck, Germany

  25. Shoemaker Christine A, Regis Rommel G, Fleming Ryan C (2007) Watershed calibration using multistart local optimization and evolutionary optimization with radial basis function approximation. Hydrol Sci J 52(3):450–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang Xuesong, Srinivasan Raghavan, Van Liew Michael (2009) Approximating swat model using artificial neural network and support vector machine 1. JAWRA J Am Water Res Assoc 45(2):460–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bermúdez María, Cea Luis, Sopelana Javier (2019) Quantifying the role of individual flood drivers and their correlations in flooding of coastal river reaches. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 33(10):1851–1861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bermúdez María, Cea Luis, Puertas Jerónimo (2019) A rapid flood inundation model for hazard mapping based on least squares support vector machine regression. J Flood Risk Manag 12:e12522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sopelana J, Cea L, Ruano S (2018) A continuous simulation approach for the estimation of extreme flood inundation in coastal river reaches affected by meso-and macrotides. Natural Hazards 93(3):1337–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shrestha DL, Kayastha N, Solomatine DP (2009) A novel approach to parameter uncertainty analysis of hydrological models using neural networks. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13(7):1235–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liong Shie-Yui, Khu Soon-Thiam, Chan Weng-Tat (2001) Derivation of pareto front with genetic algorithm and neural network. J Hydrol Eng 6(1):52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Huo Jiuyuan, Liu Liqun, Zhang Yaonan (2016) Comparative research of optimization algorithms for parameters calibration of watershed hydrological model. J Comput Methods Sci Eng 16(3):653–669

    Google Scholar 

  33. Okkan U, GedïK N (2018) Evaluation of population based evolutionary optimization algorithms in the conceptual hydrological model calibration. In Gastescu, P., Bretcan, P.(edit, 2018), Water resources and wetlands, 4th International Conference Water resources and wetlands, pp 5–9

  34. Anılan Tuğçe, Uzlu Ergun, Kankal Murat, Yuksek Omer (2018) The estimation of flood quantiles in ungauged sites using teaching-learning based optimization and artificial bee colony algorithms. Scientia Iranica 25(2):632–645

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hossain Md Shabbir, El-Shafie Ahmed, Mahzabin Mst Sadia, Zawawi Mohd Hafiz (2018) System performances analysis of reservoir optimization-simulation model in application of artificial bee colony algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 30(7):2101–2112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhao J, Lv L, Sun H (2015) Artificial bee colony using opposition-based learning. In Genetic and evolutionary computing, pp 3–10. Springer

  37. Cho E (2008) Wavelet network. In: Jørgensen Sven Erik, Fath Brian D (eds) Encyclopedia of ecology. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 3759–3764

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Farfán Juan F, Palacios Karina, Ulloa Jacinto, Avilés Alex (2020) A hybrid neural network-based technique to improve the flow forecasting of physical and data-driven models: Methodology and case studies in andean watersheds. J Hydrol: Reg Stud 27:100652

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shaw Amelia R, Sawyer Heather Smith, LeBoeuf Eugene J, McDonald Mark P, Hadjerioua Boualem (2017) Hydropower optimization using artificial neural network surrogate models of a high-fidelity hydrodynamics and water quality model. Water Resour Res 53(11):9444–9461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chu Haibo, Wenyan Wu QJ, Wang Rory Nathan, Wei Jiahua (2020) An ann-based emulation modelling framework for flood inundation modelling: application, challenges and future directions. Environ Model Softw 124:104587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cea L, Fraga I (2018) Incorporating antecedent moisture conditions and intraevent variability of rainfall on flood frequency analysis in poorly gauged basins. Water Resour Res 54(11):8774–8791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cabalar Fuentes M (2005) Los temporales de lluvia y viento en galicia. propuesta de clasificación y análisis de tendencias (1961-2001). Investigaciones geográficas, (36): 103-118

  43. Liang Jin, Melching Charles S (2015) Experimental evaluation of the effect of storm movement on peak discharge. Int J Sediment Res 30(2):167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Brocca L, Melone F, Moramarco T (2011) Distributed rainfall-runoff modelling for flood frequency estimation and flood forecasting. Hydrol Process 25(18):2801–2813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Camici S, Tarpanelli A, Brocca L, Melone F, Moramarco T (2011) Design soil moisture estimation by comparing continuous and storm-based rainfall-runoff modeling. Water Resour Res 47(5)

  46. Brocca L, Liersch S, Melone F, Moramarco T, Volk M (2013) Application of a model-based rainfall-runoff database as efficient tool for flood risk management. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(8):3159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hoffmann Lucien, El Idrissi Abdelkhalak, Pfister Laurent, Hingray Benoît, Guex Frédéric, Musy André, Humbert Joël, Drogue Gilles, Leviandier Thierry (2004) Development of regionalized hydrological models in an area with short hydrological observation series. River Res Appl 20(3):243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ritter Axel, Muñoz-Carpena Rafael (2013) Performance evaluation of hydrological models: Statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments. J Hydrol 480:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Moriasi Daniel N, Arnold Jeffrey G, Van Liew Michael W, Bingner Ronald L, Daren Harmel R, Veith Tamie L (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tkacz Greg, Sarah Hu et al (1999) Forecasting GDP growth using artificial neural networks. Citeseer, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  51. Raut P, Dani A (2020) Correlation between number of hidden layers and accuracy of artificial neural network. In Advanced Computing Technologies and Applications, pp 513–521. Springer

  52. Günther Frauke, Fritsch Stefan (2010) neuralnet: Training of neural networks. The R J 2(1):30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. MacKay David JC (1992) Bayesian methods for adaptive models. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology

  54. Wang Wen, Van Gelder Pieter HAJM, Vrijling JK (2007) Comparing bayesian regularization and cross-validated early-stopping for streamflow forecasting with ann models. IAHS Publ-Ser Proc Rep 311:216–221

    Google Scholar 

  55. Karaboga Dervis, Akay Bahriye (2009) A comparative study of artificial bee colony algorithm. Appl Math Comput 214(1):108–132

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Qin Quande, Cheng Shi, Zhang Qingyu, Li Li, Shi Yuhui (2015) Artificial bee colony algorithm with time-varying strategy. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2015

  57. Beven Keith (2006) A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. J Hydrol 320(1–2):18–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Cea Luis, Legout Cedric, Grangeon Thomas, Nord Guillaume (2016) Impact of model simplifications on soil erosion predictions: application of the glue methodology to a distributed event-based model at the hillslope scale. Hydrol Process 30(7):1096–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Fraga Ignacio, Cea Luis, Puertas Jerónimo (2019) Effect of rainfall uncertainty on the performance of physically based rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol Process 33(1):160–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Vrugt Jasper A, Ter Braak Cajo JF, Gupta Hoshin V, Robinson Bruce A (2009) Equifinality of formal (dream) and informal (glue) bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling? Stochastic Environ Res Risk Assess 23(7):1011–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study is financed by the Galician government (Xunta de Galicia) as part of its pre-doctoral fellowship program (Axudas de apoio á etapa predoutoral 2019) Register No ED481A-2019/014.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental and Water Engineering Group, Department of Civil Engineering, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain

    Juan F. Farfán & Luis Cea

Authors
  1. Juan F. Farfán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luis Cea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Juan F. Farfán Durán, and Luis Cea Gómez. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Juan F. Farfán Durán, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan F. Farfán.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farfán, J.F., Cea, L. Coupling artificial neural networks with the artificial bee colony algorithm for global calibration of hydrological models. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 8479–8494 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05601-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05601-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation