Skip to main content
Log in

A Topological Version of Hedetniemi’s Conjecture for Equivariant Spaces

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Combinatorica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A topological version of the famous Hedetniemi conjecture says: The mapping index of the Cartesian product of two \({\mathbb {Z}}/2\)- spaces is equal to the minimum of their \({\mathbb {Z}}/2\)-indexes. The main purpose of this article is to study the topological version of the Hedetniemi conjecture for G-spaces. Indeed, we show that the topological Hedetniemi conjecture cannot be valid for general pairs of G-spaces. More precisely, we show that this conjecture can possibly survive if the group G is either a cyclic p-group or a generalized quaternion group whose size is a power of 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A G-equivariant map \(f: X\rightarrow Y\) is a continuous map that also preserves the G-action, i.e., \(f(gx)=gf(x)\) for all \(g\in G\) and \(x\in X\). Moreover, if X and Y are G-simplicial complexes and f is also a simplicial map, then it is called a G-simplicial map.

  2. A G-space Y is called tidy if \({{\,\textrm{ind}\,}}Y ={{\,\mathrm{co-ind}\,}}Y\), where \({{\,\mathrm{co-ind}\,}}Y\) is the maximum k such that there exists a G-equivariant map from \(E_kG\) to Y.

  3. The generalized quaternion group is given by the presentation \(Q_{4n}=\langle a,b: a^n=b^2, a^{2n}=1, b^{-1}ab=a^{-1}\rangle \) where \(n\ge 2\).

  4. It should be noted that the cross-index for G-poset where \(G=\mathbb {Z}_2\) and \({\mathbb {Z}}/p\) were defined respectively in [1, 10].

References

  1. Alishahi, M.: Colorful subhypergraphs in uniform hypergraphs. Electron. J. Comb. 24(1), P1-23 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Daneshpajouh, H.R., Karasev, R., Volovikov, A.: Hedetniemi’s conjecture from the topological viewpoint. J. Comb. Theory Ser. A 195, 105721 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Daneshpajouh, H.R., Karasev, R., Volovikov, A.Y.: Hedetniemi’s conjecture from the topological viewpoint. arXiv:1806.04963v2 (2019)

  4. Eilenberg, S., Steenrod, N.: Foundations of Algebraic Topology, vol. 2193. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gorenstein, D.: Finite Groups, vol. 301. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hajiabolhassan, H., Meunier, F.: Hedetniemi’s conjecture for Kneser hypergraphs. J. Comb. Theory Ser. A 143, 42–55 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedetniemi, S.: Homomorphisms of graphs and automata. Michigan University Ann Arbor Communication Sciences Program, (1966). Technical report

  8. Matsushita, T.: \(Z_2\)-indices and Hedetniemi’s conjecture. Discrete Comput. Geom. 62, 662–673 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Shitov, Y.: Counterexamples to Hedetniemi’s conjecture. Ann. Math. 190(2), 663–667 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Simonyi, G., Tardif, C., Zsbán, A.: Colourful theorems and indices of homomorphism complexes. Electron. J. Combin. 20(1), 1–15 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Tardif, C.: Hedetniemi’s conjecture, 40 years later. Graph Theory Notes NY 54(46–57), 2 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Tom Dieck, T.: Transformation Groups, vol. 8. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Walker, J.W.: Canonical homeomorphisms of posets. Eur. J. Comb. 9(2), 97–107 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Wrochna, M.: On inverse powers of graphs and topological implications of Hedetniemi’s conjecture. J. Comb. Theory Ser. B 139, 267–295 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu, X.: A survey on Hedetniemi’s conjecture. Taiwan. J. Math. 2(1), 1–24 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu, X.: The fractional version of Hedetniemi’s conjecture is true. Eur. J. Comb. 32(7), 1168–1175 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their invaluable feedback and comments on the manuscript, which greatly contributed to enhancing its overall quality.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vuong Bui.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bui, V., Daneshpajouh, H.R. A Topological Version of Hedetniemi’s Conjecture for Equivariant Spaces. Combinatorica 44, 441–452 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-023-00079-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-023-00079-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation