Abstract
Purpose
Identifying and assessing psychosocial distress with an appropriate screening instrument is essential when caring for cancer patients. Since 2012, the distress thermometer (DT) has been used by nurses for all cancer inpatients at the Comprehensive Cancer Center Zurich. We wanted to identify nurses’ adherence to the screening protocol, differences between screened and not screened patients and the relationship between screening rate and productivity.
Methods
This retrospective descriptive study used screening and referral data as well as socioeconomic and disease-related data of inpatients at the Comprehensive Cancer Center Zurich. This was collected from the electronic patient documentation system. Additionally, data showing the productivity of all wards was used. All data were analyzed descriptive.
Results
Since 2012, 40.6% (4541) of the 11,184 patients have been screened. The screening rate was initially significantly lower but settled at 40% after 2 years. There was a higher screening rate among Swiss, married, male, and emergency patients and patients with hematology diseases, brain tumors, or head and neck cancer (p < 0.001). Every fourth patient with a moderate to severe distress level requested referral to a psychosocial service. Significantly more screened patients were referred to the social service (44.7%) than to the psycho-oncology service (9.4%). Only 22.9% of all referrals were made on the day of screening or a day later. There were only two wards of 15 with a significant relationship between productivity and screening rate.
Conclusions
Screening is useful in recognizing distress among patients, but screening practice needs to be reconsidered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Holland JC, Andersen B, Breitbart WS, Compas B, Dudley MM, Fleishman S, Fulcher CD, Greenberg DB, Greiner CB, Handzo GF, Hoofring L, Jacobsen PB, Knight SJ, Learson K, Levy MH, Loscalzo MJ, Manne S, McAllister-Black R, Riba MB, Roper K, Valentine AD, Wagner LI, Zevon MA, NCCN Distress Management Panel (2010) Distress management. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 8(4):448–485
Feldstain A, Tomei C, Bélanger M, Lebel S (2014) Screening for distress in patients with cancer: methodologic considerations. Curr Oncol 21(2):e330–e333
Mehnert A et al (2006) Assessment of psychosocial distress and resources in oncology--a literature review about screening measures and current developments. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 56(12):462–479
NCCN, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology, in Distress management. 2016: NCCN.org
Götz A, Kröner A, Staudacher D, Spirig R (2017) Einführung des Belastungsthermometers auf einer onkologischen Station. Pflege 30(5):289–297
McCarter K, Britton B, Baker AL, Halpin SA, Beck AK, Carter G, Wratten C, Bauer J, Forbes E, Booth D, Wolfenden L (2018) Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for psychosocial distress: systematic review. BMJ Open 8(1):e017959
Mitchell AJ (2013) Screening for cancer-related distress: when is implementation successful and when is it unsuccessful? Acta Oncol 52(2):216–224
Tondorf T, Grossert A, Rothschild SI, Koller MT, Rochlitz C, Kiss A, Schaefert R, Meinlschmidt G, Hunziker S, Zwahlen D (2018) Focusing on cancer patients’ intentions to use psychooncological support: a longitudinal, mixed-methods study. Psychooncology 27(6):1656–1663
Zebrack B, Kayser K, Bybee D, Padgett L, Sundstrom L, Jobin C, Oktay J (2017) A practice-based evaluation of distress screening protocol adherence and medical service utilization. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 15(7):903–912
Carlson LE, Waller A, Mitchell AJ (2012) Screening for distress and unmet needs in patients with cancer: review and recommendations. J Clin Oncol 30(11):1160–1177
Fulcher CD, Gosselin-Acomb TK (2007) Distress assessment: practice change through guideline implementation. Clin J Oncol Nurs 11(6):817–821
Hahn C, Joo SH, Chae JH, Lee CU, Kim TS (2017) Feasibility of psychosocial distress screening and management program for hospitalized cancer patients. Psychiatry Investig 14(6):734–745
Zebrack B, Kayser K, Sundstrom L, Savas SA, Henrickson C, Acquati C, Tamas RL (2015) Psychosocial distress screening implementation in cancer care: an analysis of adherence, responsiveness, and acceptability. J Clin Oncol 33(10):1165–1170
Chiang AC, Buia Amport S, Corjulo D, Harvey KL, McCorkle R (2015) Incorporating patient-reported outcomes to improve emotional distress screening and assessment in an ambulatory oncology clinic. J Oncol Pract 11(3):219–222
Pretto M, Spirig R, Milisen K, DeGeest S, Regazzoni P, Hasemann W (2009) Effects of an interdisciplinary nurse-led Delirium Prevention and Management Program (DPMP) on nursing workload: a pilot study. Int J Nurs Stud 46(6):804–812
Mitchell AJ, Lord K, Slattery J, Grainger L, Symonds P (2012) How feasible is implementation of distress screening by cancer clinicians in routine clinical care? Cancer 118(24):6260–6269
Mitchell AJ, Vahabzadeh A, Magruder K (2011) Screening for distress and depression in cancer settings: 10 lessons from 40 years of primary-care research. Psychooncology 20(6):572–584
Admiraal JM, van Nuenen FM, Burgerhof JGM, Reyners AKL, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM (2016) Cancer patients' referral wish: effects of distress, problems, socio-demographic and illness-related variables and social support sufficiency. Psychooncology 25(11):1363–1370
Bauwens S, Baillon C, Distelmans W, Theuns P (2014) Systematic screening for distress in oncology practice using the Distress Barometer: the impact on referrals to psychosocial care. Psychooncology 23(7):804–811
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This study was carried out in compliance with the project plan, the current version of the Helsinki Declaration, and Swiss law. The research project was approved by the Cantonal Commission for Ethics in Zurich in December 2016 (BASEC-NR. 2016-01372).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Götz, A., Kröner, A., Jenewein, J. et al. Evaluation of the adherence of distress screening with the distress thermometer in cancer patients 4 years after implementation. Support Care Cancer 27, 2799–2807 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4579-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4579-1