Skip to main content
Log in

It was just mind blowing to be honest: a qualitative phenomenological study exploring cancer survivor’s experiences of indocyanine green lymphography used to inform lymphedema therapy management

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A diagnosis of secondary lymphedema following cancer treatment can necessitate lifelong therapy. Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography is a technique for visualising lymphatics to enable individualised lymphedema diagnosis, staging and therapy prescription. The participant experience of undergoing the procedure and the impact of imaging findings on lymphedema management is unknown. This study aimed to explore participant’s experiences of ICG lymphography to inform cancer-related lymphedema therapy.

Methods

A qualitative phenomenological study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 17 adult participants who had undergone ICG lymphography for stage 0 to 2 upper or lower limb secondary cancer-related lymphedema (International Society of Lymphology, Lymphology 53(1):3–10, 2020).

Results

Seventeen participants were included in the study ranging in age from 36 to 78 years (M = 53.8 years), the majority had a primary diagnosis of breast cancer (N = 7) or melanoma (N = 7). Three overarching themes emerged. Firstly, describing the experience of the ICG lymphography procedure. Secondly, the new knowledge explained symptoms and tailored treatment. Participants reflected on how seeing their lymphatic system helped in understanding about their lymphedema symptoms and guided changes towards more individualised lymphedema management. The final theme described the internal impact of self-knowledge, which included impacts of the new information on empowerment and motivation to self-manage participant’s condition as well as their feelings.

Conclusions

ICG lymphography had beneficial impacts on participant’s understanding of their lymphedema symptoms and often led to changes in management, positive outcomes in response to management changes and peace of mind about management plans, leading to feeling more empowered to self-manage their condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Information is available from the corresponding author on request.

Code availability

N/A

References

  1. Moffatt C, Keeley V, Quéré I (2019) The concept of chronic edema—a neglected public health issue and an international response: the LIMPRINT Study. Lymphat Res Biol 17(2):121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cormier JN et al (2010) Lymphedema beyond breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer-related secondary lymphedema. Cancer 116(22):5138–5149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DiSipio T et al (2013) Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 14(6):500–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beesley VL et al (2015) Incidence, risk factors and estimates of a woman’s risk of developing secondary lower limb lymphedema and lymphedema-specific supportive care needs in women treated for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 136(1):87–93

  5. Dupuy A et al (1999) Risk factors for erysipelas of the leg (cellulitis): case-control study. BMJ 318(7198):1591–1594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shih Y-CT et al (2009) Incidence, treatment costs, and complications of lymphedema after breast cancer among women of working age: a 2-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 27(12):2007–2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organisation (2003) Adherence to long term therapies: Evidence for action. https://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_report/en/. Accessed 1 Oct 2019

  8. Suami H et al (2019) A new indocyanine green fluorescence lymphography protocol for identification of the lymphatic drainage pathway for patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema. BMC Cancer 19(1):985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ogata F et al (2007) Novel lymphography using indocyanine green dye for near-infrared fluorescence labeling. Ann Plast Surg 58(6):652–655

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Unno N et al (2007) Preliminary experience with a novel fluorescence lymphography using indocyanine green in patients with secondary lymphedema. J Vasc Surg 45(5):1016–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee Y-W et al (2018) Lymphatic vessel mapping in the upper extremities of a healthy Korean population. Arch Plast Surg 45(2):152–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Koshima I (2018) Lymphatic vessel diameter in female pelvic cancer-related lower extremity lymphedematous limbs. J Surg Oncol 117(6):1157–1163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamamoto T et al (2011) Characteristic indocyanine green lymphography findings in lower extremity lymphedema: the generation of a novel lymphedema severity staging system using dermal backflow patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(5):1979–1986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamamoto T et al (2011) Indocyanine green-enhanced lymphography for upper extremity lymphedema: a novel severity staging system using dermal backflow patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(4):941–947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamamoto T et al (2013) Indocyanine green velocity: lymph transportation capacity deterioration with progression of lymphedema. Ann Plast Surg 71(5):591–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Suami H et al (2018) Patterns of lymphatic drainage after axillary node dissection impact arm lymphoedema severity: a review of animal and clinical imaging studies. Surg Oncol 27(4):743–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamamoto T et al (2014) Minimally invasive lymphatic supermicrosurgery (MILS): indocyanine green lymphography-guided simultaneous multisite lymphaticovenular anastomoses via millimeter skin incisions. Ann Plast Surg 72(1):67–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamamoto T et al (2014) Near-infrared illumination system-integrated microscope for supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis. Microsurgery 34(1):23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Suzuki Y, Sakuma H, Yamazaki S (2019) Comparison of patency rates of lymphaticovenous anastomoses at different sites for lower extremity lymphedema. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 7(2):222–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Foldi M et al (2012) Földi’s textbook of lymphology: for physicians and lymphedema therapists, 3rd edn. Elsevier Urban & Fischer, München

  21. Liang M et al (2020) Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema in patients after breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine 99(49):e23192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Medina-Rodríguez ME et al (2019) Visualization of accessory lymphatic pathways, before and after manual drainage, in secondary upper limb lymphedema using indocyanine green lymphography. J Clin Med 8(11):1917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zaleska MT, Olszewski WL (2019) The effectiveness of intermittent pneumatic compression in therapy of lymphedema of lower limbs: methods of evaluation and results. Lymphat Res Biol 17(1):60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rockson SG et al (2019) Cancer-associated secondary lymphoedema. Nat Rev Dis Primers 5(1):22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Río-González Á et al (2018) Living with lymphoedema—the perspective of cancer patients: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 26(6):2005–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Black N, Varaganum M, Hutchings A (2014) Relationship between patient reported experience (PREMs) and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) in elective surgery. BMJ Qual Saf 23(7):534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. International Society of Lymphology (2020) The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2020 consensus document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology 53(1):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  28. Britten N (1995) Qualitative research: qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ 311(6999):251–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Suami H et al (2018) Cryogenic numbing to reduce injection discomfort during indocyanine green lymphography. J Reconstr Microsurg 35:31-e2

    Google Scholar 

  30. Graneheim UH, Lundman B (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 24(2):105–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Sandelowski M (1995) Sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health 18(2):179–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Akita S et al (2016) Early detection of lymphatic disorder and treatment for lymphedema following breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 138(2):192e–202e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Boyages J, Koelmeyer LA, Suami H, Lam T, Ngo QD, Heydon-White A, Mackie H (2019) The ALERT model of care for the assessment and personalized management of patients with lymphoedema. Br J Surg 107(3):238–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11368

  35. Brijnath B et al (2016) Do Web-based mental health literacy interventions improve the mental health literacy of adult consumers? Results from a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 18(6):e165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lorig KR, Holman HR (2003) Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med 26(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Linden W et al (2012) Anxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age. J Affect Disord 141(2):343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Grady PA, Gough LL (2014) Self-management: a comprehensive approach to management of chronic conditions. Am J Public Health 104(8):e25–e31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Vignes S et al (2007) Long-term management of breast cancer-related lymphedema after intensive decongestive physiotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101(3):285–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Johnstone PA, Hawkins K, Hood S (2006) Role of patient adherence in maintenance of results after manipulative therapy for lymphedema. J Soc Integr Oncol 4(3):125–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Turner J, Kelly B (2000) Emotional dimensions of chronic disease. West J Med 172(2):124–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Fu MR et al (2013) Psychosocial impact of lymphedema: a systematic review of literature from 2004 to 2011. Psycho-Oncology 22(7):1466–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Corbin J, Strauss A (1985) Managing chronic illness at home: three lines of work. Qual Sociol 8(3):224–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of all participants in this project and the support of the Occupational Therapy Department at the Princess Alexandra Hospital.

Funding

This research was supported by internal funding from the University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AP and MT initiated and developed the research design. MT performed recruitment tasks. MT and AM performed the ICG procedure. ED completed all data collection and led data analysis with involvement from AP and MT. AP and ED drafted final manuscript which was revised by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda Pigott.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was received from hospital (HREC/2019/QMS/49709) and university ethics committees (2019000868/ HREC/2019/QMS/49709). All participants provided informed, written consent.

Consent for publication

All authors have reviewed the final manuscript and provided consent for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pigott, A., Doig, E., McCann, A. et al. It was just mind blowing to be honest: a qualitative phenomenological study exploring cancer survivor’s experiences of indocyanine green lymphography used to inform lymphedema therapy management. Support Care Cancer 29, 6389–6397 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06229-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06229-2

Keywords

Navigation