Soft Computing

, Volume 22, Issue 7, pp 2341–2368 | Cite as

Examining dynamic functional relationships in a pathological brain using evolutionary computation

  • Arnab Roy
Methodologies and Application


Neuropathological conditions often result in abnormal functional relationship between different regions in the brain and are specific to certain spectral bands that are not known in advance. Typically, these abnormalities are spatially and temporally very localized in nature, and detecting these changes can be clinically very useful. In this article, a novel evolutionary computation-based procedure is introduced to discover such localized changes in a data-driven manner. Given a predefined set of regions of interest (ROIs), the procedure automatically detects a subset of ROIs, a time window, and a frequency band, such that the functional relationship among the ROIs significantly differ between controls and neuropathological cases; the procedure makes no prior assumptions regarding the spectral characteristics of the data. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this procedure, a publicly available EEG dataset of 46 alcoholics and 31 controls is used. In all, 100 cross-validation runs are performed. Using the procedure, many weakened inter-hemispheric functional connections, primarily between the left and the right parietal lobe sensors, are detected in chronic alcoholics. For these functional connections, gamma band (35–50 Hz) activity in 200–400 ms window was found to be significantly different between alcoholics and controls. These results are consistent with the existing literature and helps to validate the procedure. In addition, the procedure is also tested via simulation using a graph generation model with known characteristics, and its general utility to brain imaging literature is discussed.


Dynamic functional connectivity Time-frequency analysis Evolutionary computation EEG Alcoholism Feature subset selection Graph simulation 



The data for this research was made available on the web by Dr. Henri Begleiter, Neurodynamics Laboratory, State University of New York Health Center at Brooklyn. I would also like to thank Dr. J. David Schaffer, Institute for Multi-Generational Studies, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY and Dr. Bharath Sriperumbudur, Department of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA for their valuable comments that greatly helped to improve the manuscript. Finally, I would like to thank Ms. Rachel A. Bernier, Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA for her comments regarding clinical utility of this work.

Funding The research was not supported by any funding agency. All programs were written in R 3.2.3, and the experiments were run on a personal laptop computer. The data used in this work are part of a publicly available dataset currently hosted by UCI machine learning repository.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no known conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.


  1. Allen EA, Damaraju E, Plis SM, Erhardt EB, Eichele T, Calhoun VD (2012) Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cereb Cortex 24(3):663–676. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allgaier N (2015) Reverse engineering the human brain: an evolutionary computation approach to the analysis of fMRI. The University of Vermont, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Alstott J, Breakspear M, Hagmann P, Cammoun L, Sporns O (2009) Modeling the impact of lesions in the human brain. PLoS Comput Biol 5(6):e1000408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anscombe FJ (1963) Tests of goodness of fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 25:81–94Google Scholar
  5. Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2001) Why voxel-based morphometry should be used. Neuroimage 14(6):1238–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basser PJ, Jones DK (2002) Diffusion-tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis—a technical review. NMR Biomed 15(7–8):456–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bassett DS, Bullmore ET, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Apud JA, Weinberger DR, Coppola R (2009) Cognitive fitness of cost-efficient brain functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(28):11747–11752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bassett DS, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Achard S, Duke T, Bullmore E (2006) Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(51):19518–19523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bassett DS, Wymbs NF, Porter MA, Mucha PJ, Carlson JM, Grafton ST (2011) Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(18):7641–7646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Begleiter H (1999). Accessed Oct 1999
  11. Bluhm RL, Miller J, Lanius RA, Osuch EA, Boksman K, Neufeld RWJ, Williamson P (2007) Spontaneous low-frequency fluctuations in the BOLD signal in schizophrenic patients: anomalies in the default network. Schizophr Bull 33(4):1004–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buckner RL, Sepulcre J, Talukdar T, Krienen FM, Liu H, Hedden T, Johnson KA (2009) Cortical hubs revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity: mapping, assessment of stability, and relation to Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 29(6):1860–1873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Calhoun VD, Adali T, Pearlson GD, Pekar JJ (2001) A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 14(3):140–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Calhoun VD, Liu J, Adalı T (2009) A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data. Neuroimage 45(1):S163–S172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cordes D, Haughton VM, Arfanakis K, Carew JD, Turski PA, Moritz CH, Meyerand ME (2001) Frequencies contributing to functional connectivity in the cerebral cortex in “resting-state” data. Am J Neuroradiol 22(7):1326–1333Google Scholar
  16. Cribben I, Haraldsdottir R, Atlas LY, Wager TD, Lindquist MA (2012) Dynamic connectivity regression: determining state-related changes in brain connectivity. Neuroimage 61(4):907–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Csardi G, Nepusz T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJ Complex Syst 1695(5):1–9Google Scholar
  18. Cuadra MB, Pollo C, Bardera A, Cuisenaire O, Villemure JG, Thiran JP (2004) Atlas-based segmentation of pathological MR brain images using a model of lesion growth. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23(10):1301–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Daniell PJ (1946) Discussion on symposium on autocorrelation in time series. Suppl J R Stat Soc 8:88–90Google Scholar
  20. De Jong KA (2006) Evolutionary computation: a unified approach. MIT press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Eshelman LJ (1991) The CHC adaptive search algorithm: how to have safe search when engaging. Found Genet Algorithms 1991 (FOGA 1) 1:265Google Scholar
  22. Eshelman LJ, Schaffer JD (1991) Spurious correlations and premature convergence in genetic algorithms. In: Rawlins GJE (ed) Foundations of genetic algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, pp 102–112Google Scholar
  23. Eshelman LJ, Schaffer JD (1992) Real-coded genetic algorithms and interval-schemata. Foundations of genetic algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. Eshelman LJ, Mathias KE, Schaffer JD (1997) Convergence controlled variation. Found of Genet Algorithms 4:203–224Google Scholar
  25. Fay MP, Shaw PA (2010) Exact and asymptotic weighted logrank tests for interval censored data: the interval R package. J Stati Softw 36(2)Google Scholar
  26. Fridriksson J, Morrow-Odom L, Moser D, Fridriksson A, Baylis G (2006) Neural recruitment associated with anomia treatment in aphasia. Neuroimage 32(3):1403–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Friston KJ, Frith CD, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RS (1993) Functional connectivity: the principal-component analysis of large (PET) data sets. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 13(1):5–14. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1993.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. GeethaRamani R, Sivaselvi K (2014) Human brain hubs (provincial and connector) identification using centrality measures. In: 2014 international conference on recent Trends in information technology (ICRTIT). IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  29. Gonzalez R, Berman MG (2010) The value of brain imaging in psychological research. Open image in new window 42(1): 111–119Google Scholar
  30. Greenough WT, Chang FF (1988) Plasticity of synapse structure and pattern in the cerebral cortex. In: Peters A, Jones EG (eds) Cerebral cortex. Plenum, New York, pp 391–440Google Scholar
  31. Hagmann P, Kurant M, Gigandet X, Thiran P, Wedeen VJ, Meuli R, Thiran JP (2007) Mapping human whole-brain structural networks with diffusion MRI. PLoS ONE 2(7):e597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. He Y, Chen ZJ, Evans AC (2007) Small-world anatomical networks in the human brain revealed by cortical thickness from MRI. Cereb Cortex 17(10):2407–2419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hebb DO (1947) The effects of early experience on problem solving at maturity. Am Psychol 2:306–307Google Scholar
  34. Heeger DJ, Ress D (2002) What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity? Nat Rev Neurosci 3(2):142–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hillary FG, Rajtmajer SM, Roman CA, Medaglia JD, Slocomb-Dluzen JE, Calhoun VD, Wylie GR (2014) The rich get richer: brain injury elicits hyperconnectivity in core subnetworks. PLoS ONE 9(8):e104021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Honea R, Crow TJ, Passingham D, Mackay CE (2005) Regional deficits in brain volume in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies. Am J Psychiatry 162(12):2233–2245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoppenbrouwers SS, Hofman D, Schutter DJ (2010) Alcohol breaks down interhemispheric inhibition in females but not in males. Psychopharmacology 208(3):469–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Huettel SA, Song AW, McCarthy G (2009) Functional magnetic resonance imaging, 2nd edn. Sinauer, Massachusetts ISBN 978-0-87893-286-3Google Scholar
  39. Hwang K, Hallquist MN, Luna B (2013) The development of hub architecture in the human functional brain network. Cereb Cortex 23(10):2380–2393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Irimia A, Chambers MC, Torgerson CM, Filippou M, Hovda DA, Alger JR, Van Horn JD (2012) Patient-tailored connectomics visualization for the assessment of white matter atrophy in traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol 3:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jirapech-Umpai T, Aitken S (2005) Feature selection and classification for microarray data analysis: evolutionary methods for identifying predictive genes. BMC Bioinform 6(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaiser J, Lutzenberger W (2005) Human gamma-band activity: a window to cognitive processing. Neuroreport 16(3):207–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kudo M, Sklansky J (2000) Comparison of algorithms that select features for pattern classifiers. Pattern Recognit 33(1):25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Land WH, Qiao X, Margolis DE, Ford WS, Paquette CT, Perez-Rogers JF, Deng Y (2011) Kernelized partial least squares for feature reduction and classification of gene microarray data. BMC Syst Biol 5(3):1Google Scholar
  45. Leardi R, Boggia R, Terrile M (1992) Genetic algorithms as a strategy for feature selection. J Chemom 6(5):267–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liu H, Yu L (2005) Toward integrating feature selection algorithms for classification and clustering. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(4):491–502MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lucasius CB, Kateman G (1992) Towards solving subset selection problems with the aid of the genetic algorithm. In: Manner R, Mandrick B (eds) Parallel problem solving from nature 2. Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp 239–247Google Scholar
  48. Luque-Baena RM, Urda D, Claros MG, Franco L, Jerez JM (2014) Robust gene signatures from microarray data using genetic algorithms enriched with biological pathway keywords. J Biomed Inform 49:32–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lynall ME, Bassett DS, Kerwin R, McKenna PJ, Kitzbichler M, Muller U, Bullmore E (2010) Functional connectivity and brain networks in schizophrenia. J Neurosci 30(28):9477–9487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marple SL Jr (1987) Digital spectral analysis with applications, vol 512. Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, p 1Google Scholar
  51. Mathias KE, Eshelman LJ, Schaffer JD, Augusteijn L, Hoogendijk PF, Wiel R (2000) Code compaction using genetic algorithms. In: GECO, pp 710–717Google Scholar
  52. Mechelli A, Price CJ, Friston KJ, Ashburner J (2005) Voxel-based morphometry of the human brain: methods and applications. Curr Med Imaging Rev 1(2):105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moselhy HF, Georgiou G, Kahn A (2001) Frontal lobe changes in alcoholism: a review of the literature. Alcohol and Alcohol 36(5):357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nakamura T, Hillary FG, Biswal BB (2009) Resting network plasticity following brain injury. PLoS ONE 4(12):e8220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nakatomi H, Kuriu T, Okabe S, Yamamoto SI, Hatano O, Kawahara N, Nakafuku M (2002) Regeneration of hippocampal pyramidal neurons after ischemic brain injury by recruitment of endogenous neural progenitors. Cell 110(4):429–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Narendra PM, Fukunaga K (1977) A branch and bound algorithm for feature subset selection. IEEE Trans Comput 100(9):917–922CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. Newman M (2010) Networks: an introduction. OUP Oxford, OxfordCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. Oh IS, Lee JS, Moon BR (2004) Hybrid genetic algorithms for feature selection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 26(11):1424–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ong KM, Thung KH, Wee CY, Paramesranle R (2005) Selection of a subset of EEG channels using PCA to classify alcoholics and non-alcoholics. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE engineering in medicine and biology 27th annual conference, Shanghai, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  60. Palaniappan R (2005) Discrimination of alcoholic subjects using second order autoregressive modelling of brain signals evoked during visual stimulus perception. In: Proceedings of world academy of science, engineering and technology, Vol 7 (Prague), pp 282–287Google Scholar
  61. Palaniappan R (2006) Improved automated classification of alcoholics and non-alcoholics. Inf Technol 2:182–186Google Scholar
  62. Palaniappan R (2007) Screening for chronic alcoholic subjects using multiple gamma band EEG: a pilot study. J Comput Sci Technol 7:182–185Google Scholar
  63. Palaniappan R, Paramesran R (2002) Using genetic algorithm to identify the discriminatory subset of multi-channel spectral bands for visual response. Appl Soft Comput 2(1):48–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Peralta D, del Río S, Ramírez-Gallego S, Triguero I, Benitez JM, Herrera F (2015) Evolutionary feature selection for big data classification: a mapreduce approach. Math Probl Eng 501:246139Google Scholar
  65. Power JD, Cohen AL, Nelson SM, Wig GS, Barnes KA, Church JA, Petersen SE (2011) Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 72(4):665–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Radcliffe NJ (1990) Genetic neural networks on MIMD computers (compressed edition). Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. dissertation, Dep. Theoretical Phys., Univ. Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
  67. Radcliffe NJ (1992) Genetic set recombination. Found Genet Algorithms 2:203–220Google Scholar
  68. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Stanczak L, Miller AC (1999) Neural recruitment and cognitive aging: two hemispheres are better than one, especially as you age. Psychol Sci 10(6):494–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez JC, Müller M (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinform 12(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Romer M (2016) Applied time series analysis.
  71. Roy A (2014) Evolving spike neural network based spatio-temporal pattern classifiers with an application to identifying the alcoholic brain. State University of New York at Binghamton, VestalGoogle Scholar
  72. Roy A, Schaffer JD, Laramee CB (2013) Evolving spike neural network sensors to characterize the alcoholic brain using visually evoked response potential. Procedia Comput Sci 20:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Roy A, Schaffer JD, Laramee CB (2015) New crossover operators for multiple subset selection tasks. Comput Commun Collab 3(1)Google Scholar
  74. Roy A, Campbell C, Bernier RA, Hillary FG (2016a) An evolutionary computation approach to examine functional brain plasticity. Front Neurosci 10Google Scholar
  75. Roy A, Schaffer JD, Laramee CB (2016b) A novel approach to signal classification with an application to identifying the alcoholic brain. Appl Soft Comput 43:406–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rutter L, Nadar SR, Holroyd T, Carver FW, Apud J, Weinberger DR, Coppola R (2013) Graph theoretical analysis of resting magnetoencephalographic functional connectivity networks. Front Comput Neurosci 7:93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schaffer JD, Janevski A, Simpson MR (2005) A genetic algorithm approach for discovering diagnostic patterns in molecular measurement data. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE symposium on computational intelligence in bioinformatics and computational biology, 2005. CIBCB’05. IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  78. Shri TP, Sriraam N (2012a) EEG based detection of alcoholics: a selective review. Int J Biomed Clin Eng (IJBCE) 1(1):59–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shri TP, Sriraam N (2012b) EEG based detection of alcoholics using spectral entropy with neural network classifiers. In: 2012 international conference on biomedical engineering (ICoBE). IEEE, pp 89–93Google Scholar
  80. Siedlecki W, Sklansky J (1989) A note on genetic algorithms for large-scale feature selection. Pattern Recognit Lett 10(5):335–347CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  81. Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M (1980) A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem 6(2):174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sörnmo L, Laguna P (2005) Bioelectrical signal processing in cardiac and neurological applications. Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  83. Sporns O, Zwi JD (2004) The small world of the cerebral cortex. Neuroinformatics 2(2):145–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sporns O, Honey CJ, Kötter R (2007) Identification and classification of hubs in brain networks. PLoS ONE 2(10):e1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sporns O (2011) The human connectome: a complex network. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1224(1):109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sporns O (2013) Structure and function of complex brain networks. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 15(3):247–262Google Scholar
  87. Stam CJ (2004) Functional connectivity patterns of human magnetoencephalographic recordings: a ‘small-world’network? Neurosci Lett 355(1):25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Stam CJ, Jones BF, Nolte G, Breakspear M, Scheltens P (2007) Small-world networks and functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease. Cereb Cortex 17(1):92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Stoean R, Stoean C (2013) Modeling medical decision making by support vector machines, explaining by rules of evolutionary algorithms with feature selection. Expert Syst Appl 40(7):2677–2686MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sullivan TJ, Deiss SR, Jung TP, Cauwenberghs G (2008) A brain-machine interface using dry-contact, low-noise EEG sensors. In: IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems, (2008) ISCAS 2008. IEEE, pp 1986–1989Google Scholar
  91. Swets JA (2014) Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics: collected papers. Psychology Press, OxfordshirezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  92. Thirion B, Varoquaux G, Dohmatob E, Poline JB (2014) Which fMRI clustering gives good brain parcellations? Front Neurosci 8(167):13Google Scholar
  93. Troy ML, Joseph TG, Daniel PF (2012) How many electrodes are really needed for EEG-based mobile brain imaging? J Behav Brain Sci 2:387–393Google Scholar
  94. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Joliot M (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 15(1):273–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wang L (2012) Feature selection in bioinformatics. Proc. SPIE 8401, Independent Component Analyses, Compressive Sampling, Wavelets, Neural Net, Biosystems, and Nanoengineering X, 840113 (May 1, 2012). doi: 10.1117/12.921417
  96. Wang L, Zang Y, He Y, Liang M, Zhang X, Tian L, Li K (2006) Changes in hippocampal connectivity in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 31(2):496–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  98. Wheeler B (2010) lmPerm: permutation tests for linear models. R Package Version 1:1–2Google Scholar
  99. Xu Y, Lindquist MA (2015) Dynamic connectivity detection: an algorithm for determining functional connectivity change points in fMRI data. Front Neurosci 9Google Scholar
  100. Xue B, Zhang M, Browne W, Yao X (2015) A survey on evolutionary computation approaches to feature selection. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 20(4):606–626Google Scholar
  101. Yamada K, Sakai K, Akazawa K, Yuen S, Nishimura T (2009) MR tractography: a review of its clinical applications. Magn Reson Med Sci 8(4):165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Yang J, Honavar V (1998) Feature subset selection using a genetic algorithm. IEEE Intell Syst 13(2):44–49Google Scholar
  103. Zalesky A, Fornito A, Egan GF, Pantelis C, Bullmore ET (2012) The relationship between regional and inter-regional functional connectivity deficits in schizophrenia. Hum Brain Mapp 33(11):2535–2549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zhang XL, Begleiter H, Porjesz B (1997) Do chronic alcoholics have intact implicit memory? An ERP study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 103(4):457–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zhang XL, Begleiter H, Porjesz B, Wang W, Litke A (1995) Event related potentials during object recognition tasks. Brain Res Bull 38(6):531–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Zhang H, Sun HG (2002) Feature selection using tabu search method. Pattern Recognit 35(3):701–711MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  107. Zhao M, Fu C, Ji L, Tang K, Zhou M (2011) Feature selection and parameter optimization for support vector machines: a new approach based on genetic algorithm with feature chromosomes. Expert Syst Appl 38(5):5197–5204CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Physiology and KinesiologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations