Abstract
Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr or Ti-5553 is a metastable β Titanium alloy with excellent mechanical properties. Compared to the most common titanium alloy, the α and β Ti6Al4V, even at high cooling rates as present in the laser powder bed fusion process, it establishes an β dominant microstructure which is further highly tunable by heat treatment at lower temperatures than Ti6Al4V.
In the scope of this contribution, the processability of T‑5553 is investigated, and the effects of stress relief heat treatment are evaluated. Its influence of achieved microstructures on hardness and impact strength is shown.
Zusammenfassung
Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr oder Ti-5553 ist eine metastabile β‑Titanlegierung mit hervorragenden mechanischen Eigenschaften. Im Vergleich zur gebräuchlichsten Titanlegierung, dem α‑ und β‑Ti6Al4V, bildet es selbst bei hohen Abkühlungsraten, wie sie beim Laser-Pulverbett-Schmelzverfahren vorliegen, eine β‑dominante Mikrostruktur aus, die zudem durch Wärmebehandlung bei niedrigeren Temperaturen als Ti6Al4V hochgradig abstimmbar ist.
Im Rahmen dieses Beitrags wird die Verarbeitbarkeit von T‑5553 untersucht und die Auswirkungen der Spannungsarmglühung bewertet. Der Einfluss der erzielten Gefüge auf Härte und Kerbschlagzähigkeit wird aufgezeigt.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Today’s main research focus on titanium alloys for laser powder bed fusion for technical applications L‑ PBF lies on α + β alloys such as Ti6Al4V [1, 2]. Conventionally processed α + β alloys offer a high strength and sufficient ductility. However, due to the process fundamentals of L‑PBF, some issues arise. The high cooling rates [3] lead to a martensitic α’ microstructure, which shows a higher tensile strength but comes at the costs of ductility [2, 4]. Additionally, it limits the fatigue strength of L‑PBF Ti6Al4 [5, 6]. To address these issues, furnace annealing [4, 7] in a highly pure argon atmosphere or even hot isostatic pressing [5, 6] is inevitable for most applications, pushing the costs of L‑PBF applications.
An alternative to α + β alloys can be found in metastable β titanium alloys [8,9,10]. In contrast to the α + β alloys, metastable β titanium alloys form a (α +) β microstructure independent of the cooling rate [11, 12]. Compared to α + β alloys, high cooling rates from an above β transus temperature lead to an increased amount of the β phase, while at slower cooling rates, the nucleation of the α phase increases. As the fraction and distribution of the α + β phase is essential for the material properties, a lot of research is conducted on the understanding of phase formation in Ti5553 and the development of heat treatments for conventional production processes [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Huang et al. [19] show the precipitation and growth of α laths for 3 h heat treatments from 610–690 °C and their influence on impact toughness for bimodal Ti-55531. Guao et al. [20] investigate the influence of 1 h heat treatment from 600–750 °C for hot-pressed Ti-5553.
Additionally, the metastable beta Ti alloys offer higher tensile strength, high fatigue strength, and ductility, but due to their alloying elements, they have higher weight and worse oxidation behavior. Together with their material properties, they lead to increased tool wear and call for slow cutting speeds, which raises their application costs [8, 9].
However, the possibility of producing near-net-shape geometries and the high cooling rates of the L‑PBF process might overcome the issues mentioned above. Therefore, an increasing interest in research of processing Ti5553 and other metastable β titanium alloys by L‑PBF can be seen. Therefore, this contribution further focuses on Ti-5553. Calta et al. [21] investigated the solidification and phase transformation with in-Situ X‑Ray diffraction (xrd) for single lines of ti5553 and compared them to Ti6Al4V, showing that theoretically higher densities and a mainly β‑phase microstructure can be achieved. Zopp et al. [21] prove that infill densities up to 99.99% are possible and further investigate the impact of particle size distribution on surface roughness. Schwab et al. [22] achieve densities of 99.0 to 99.5%, a pure β phase microstructure, and tensile strength of 800 MPa without heat treatment. Using a heated built-platform, Schwab et al. [23] investigate the achieved microstructure and changes in compression strength and microhardness. They achieve α percipitations and an increased hardness of 460 HV0.2. Ahmed et al. [24] focus on the influence of process parameters on density, surface roughness, and hardness, achieving infill densities of 99.9% and a hardness of around 280 HV. Carlton et al. [25] describe effects of 1H isothermal heat treatments from 300–800 °C on microstructure and tensile strength. Additional work can be found on the similar alloy Ti-55511 [26,27,28,29].
This contribution focuses on material densities achievable by L‑PBF using Design of Experiment and the influence of stress-relieve heat treatment on phase composition, microstructure, and the achieved mechanical properties in the form of hardness and notched bar impact strength, as stress-relief treatment is recommended to deal with the residual stresses caused by the L‑PBF process. However, temperatures and times needed for the stress relieve of Titanium alloys is similar to the furnace annealing treatments of metastable β Titanium alloys. Hence, the percipitation of an α phase is expected.
2 Methodology
All build jobs were performed on an EOS EOSINT M280 L‑PBF machine with a 400W Nd:Yag laser. A Design of Experiment (DoE) model programmed in Studio R Software was used to develop process parameters for maximal density. The final samples underwent stress-relief heat treatment for 2 h at 650 °C in an argon flooded Lynn Highterm furnace 135.
Archimedes density tests with cubes of 15 × 15 × 15 mm3 according to ISO 3369:2006 standard were performed on a Radwag PS 210 X2 digital scale. X‑ray diffraction (XDR) measurements were carried out with a Brucker diffractometer to determine the phase composition, with the detector in reflection mode using CoKα radiation (1.790300 Å). The microstructure was investigated using SEM (Tescan Vega 3) on cut and etched samples.
To compare the mechanical properties, hardness was measured on the polished cross-section using an Anton Paar Micro Indentation Tester (MHT 01-60315); the results are reported in Vickers hardness (HV) values. The measuring distance between two indentations was carefully maintained to avoid an influence on each other. Additionally, the notched bar impact strength was investigated using a digital Zwick Roll 300J Hammer with 10 × 10 × 55 mm3 specimens with printed notches, following ASTM E23.
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Density
For the DoE for process parameters, a range of energy density between 40 and 95 J/mm3 was selected; Laser power was kept between 220–360 W, scan speed within 800–1600 mm/s, and hatching within 80–200 µm for a fixed layer thickness of 30 µm. A material density of 4.66 g/cm3 was taken from the literature to calculate relative density. However, Zopp et al. [20] use 4.65 g/cm3, while Schwab et al. [23, 24] and Ahmed et al. [25] apply 4.67 g/cm3. Besides, the influence of the measurement method [4] has to be taken into account when comparing the results of different research works. The achieved densities are shown in Table 1.
In the first run, relative densities of 99.74% could be achieved for several parameter combinations, with a deviation below 0.08. The needed energy densities of these sets were similar to Ahmed et al. [25] and considerably higher than for Ti6Al4V [4]. The measured data was then used in five different evaluation models. For all models, cubes for the suggested parameters for highest density and highest density using 280 W were produced and their density was measured. Table 2 shows energy densities of the parameters, predicted and measured densities.
Two different parameter sets achieved a maximal density of 99.8%, from which the one being revommented by three of the models was selected for the final production of specimens. This is higher than the results of Schwab et al. [23] with 99.0 and 99.5% but lower than Ahmend et al. [25] and Zopp et al. [22] with over 99.9%. Besides the before mentioned different material densities used to calculate relative density, Zopp et al. only measures infill density which does not take sub-surface porosity into account, which can be considerably higher than the one of the infill [4].
3.2 Microstructure and Phase Composition
Figure 1 shows the XRD spectra of a stress-relieved Ti-5553 sample. The β diffraction peak shifts to the higher 2ϴ values compared with the literature [25]. Possible α Ti peaks are marked in Fig. 1. and can be compared with the peaks in work of V.C. Opini et al. [30]. Hence, a presence of α percipitations caused by stress-relief heat treatment is expected.
Figure 2 shows SEM images of cut and etched stress-relieved samples produced with parameter sets M1 (Fig. 2a,b) and M6 (Fig. 2c,d), with no noticeable substancial differences.
At a lower resolution (Fig. 2a,c), scan tracks (round, nose shapes) and grain boundaries (thin, straight lines) are visible. Grains are elongated in the build direction with continuous growth through the scan lines and proofing energy input to be sufficient to remelt multiple layers. The thicker lines visible (e.g., Fig. 2c) are due to uneven etching and cleaning.
Higher-resolution images show fine dendritic β cells around α percipitations in the growth direction within the grains. As they are isotropic over the grain, nucleation from grain boundaries can be assumed. Additionally to this, α percipitates are found at the grain boundaries.
Hence, in contrast to in-situ heat treatment at 500 °C performed by Schwab et al. [25] and the heat treatments at similar temperatures and time for conventionally processed material [19, 20], the achieved α precipitates are considerably smaller. This might be due to the fact that, though the temperature is lower, holing times with the in-situ heat treatment are significantly longer, and compared to conventional processed Ti5553, the starting microstructure is finer.
For Ti-55511, Bai et al. [29] and Shaba et al. [28] achieved a similar microstructure for stress relief treatment, but at higher tempertures. Hence, the α percipitates noticeable increased in size.
3.3 Hardness
Table 3 shows the average hardness values of the same stress-relieved sample tested five times under the same conditions.
The stress-relieved sample exhibits anaverage hardness of about 286 HV1. Hardness values are in good agreement with the work of M. Ahmed et al. [25] and Schwab et al. [24] (290 HV02) for as-built L‑PBF Ti-5553. Hence, the formation of α‑phase precipitates must be considerably lower than for in-situ heat treatment by Schwab et al. [24], who achieved a hardness of 460 HV02.
3.4 Notched Bar Impact Strength
Notched bar impact strength is low compared to the results found for Ti6Al4V [4] at 3.9 J for vertical and 3.1 J for horizontal orientation but with little deviation (Fig. 3).
Compared to conventionally processed material tested by Huang et al. [20], the impact toughness is below their values of 15 to 28 J for 3 h heat treatment at 610 °C to 690 °C, respectively.
Fracture surfaces after stress relief (Fig. 4) show a combination of long tearing ridges and fine dimples, interrupted by quasi-cleavage facets and a high number of micro cracks. The long tearing ridges indicate trans-lamellar fractures, leading to low impact strength. This indicates that the α percipitates are too small to block trans-lamellar fracture. As noted in the impact strength, vertical and horizontal surfaces look alike. Compared to Huang et al. [20], dimples are smaller but tearing ridges longer and more frequent. It is similar to tensile fracture surfaces after 1 h at 500 °C as in the work of Carlton et al. [26].
4 Conclusion
Ti-5553 can be processed to high material density using L‑PBF. Using DoE, densities of 99.8% are achieved. For stress relief heat-treatment at 650 °C for 2 h, first precipitations of α phase are present. Hence, in comparison to standard Ti6Al4V, an α and β microstructure can be produced with heat treatments at lower temperatures, reducing the price and the risk of oxygen or hydrogen embrittlement.
Compared to conventional production processes, the final shape of components could be reached without the high costs of long machining times and with reduced material losses. However, the achieved impact strength reaches just 3.9 J, while hardness is around 286 HV1. For further investigations, an in-depth study of the effect of heat treatment on microstructure and residual stress of L‑PBF processed Ti-5553 is necessary.
References
Yap, C.Y., Chua, C.K., Dong, Z.L., Liu, Z.H., Zhang, D.Q., Loh, L.E., Sing, S.L.: Review of selective laser melting: Materials and applications; Applied Physics. Reviews, vol. 2. (2015)
Shunyu Liu, Y.C.: Shin , Additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V. Alloy. A Rev. Jmade (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107552
T. DebRoy, H.L. Wei. J.S. Zuback, T. Mukherejee, J.W. Elmer, J.O. Milewski, A.M. Beese, A. Wilson-Heid, A. De, W. Zhang; Additive manufacturing of metallic components—Process, structure and properties; pmatsci 92, 2018, 112–224; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001
Benjamin Meier, Norica Godja, Fernando Warchomicka, Carlos Belei, Sandra Schäfer, Andreas Schindel, Gregor Palczynski, Reinhard Kaindl, Wolfgang Waldhauser, Christof Sommitsch; Influence of Surface Treatment, Heat Treatment and Print Orientation on the Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Ti 6Al 4V Processed by L‑PBF, MPDI, 2022.
Gainni Nocoletto; Anisotropic HCF behavior of Ti6Al4V optained by powder bed laser fusion. Int J Fatigue , (2016)
Meier, B., Warchomicka, F., Kaindl, R., Sommitsch, C., Waldhauser, W.: Influence of Different Surface- and Heat Treatments; Elevated Temperature, Orientation on the Fatigue Properties of Ti6Al4V Processed by L‑PBF for Controlled Powder; STIN. Fatigue Fract. Mater. Struct. 24, 235–243 (2022)
Lore Thijs, Frederik Verhaeghe a, Tom Craeghs b, Jan Van Humbeeck a, Jean-Pierre Kruth b; A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V; Acta Materialia 58 (2010) 3303–3312
Huang, R.; Riddle, M.; Graziano, D.; Warren, J.; Das, S.; Nimbalkar, S.; Cresko, J.; Masanet, E. Energy and emissions saving potential of additive manufacturing: The case of lightweight aircraft components. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 135, 1559–1570. [CrossRef]
Aerotec, P.: Premium AEROTEC delivers first 3D—printed serial components, Press Release (2016). http://www.premiumaerotec.com/Binaries/Binary8101/2015_10_28_Press_Release_-_AM_handover.pdf
Valentine Cobbinah, Rivel Armil Nzeukou, Omoyemi Temitope Onawale and Wallace Rwisayi Matizamhuka; Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Potential Superalloys: A Review; Metals 2021, 11, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11010058
Leyens, C., Peters, M.: Titanium and Titanium Alloys. Wiley-VCH (2003). ISBN 3‑527-30534‑3
Lütjering, G., Titanium, J.C.W.: second. In: (ed.) New York. Springer, (2007)
Nag, S., Zheng, Y., Williams, R.E.A., Devaraj, A., Boyne, A., Wang, Y., Collins, P.C., Viswanathan, G.B., Tiley, J.S., Muddle, B.C., Banerjee, R., Fraser, H.L.: Non-classical homogeneous precipitation mediated by compositional fluctuations in titanium alloys. ActaMater, vol. 60., pp. 6247–6256 (2012)
Nag, S., Banerjee, R., Srinivasan, R., Hwang, J.Y., Harper, M., Fraser, H.L.: ω‑Assisted nucleation and growth of α precipitates in theTi-5Al-5Mo-5V–3Cr‑0.5Fe β titanium alloy. ActaMater 57, 2136–2147 (2009)
Boyne, A., Wang, D., Shi, R.P., Zheng, Y., Behera, A., Nag, S., Tiley, J.S., Fraser, H.L., Banerjee, R., Wang, Y.: Pseudospinodal mechanism for fine α/β microstructures in β‑Ti alloys. ActaMater, vol. 64., pp. 188–197 (2014)
Zheng, Y., Williams, R.E.A., Sosa, J.M., Wang, Y., Banerjee, R., Fraser, H.L.: The role of the ω phase on the non-classical precipitation of the α phase inmetastable β‑titanium alloys, Scr. Mater, vol. 111., pp. 81–84 (2016)
Zheng, Y., Williams, R.E.A., Sosa, J.M., Wang, Y., Alam, T., Banerjee, R., Fraser, H.L.: The indirect influence of the ω phase on the degree of refinement of distributions of the α phase in metastable β‑titanium alloys. ActaMater, vol. 103., pp. 165–173 (2016)
Zheng, Y., Williams, R.E.A., Wang, D., Shi, R., Nag, S., Kami, P., Sosa, J.S., Banerjee, R., Wang, Y., Fraser, H.L.: Roleof ω phase in the formation of extremely refined intragranular α precipitates in metastable β‑titanium alloys. ActaMater, vol. 103.
Chaowen Huang, Fengmei Wang, Xin Wen, Mingpan Wan, Min Lei, Junqin Ye, and Weidong Zeng; Tensile performance and impact toughness of Ti-55531 alloy with multilevel lamellar microstructure; J Mater Sci (2021) 56:8848–8870
Yingchao Guo, Paul Genelot, Ajit Pal Singh, Leandro Bolzoni, Yingdong Qu, Hongchao Kou, Junpin Lin, and Fei Yang; High-Strength Near-Beta Titanium Alloy Fabricated by Direct Hot Pressing of the Machining Swarf; JMEPEG (2022) 31:8619–8629
Nicholas P. Calta, Vivek Thampy, Duncan R.C. Lee, Aiden A. Martin, Rishi Ganeriwala, Jenny Wang, Philip J. Depond, Tien T. Roehling, Anthony Y. Fong, Andrew M. Kiss, Christopher J. Tassone, Kevin H. Stone, Johanna Nelson Weker, Michael F. Toney, Anthony W. Van Buuren, Manyalibo J. Matthews; Cooling dynamics of two titanium alloys during laser powder bed fusion probed with in situ X‑ray imaging and diffraction; Materials and Design 195 (2020) 108987
Zopp, C., Blümer, S., Schubert, F., Kroll, L.: Processing of a metastable titanium alloy (Ti-5553) by selective laser melting. Ain Shams Eng. J. 8, 475–479 (2017)
Schwab, H., Palmb, F., Kühn, U., Eckert, J.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of the near-beta titanium alloy Ti-5553 processed by selective laser melting. Mater. Des. 105, 75–80 (2016)
H. Schwab, Matthias Bönisch, Lars Giebeler, Tobias Gustmann, Jürgen Eckert, Uta Kühn; Processing of Ti-5553 with improved mechanical properties via an in-situ heat treatment combining selective laser melting and substrate plate heating; Materials and Design S0264-1275(17)30475‑6
Ahmed, M. et al. (2022) “Influence of processing parameters on density, surface morphologies and hardness of as-built ti-5al-5mo-5v-3cr alloy manufactured by selective laser melting,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 910, p. 164760. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164760.
Holly D. Carlton, Kyle D. Klein, John W. Elmer; Evolution of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Selective Laser Melted Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr After Isothermal Heat Treatments; LLNL-JRNL-764337
Li, Dan & Huang, Hualong & Chen, Chao & Liu, Shichao & Liu, X.C. & Zhang, Xiao-yong & Zhou, Kechao. (2021). Additive manufacturing of high strength near β titanium alloy Ti-55511by engineering nanoscale secondary α laths via in-situ heat treatment. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 814. 141245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.141245.
Sugrib K. Shaha, Hamid Jahed, Josh Kacher, Additively manufactured Ti55511 alloy: Microstructure and residual stress effect on mechanical properties, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Volume 94, 2023, Pages 348–358, ISSN 1526-6125,
Bai, H., et al.: Effect of heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser-melted TI64 and ti-5al-5mo-5v-1cr-1fe. Metals 11(4), 534 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/met11040534
Opini, V.C., et al.: Α phase precipitation and mechanical properties of Nb-modified TI-5553 alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 670, 112–121 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.06.001
Acknowledgements
This research was funded through the COMET K project CAMed (funded by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology (BMK) and the Federal Ministry for Digitalization and Economic Location (BMDW) under FFG project no. 871132; further financial support was provided by Steirische Wirtschaftsförderungsgesellschaft m.b.H (SFG) on behalf of the Province of Styria).
Funding
Open access funding provided by JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Meier, B., Petrusa, J. & Waldhauser, W. L-PBF of the Metastable β Titanium Alloy Ti-5553: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties. Berg Huettenmaenn Monatsh 169, 17–22 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-023-01424-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-023-01424-6