Abstract
According to behavioural finance, economic agents display cognitive bias, heuristics and emotional factors that generate preferences which systematically violate the rationality assumptions of the normative model of classical decision theory. Rather than maximizing the expected utility, representing the optimal choice, they attempt to accept a satisfactory solution. Morton and Fasolo (J Oper Res Soc 60:268–275, 2009) outlined some behavioural findings relevant to the practice of multicriteria approach. In this paper, we propose a multicriteria model for analysing some experiments proposed by Kahneman and Tversky (Econometrica 47:263–29 l, 1979). Our aim is to verify whether a multicriteria tool reduces or minimizes cognitive biases. We focus on ELECTRE due to its main features: it accepts the violation of some mathematical axioms. By a simulation study, we represent a set of prospects by means of decision matrices: the prospects are considered as alternatives, the events as criteria, the probabilities of events as the weights assigned to criteria. Then, we apply ELECTRE to verify whether the preference ranking among the alternatives confirms the results obtained by Kahneman–Tversky, that is, whether it is able to describe the emotional behaviours of economic agents.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allais M (1953) Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’Ecole Americaine. Econometrica 21(4):503–546
Anscombe FJ, Aumann R (1963) Definition of subjective probability. Ann Math Stat 34(1):199–205
Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity and savage axioms. Q J Econ 75(4):643–669
Ferretti R, Rubaltelli E, Rumiati R (2011) La mente finanziaria. Economia e psicologia al servizio dell’investitore. Il Mulino, Fiesole, pp 1–310
Figueira J, Roy B (2002) Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. Eur J Oper Res 139:317–326
Figueira J, Greco S, Slowinski R (2009) Building a set of additive value functions representing a reference preorder and intensities of preference: GRIP method. Eur J Oper Res 195(2):460–486
Ishizaka A, Nemery P (2013) Multi-criteria decision analysis methods and software. Wiley, New York
Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291
Kahneman D, Tversky A (1986) Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J Bus 59(4):251–278
Korhonen P, Moskowitz H, Wallenius J (1990) Choice behavior in interactive multiple criteria decision making. Ann Oper Res 23:161–179
Luce RD, Krantz DH (1971) Conditional expected utility. Econometrica 39:253–271
Morton A, Fasolo B (2009) Behavioural decision theory for multi-criteria decision analysis: a guided tour. J Oper Res Soc 60:268–275
Roy B (1990) The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. In: Bana e Costa CA (ed) Readings in multiple criteria decision aid. Springer, Berlin, pp 155–183
Roy B (1991) The outranking approach and thinks of ELECTRE methods. Theor Decis 31:49–73
Roy B, Mousseau V (1996) A theoretical framework for analysing the notion of relative importance of criteria. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 5(2):145–159
Saaty T (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Saaty TL (1986) Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Manag Sci 32:841–855
Salminen P (1994) Solving the discrete multiple criteria problem using linear prospect theory. Eur J Oper Res 72:146–154
Savage LJ (1954) The foundation of statistics. Wiley, New York
Shefrin H (2002) Behavioral decision making, forecasting, game theory, and role-play. Int J Forecast 18(3):375–382
Simon HA (1990) Bounded rationality. In: Eatwell J, Milgate M, Newman P (eds) Utility and probability. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 15–18
Slovic P, Lichtenstein S (1971) Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment. Organ Behav Hum Perform 6(6):649–744
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Quart J Econ 106(4):1039–1061
von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Yücel MG, Görener A (2016) Decision making for company acquisition by ELECTRE method. Int J Supply Chain Manag 5(1):75–83
Zweig J (2007) Your money and your brain: how the new science of neuroeconomics can help make you rich. Simon & Schuster, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Communicated by M. Squillante.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fattoruso, G., Marcarelli, G., Olivieri, M.G. et al. Using ELECTRE to analyse the behaviour of economic agents. Soft Comput 24, 13629–13637 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04397-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04397-2