Skip to main content
Log in

Fuzzy back-propagation network approach for estimating the simulation workload

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimating the time required for simulating a factory online is a crucial topic in manufacturing. However, this topic has rarely been discussed. A fuzzy back-propagation network (FBPN) approach for estimating the workload of a simulation task according to the required simulation time is proposed in this paper. In the proposed FBPN approach, tasks for which simulation times cannot be effectively estimated are considered as outliers and excluded, and therefore, more appropriate lower and upper bounds on the simulation time can be set. Thus, the ranges of all simulation times can be efficiently narrowed; however, this decrease is achieved at the expense of a slight decrease in the hit rate, which is still tolerable. A real case containing data of 90 simulation tasks was used to validate the proposed methodology. In addition, two existing FBPN methods, the adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system method and the Chen (Comput Ind Eng 66:834–848, [2013]) method, were applied to these tasks for comparison. The experimental results showed that the proposed methodology was superior to the two existing FBPN methods in estimating precision and accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zott C (2003) Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study. Strateg Manag J 24(2):97–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen T (2014) Strengthening the competitiveness and sustainability of a semiconductor manufacturer with cloud manufacturing. Sustainability 6:251–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fujimoto RM (1987) Performance measurements of distributed simulation strategies. Defense Technical Information Center, Fort Belvoir

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amin MB, Vinnakota B (1999) Data parallel fault simulation. IEEE Trans Very Large Scale Integr Syst 7(2):183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Majumdar A, Ochieng WY (2007) Factors affecting air traffic controller workload: multivariate analysis based on simulation modeling of controller workload. J Transp Res Rec J 1788:58–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meng W, Zhao G (2014) Effects of key simulation parameters on conical ring rolling process. Procedia Eng 81:286–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Horikawa SI, Furuhashi T, Uchikawa Y (1992) On fuzzy modeling using fuzzy neural networks with the back-propagation algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3(5):801–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen T (2003) A fuzzy back propagation network for output time prediction in a wafer fab. Appl Soft Comput 2(3):211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jang JS (1992) Self-learning fuzzy controllers based on temporal backpropagation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3(5):714–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen T, Lin YC (2011) A collaborative fuzzy-neural approach for internal due date assignment in a wafer fabrication plant. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 7(9):5193–5210

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen T (2013) An effective fuzzy collaborative forecasting approach for predicting the job cycle time in wafer fabrication. Comput Ind Eng 66:834–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zimmermann HJ (1991) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Tesauro G (1995) Temporal difference learning and TD-Gammon. Commun ACM 38(3):58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hans Raj K, Sharma RS, Srivastava S, Patvardhan C (2000) Modeling of manufacturing processes with ANNs for intelligent manufacturing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(6):851–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonnans JF, Gilbert JC, Lemaréchal C, Sagastizábal CA (2006) Numerical optimization: theoretical and practical aspects. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Benardos PG, Vosniakos GC (2002) Prediciton of surface roughness in CNC face milling using neural networks and Taguchi’s design of experiments. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 18(5–6):343–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sukthomya W, Tannock J (2005) The optimization of neural network parameters using Taguchi’s design of experiments approach: an application in manufacturing process modeling. Neural Comput Appl 14(4):337–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen T (2009) A fuzzy-neural knowledge-based system for job completion time prediction and internal due date assignment in a wafer fabrication plant. Int J Syst Sci 40(8):889–902

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Jang JS (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23(3):665–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen T, Romanowski R (2013) Precise and accurate job cycle time forecasting in a wafer fabrication factory with a fuzzy data mining approach. Math Probl Eng 2013:1–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tin-Chih Toly Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toly Chen, TC. Fuzzy back-propagation network approach for estimating the simulation workload. Neural Comput & Applic 27, 1707–1715 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1967-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1967-z

Keywords

Navigation