Abstract
This study primarily introduces fuzzy set theory in the reservoirs modeling to enhance the accuracy of the model. The conventional seepage models of dual medium in reservoirs have several limitations. To be specific, it considers the complexity of the model during the modeling process and idealizes certain reservoir parameters to be constant. By adopting fuzzy set theory to study reservoir seepage theory, on the one hand, the seepage model is capable of fully considering the complex and variability of the reservoir; on the other hand, it can avoid parameter errors attributed to laboratory measurements. A numerical example is given in this study to illustrate the accuracy and superiority of the fuzzy seepage model. Studies suggest that fuzzy set theory is capable of effectively addressing the limitations in conventional seepage models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afanasyev Andrey (2017) Reservoir simulation with the MUFITS code: extension for horizontal wells and fractured reservoirs. Energy Procedia 125:596–603
Ahmed MN, Yamany SM, Mohamed N et al (2002) A modified fuzzy c-means algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21(3):193–199
Civan F, Rai CS, Sondergeld CH (2011) Shale-gas permeability and diffusivity inferred by improved formulation of relevant retention and transport mechanisms. Transp Porous Media 86(3):925–944
Craig M, George J, Dilhan I et al (2009) A numerical study of performance for tight gas and shale gas reservoir systems. J Pet Sci Eng 108:22–39
Daniel J, Bustin R (2007) Impact of mass balance calculations on adsorption capacities in microporous shale gas reservoirs. Fuel 86(17–18):2696–2706
Deng J, Zhu W, Ma Q (2014) A new seepage model for shale gas reservoir and productivity analysis of fractured well. Fuel 124:232–240
He J, Zhang W, Lu Z (2017) Seepage system of oil–gas and its exploration in Yinggehai Basin located at northwest of South China Sea. J Nat Gas Geosci 2(1):29–41
Jiang H, Zhan J, Chen D (2019) Covering-based variable precision \(({\cal{I}},{\cal{T}})\)-fuzzy rough sets with applications to multiattribute decision-making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(8):1558–1572
Körber JH, Sahling H, Pape T et al (2014) Natural oil seepage at Kobuleti Ridge, eastern Black Sea. Mar Pet Geol 50:68–82
Li S-C, Zheng P, Zhang Y (2009) Similar structure of pressure distribution in the multilayer reservoir. Appl Math A J Chin Univ (Ser A) 24(2):234–238
Li S, Zhang D, Zheng P et al (2017) Similar structure of solution for triple media shale gas reservoir. J Pet Sci Eng 152:67–80
Lian L, Qin J, Yang S et al (2013) Analysis and evaluation on horizontal well seepage models and their developing trends. Oil Gas Geol 34(6):821–826
Qiu D, Zhang W (2013) Symmetric fuzzy numbers and additive equivalence of fuzzy numbers. Soft Comput 17(8):1471–1477
Qiu D, Lu C, Zhang W et al (2014) Algebraic properties and topological properties of the quotient space of fuzzy numbers based on Mareš equivalence relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 245:63–82
Qiu D, Zhang W, Lu C (2016) On fuzzy differential equations in the quotient space of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 295:72–98
Takagi T, Sugeno M (1993) Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. Read Fuzzy Sets Intell Syst 15(1):387–403
Xu Z (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(6):1179–1187
Zeng G, Chen M, Zeng Z (2013) Shale gas: surface water also at risk. Nature 499(7457):154–154
Zhan J, Sun B, Alcantud J (2019) Covering based multigranulation-fuzzy rough set models and applications in multi-attribute group decision-making. Inf Sci 476:290–318
Zhang T, Ellis G, Ruppel S et al (2012) Effect of organic-matter type and thermal maturity on methane adsoption in shale-gas systems. Org Geochem 47(6):120–131
Zhang L, Shan B, Zhao Y et al (2017) Comprehensive seepage simulation of fluid flow in multi-scaled shale gas reservoirs. Transp Porous Media 121(2):263–288
Zhang L, Zhan J, Xu Z (2019a) Covering-based generalized IF rough sets with applications to multi-attribute decision-making. Inf Sci 478:275–302
Zhang K, Zhan J, Wu W, Alcantud J (2019b) Fuzzy \(\beta \)-covering based (I, T)-fuzzy rough set models and applications to multi-attribute decision-making. Inf Sci 128:605–621
Zhang L, Zhan J, Xu Z, Alcantud J (2019c) Covering-based general multigranulation intuitionistic fuzzy rough sets and corresponding applications to multi-attribute group decision-making. Inf Sci 494:114–140
Zhang D, Qiu D, Shu L (2019d) Fuzzy structure element method for solving fuzzy trilinear seepage model of shale gas reservoir. Int J Fuzzy Syst 21(5):1597–1612
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11361050 and 11671284).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights statement
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Communicated by V. Loia.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Transformation of fuzzy structural element
Definition 12
(Zhang et al. 2019d) If the membership function of the fuzzy structural element is symmetrical on the axis of the ordinate \(x=0\), it is called the symmetric fuzzy structural element.
Definition 13
(Zhang et al. 2019d) If the membership function of a fuzzy structural element has a \(E(x)>0\) on the interval \((-1,1)\). And in \((-1,0)\), it is a strictly single increase continuous function, and in the interval (0, 1) it is a strict single drop continuous function. E is called a regular fuzzy structural element.
Theorem 5
(Zhang et al. 2019d) Let A be a fuzzy subset of X and remember that \(A\in F(x)\) has a membership function. Then,
\(\lambda *{x}\) is called the point state fuzzy set on X, and its membership function is
Theorem 6
(Zhang et al. 2019d) Considering the common mapping \(f:X\rightarrow Y\), the mapping of F(X) to F(Y) can be induced by f
The membership function of the fuzzy set \(f(A)\in F(Y)\) is
Theorem 7
(Zhang et al. 2019d) Set the fuzzy number \(A=a+bE\), a, b as the finite real number,\(b>0\). If \(\forall \lambda \in [0,1]\), \(E_\lambda =[e_\lambda ^L,e_\lambda ^U]\), then the intercepting set of A is
Structural element representation of fuzzy numbers
Theorem 8
(Zhang et al. 2019d) For a given regular fuzzy structure element E and any finite fuzzy number A, there is always a monotone bounded function f on \([-1,1]\) that makes \(A=f (E)\).
Theorem 9
(Zhang et al. 2019d) Let f be a monotone bounded function on \([-1,1]\), E is a given fuzzy structural element on R, and a fuzzy number \(A=f(E)\). \(\forall \lambda \in [0,1]\), the cut set of E is \(E_\lambda =[e_\lambda ^L,e_\lambda ^U]\). in which \(e_\lambda ^L\in [-1,0]\), \(e_\lambda ^U\in [0,1]\). If f is a single increment function on \([-1,1]\), the cut set of the fuzzy number A is closed interval on the R
If f is a single drop function on \([-1,1]\), the cut set of the fuzzy number A is closed interval on the R
Theorem 10
(Zhang et al. 2019d) Let E be a fuzzy structural element, and f and g are two identical monotone functions on \([-1,1]\). There are also \(A=f(E)\), \(B=g(E)\); then,
And the membership function is
Definition 14
(Zhang et al. 2019d) Let A be a finite fuzzy number, if there is a fuzzy structural element E and a finite real number a, r, so that \(A=a+rE\)(where \(r>0\)). It is called A is a fuzzy number generated linearly by the fuzzy structural element E.
Structural element representation of fuzzy valued function
Let N(R) be a whole of fuzzy numbers on R, X and Y are two real numbers, \(D\subseteq X\), and \({\widetilde{f}}\) is a mapping from D to N(Y). If there is a unique fuzzy number \({\widetilde{y}}\in N(Y)\) for \(\forall x\in D\), remember \({\widetilde{y}}={\widetilde{f}}(x)\), then \({\widetilde{f}}\) is called the fuzzy value function on D.
Definition 15
(Zhang et al. 2019d) Considering two-dimensional real space \(X\times Y\), E is a regular fuzzy structural element on Y. Let g(x, y) be a two element function on \(X\times Y\), and for \(\forall x\in X\), g(x, y) is a monotone bounded function of y on \([-1,1]\), and \(g_x(y)=g(x,y)\). It is known from the principle of fuzzy expansion that \(g_x(E)=g(x,E)\) is a finite fuzzy number. g(x, E) is called as the fuzzy value function generated by the fuzzy structural element E on the X, remember to \({\widetilde{F}}_E=g(x,E)\), or \({\widetilde{F}}(x)\) for short.
Definition 16
(Zhang et al. 2019d) Let us set \(g(x,y)=f(x)+\omega (x)E\), where f(x) and \(\omega (x)\) are bounded on X and \(\omega (x)\) is not negative. So the function g(x, y) is the monotone bounded function of y on the interval \([-1,1]\); then,
is a fuzzy value function on X, which is called a fuzzy value function generated linearly by the fuzzy structural element E. Its membership function can be represented by the membership function of the fuzzy structuring element as follows
Nomenclature
See Table 2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, D., Shu, L. & Li, S. Fuzzy structural element method for solving fuzzy dual medium seepage model in reservoir. Soft Comput 24, 16097–16110 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04926-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04926-4