Skip to main content
Log in

Cancer-associated hypercalcemia: validation of a bedside prognostic score

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Until now, there was no validated and reliable tool to estimate life expectancy among patients with cancer-associated hypercalcemia (CAH). This study aimed to validate a prognostic score previously published.

Methods

We studied a new cohort of 252 patients with CAH. Our prognostic score based on the four poor-prognosis factors (liver metastasis, squamous cell carcinoma, hypoalbuminemia, and calcemia >2.83 mmol) was implemented to this cohort. The accuracy of this score for the prediction of 90-day mortality was estimated with area under the curve of the receiver operator curve (AUC-ROC).

Results

Among this validation cohort, patients with score = 0 experienced a median overall survival of 797 days; whereas, patients with score ≥1 (at least one poor-prognosis factor) had median overall survival of 49 days (p < 0.0001). The AUC-ROC for the prediction of 90-day mortality were 0.88 (0.76–0.86) and 0.67 (0.61–0.74) in the development cohort and in the validation cohort, respectively.

Conclusion

We have validated a reliable bedside prognostic score for CAH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Augustson BM, Begum G, Dunn JA et al (2005) Early mortality after diagnosis of multiple myeloma analysis of patients entered onto the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials between 1980 and 2002—Medical Research Council Adult Leukemia Working Party. J Clin Oncol 23:9219–9226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Body JJ, Borkowski A, Cleeren A, Bijvoet OL (1986) Treatment of malignancy-associated hypercalcemia with intravenous aminohydroxypropylidene diphosphonate. J Clin Oncol 4:1177–1183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cvitkovic F, Armand JP, Tubiana-Hulin M, Rossi JF, Warrell RP Jr (2006) Randomized, double-blind, phase II trial of gallium nitrate compared with pamidronate for acute control of cancer-related hypercalcemia. Cancer J 12:47–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Major P, Lhortolary A, Hon J et al (2001) Zoledronic acid is superior to pamidronate in the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy: a pooled analysis of two-randomized controlled clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 19:558–567

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nussbaum SR, Younger J, Vandepol CJ et al (1993) Single-dose intravenous therapy with pamidronate for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy: comparison of 30-, 60-, and 90-mg dosages. Am J Med 95:297–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Penel N, Dewas S, Doutrelant P, Clisant S, Yazdanpanah Y, Adenis A (2008) Cancer-associated hypercalcemia treated by intravenous diphosphonates: a survival and prognostic factor analysis. Support Care Cancer 16:387–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Penel N, Vanseymortier M, Bonneterre ME et al (2008) Prognostic factors among patients with good performance status screened for phase I trials. Invest New Drugs 26:53–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rades D, Dunst J, Schild SE (2008) The first score predicting overall survival in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression. Cancer 112:157–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rassi A Jr, Rassi A, Little WC et al (2006) Development and validation of a risk score for predicting death in Chaga’s heart disease. N Engl J Med 355:799–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sather H (1986) The use of prognostic factors in clinical trials. Cancer 58:461–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tanko LB, Karsdal MA, Christiansen C, Leeming DJ (2006) Biochemical approach to the detection and monitoring of metastatic bone disease: what do we know and what questions need answers? Cancer Metastasis Rev 25:659–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vinholes J, Guo CY, Purohit OP, Eastell R, Coleman RE (1997) Evaluation of new bone resorption markers in a randomized comparison of pamidronate or clodronate for hypercalcemia of malignancy. J Clin Oncol 15:131–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Penel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Penel, N., Dewas, S., Hoffman, A. et al. Cancer-associated hypercalcemia: validation of a bedside prognostic score. Support Care Cancer 17, 1133–1135 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0607-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0607-5

Keywords

Navigation