Summary
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of allergy to Hymenoptera venom is usually confirmed with skin testing and measurement of specific serum IgE antibody, tests which are sometimes inconclusive. In these cases, additional in vitro tests are necessary. The aim of this study was to show the applicability of the basophil activation test in detecting sensitization to Hymenoptera venom and to compare the test sensitivity and clinical positive-predictive value with skin prick tests and measurement of allergen-specific serum IgE. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted between June 2004 and December 2007 and included a large group of 204 patients. All patients had a history of at least one systemic allergic reaction of Müller grades II–IV after a Hymenoptera sting. We compared results of the basophil activation test, specific serum IgE and skin prick tests with patients' clinical history and data on culprit insects. RESULTS: The overall clinical sensitivities of the basophil activation test, specific serum IgE and skin prick tests were 90%, 76% and 64%, respectively; the clinical positive-predictive values of the three tests were 79%, 73% and 78% for bee venom, 86%, 59% and 43% for wasp venom; and 84%, 77% and 22% for both venoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed a higher clinical sensitivity and comparable or better clinical positive-predictive value of basophil activation tests than skin prick tests and allergen-specific serum IgE in the detection of allergy to Hymenoptera venom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Till SJ, Francis JN, Nouri-Aria K, Durham SR (2004) Mechanisms of immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 113: 1025–1034
Hamilton GR, Adkinson NF Jr (2004) In vitro assays for the diagnosis of IgE-mediated disorders. J Allergy Clin Immunol 114: 213–225
Hamilton RG, Adkinson NF Jr (2003) Clinical laboratory assessment of IgE-dependent hypersensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 111: 687–701
Kemp SF, Lockey RF (2002) Anaphylaxis: a review of causes and mechanisms. J Allergy Clin Immunol 110: 341–348
Schroeder JT, Kagey-Sobotka A, Lichtenstein LM (1995) The role of the basophil in allergic inflammation. Allergy 50: 463–472
Sperr WR, Agis H, Valenta R, Bankl HC, Sillaber C, Scheiner O, et al (1993) Effector cells in allergy: biological principles and new pharmacologic concepts. [Article in German] Wien Klin Wochenschr 105: 677–681
Schwartz LB, Kepley C (1994) Development of markers for human basophils and mast cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol 94: 1231–1240
Bochner SB (2000) Systemic activation of basophils and eosinophils: Markers and consequences. J Allergy Clin Immunol 106: 292–302
Knol EF, Mul FP, Jansen H, Calafat J, Roos D (1991) Monitoring human basophil activation via CD63 monoclonal antibody 435. J Allergy Clin Immunol 88: 328–338
Ebo DG, Hagendorens MM, Bridts CH, Schuerwegh AJ, De Clerck LS, Stevens WJ (2004) In vitro allergy diagnosis: should we follow the flow? Clin Exp Allergy 34: 332–339
Ebo DG, Sainte-Laudy J, Bridts CH, Mertens CH, Hagendorens MM, Schuerwegh AJ, et al (2006) Flow-assisted allergy diagnosis: current applications and future perspectives. Allergy 61: 1028–1039
Eberlein-König B, Schmidt-Leidescher C, Rakoski J, Behrendt H, Ring J (2006) In vitro basophil activation using CD63 expression in patients with bee and wasp venom allergy. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 16: 5–10
Sturm GJ, Böhm E, Trummer M, Wieglhofer I, Heinemann A, Aberer W (2004) The CD63 basophil activation test in Hymenoptera venom allergy: a prospective study. Allergy 59: 1110–1117
Erdmann SM, Sachs B, Kwiecien R, Moll-Slodowy S, Sauer I, Merk HF (2004) The basophil activation test in wasp venom allergy: sensitivity, specificity and monitoring specific immunotherapy. Allergy 59: 1102–1109
Kosnik M, Silar M, Bajrovic N, Music E, Korosec P (2005) High sensitivity of basophils predicts side-effects in venom immunotherapy. Allergy 60: 1401–1406
Peternelj A, Silar M, Erzen R, Kosnik M, Korosec P (2008) Basophil sensitivity in patients not responding to venom immunotherapy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 146: 248–254
Straumann F, Bucher C, Wüthrich B (2000) Double sensitization to honeybee and wasp venom: Immunotherapy with one or with both venoms? Int Arch Allergy Immunol 123: 268–274
Kampelmacher MJ, van der Zwan JC (1987) Provocation test with a living insect as a diagnostic tool in systemic reactions to bee and wasp venom: a prospective study with emphasis on the clinical aspects. Clin Allergy 17: 317–327
Zora JA, Swanson MC, Yunginger JW (1988) A study of prevalence and clinical significance of venom-specific IgE. J Allergy Clin Immunol 81: 77–82
Eberlein-König B, Rakoski J, Behrendt H, Ring J (2004) Use of CD63 expression as marker of in vitro basophil activation in identifying the culprit in insect venom allergy. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 14: 10–16
Eberlein-König B, Ring J (2004) Diagnosis of IgE-mediated hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis in patients with negative skin test and negative RAST using cellular in vitro tests. J Allergy Clin Immunol 113: 1223–1224
Nguyen K-L, Gillis S, MacGlashan DW (1990) A comparative study of releasing and nonreleasing human basophils: nonreleasing basophils lack an early component of the signal transduction pathway that follows IgE cross-linking. J Allergy Clin Immunol 85: 1020–1029
Kepley CL, Youssef L, Andrews RP, Wilson BS, Oliver JM (2000) Multiple defects in Fc epsilon RI signaling in Syk-deficient nonreleaser basophils and IL-3-induced recovery of Syk expression and secretion. J Immunol 165: 5913–5920
Sainte-Laudy J, Sabbah A, Drouet M, Lauret MG, Loiry M (2000) Diagnosis of venom allergy by flow cytometry. Correlation with clinical history, skin tests, specific IgE, histamine and leukotriene C4 release. Clin Exp Allergy 30: 1166–1171
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peternelj, A., Silar, M., Bajrovic, N. et al. Diagnostic value of the basophil activation test in evaluating Hymenoptera venom sensitization. Wien Klin Wochenschr 121, 344–348 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-009-1174-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-009-1174-y