Abstract
Purpose
People with advanced cancer experience different sequelae which have unique effects on quality of life (QOL). The patient-generated index (PGI) is a personalized measure that allows patients to nominate, rate, and value areas that have the most impact on QOL. Fatigue, pain, and aspects of physical function are among the top 10 areas with QOL impact. An area of validation that is lacking for the PGI is the extent to which spontaneously nominated areas of QOL that patients are concerned with, agree with ratings obtained from standard patient reported outcomes (PROs).
Methods
Data from 192 patients were used to compare ratings on fatigue, pain, and physical function obtained from PGI to those from standard outcome measures.
Results
Within one severity rating, agreement ranged from 32.1 to 76.9 % within the fatigue domain, 34.2 to 95.24 % for pain, and between 84.2 and 94.7 % for physical function. Of the 10 items where the PGI had the highest agreement, 7 came from the RAND-36. At the domain level, people nominating an area scored in the more impaired range on standard measures than people who did not.
Conclusion
PGI gives comparable information as do standard measures.
Implications for cancer
PGI provides important information to guide clinical care of the patient and also produces a legitimate total score suitable for research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Smith T et al. (2007) The rationale, design, and implementation of the American Cancer Society’s studies of cancer survivors. Cancer 109(1):1–12
Lehmann JF et al. (1978) Cancer rehabilitation: assessment of need, development, and evaluation of a model of care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 59(9):410–419
Ness KK et al. (2006) Physical performance limitations and participation restrictions among cancer survivors: a population-based study. Ann Epidemiol 16(3):197–205
Zucca A et al. (2015) Medical oncology patients: are they offered help and does it provide relief? J Pain Symptom Manag 50(4):436–444
Aburub AS et al. (2016) Using a personalized measure (Patient Generated Index (PGI)) to identify what matters to people with cancer. Support Care Cancer 24(1):437–445
Donnelly S, Walsh D (1995) The symptoms of advanced cancer. Semin Oncol 22(2 Suppl 3):67–72
Morrow GR et al. (2005) Management of cancer-related fatigue. Cancer Investig 23(3):229–239
Mayo NE et al. (2014) Pedometer-facilitated walking intervention shows promising effectiveness for reducing cancer fatigue: a pilot randomized trial. Clin Rehabil 28(12):1198–1209
Cramp, F. and J. Daniel, Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2008(2): p. Cd006145.
Cancer-related fatigue. (2003) Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 1(3):308–331
Network, N.C.C., Clinical practice guidelines in oncology—cancer-related fatigue., 2009. V2.2009.
Di Maio M et al. (2004) Prevalence and management of pain in Italian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 90(12):2288–2296
Stromgren AS et al. (2004) Pain characteristics and treatment outcome for advanced cancer patients during the first week of specialized palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manag 27(2):104–113
Knudsen AK et al. (2009) Classification of pain in cancer patients—a systematic literature review. Palliat Med 23(4):295–308
Kocoglu H et al. (2002) Cancer pain, pathophysiology, characteristics and syndromes. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 23(6):527–532
Lunney JR et al. (2003) Patterns of functional decline at the end of life. JAMA 289(18):2387–2392
Friedenreich CM, Orenstein MR (2002) Physical activity and cancer prevention: etiologic evidence and biological mechanisms. J Nutr 132(11 Suppl):3456S–3464S
McMichael AJ (2008) Food, nutrition, physical activity and cancer prevention. Authoritative report from World Cancer Research Fund provides global update. Public Health Nutr 11(7):762–763
McTiernan A (2008) Mechanisms linking physical activity with cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 8(3):205–211
Midtgaard J et al. (2015) Cancer survivors’ experience of exercise-based cancer rehabilitation—a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Acta Oncol 54(5):609–617
Salakari MR et al. (2015) Effects of rehabilitation among patients with advances cancer: a systematic review. Acta Oncol 54(5):618–628
Weis J, Giesler JM (2014) Rehabilitation for cancer patients. Recent Results Cancer Res 197:87–101
Dimoska A et al. (2008) Can a “prompt list” empower cancer patients to ask relevant questions? Cancer 113(2):225–237
Group EQOL (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3):199–208
Gudex C et al. (1996) Health state valuations from the general public using the visual analogue scale. Qual Life Res 5(6):521–531
Ware JE Jr (2000) SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(24):3130–3139
Aaronson NK et al. (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376
Cella DF et al. (1993) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11(3):570–579
Ribaudo JM et al. (2000) Re-validation and shortening of the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) questionnaire. Qual Life Res 9(10):1137–1146
Cohen SR, Mount BM (2000) Living with cancer: “good” days and “bad” days–what produces them? Can the McGill quality of life questionnaire distinguish between them? Cancer 89(8):1854–1865
Cohen SR et al. (1997) Validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire in the palliative care setting: a multi-centre Canadian study demonstrating the importance of the existential domain. Palliat Med 11(1):3–20
Cohen SR et al. (1995) The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire: a measure of quality of life appropriate for people with advanced disease. A preliminary study of validity and acceptability. Palliat Med 9(3):207–219
Bruera E et al. (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7(2):6–9
Ruta DA et al. (1994) A new approach to the measurement of quality of life. The Patient-Generated Index. Med Care 32(11):1109–1126
Hickey AM et al. (1996) A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS. BMJ 313(7048):29–33
Joyce CR et al. (2003) A theory-based method for the evaluation of individual quality of life: the SEIQoL. Qual Life Res 12(3):275–280
Ruta DA, Garratt AM, Russell IT (1999) Patient centred assessment of quality of life for patients with four common conditions. Qual Health Care 8(1):22–29
Phantipa Sakthong P (2014) Win Winit-Watjana, MD2, Kobkan Choopan, MSc (Clin Pharm)3, Usefulness of Patient-Generated Index for HIV to measure individual quality of life: a study from Thailand. V A L U E I N H E A L T H R E G I O N A L I S S U E S 3:101–107
Martin F et al. (2007) Twelve years’ experience with the Patient Generated Index (PGI) of quality of life: a graded structured review. Qual Life Res 16(4):705–715
Machhin, P.M.F.a.D., Qulaity of life, second edition: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patients reported outcomes. 2007.
Rodriguez AM, Mayo NE, Gagnon B (2013) Independent contributors to overall quality of life in people with advanced cancer. Br J Cancer 108(9):1790–1800
Bohannon RW, Wang YC, Gershon RC (2015) Two-minute walk test performance by adults 18 to 85 years: normative values, reliability, and responsiveness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96(3):472–477
Mock V et al. (2007) Cancer-related fatigue. clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 5(10):1054–1078
Tavernier SS, Totten AM, Beck SL (2011) Assessing content validity of the patient generated index using cognitive interviews. Qual Health Res 21(12):1729–1738
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This research was supported by a grant from the Terry Fox Research Institute and by the Cancer Research Society/Rob Lutterman Pancreatic Cancer Research Grant. B Gagnon is a recipient of “Chercheur-clinicien Boursier” award from Fond de Recherche Santé Québec, Québec, Canada.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplemental Table 1
(DOC 50 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aburub, A.S., Gagnon, B., Rodríguez, A.M. et al. Agreement between personally generated areas of quality of life concern and standard outcome measures in people with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 24, 3831–3838 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3204-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3204-4