Table 3 IGD results from 30 executions of m-CMA-PAES and MO-CMA-ES on the ZDT and CEC09 test suites with two problem objectives
2D | m-CMA-PAES | MO-CMA-ES | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best | Mean | Worst | Best | Mean | Worst | p value | %IGD | ||
ZDT1 | 0.00628 | 0.00657 | 0.00686 | 0.00813 | 0.00936 | 0.01031 | 1.4e−09 | 69.23 | + |
ZDT2 | 0.00592 | 0.00614 | 0.00639 | 0.00989 | 0.01172 | 0.01511 | 1.4e−09 | 60.72 | + |
ZDT3 | 0.00574 | 0.00609 | 0.00676 | 0.00552 | 0.00594 | 0.00643 | 0.0625 | \(-\)12.10 | = |
ZDT4 | 1.80044 | 6.17983 | 11.44563 | 2.85512 | 8.35397 | 14.56593 | 0.0232 | 17.03 | + |
ZDT6 | 0.01132 | 0.01279 | 0.01406 | 0.04788 | 0.08938 | 0.20901 | 1.4e−09 | 38.74 | + |
UF1 | 0.03762 | 0.05824 | 0.06579 | 0.05044 | 0.07228 | 0.12375 | 1.1e−06 | 17.00 | + |
UF2 | 0.01359 | 0.02006 | 0.02687 | 0.02117 | 0.03496 | 0.05235 | 5.5e−08 | 38.44 | + |
UF3 | 0.04869 | 0.07992 | 0.12647 | 0.06044 | 0.08129 | 0.10133 | 0.7269 | 1.76 | = |
UF4 | 0.05925 | 0.06431 | 0.06942 | 0.07661 | 0.08261 | 0.09722 | 1.4e−09 | 48.20 | + |
UF5 | 0.49880 | 0.72982 | 1.04816 | 0.87997 | 1.04873 | 1.26644 | 8.3e−09 | 41.54 | + |
UF6 | 0.08817 | 0.12736 | 0.22802 | 0.09314 | 0.11268 | 0.22469 | 0.010432 | \(-\)10.50 | – |
UF7 | 0.01791 | 0.02431 | 0.03226 | 0.03306 | 0.06434 | 0.12773 | 1.4e−09 | 36.45 | + |