Table 4 IGD results from 30 executions of m-CMA-PAES and MO-CMA-ES on the DTLZ and CEC09 test suites with three problem objectives
3D | m-CMA-PAES | MO-CMA-ES | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best | Mean | Worst | Best | Mean | Worst | p value | %IGD | ||
UF8 | 0.13308 | 0.18188 | 0.23023 | 0.16091 | 0.23432 | 0.24924 | 3.6e−08 | 45.14 | + |
UF9 | 0.07381 | 0.07877 | 0.08795 | 0.06755 | 0.07440 | 0.07911 | 5.4e−05 | \(-\)21.45 | – |
UF10 | 0.64046 | 0.97907 | 1.34102 | 1.33073 | 1.90805 | 2.89107 | 1.6e−09 | 41.28 | + |
DTLZ1 | 0.60928 | 3.11971 | 5.72913 | 2.11988 | 10.1829 | 20.9531 | 1.2e−06 | 34.72 | + |
DTLZ2 | 0.03919 | 0.04005 | 0.04077 | 0.04207 | 0.04491 | 0.04939 | 1.4e−09 | 7.06 | + |
DTLZ3 | 22.4023 | 50.7571 | 102.51 | 171.175 | 188.531 | 229.147 | 1.4e−09 | 66.64 | + |
DTLZ4 | 0.02459 | 0.03090 | 0.04093 | 0.03181 | 0.04411 | 0.07016 | 5.5e−08 | 28.99 | + |
DTLZ5 | 0.00152 | 0.00174 | 0.00201 | 0.00190 | 0.00213 | 0.00259 | 8.3e−09 | 11.21 | + |
DTLZ6 | 0.11059 | 0.32162 | 0.65582 | 0.19705 | 0.42455 | 0.71631 | 0.01701 | 16.99 | + |
DTLZ7 | 0.05268 | 0.05783 | 0.06449 | 0.05824 | 0.06653 | 0.07449 | 2.9e−08 | 39.89 | + |