1 Introduction

Optimal use of monetary resources is an issue of ever greater importance in the world today, and asset management in the energy sector is also gaining significance. An essential task that goes hand in hand with this, is evaluating the current condition of electrical equipment is. Dissolved gas analysis (DGA) is an accepted procedure worldwide for condition assessment and condition monitoring of transformers. In addition, DGA is the most frequently used procedure to detect incipient faults at an early stage and one that also has the capability to initiate appropriate maintenance measures [1, 2].

Naphthenic mineral oil consists primarily of a mixture of hydrocarbon chains (C12H26, 11.6%) and alkanes—A cycloalkane (C14H28, 15.5%), bicyclic alkanes (C13H24, 28.5%), tricyclic alkanes (C16H28, 23.3%) and tetracyclic alkanes (C16H26, 9.7%) (Fig. 1; [3]). Electrical and/or thermal stresses in the transformer can exceed the binding energy of the carbon-carbon or carbon-hydrogen bonds. The bonds break and the resulting instable decomposition products then combine again to form gaseous molecules, which can be present in dissolved and/or free form. The resulting key gases are H2, CH4, C2H2, C2H4 and C2H6. In addition, CO and CO2, which are produced in combination with atmospheric oxygen and cellulose degradation, as well as O2 are also among the key gases [4, 5].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Molecular structures of main components of naphthenic mineral oil, following [3]

With DGA, the presence or concertation of the key gases is detected within the mineral. There is the possibility of manual sampling including subsequent analysis in the laboratory and the possibility of continuous monitoring systems (online DGA, Fig. 2). In general, the measurement starts with sampling and extraction of the gases dissolved in the oil. A distinction is made between the different extraction methods, with vacuum extraction being the most accurate and the headspace method the most commonly used. In the headspace method, a gas phase consisting of carrier gas is located above the mineral oil to be analysed, into which the dissolved gases diffuse. After the extraction of the gases, their composition is analysed. In most cases, this is done using gas chromatography. Here, the gas mixture (carrier gas + key gases) is forced through a system of tubes and detected on a thermal detector. The gas molecules migrate through the columns of the GC tube at different speeds and then hit the detector at a defined point in time, depending on the physical and chemical properties. Other methods with their own specific advantages and disadvantages are also in use, such as infrared spectroscopy. In this method, the reflection of an infrared light source is analysed depending on the gases present. Different gas molecules absorb different frequencies of the IR spectrum to different degrees. The great advantage of this method is very high long-term stability and the maintenance-free nature of the device itself, but not all key gases can be directly detected with this method [6, 7].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Transformer with online DGA system

2 Condition assessment of transformers by DGA

It is possible to determine the present condition of the transformer by analysing the gases dissolved in the oil. There are various approaches for data interpretation [8]. One frequently used method is to compare identically designed transformers and define a threshold value at 90% of the maximum gas concentrations. It is assumed, that the probability of a fault occurring in a transformer at gas concentrations below this threshold is low. If one of these gas thresholds is exceeded, the transformer should be inspected more precisely. If the fleet of transformers is too small or no comparative data is available, reference values from the literature and standards can be used. Trends of recent years have shown that a condition assessment based on absolute gas concentrations can often be insufficient, the rates of gas change are thus increasingly used as an assessment criterion. Here, also, the 90% value of the gas change rate is defined or reference values can be used [4, 9, 10]. The procedure defined in IEEE C57.104 goes one step further and makes recommendations for action directly on the individual gas concentrations and gas change rates (Table 1; [11]).

Table 1 Recommendations for action related to percentage of total combustible gases (TCG) [11]

Depending on the real instantaneous energy input, typical key gas compositions are formed for different faults (Fig. 3a). A distinction is made between catalytic reactions R, partial discharges of the corona type PD, stray gassing S, thermal faults T1 (< 300 °C), T2 (300 °C–700 °C) and T3 (> 700 °C), overheated paper or cellulose O, carbonisation of cellulose C, low energy discharge D1 and high energy discharges D2 [11, 12]. Various mathematical and graphical methods are available for fault identification, which are described in detail in [6, 10]. The most frequently used methods are the key gas method, the gas concentration ratio method according to Rogers/Doernenburg/IEC and the Duval triangle method (Fig. 3b; [2, 6, 13]).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of key gases for different faults in percentage (a) and Duval triangle one (b)

3 Benefits of an online DGA monitoring system

In recent years proof has been provided that knowing the history of a transformer and detecting incipient faults from an early stage is a great advantage. Through continuous monitoring, the condition of a transformer can be determined more accurately and maintenance measures can be more effectively planned (Fig. 4). This leads to better allocation of available monetary and material resources and an increase in overall system reliability [1, 14]. An essential part of this is to know exactly the rates of change of dissolved gases in a transformer—they are considered a more important indicator than the absolute gas concentrations [9]. The assessment of the transformer condition based on absolute gas concentrations can lead to incorrect estimates. The same amount of dissolved gas can be assessed with a different criticality in different transformers [4, 13, 14]. Furthermore, gas concentrations in different transformers can be attributed to different causes. There are transformers with highly increased gas concentrations that have been operating stably for many years and show no or only very small further increases. This might indicate an inactive fault, which can lead to a failure within a short time if it begins to evolve again. It is advisable to aim for continuous monitoring of the transformer. Other transformers show very rapid increases in dissolved gases in a very short time, which cannot be detected in time by regular sampling [9].

Fig. 4
figure 4

380/110-kV transformer with a DGA monitoring system (a) and the DGA monitor itself (b)

The fact that the condition of a transformer can change rapidly is shown by the case of a 23.5/432 kV generator step-up transformer, where a multi-gas DGA monitoring system was installed in 2010. Up to that time, the transformer did not show any significant gas concentrations. Shortly after installation, there was a sharp increase in H2 and C2H2, indicating an electrical fault (Fig. 5). For safety reasons, the transformer was taken off the grid, subjected to electrical tests and maintenance work. The electrical tests did not lead to a result, but forensic examinations showed a developing electrical fault in the winding with an already advanced decomposition of the paper insulation (degree of polymerisation, DP < 200) [13]. The DP value corresponds to the number of interconnected glucose rings of the cellulose. It provides information about the current condition of the paper insulation and has a direct correlation to the remaining service life. The number of interconnected glucose rings in new transformers is in the range of 1000 to 1200. When this value is less than 200, it can be assumed that the paper quality is no longer sufficient for reliable operation [8].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Time dependent dissolved gas concentrations in a 23.5/432 kV GSU transformer, based on [13]

In [14], five cases are described in which a DGA monitoring system was able to successfully identify incipient faults at an early state. Of particular interest is the case of a 735/230 kV transformer where a fault in the bushing area was detected in time by an increase in H2. Consequently, the transformer load was reduced and the transformer could be taken off the grid and maintained within 40 days as planned. The estimated cost saving due to the early detection of the fault and the corresponding repair of the transformer is estimated to be around $ 4,000,000.

A somewhat more recent example from [12] also shows that gas concentrations can increase rapidly within a short time (Fig. 6). The evaluation of the data with all methods showed that there is a thermal fault and the scenario described in [11] requests immediate action. The integrated Buchholz relay did not trigger in this case and the transformer was manually taken off the grid. The inspection carried out showed severe carbonisation of the paper insulation.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Time dependent dissolved gas concentrations in a 345 kV GSU transformer, based on [12]

In general, any incipient fault is accompanied by the formation of hydrogen (compare Fig. 3a). In many cases, a hydrogen sensor is sufficient for monitoring and enables a simple realisation of a monitoring system. The interpretation basis for a developing defect and also its classification is strongly limited, however, since historical data is only available for H2 or a few other gases. Hydrogen is not always available in sufficient quantities for thermal defects such as those that occur with broken or loose connections, overheating cores, poor cooling, eddy currents, etc. The so-called “hot metal gases” (CH4, C2H6 and C2H4) are of central importance here. Furthermore, the increase of C2H2 as a significant sign for electrical discharges is not present. C2H2 can indicate a significant fault from concentrations of a few ppm. In the case of stray gassing, there is also a large increase in H2, although this is not a defect with consequences [12]. It can thus be stated that monitoring with an H2 sensor is better than no monitoring at all, but each additional key gas increases the overall system reliability and prevents costly failures. The recognised disadvantage of multi-gas monitoring systems is the purchase price, but this is negligible compared to the cost of a power transformer failure.

4 Gas balance of transformers for DGA interpretation

4.1 Degassing at the phase interface

In the case of free-breathing transformers, which are primarily used in Europe, gas exchange occurs at the phase interface between the mineral oil and the gas phase above [15, 16]. This exchange can be explained by the desired equal distribution of free moving molecules in a closed chemical-physical system. After the appearance of an electrical or thermal fault, very high gas concentrations are formed locally at the point of the fault due to the decomposition of the mineral oil and possibly of the cellulose. Subsequently, the dissolved and free gas molecules are distributed throughout the entire system. This balancing process is composed of free diffusion and superimposed convection flows. Consequently, an equilibrium is established between the gas phase and the mineral oil, which means that key gases are degassed into the gas phase and gases from the gas phase dissolve in the mineral oil [2, 15, 17].

Although this method is not generally recommended today, the condition of a transformer, as well as its warning and alarm gas values, are determined using the absolute gas concentrations [9, 11]. Due to the continuous degassing with simultaneous gas formation, a state of equilibrium is established between these two processes. This equilibrium does not necessarily reflect the actual state of the transformer [15, 18, 19]. Fig. 7 shows the concentrations of dissolved gases in the case of a continuous surface discharge over time in a laboratory experiment. It can be seen that in the free-breathing configuration, an equilibrium between degassing and gas formation already occurs, whereas this does not occur in the hermetically sealed configuration. Furthermore, the degassing of H2 and CH4 takes place so quickly that no measurable concentrations arise in the test object. This may also lead to a different interpretation of the defect [17].

Fig. 7
figure 7

Time dependent gas generation in a hermetically sealed and a free breathing arangement [17]

4.2 Dissolving air gases and their temperature behaviour

The opposite case to the degassing of transformers is the dissolving of ambient air gases from the atmospheric ambient air during initial commissioning or after degassing of the mineral oil [16]. Own measurements showed a saturation concentration of about 63,000 ppm for N2, 18,000 ppm for O2 and 500 ppm for CO2 (Fig. 8a). It can also be seen that different gases dissolve in the mineral oil with different velocities.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Dissolving of N2, O2 and CO2 from ambient air in mineral oil of a 200 l transformer model in the laboratory (a) and temperature and concentration of dissolved CO2 over time of a in service 110/380 kV transformer (b)

In addition, different concentrations of dissolved gases can occur depending on temperature fluctuations due to changes in the load or the ambient temperature. On the one hand, this is due to the temperature dependence of Henry’s constant, which describes the gas solubility in mineral oil, and the gas storage capacity of cellulose. Fig. 8b shows this behaviour based on measurements at a 110/380 kV transformer. The concentration of CO2 is stated in p. u. with reference to the maximum value of the concentration in the period under consideration.

5 Current research on chemical and physical properties for DGA interpretation

5.1 General

As mentioned above, gas exchange occurs in the area of the phase interface. Dissolved gas molecules in the mineral oil diffuse into the gas phase and gas molecules from the air or the gas cushion dissolves in the mineral oil. Since different substances have varying solubilities, different gases degas at unequal rates. This leads to a shift in the relative proportions of the gases and makes it difficult to identify the fault by established methods like the ratio methods or Duval triangles [17].

For decades, the DGA has been a well-suited and approved method for assessing and monitoring the condition of transformers. By taking the gas exchange into account, the DGA could be further improved. An even more precise assessment of the current condition would be possible and the accuracy of interpretation would be increased. For this purpose, a mathematical model based on the various mass transport theories is being developed and tested at the Institute of High Voltage Engineering and System Performance. In future, this model should be able to quantify the degassing at the phase interface between the mineral oil and the overlying gas blanket or the ambient air [18].

In general, all transfer and transport processes are subject to comparable physical laws and are described by similar effects. The mass transfer is understood to be a change in quantity in a time interval. The diffusion coefficients and the Henry constants are considered to be the determining parameters for the characteristics of mass transfer. The diffusion coefficients determine the relationship between concentration gradient and diffusive mass transfer. The Henry constants describe the concentration equilibrium between the liquid and gaseous phase at the phase interface [18, 20].

The Henry constants of gas i are based on own investigations and are determined experimentally as described in [21]. The schematic test setup is shown in Fig. 9. The oil samples taken after saturation are analysed in the laboratory for the corresponding concentration ci. Then, ci is set in relation to the measured gas pressure pi and the Henry constant Hi results (Eq. 1).

$$H_{i}=\frac{p_{i}}{c_{i}}\ \mathrm{in}\;\mathrm{Pa}/\mathrm{ppm}$$
(1)
Fig. 9
figure 9

Setup for measuring Henry constants

The diffusion coefficient D describes the relationship between a concentration gradient and the diffusion flux. An exact determination is only possible empirically—e.g. measurement with a diaphragm diffusion cell. In practice, mathematical approximations are often used, but these can be of very variable quality. The values of the diffusion coefficients increase with rising temperature and pressure [20, 22]. The most commonly used approaches are the Stokes-Einstein equation (Eq. 2, k Boltzmann constant, T temperature, η dynamic viscosity of the solvent, R0 Van-der-Waals radius) and the approach of Wilke and Chang (Eq. 3, φ association factor of the solvent, Mm,2 molecular mass of the solvent, Vm,1 molar volume of the diffusing species at the boiling point under normal conditions, η2 to the viscosity of the liquid, T temperature) [20, 23,24,25].

$$D=\frac{kT}{6\pi \cdot \eta \cdot R_{0}}$$
(2)
$$D=7,4\cdot 10^{-8}\left(\left(\varphi \cdot M_{m,2}\right)^{1/2}\cdot \frac{T}{\eta _{2}\cdot {V}_{m,2,S}^{0,6}}\right)$$
(3)

Another empirical approach is provided by the American Petroleum Institute (API), which is specifically designed to determine diffusion coefficients of dissolved gases in petroleum liquids (Eq. 4, D1,2 in ft2/h, T in °Ra, η2 cP, R in Å) [26].

$$D=5,922\cdot 10^{-8}\cdot \frac{T\cdot R_{2}}{\eta _{2}\cdot {R}_{1}^{2/3}}$$
(4)

5.2 Results and interpretation

5.2.1 Henry constants

The experiments carried out clearly show that various gases behave differently with increasing temperature. The solubility of the investigated hydrocarbons (C2H2, C2H4, C2H6 and CH4) increases with rising temperature, whereas the solubility of hydrogen (H2) decreases with increasing temperature (Fig. 10). This behaviour is also consistent with the available results [19, 27,28,29,30]. It should be noted that the Ostwald coefficients have an opposite behaviour since the Ostwald coefficients roughly correspond to the reciprocal of the respective Henry’s constants [21].

Fig. 10
figure 10

Henry constant of different gases over temperature

An actual comparison of the measured and calculated Ostwald coefficients with values from the literature is only possible to a limited extent, as there is no indication of the exact definition of the Ostwald coefficients used [4, 11]. However, the chosen definition variant has a strong influence on the expected value [29]. Furthermore, the values in [4, 11] reflect averaged values and the density of the oil used has a significant influence on the actual values of the coefficients and constants [30]. A more detailed look at the values in Table 2 shows that the differences to the values in the literature are relatively large but the values are in the same order of magnitude. The conversion between the Henry constants and Ostwald coefficients was carried out according to [30].

Table 2 Comparison of own measurements with values from literature at 25 °C

5.2.2 Diffusion coefficients

A deeper look at the calculation results of the diffusion coefficients for different key gases (C2H2, C2H4, C2H6, H2 and CH4) shows that they not only increase with rising temperature but that there are also significant differences between the individual gases and calculation procedures (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11
figure 11

Temperature dependent diffusion coefficients of hydrogen, determined with the help of different calculation methods

The non-linear increase with temperature results from the fact that not only is the temperature directly linear (cf. Eqs. 2 to 4) but other parameters such as viscosity, radii and volumes are also temperature-dependent.

In the Wilke and Chang method, the value of the boiling point has the greatest influence on the slope of the curve, as this has a decisive influence on the molar volume. In the literature, the results determined for the diffusion coefficients vary in the range of 10−8 m2/s and 10−11 m2/s. The values determined using the approximation formula are within this range (Table 3). For the first calculations, the determined values can be used, but for a more precise later consideration, measurements of the diffusion coefficients should be carried out [31,32,33].

Table 3 Calculated values for the diffusion coefficients of different gases in mineral oil at 20 °C and comparative values from the literature

6 Summary

The optimal utilisation of resources and thus also the condition assessment of electrical equipment in the power engineering sector is becoming increasingly important. DGA has been used to evaluate and monitor the current condition of transformers for many decades. In addition to the absolute gas concentrations, the rate of gas increase has become more and more important for the assessment in recent years. Trend analysis allows a more precise determination of the actual state due to the trend evaluation. Different standards offer guidelines for threshold values on the one hand and clear recommendations for measures based on the gas trends on the other. With the help of online DGA monitoring systems, incipient faults can be detected at an early stage and appropriate maintenance measures can be initiated. Through planned and timely maintenance measures, financial resources can be saved and the overall system reliability can be increased.

Current research is focused on the phase interface between the mineral oil and the gas phase in the conservator tank, where an exchange of gas molecules occurs. This exchange means that key gases dissolved in the oil dissipate into the ambient air and, vice versa, gases from the ambient air are dissolved in the mineral oil. The basis of interpretation of the DGA is consequently affected. This can lead to a wrong assessment of a fault criticality and to a fault being classified incorrectly. The exchange of gas molecules can be described using various theories of mass transfer. All these theories have in common that the basis is formed by the diffusion coefficients as well as the Henry constants. Currently, a model based on these theories is being developed.

The Henry constants can only be determined exactly by empirical means and they are strongly dependent on the temperature. A comparison of the determined values and the values from the literature shows that large differences sometimes occur between all values. This is primarily due to how the results are determined and the strong dependence on the density of the oil used. It can be seen that the Henry constants of hydrocarbons increase with temperature, whereas those of pure substances decrease. Furthermore, the absolute values of different gases differ greatly. The diffusion coefficients were calculated in this work and it can be seen that significant differences are dependent on both the equation used and the temperature. The literature also shows a very large range of error over several powers of ten. It would therefore appear appropriate in the view of the authors that an experimental procedure for the determination of the diffusion coefficients should be applied in further work.