Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of a modified MASCC index score for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goals of work

This is a prospective and observational study comparing the efficacy of risk-assessment models in patients with neutropenic fever in a reference treatment center. The meaning of the complex infection was evaluated.

Materials and methods

Patients were recruited throughout a 9-month period. Inclusion criteria were histologic diagnosis of malignancy, neutropenic febrile secondary to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (absolute neutrophil count of <500/µl and axillary temperature ≥38°C), and ≥18 years of age.

Main results

Fifty-three febrile neutropenic patients were included. Twenty one of them were classified as low risk by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk-index score. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of the MASCC risk-index scores were, respectively 87.9, 85.0, 90.6, 80.9, and 86.8%. None of the low-risk patients died, but four patients classified as low risk by the MASCC model developed serious medical complications during febrile neutropenic episodes. When we subtracted patients with complex infections from the group of patients with the MASCC risk-index score of ≥21, we got 15 patients that were classified as low risk by a proposed adjustment by complex infection (PACI) model. None of them developed serious medical complications. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and the accuracy of this new model were, respectively, 100, 75.0, 86.8, 100, and 90.6%.

Conclusion

The MASCC risk-index score had high sensitivity and specificity to predict the absence of complications, but the PACI model was better than MASCC for predicting the absence of complications in this febrile neutropenic patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chamilos G, Bamias A, Efstathiou E et al (2005) Outpatient treatment of low-risk neutropenic fever in cancer patients using oral moxifloxacin. Cancer 103(12):2629–2635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cherif H, Johansson E, Bjorkholm M et al (2006) The feasibility of early hospital discharge with oral antimicrobial therapy in low risk patients with febrile neutropenia following chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies. Haematologica 91(2):215–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Donowitz GR, Maki DG, Crnich CJ, et al (2001) Infections in the Neutropenic Patient - New Views of an Old Problem. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY, 43TH., 2001, Orlando. Education Program Book: Hematology (Am Soc Hematol Educ Program):113–139

  4. Elting LS, Rubenstein EB, Rolston KV et al (1997) Outcomes of bacteremia in patients with cancer and neutropenia: Observations from two decades of epidemiological and clinical trials. Clin Infect Dis 25(2):247–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Escalante CP, Weiser MA, Manzullo E et al (2004) Outcomes of treatment pathways in outpatient treatment of low risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 12(9):657–662

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP et al (2002) 2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis 34(6):730–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kern WV (2006) Risk assessment and treatment for low-risk patients with febrile neutropenia. Clin Infect Dis 42(4):533–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Rubenstein EB et al (2000) The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index: A multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 18(16):3038–3051

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nijhuis CO, Kamps WA, Daenen SM et al (2005) Feasibility of withholding antibiotics in selected febrile neutropenic cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 23(30):7437–7444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paesmans M (2000) Risk factors assessment in febrile neutropenia. Int J Antimicrob Agents 16(2):107–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sipsas NV, Bodey GP, Kontoyiannis DP (2005) Perspectives for the management of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer in the 21st century. Cancer 103(6):1103–1113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rolston KV (2003) Oral antibiotic administration and early hospital discharge is a safe and effective alternative for treatment of low-risk neutropenic fever. Cancer Treat Rev 29(6):551–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rolston KV (1999) New trends in patient management: Risk-based therapy for febrile patients with neutropenia. Clin Infect Dis 29(3):515–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Talcott JA, Finberg R, Mayer RJ et al (1988) The medical course of cancer patients with fever and neutropenia. Clinical identification of a low-risk subgroup at presentation. Arch Intern Med 148(12):2561–2568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Uys A, Rapoport BL, Anderson R (2004) Febrile neutropenia: a prospective study to validate the Multinational Association of Supportive Care of Cancer (MASCC) risk-index score. Support Care Cancer 12(8):555–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We are indebted to all members of the Departments of Medical Oncology and Internal Hematology of the Felicio Rocho Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano de Souza Viana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Souza Viana, L., Serufo, J.C., da Costa Rocha, M.O. et al. Performance of a modified MASCC index score for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 16, 841–846 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0347-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0347-3

Keywords

Navigation