Abstract
Purpose
Skin tests are an integral part in the diagnosis of allergy to Hymenoptera venom (HV). While usually these include skin prick tests (SPT) and intradermal tests (IDT) with venom extracts at a maximum concentration of 100 μg/ml and 1 μg/ml, respectively, in addition, a SPT with 300 μg/ml (SPT300) may be performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of SPT300.
Methods
In all, 75 patients with history of anaphylaxis to HV were evaluated by SPT and IDT, including SPT300, as well as measuring HV-specific IgE antibodies. In a subgroup of monosensitized patients with IgE antibodies to either only wasp (WV) or bee venom (BV) the specificity and sensitivity of SPT300 was assessed.
Results
While 64 % and 68 % patients showed positive test results in SPT with 100 μg/ml (SPT100) and IDT with 1 μg/ml (IDT1) HV, respectively, 82.7 % reacted to SPT300, considering a mean wheal diameter (MWD) of at least 3 mm a positive skin reaction. Choosing either a MWD of 4 or 5 mm as threshold, merely 69.3 % and 32 % had a positive test result. Evaluation of individuals monosensitized to only WV (n = 27) or BV (n = 10) by IgE analysis revealed an almost equally satisfactory sensitivity of more than 80 % for SPT300, but also for SPT100 and IDT1 with both allergens. Of note, while the specificity of SPT300 for WV exceeded 90 %, it was markedly lower for SPT300 with BV (51.9 %). Other factors like atopy, grade of anaphylaxis, and the time lag between index sting and skin testing had no influence on the test results.
Conclusions
SPT300 shows a high but not substantially superior sensitivity utilizing both WV and BV extract for diagnosis of HV allergy compared to SPT100 and IDT1. However, since SPT300 with BV extract demonstrated a very low specificity, our results indicate that SPT300 has limited added value in the diagnosis of HV allergy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BV:
-
Bee venom
- HV:
-
Hymenoptera venom
- IDT:
-
Intradermal test
- MWD:
-
Mean wheal diameter
- SPT:
-
Skin prick test
- WV:
-
Wasp venom
References
Worm M, Eckermann O, Dölle S, Aberer W, Beyer K, Hawranek T, et al. Triggers and treatment of anaphylaxis: an analysis of 4,000 cases from Germany, Austria and Switzerland. DtschArztebl Int 2014;111:367–75
Grabenhenrich LB, Dölle S, Moneret-Vautrin A, Köhli A, Lange L, Spindler T, et al. Anaphylaxis in children and adolescents: the European Anaphylaxis Registry. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016;137:1128–1137.e1
Przybilla B, Rueff F. Hymenoptera venom allergy. J Dtsch DermatolGes. 2010;8:114–27.
Hamilton RG. Diagnostic methods for insect sting allergy. CurrOpinAllergyClin Immunol 2004;4:297–306
Goldberg A. Variability of venom skin tests. Curr Opin AllergyClin Immunol 2007;7:342–5
Bilo BM, Rueff F, Mosbech H, Bonifazi F, Oude-Elberink JN. EAACI Interest Group on Insect Venom Hypersensitivity. Diagnosis of hymenoptera venom allergy. Allergy 2005;60:1339–49
Przybilla B, Rueff F, Walker A, Räwer H-C, Aberer W, Bauer CP, et al. Diagnosis and therapy of bee and wasp venom allergy. Allergo J 2011;20:318–39
Rueff F, Bergmann KC, Brockow K, Fuchs T, Grübl A, Jung K, et al. Skin tests for diagnostics of allergic immediate-type reactions. Guideline of the German Society for Allergology andClinical Immunology. Pneumologie 2011;65:484–95
Georgitis JW, Reisman RE. Venom skin tests in insectallergic and insect-nonallergic populations. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1985;76:803–7
Ring J, Messmer K. Incidence and severity of anaphylactoid reactions to colloid volume substitutes. Lancet 1977;1:466–9.
Jakob T, Müller U, Helbling A, Spillner E. Component resolved diagnostics for hymenoptera venom allergy. Curr OpinAllergyClin Immunol 2017;17:363–72
Hamilton RG. Diagnosis and treatment of allergy to hymenoptera venoms. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;10:323–9
Harries MG, Kemeny DM, Youlten LJ, Mills MM, Lessof MH. Skin and radioallergosorbent testsin patients with sensitivity tobee andwasp venom. ClinAllergy 1984;14:407–12
Leimgruber A, Lantin JP, Frei PC. Comparison of two in vitro assays, RAST and CAP, when applied to the diagnosis of anaphylactic reactions to honeybee or yellow jacket venoms. Correlation with history and skin tests. Allergy 1993;48:415–20.
Green-Graif Y, Ewan PW. Diagnostic value of the skin-prick test and RAST assay in insect sting allergy. Clin Allergy 1987;17:431–8
Golden DBK, Kagey-Sobotka A, Reply LLM. Evaluation of venom skin test sensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998;102:702–3
Habermann E. Bee and wasp venoms. Science 1972;177:314–22
Hider RC.Honeybee venom: a rich sourceofpharmacologically activepeptides. Endeavour. 1988;12:60–5
Golden DB, Marsh DG, Freidhoff LR, Kwiterovich KA, Addison B, Kagey-Sobotka A, et al. Natural history of hymenoptera venom sensitivity in adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;100:760–6
Jeep S, Reiprich G, Kunkel G. Yellowjacket allergy. Comparison of skin prick tests and intradermal tests with three different yellowjacket venom extracts. Allergy 1992;47:35–40
Graif Y, Confino-Cohen R, Goldberg A. Reproducibility of skin testing and serum venom specific IgE in hymenoptera venomallergy. AnnAllergyAsthmaImmunol 2006;96:24–9
Schäfer T, Przybilla B. IgE antibodies to Hymenoptera venomsin theserumarecommonin thegeneralpopulationand are related toindicationsof atopy. Allergy 1996;51:372–7
Jakob T, Rafei-Shamsabadi D, Spillner E, Müller S. Diagnostics in Hymenoptera venom allergy: current concepts and developments with special focus on molecular allergy diagnostics. Allergo J Int 2017;26:93–105
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (www.springermedizin.de/allergo-journal) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users:
_ Fig. S1: Sensitivity and specificity of skin test responses using a cut-off value for specific IgE of 0.1 kUA/l.
_ Fig. S2: Consecutive skin testing of monosensitized patients using a cut-off value for specific IgE of 0.1 kUA/l.
_ Fig. S3: Sensitivity and specificity of skin test responses in patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy stratified according to low and high levels of total IgE
Funding
The study was supported by a grant from ALK-Abelló, Hamburg, Germany.
Conflict of interest
W. Pfützner has consultant arrangements with ALK-Abelló, Novartis and Thermo Fisher. C. Möbs and D. Wiedemann declare that they have no competing interests.
Cite this as
Möbs C, Wiedemann D, Pfützner W. Evaluation of a modified skin prick test for diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy. Allergo J Int 2019;28:43–9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-018-0073-z
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Möbs, C., Wiedemann, D. & Pfützner, W. Evaluation of a modified skin prick test for diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy. Allergo J 28, 20–27 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15007-019-1807-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15007-019-1807-z