Skip to main content
Log in

Retrospective evaluation of weekly paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions reported utilizing an electronic medical record system at a tertiary cancer center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This is a retrospective observational study evaluating hypersensitivity reactions captured by an electronic medical record (EMR) system for weekly paclitaxel infusions.

Materials and methods

The study evaluates the demographics, co-morbidities, premedications, chemotherapy agents, and postmedications of patients reporting a hypersensitivity reaction to weekly infusions of paclitaxel at a major cancer center, from June 2006 to December 2007. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. P values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

There were 51 hypersensitivity reactions in 36 patients during this time period that were documented in the allergy section of the EMR. Reactions occurred in patients with an average age of 55 years (SD = 10.77); 47 (92%) of the reactions occurred in females, and 42 (82%) of the reactions occurred with orders on the breast medical/surgical service. Thirty-two (63%) reactions occurred with either the first or second dose of weekly paclitaxel infusion. The most common premedication was dexamethasone (50 infusions), followed by diphenhydramine (18 infusions), and cimetidine (14 infusions). Thirty-three (65%) infusions had only one premedication. Postreaction, 41 (80%) cases had diphenhydramine and 30 (59%) cases had hydrocortisone administered prior to restarting the infusion. Logistic regression analysis did not indicate any relationship between history of previous allergies, hypertension, coronary disease, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the number of premedications.

Conclusions

The results indicate that there is substantial variability in the type and number of premedications utilized in the management of paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions. Interventions are needed to decrease the rate of hypersensitivity reactions from weekly paclitaxel infusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akerly W, Sikov WM, Cummings F et al (1997) Weekly high-dose paclitaxel in metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer. A preliminary report. Semin Oncol 24:87–90

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang AY, Boros L, Asbury R et al (1997) Dose-escalation study of weekly 1-hour paclitaxel administration in patients with refractory cancers. Semin Oncol 24:69–71

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dyer AR, Stamler J, Berkson DM et al (1975) High blood-pressure: a risk factor for cancer mortality? Lancet 1:1051–1056. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(75)91826-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goon PKY, Messerli FH, Lip GYH (2006) Hypertension and breast cancer: an association revisited? J Hum Hypertens 20:722–724. doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1002053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Itoh Y, Sendo T, Hirakawa T et al (2004) Role of sensory nerve peptides rather than mast cell histamine in paclitaxel hypersensitivity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169:113–119. doi:10.1164/rccm.200307-901OC

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lau DHM, Ryu J, Gandara D et al (1999) Concurrent twice weekly paclitaxel and thoracic irradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 9:117–120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lenz HJ (2007) Management and preparedness for infusion and hypersensitivity reactions. Oncologist 12:601–609. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.12-5-601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Milani A, DePas T, Noberasco C et al (2007) A 15-min premedication for 1-h paclitaxel infusion: optimizing patients’ care. Lung Cancer 58:300–301. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.08.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. National Cancer Institute (2006) Common terminology criteria for adverse events v3.0 (CTCAE). National Cancer Institute, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  10. Quock J, Dea G, Tanaka M et al (2002) Premedication strategy for weekly paclitaxel. Cancer Invest 20:666–672. doi:10.1081/CNV-120003535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rowinsky EK, Onetto N, Canetta RM et al (1992) Taxol: the first of the taxanes, an important new class of antitumor agents. Semin Oncol 19:646–662

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruiz-Casado A, Calzas J, Garcia J et al (2006) Life-threatening adverse drug reaction to paclitaxel. Postmarketing surveillance. Clin Transl Oncol 8:60–61. doi:10.1007/s12094-006-0098-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sparano JA, Wang M, Martino D et al (2008) Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 358:1663–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. University of Texas M. D. Anderson (2008) Paclitaxel. Lexi-Comp ONLINE, Hudson

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weiss RB, Donehower RC, Wiernik PH et al (1990) Hypersensitivity reaction from taxol. J Clin Oncol 7:1263–1268

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zidan J, Hussein O, Abzah A et al (2008) Oral premedication for the prevention of hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel. Med Oncol 25:274–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Presented as an invited lecture at the Supportive Care in Cancer MASCC/ISOO 2008 International Symposium in Houston, TX, USA on June 26–28, 2008. No funding was available for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lincy S. Lal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lal, L.S., Gerber, D.L., Lau, J. et al. Retrospective evaluation of weekly paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions reported utilizing an electronic medical record system at a tertiary cancer center. Support Care Cancer 17, 1311–1315 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0588-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0588-4

Keywords

Navigation