Extreme weather events are major causes of loss of life and damage infrastructure worldwide. High temperatures cause heat stress on humans, livestock, crops and infrastructure. Heat stress exposure is projected to increase with ongoing climate change. Extremes of temperature are common in Africa and infrastructure is often incapable of providing adequate cooling. We show how easily accessible cooling technology, such as evaporative coolers, prevent heat stress in historic timescales but are unsuitable as a solution under climate change. As temperatures increase, powered cooling, such as air conditioning, is necessary to prevent overheating. This will, in turn, increase demand on already stretched infrastructure. We use high temporal resolution climate model data to estimate the demand for cooling according to two metrics, firstly the apparent temperature and secondly the discomfort index. For each grid cell we calculate the heat stress value and the amount of cooling required to turn a heat stress event into a non heat stress event. We show the increase in demand for cooling in Africa is non uniform and that equatorial countries are exposed to higher heat stress than higher latitude countries. We further show that evaporative coolers are less effective in tropical regions than in the extra tropics. Finally, we show that neither low nor high efficiency coolers are sufficient to return Africa to current levels of heat stress under climate change.
Heat stress occurs when a person is unable to maintain homeostasis and subsequent healthy internal body temperatures. Extremes of heat stress cause hyperthermia and a variety of physiological factors lead to increase rate of death, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and drug use (Ebi et al. 2021, and references therein). There are several methods to prevent heat stress, these include but are not limited to, reducing physical exertion in high temperatures, avoiding direct sunlight or using cooling or warming technologies to control the ambient temperature (Suzuki-Parker and Kusaka 2016). Natural responses to heat stress include sweating and dilating blood vessels in the extremities to increase radiative cooling (Simon 1993).
A person’s ability to adjust their environment to prevent heat stress is linked to their adaptive capacity. Adaptive capacity is a combination of factors and includes physiological, technological and economic options. Richer people have access to more options to adjust the environment to suit them and they have a high adaptive capacity. The inverse of this is also true, people with low adaptive capacity are by definition more vulnerable to stresses (Putnam et al. 2018; Ahmadalipour et al. 2019; Jagarnath et al. 2020). People that predominantly work outdoors are more vulnerable to heat stress as shade and cooling stations may not be available and moving indoors may not be practical. Vulnerability to heat stress is not limited to outside work, buildings may have old, inefficient or absent space cooling that prevents the occupants from altering their environment (Uejio et al. 2011). Heat stress also affects labour with extremes of temperature causing people to be less productive, or requiring commercial establishments to close to prevent injury or deaths of workers (Kjellstrom et al. 2009; Dunne et al. 2013; de Lima et al. 2021). Vulnerability is not solely determined by economic conditions, people suffering with chronic health conditions are more adversely affected by extremes of temperature (Kenny et al. 2010; Ebi et al. 2021). Climate change and an associated increase in heat stress may render some areas uninhabitable due to excessive temperatures (Sherwood and Huber 2010; Pal and Eltahir 2016).
The impacts of high temperatures on economic output were examined in Burke et al. (2015), where countries with a high average temperature are shown to experience significant reductions in gross domestic product (GDP) when temperatures rise further. Highly developed nations such as the United States of America are vulnerable to heat stress events occurring alongside power cuts. A power cut prevents the use of air conditioning which, if it is the sole cooling method, will lead to significant heat stress (Sailor et al. 2019). In less developed nations the prevalence of air conditioning is lower, which indicates reduced adaptive capacity. Concurrently, those fortunate enough to have access to air conditioning are also likely to experience power cuts. During extreme heat stress events, the excess strain on civic infrastructure can cause cascading failures where the failure of one component increases stress on another which in turn fails and increases stress on a third component. An example of a cascading failure was the 2015 Pakistan heat wave where extra demand for electricity caused the grid to fail, this greatly reduced the effectiveness of hospitals leading to further deaths (Masood et al. 2015).
The energy demand of cooling during extreme heat events is projected to increase globally into the 21st century (Levesque et al. 2018). Furthermore, countries in the developing world, which are concentrated in the tropics, are expected to bear the brunt of this increase in energy demand (van Ruijven et al. 2019; De Cian and Wing 2019). Compound hazard events whereby a tropical cyclone is followed by a period of high temperature are projected to increase in likelihood with climate change. These events are dangerous across the globe and with the low adaptive capacity of developing countries, the effects will be felt the strongest there (Matthews et al. 2019). South Asia is projected to suffer increasing numbers of heat related deaths especially among agricultural workers who are outside in hot humid weather for much of their working day (Im et al. 2017). Cascading impacts predominantly affect regions and nations with low adaptive capacity. Inequalities in access to cooling technologies and low income are key contributors of vulnerability to heat stress (Pasquini et al. 2020; Gronlund 2014; Reid et al. 2009). Africa, with its large number of developing nations, is particularly vulnerable to heat stress and extra cooling demand (Zhao et al. 2015; Parkes et al. 2019).
The population of Africa in 2000 was 0.82 billion, and by 2050 this is projected to be 2.53 billion (United Nations Population Division 2017). Africa is also undergoing rapid urbanisation which, when combined with the population growth, leads to a significant increase in demand on civic infrastructure. Several African cities are vulnerable to heat stress under current climate conditions where temperatures can be hazardous to human health for four months of the year (Barbier et al. 2018). Urban centres are more exposed to heat stress than rural regions as a result of the urban heat island effect, which causes urban areas to be warmer than their rural surroundings (Fischer et al. 2012; Oke 1982; Tran et al. 2006; Wouters et al. 2017). As a quantitative indicator of vulnerable populations and lack of development, researchers use the Human Development Index (HDI), a combination of Life Expectancy, Education and Income (United Nations Development Programme 2010). Sub-Saharan Africa has some of the lowest HDI values on the planet (United Nations Development Programme 2019). The combination of an increasing urban population, high vulnerability, and larger temperature extremes means that Africa is particularly susceptible to future heat stress (Asefi-Najafabady et al. 2018; Ahmadalipour and Moradkhani 2018; Lelieveld et al. 2016; Sylla et al. 2018).
Climate change is projected to increase both average and extreme temperatures in Africa (Zhao et al. 2015; Sun et al. 2019; Orlowsky and Seneviratne 2012; Varela et al. 2020; Zittis et al. 2021). Higher temperatures and higher humidity are key components of increasing heat stress. The majority of cities are either coastal or near major rivers, and in the case of coastal cities, the increased humidity from evaporation further exacerbates vulnerability to heat stress (Diffenbaugh et al. 2007; Kumar et al. 2017; Coffel et al. 2017; Mishra et al. 2020). South East Asia is projected to suffer increasing numbers of days with high wet bulb temperature under future climate change (Im et al. 2018). The increase in average temperatures, alongside an increase in variability of extremes of temperature, results in people desiring more temperature control. Existing technologies such as evaporative coolers (Koca et al. 1991), colloquially known as swamp coolers, are common in the developing world. Although the target efficiency values of 65 % and 80 % are arbitrary, these represent the range that commonly used inexpensive evaporative cooling systems exhibit. Two example types of industrial scale evaporative cooling systems demonstrate the robustness of these estimates. First, the direct evaporative cooling system using a wet mesh pad that is inexpensive and has an efficiency range from 60–85 % efficiency depending on the age of the unit (Koca et al. 1991). Second, more expensive two-stage direct and indirect evaporative cooling systems, such as a mesh pad with a secondary heat pump exchanger that can be 50–110 % efficient (Heidarinejad et al. 2009). The higher efficiency system requires access to larger power and water resources. This evaporation inhibits natural sweating and also raises the local humidity, therefore the maximum cooling is limited to the wet bulb temperature (Buzan et al. 2015). Air conditioning is a forced heat transfer where rooms are cooled but the excess energy is vented outside. The electricity demand in the United States is projected to increase by 8 % under climate change (Maia-Silva et al. 2020). Similarly the cumulative financial costs of improving the electricity grid in Africa to provide energy to prevent heat stress under high intensity climate change are over $50bn by 2035 and more than $480bn by 2076 (Parkes et al. 2019).
In this study we examine the change in exposure to heat stress and the change in cooling demand in Africa using high temporal resolution output from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) climate model ensemble. We further investigate the change in cooling demand after deployment of evaporative coolers. These data sources allows us to test the following hypotheses.
We hypothesise that evaporative coolers will be most effective in less humid regions.
We further hypothesise that before the end of the 21st century, evaporative coolers will be unable to cool regions sufficiently to replicate current conditions.
We hypothesise that increasing population will lead to an increase in people exposed to heat stress.
Climate model data
We calculate evaporative cooler algorithms and heat stress metrics using CMIP5 output (Table 1; Taylor et al. 2012). Our focus is on the Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5) for the largest climate signal (Meinshausen et al. 2011). The RCP8.5 scenario is used to develop a climate emulator that produces changes in means and extremes per degree of climate change following previously demonstrated methods (Buzan and Huber 2020; de Lima et al. 2021; Buzan 2021). Eighteen models fit the criteria with sub-daily values of temperature (T), moisture (Q), and surface pressure (P) across three time slices, 1986–2005 (modern), 2026–2045 (near future), and 2081–2100 (far future). The 1986–2005 span used as the modern period results from 2005 being the end of the CMIP5 historic model period (Taylor et al. 2012). 10 metre winds (μ10m) were only available for 14 CMIP5 models. All relevant variables are listed and described below (Table 2), and all data was interpolated to interpolated to a 0.9∘x1.25∘ resolution. The evaporative cooler algorithms are described in SI Section 1 and SI Fig. 1.
Heat stress metrics
There are multiple metrics used to estimate heat stress in humans, with some equations dating from the early 20th century (Haldane 1905; Dufton 1929; Belding et al. 1955). A list of commonly utilised metrics along with their publication date is shown in Table 1 of Buzan et al. (2015). Two metrics were selected for use in this study, the Apparent Temperature and the Discomfort index. The Apparent Temperature (AT) is a comfort algorithm that is derived from a human thermo-physiology model (Steadman 1984; Buzan et al. 2015):
An AT value of greater than 28∘C is sufficient to cause slight heat stress, a value of 32∘C indicates moderate heat stress with higher values increasing severity of discomfort and relevant health impacts (Zhao et al. 2015).
The Discomfort Index (DI) is an estimate of the discomfort associated with high temperatures and humidity (Thom 1959):
The DI is used to estimate the cooling required to achieve a comfortable temperature with a limit of 21∘C, where an increase in temperature would be uncomfortable for half of the population. A DI limit of 24 ∘C indicates any further temperature increase causes discomfort to more than half the population (Giles et al. 1990; Sylla et al. 2018).
We calculate the fraction of the year above the AT and DI thresholds listed above. Any time the AT is above the threshold of, 28∘C for the lower limit or 32∘C for the higher limit, is a heat stress event. Similarly if the DI exceeds 21∘C for the lower limit or 24∘C for the higher limit then these are recorded as events. Solving Eqs. 1 or 4 for temperature allows calculation of the change in temperature required to bring the heat stress value below the limits (Parkes et al. 2019). This reduction in temperature is measured in degree days and referred to as cooling degree days. The use of multiple limits shows the effects of ethnic differences, genetic adaptations or acclimatisation to living and working in tropical environments (McNeill and Parsons 1999; Lee et al. 2011; Lundgren et al. 2013).
The climate emulator, ExC-CEPt
Climate emulators are derived from a combination of statistical averaging and the use of pattern scaling techniques, machine learning, and various linear approximation statistical techniques (Lord et al. 2017; Beusch et al. 2020a, 2020b). The underlying assumption in linear regression is that the degrees of freedom are proportional to the number of data points minus one, and that the data being compared are independent. When it comes climate model output however, these assumptions are too strict because the data is dependent on underlying comparisons. Thus the degrees of freedom are much less than the total volume from the time series. Rectifying this issue, we focus on mean changes in slopes using pattern scaling (Seneviratne et al. 2012; Sillmann et al. 2013; Donat et al. 2017).
Construction of the emulator is grounded on moist thermodynamic theory (Byrne and O’gorman 2016; Buzan and Huber 2020), radiative convective quasi-equilibrium arguments (Williams et al. 2009nov; Williams and Pierrehumbert 2017), and recent developments in statistical covariance of extremes (McKinnon and Poppick 2020; Poppick and McKinnon 2020). The emulator here is in active use for a variety of applications, ranging from theoretical thermodynamic heat stress applications (Buzan and Huber 2020) and climate change induced labour reductions in agricultural settings (de Lima et al. 2021). A target variable is selected as the primary variable for which all nine other climate variables are conditioned upon. For descriptive purposes, we focus on DI. Each 20 year time series of 4x daily output for each CMIP5 simulation is ranked from lowest to highest. Following this, every other variable (Table 2) is reordered by the same index map that DI was ranked by. This provides the ranked ordered DI and conditional covariance. Due to the size of CMIP5 data (\(\sim\)7 TB of data), the output goes through data reduction process that extracts the statistical properties. The reordered DI time series is binned into 100 percentiles and the average and standard deviations are extracted.
Then, the baseline percentiles (1986–2005) are subtracted from the future percentiles (2081–2100). These 100 percentile differences are then divided by the global mean surface temperature change for each CMIP5 simulation, respectively. This produces the pattern scaling for which climate change projections are determined. Next, the pattern scalings between all CMIP5 simulations are averaged, producing a single DI pattern scaling map that is dependent on global mean surface temperature. Although conceptually, the RCP8.5 greenhouse gasses pathway warming is not expected to be reached at the end of 21st Century, the amplitude of climate change is large, enhancing the pattern of warming (Buzan and Huber 2020). This allows the user to use a predetermined amount of warming such as 1, 2 or more degrees of climate change—independent of time—and evaluate outcomes (de Lima et al. 2021). This process is then repeated for the other nine conditioned variables, and produces the pattern scaling conditioned upon DI’s specific spatial pattern. This is critical, because this means that all multivariate climate projections are physically consistent. The variance between patterns within the CMIP models is small and is dependent on the unknown climate sensitivity of Earth system models (Buzan and Huber 2020; Schwingshackl et al. 2021). Finally, projections are produced by using the pattern scaling map multiplied by the amount of global mean surface temperature change plus the baseline (1986–2005) conditions. The 1986–2005 baseline has a built in + 0.6∘C from historical emissions (Seneviratne et al. 2016). In principle, any other time period with the same temporal and spatial resolution could be used due to the robustness and physical constraints of the patterns in Earth system models. (Buzan and Huber 2020; McKinnon and Poppick 2020; Poppick and McKinnon 2020; Schwingshackl et al. 2021).
Determining the timing of air conditioning use is dependent on multiple factors: human comfort and health, evaporative cooling potential, etc. It is not enough to project, for example, the DI changes at 3∘C of global warming. What is required is determining if the global warming changed DI value has surpassed discomfort, labour reducing, or life threatening thresholds after evaporative cooling mechanisms were applied. This is where ExC-CEPt covariances are required.
Sticking with the before mentioned DI example, the entire pattern scaling of DI and the nine conditioned variables are multiplied by 3 ∘C global mean surface temperature change and added to the ranked DI and conditioned baselines. Then the scaled evaporative cooler output temperature, for example TSWMP65, is used as a new moist air temperature at 100% relative humidity. This is used to represent a new Tw which is combined with coincident scaled T to produced a new evaporatively cooled DI value. This cooled DI value is compared to the danger thresholds, and if exceeded, the 65% efficiency coolers are noted as incapable of cooling to safe values, thus requiring the more expensive high efficiency evaporative coolers. The process is repeated again with 80% efficiency coolers values, and if the cooled DI values still exceed the danger thresholds, air conditioning is required. This is applied across the 100 percentiles to produce a percentage of climatology that requires mechanical cooling at 3∘C global warming.
The effect of the evaporative coolers was calculated by replacing the temperature in Eqs. 1 and 4 with the adjusted temperatures. The change in temperature and evaporation of water from the coolers affects the water vapour pressure, therefore this is recalculated using Eqs. 2 and 3. Evaporative coolers saturate the atmosphere so the relative humidity is set to 100 % for use in Eq. 3 (Buzan et al. 2015). Utilising these methods warming between 0∘C and 5∘C is simulated for scenarios with no cooling, low efficiency evaporative coolers and high efficiency evaporative coolers. The control scenario is one where climate warming is 0∘ and no cooling technology is applied.
The scaling approach used in this study allows analyses of large temperature changes. These temperature changes are only consistent with a high intensity Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) (O’Neill et al. 2016). Therefore the population data for this analysis are based on the total population data for SSP5 (Kriegler et al. 2017; Riahi et al. 2017). SSP5 corresponds to Fossil-fuelled Development where the world experiences high migration, strong globalisation, meat rich diets alongside no commitments to reducing fossil fuel usage (KC and Lutz 2017). The population data were regridded onto the same grid as the climate model data. We calculated average population data for four time slices, 1986–2005, 2006–2035, 2036–2065, 2066–2095, with the first using gridded historic data and the remaining three using gridded SSP5 population data. The population dependent results were calculated by multiplying the gridded population data with the gridded model outputs before summing for use in figures. This produces the total number of person-day-events. The integrated population heat stress is used to give a consistent comparison between historic and future events while incorporating both temperature and population changes.
The fraction of the year where people are vulnerable to heat stress is shown in Fig. 1. There are two major patterns in the results. Firstly as climate change leads to higher global temperatures, the amount of heat stress increases, secondly there is an increase in cooling required to reduce the heat stress exposure. In the scenario with no climate change warming, the highly populated Sahel region experiences at heat stress for at least half the year. As temperatures increase the fraction of the year with heat stress (AT \(\geqslant 24\)) increases to the point that almost the entire year contains heat stress under high warming loads. With cooling technology of either low or high efficiency, the number of heat stress events drops quickly, especially in the extra tropics. However, evaporative coolers, which require a difference in humidity to work effectively, are of less benefit in the tropical regions of Central and West Africa. The fraction of the year where people are exposed to moderate heat stress (AT \(\geqslant 32\)) increases into the 21st century (SI Fig. 8), in this case the evaporative coolers are sufficient to prevent moderate heat stress under mild warming conditions. A comparison of the number of heat stress events with the scenario without cooling technology or climate warming is shown in Fig. 2. In the Sahara Desert, there is a reduction in heat stress under cooling, this is in contrast with the increase in events in the highly populated Sahel and Central African coasts. In the case of moderate heat stress, evaporative coolers are sufficient to reduce heat stress outside of the tropics, even as temperatures reach + 5∘C (SI Fig. 9).
The Discomfort Index and Apparent Temperature come from fundamentally different construction. Whereas the AT was the result of human physiology modelling, DI focused on comfort in relationship to cooling systems. Despite the differences in origins, similar patterns appear between the DI and AT results. The percentage of the with a DI above 21∘C is shown in Fig. 3. The additional discomfort events increase throughout the 21st century and the cooling technologies reduce the amount of extra cooling required. The difference in cooling required is concentrated in the warmer equatorial regions. This pattern is repeated for the higher temperature limit results and in the historic period the high efficiency coolers almost eliminate extra cooling demand (SI Fig. 10). The difference in fraction of the year with DI above 21∘C from the scenario with no cooling technology nor climate warming is shown in Fig. 4. The regions where evaporative coolers are most efficient at reducing the cooling demand are in agreement with the heat stress results in Fig. 2. The dry Sahara desert requires less cooling. However this is of little impact due to the extremely low population density. Under increasing levels of climate change the cooling required increases fairly evenly across Africa. The fraction of the year with DI above 21∘C increases strongly in in West and Central Africa. The evaporative coolers are less effective at preventing discomfort than heat stress, particularly in the extra tropics. With an increase of 2∘C low efficiency coolers are overwhelmed across the continent. By 3∘C the high efficiency coolers cannot bring discomfort below the control scenario.
Population dependent results
Climate change is not the only phenomena which influences the number of heat stress events, population density and population change are important for estimating the total number of events.
Figure 5 shows panels of the total number of heat stress events multiplied by future population change under different warming conditions and with deployment of different cooling technologies. The total number of events are heavily population driven as is shown on each bar chart, as populations increase towards the end of the century the number of people exposed to heat stress increases proportionately. The evaporative coolers are effective at preventing high levels of heat stress to the end of the 21st century, providing global warming is kept below 2∘C. Figure 6 shows the number of cooling degree days, weighted by population, required to prevent heat stress. This shows that the extra cooling to prevent moderate heat stress is much smaller than the cooling required to prevent all heat stress, indicating that many events are between the two values.
Cooling technology requirement
The magnitude of the change in number of heat stress events on a country is a function of the population change and severity of warming from climate change. The number of heat stress events is also moderated by the prevalent cooling technology. Figure 7 shows the cooling technology required for African regions to reduce AT \(\geqslant 28\) (top row) or AT \(\geqslant 32\) (bottom row) events to below the number of events in the control scenario. For a country scale break down of these plots see SI Figs. 12–17. Tropical countries in West and Central Africa often have to switch to air conditioning regardless of the intensity of global temperature changes. In contrast; extra tropical nations can take advantage of evaporative coolers even with severe climate change. The high efficiency evaporative coolers have little use and many nations will be forced to move from low efficiency coolers to air conditioning to prevent heat stress.
Discussion and Conclusions
Robustness of CMIP5 results
The TSWMP65 and TSWMP80 values are tied to moist thermodynamics of the atmosphere, and specifically tied to Tw. The Tw represents two phenomenon in the climate system. First, Tw is the minimum temperature that the parcel of air will cool to from maximized evaporation. Tying this to evaporative coolers, Tw is the equivalent to a representation of a perfect evaporator, i.e. a evaporative cooler at 100 % efficiency. Second, Tw is a measure of atmospheric buoyancy, and is directly tied to changes in global mean surface temperature through radiative convective quasi-equilibrium constraints (Pierrehumbert 1995; Williams et al. 2009 nov; Williams and Pierrehumbert 2017). Changes in Tw, thus changes in TSWMP65 and TSWMP80, are shown to be robust (Buzan and Huber 2020).
Interpretation of cooling potential
The pattern of effective cooling is linked to the moisture levels in the atmosphere, in the humid monsoonal regions of Africa, the efficacy of evaporative coolers is lower. This results in less cooling in the regions most vulnerable to heat stress. By the end of the century the regions where evaporative coolers are less effective are clearly identifiable, they are tropical West and Central Africa, along with coastal East Africa and Madagascar. Cities in the region where evaporative coolers cannot prevent an increase in heat stress include Lagos, Kinshasa, Abidjan and Dar es Salaam. These are four of the ten most populated cities in Africa. Cairo and Giza in Egypt see a reduction in heat stress when using evaporative coolers, however the impact of the Nile river may not be resolved in climate models. Recent work shows that heavy irrigated regions may exacerbate extreme heat stress (Mishra et al. 2020). Johannesburg, Nairobi and Casablanca see heat stress levels remain similar under increasing levels of climate change. This disparity of response where the richer nations of Egypt and South Africa can use cheaper cooling technology such as evaporative coolers rather than air conditioning exacerbates income inequality.
The cooling demand for comfort has a different response than the number of heat stress events. The evaporative coolers appear to prevent severe high temperatures, at the penalty of increasing humidity. This pattern breaks down by the under severe climate change of 3∘C and tropical Africa requires additional cooling beyond high efficiency evaporative coolers. The contrast between Figs. 2 and 4 for small temperature changes and evaporative coolers is notable as heat stress is either reduced or held stable, while cooling demand for comfort increases. It is not unreasonable to expect that people with sufficient disposable income will invest in air conditioning in the short term. If this is the case, then governments and the energy sector will need to account for the extra electricity demand during hot episodes.
The AT and DI results show similar responses when analysing both the lower and upper limits defined in Section “Heat stress metrics”. Both metrics see an expected decrease in events as the limits increase. At the continent scale for both cases, the evaporative coolers, are not sufficient to bring the number of events below those in the control scenario. However at country scale, high efficiency evaporative coolers prevent almost all moderate heat stress with the exception of the tropics, even under 5 ∘C of global warming.
Nigeria is an interesting case within Africa, due to its high population and tropical location Nigeria is exposed to considerable heat stress. However, Nigeria is also one of the richer countries in Africa and is therefore more able to respond to stresses on infrastructure such as increasing energy demand. The increase in infrastructure demand in Nigeria is in contrast with other affluent Africa nations such as Egypt and South Africa who will be able to continue with their existing infrastructure even as global temperatures rise. Furthermore, both nations are extra-tropical and are able to use evaporative coolers instead of more expensive air conditioning units. Countries that are both tropical and least developed are doubly vulnerable, they are exposed to significant heat stress and their existing infrastructure is often inadequate for current conditions. Countries that fall into this category include Burkina Faso, Liberia and Niger. Adding extra demand during heat stress events is dangerous and coupling this with future climate threatens the health of large portions of the population.
The urban heat island effect and its amplification of warming is too fine to be observed with the climate model analysis used herein (Fischer et al. 2012; Oke 1982; Wouters et al. 2017). Therefore the results for highly urbanised areas are likely an underestimate of total cooling demand. Increases in both temperature and urban area amplify the urban head island effect and this sprawl will increase heat stress (Marcotullio et al. 2021). The causes of increased heat stress do not solely cause heat stress. Higher temperatures increase risk of fires and droughts. Static air allows pollutants to build up and therefore reduce air quality, which will in turn negatively affect health (Heft-Neal et al. 2018; Prüss-Üstün et al. 2016). These events will not happen in isolation and compound events, where a region is struck by multiple hazards are projected to increase in frequency under future climate change (Zscheischler et al. 2018). Climate change is not restricted to temperature increase, a warmer atmosphere holds more moisture, this in turn increases thermal load on people. Focusing solely on temperature as a proxy for heat stress therefore omits part of the signal from climate change and underestimates the increase in cooling demand (Maia-Silva et al. 2020).
Limitation of experimental design
Events where the heat stress or thermal discomfort occurs will increase in frequency with climate change. The focus of our work highlights the disparity from socio-economic access between different pathways for types of cooling infrastructure. This is accomplished by evaluating the transition from no cooling to varying infrastructure quality of evaporative coolers to the energy intensive air conditioning, which cannot be assessed through traditional methods of degree cooling days. One of the issues with using CMIP type models is that the results are grid cell averages, and do not evaluate the specific environments where humans work and live. Future work should focus on specific rural and urban environments. However, as a first estimate, evaporative coolers are not sufficient to prevent all demand for comfort cooling for low or high limits. Evaporative coolers do prevent moderate heat stress with small global temperature changes, but they are less useful in tropical regions with high humidity.
Cooling infrastructure choice is a combination of health and comfortable working environment. Our analysis attacks this issue from both angels, as apparent temperature is regularly used in health applications, mitigating high heat stress is a health decision. DI is traditionally used for measuring the effectiveness of cooling to a comfortable environment, and thus mitigating high DI events is a comfort decision. The use of fans to cool an environment is a lower cost option than the evaporative coolers. They are also of limited use in the high temperature and high humidity environments in West and Central Africa. Fans moving hot, moist air have a limited window where they provide benefits to working conditions as shown in Foster et al. (2021). People with disposable income are likely to invest in their comfort, therefore even governments operating on the higher limits for AT and DI will need to provide infrastructure to support additional cooling in the near future. In the national results, the evaporative coolers are less effective in tropical regions. Tropical countries in Africa are typically poorer than their extra-tropical counterparts. The requirement of poorer nations to invest in more expensive technology and infrastructure to counteract climate change is a clear example of climate injustice (Comim 2008).
Energy systems are national or regional scale projects. Given the development time and costs, the increase in cooling demand requires active consideration by policy makers sooner rather than later. Preventing future climate change, by as little as 0.5∘C reduces health impacts of climate change across Africa (Sun et al. 2019).
Ahmadalipour A, Moradkhani H (2018) Escalating heat-stress mortality risk due to global warming in the middle east and north africa (mena). Environ Int 117:215–225
Ahmadalipour A, Moradkhani H, Kumar M (2019) Mortality risk from heat stress expected to hit poorest nations the hardest. Clim Chang 152(3):569–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2348-2
Asefi-Najafabady S, Vandecar KL, Seimon A, Lawrence P, Lawrence D (2018) Climate change, population, and poverty: vulnerability and exposure to heat stress in countries bordering the great lakes of africa. Clim Chang 148(4):561–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2211-5
Barbier J, Guichard F, Bouniol D, Couvreux F, Roehrig R (2018) Detection of intraseasonal large-scale heat waves: Characteristics and historical trends during the sahelian spring. J Clim 31(1):61–80. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0244.1
Belding HS, Hatch TF, et al. (1955) Index for evaluating heat stress in terms of resulting physiological strains. Heating, Piping and Air Conditioning 27(8):129–36
Bentsen M, Bethke I, Debernard JB, Iversen T, Kirkevåg A, Seland O, Drange H, Roelandt C, Seierstad IA, Hoose C, Kristjánsson JE (2013) The Norwegian earth system model, NorESM1-M – part 1: description and basic evaluation of the physical climate. Geosci Model Dev 6(3):687–720
Beusch L, Gudmundsson L, Seneviratne SI (2020) Emulating earth system model temperatures with mesmer: from global mean temperature trajectories to grid-point-level realizations on land. Earth Syst Dynam 11(1):139–159. https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/11/139/2020/
Beusch L, Gudmundsson L, Seneviratne SI (2020) Crossbreeding cmip6 earth system models with an emulator for regionally optimized land temperature projections. Geophys Res Lett 47(15):e2019GL086812. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086812
Bitz CM, Shell KM, Gent PR, Bailey DA, Danabasoglu G, Armour KC, Holland MM, Kiehl JT (2012) Climate sensitivity of the community climate system model, version 4. J Climate 25(9):3053–3070
Burke M, Hsiang SM, Miguel E (2015) Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production. Nature 527(7577):235–239
Buzan JR, Oleson K, Huber M (2015) Implementation and comparison of a suite of heat stress metrics within the community land model version 4.5. Geosci Model Dev 8(2):151–170. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-151-2015
Buzan JR (2021) Describing the extreme covariance climate emulator projections exc-cept. Geoscientific Model Development (in Prep)
Buzan JR, Huber M (2020) Moist heat stress on a hotter earth. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 48(1):623–655. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-053018-060100
Byrne MP, O’gorman PA (2016) Understanding decreases in land relative humidity with global warming: conceptual model and GCM simulations. J Climate 29(24):9045–9061
Coffel ED, Horton RM, de Sherbinin A (2017) Temperature and humidity based projections of a rapid rise in global heat stress exposure during the 21st century. Environ Res Lett 13(1):014001
Comim F (2008) Climate injustice and development: a capability perspective. Development 51 (3):344–349
De Cian E, Wing IS (2019) Global energy consumption in a warming climate. Environ Resour Econ 72(2):365–410
de Lima CZ, Buzan JR, Moore FC, Baldos ULC, Huber M, Hertel TW (2021) Heat stress on agricultural workers exacerbates crop impacts of climate change. Environ Res Lett 16(4):044020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abeb9f
Diffenbaugh NS, Pal JS, Giorgi F, Gao X (2007) Heat stress intensification in the mediterranean climate change hotspot. Geophys Res Lett 34:11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030000
Dix M, Vohralik P, Bi D, Rashid H, Marsland S, O’Farrell S, Uotila P, Hirst T, Kowalczyk E, Sullivan A, Yan H, Franklin C, Sun Z, Watterson I, Collier M, Noonan J, Rotstayn L, Stevens L, Uhe P, Puri K (2013) The ACCESS coupled model: documentation of core CMIP5 simulations and initial results. Australian Meteorol Oceanograp J 63(1):83–99
Donat MG, Pitman AJ, Seneviratne SI (2017) Regional warming of hot extremes accelerated by surface energy fluxes. Geophys Res Lett 44(13):7011–7019
Donner LJ, Wyman BL, Hemler RS, Horowitz LW, Ming Y, Zhao M, Golaz J-C, Ginoux P, Lin SJ, Schwarzkopf MD, Austin J, Alaka G, Cooke WF, Delworth TL, Freidenreich SM, Gordon CT, Griffies SM, Held IM, Hurlin WJ, Klein SA, Knutson TR, Langenhorst AR, Lee H-C, Lin Y, Magi BI, Malyshev SL, Milly PCD, Naik V, Nath MJ, Pincus R, Ploshay JJ, Ramaswamy V, Seman CJ, Shevliakova E, Sirutis JJ, Stern WF, Stouffer RJ, Wilson RJ, Winton M, Wittenberg AT, Zeng F (2011) The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3. J Climate 24(13):3484–3519
Dufresne JL, Foujols MA, Denvil S, Caubel A, Marti O, Aumont O, Balkanski Y, Bekki S, Bellenger H, Benshila R, Bony S, Bopp L, Braconnot P, Brockmann P, Cadule P, Cheruy F, Codron F, Cozic A, Cugnet D, de Noblet N, Duvel J P, Ethé C, Fairhead L, Fichefet T, Flavoni S, Friedlingstein P, Grandpeix JY, Guez L, Guilyardi E, Hauglustaine D, Hourdin F, Idelkadi A, Ghattas J, Joussaume S, Kageyama M, Krinner G, Labetoulle S, Lahellec A, Lefebvre MP, Lefevre F, Levy C, Li ZX, Lloyd J, Lott F, Madec G, Mancip M, Marchand M, Masson S, Meurdesoif Y, Mignot J, Musat I, Parouty S, Polcher J, Rio C, Schulz M, Swingedouw D, Szopa S, Talandier C, Terray P, Viovy N, Vuichard N (2013) Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5. Clim Dyn 40(9–10):2123–2165
Dufton AF (1929) The eupatheostat. J Sci Instrum 6(8):249–251. https://doi.org/10.1088/0950-7671/6/8/303
Dunne JP, John JG, Adcroft AJ, Griffies SM, Hallberg RW, Shevliakova E, Stouffer RJ, Cooke W, Dunne KA, Harrison MJ, Krasting JP, Malyshev SL, Milly PCD, Phillipps PJ, Sentman LT, Samuels BL, Spelman MJ, Winton M, Wittenberg AT, Zadeh N (2012) GFDL’s ESM2 global coupled climate–carbon earth system models. Part I: physical formulation and baseline simulation characteristics. J Climate 25(19):6646–6665
Dunne JP, Stouffer RJ, John JG (2013) Reductions in labour capacity from heat stress under climate warming. Nat Clim Chang 3(6):563–566
Ebi KL, Capon A, Berry P, Broderick C, de Dear R, Havenith G, Honda Y, Kovats RS, Ma W, Malik A, Morris NB, Nybo L, Seneviratne SI, Vanos J, Jay O (2021) Hot weather and heat extremes: health risks. Lancet 398(10301):698–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01208-3
Fischer EM, Oleson KW, Lawrence DM (2012) Contrasting urban and rural heat stress responses to climate change. Geophys Res Lett 39:3. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050576
Foster J, Smallcombe JW, Hodder S, Jay O, Flouris AD, Havenith G (2021) Quantifying the impact of heat on human physical work capacity; part ii: the observed interaction of air velocity with temperature, humidity, sweat rate, and clothing is not captured by most heat stress indices. Int J Biometeorol, 1–14
Giles BD, Balafoutis C, Maheras P (1990) Too hot for comfort: the heatwaves in greece in 1987 and 1988. Int J Biometeorol 34(2):98–104
Gronlund CJ (2014) Racial and socioeconomic disparities in heat-related health effects and their mechanisms: a review. Curr Epidemiol Rep 1(3):165–173
Haldane JS (1905) The influence of high air temperatures no. I. J Hyg 5(04):494–513
Heft-Neal S, Burney J, Bendavid E, Burke M (2018) Robust relationship between air quality and infant mortality in Africa. Nature 559(7713):254–258
Heidarinejad G, Bozorgmehr M, Delfani S, Esmaeelian J (2009) Experimental investigation of two-stage indirect/direct evaporative cooling system in various climatic conditions. Build Environ 44(10):2073–2079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.02.017, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132309000511
Im E-S, Kang S, Eltahir EA (2018) Projections of rising heat stress over the western maritime continent from dynamically downscaled climate simulations. Glob Planet Chang 165:160–172
Im E-S, Pal JS, Eltahir EA (2017) Deadly heat waves projected in the densely populated agricultural regions of South Asia. Sci Adv 3(8):e1603322
Jagarnath M, Thambiran T, Gebreslasie M (2020) Heat stress risk and vulnerability under climate change in Durban metropolitan, South Africa–identifying urban planning priorities for adaptation. Clim Chang 163(2):807–829
Ji D, Wang L, Feng J, Wu Q, Cheng H, Zhang Q, Yang J, Dong W, Dai Y, Gong D, Zhang RH, Wang X, Liu J, Moore JC, Chen D, Zhou M (2014) Description and basic evaluation of Beijing Normal University Earth System Model (BNU-ESM) version 1. Geosci Model Dev 7(5):2039–2064
KC S, Lutz W (2017) The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. Glob Environ Chang 42:181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.004
Kenny G P, Yardley J, Brown C, Sigal R J, Jay O (2010) Heat stress in older individuals and patients with common chronic diseases. Cmaj 182(10):1053–1060
Kjellstrom T, Holmer I, Lemke B (2009) Workplace heat stress, health and productivity – an increasing challenge for low and middle-income countries during climate change. Global Health Action 2(1):2047. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v2i0.2047
Koca RW, Hughes WC, Christianson LL (1991) Evaporative cooling pads: test procedure and evaluation. Appl Eng Agric 7(4):485–490
Kriegler E, Bauer N, Popp A, Humpen̈der F, Leimbach M, Strefler J, Baumstark L, Bodirsky B L, Hilaire J, Klein D, Mouratiadou I, Weindl I, Bertram C, Dietrich J-P, Luderer G, Pehl M, Pietzcker R, Piontek F, Lotze-Campen H, Biewald A, Bonsch M, Giannousakis A, Kreidenweis U, Müller C, Rolinski S, Schultes A, Schwanitz J, Stevanovic M, Calvin K, Emmerling J, Fujimori S, Edenhofer O (2017) Fossil-fueled development (ssp5): an energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. Glob Environ Chang 42:297–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015
Kumar R, Mishra V, Buzan J, Kumar R, Shindell D, Huber M (2017) Dominant control of agriculture and irrigation on urban heat island in india. Sci Rep 7(1):14054
Lee J-Y, Wakabayashi H, Wijayanto T, Hashiguchi N, Saat M, Tochihara Y (2011) Ethnic differences in thermoregulatory responses during resting, passive and active heating: application of werner’s adaptation model. Eur J Appl Physiol 111(12):2895–2905
Lelieveld J, Proestos Y, Hadjinicolaou P, Tanarhte M, Tyrlis E, Zittis G (2016) Strongly increasing heat extremes in the middle east and north africa (mena) in the 21st century. Clim Chang 137(1–2):245–260
Levesque A, Pietzcker RC, Baumstark L, De Stercke S, Grübler A, Luderer G (2018) How much energy will buildings consume in 2100? A global perspective within a scenario framework. Energy 148:514–527
Li L, Lin P, Yu Y, Wang B, Zhou T, Liu L, Liu J, Bao Q, Xu S, Huang W, Xia K, Pu Y, Dong L, Shen S, Liu Y, Hu N, Liu M, Sun W, Shi X, Zheng W, Wu B, Song M, Liu H, Zhang X, Wu G, Xue W, Huang X, Yang G, Song Z, Qiao F (2013) The flexible global ocean-atmosphere-land system model, Grid-point Version 2: FGOALS-g2. Adv Atmos Sci 30(3):543–560
Lord NS, Crucifix M, Lunt DJ, Thorne MC, Bounceur N, Dowsett H, O’Brien C L, Ridgwell A (2017) Emulation of long-term changes in global climate: application to the late pliocene and future. Clim Past 13(11):1539–1571. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-1539-2017, https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/13/1539/2017/
Lundgren K, Kuklane K, Gao C, Holmer I (2013) Effects of heat stress on working populations when facing climate change. Industrial Health 51(1):3–15
Maia-Silva D, Kumar R, Nateghi R (2020) The critical role of humidity in modeling summer electricity demand across the united states. Nat Commun 11(1):1–8
Marcotullio PJ, Keßler C, Fekete BM (2021) The future urban heat-wave challenge in africa: Exploratory analysis. Glob Environ Chang 66:102190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102190, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378020307731
Masood I, Majid Z, Sohail S, Zia A, Raza S (2015) The deadly heat wave of pakistan, June 2015. Int J Occup Environ Med 6(4):247
Matthews T, Wilby R L, Murphy C (2019) An emerging tropical cyclone–deadly heat compound hazard. Nat Clim Chang 9(8):602–606
McKinnon KA, Poppick A (2020) Estimating changes in the observed relationship between humidity and temperature using noncrossing quantile smoothing splines. J Agri Biol Environ Stat 25(3):292–314
McNeill MB, Parsons KC (1999) Appropriateness of international heat stress standards for use in tropical agricultural environments. Ergonomics 42(6):779–797
Meinshausen M, Smith SJ, Calvin K, Daniel JS, Kainuma MLT, Lamarque J-F, Matsumoto K, Montzka SA, Raper SCB, Riahi K et al (2011) The rcp greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim Change 109(1–2):213
Mishra V, Ambika AK, Asoka A, Aadhar S, Buzan J, Kumar R, Huber M (2020) Moist heat stress extremes in India enhanced by irrigation. Nat Geosci. Accepted
Oke TR (1982) The energetic basis of the urban heat island. Q J R Meteorol Soc 108(455):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710845502
O’Neill BC, Tebaldi C, van Vuuren DP, Eyring V, Friedlingstein P, Hurtt G, Knutti R, Kriegler E, Lamarque J-F, Lowe J, Meehl GA, Moss R, Riahi K, Sanderson BM (2016) The scenario model intercomparison project (scenariomip) for cmip6. Geosci Model Dev 9(9):3461–3482. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
Orlowsky B, Seneviratne SI (2012) Global changes in extreme events: regional and seasonal dimension. Clim Chang 110(3–4):669–696
Pal JS, Eltahir EA (2016) Future temperature in Southwest Asia projected to exceed a threshold for human adaptability. Nat Clim Chang 6(2):197
Parkes B, Cronin J, Dessens O, Sultan B (2019) Climate change in Africa: costs of mitigating heat stress. Clim Chang 154(3):461–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02405-w
Pasquini L, van Aardenne L, Godsmark C N, Lee J, Jack C (2020) Emerging climate change-related public health challenges in africa: a case study of the heat-health vulnerability of informal settlement residents in dar es salaam, tanzania. Sci Total Environ 747:141355
Pierrehumbert RT (1995) Thermostats, radiator fins, and the local runaway greenhouse. J Atmos Sci 52(10):1784–1806. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<1784:TRFATL>2.0.CO;2
Poppick A, McKinnon KA (2020) Observation-based simulations of humidity and temperature using quantile regression. J Clim 33(24):10691–10706. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0403.1, https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/33/24/jcliD200403.xml
Population Division (2017) World population prospects: The 2017 revision, volume i: Comprehensive tables. st/esa/ser.a/399. Tech. rep., Department 759 of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations
Prüss-Üstün A, Wolf J, Corvalán C, Bos R, Neira M (2016) Preventing disease through healthy environments: a global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks. World Health Organization
Putnam H, Hondula DM, Urban A, Berisha V, Iñiguez P, Roach M (2018) It’s not the heat, it’s the vulnerability: attribution of the 2016 spike in heat-associated deaths in maricopa county, arizona. Environ Res Lett 13(9):094022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aadb44
Reid CE, O’neill MS, Gronlund CJ, Brines SJ, Brown DG, Diez-Roux AV, Schwartz J (2009) Mapping community determinants of heat vulnerability. Environ Health Perspect 117(11):1730–1736
Riahi K, van Vuuren DP, Kriegler E, Edmonds J, O’Neill BC, Fujimori S, Bauer N, Calvin K, Dellink R, Fricko O, Lutz W, Popp A, Cuaresma JC, KC S, Leimbach M, Jiang L, Kram T, Rao S, Emmerling J, Ebi K, Hasegawa T, Havlik P, Humpenöder F, Silva LAD, Smith S, Stehfest E, Bosetti V, Eom J, Gernaat D, Masui T, Rogelj J, Strefler J, Drouet L, Krey V, Luderer G, Harmsen M, Takahashi K, Baumstark L, Doelman JC, Kainuma M, Klimont Z, Marangoni G, Lotze-Campen H, Obersteiner M, Tabeau A, Tavoni M (2017) The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob Environ Chang 42:153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009
Sailor DJ, Baniassadi A, O’Lenick CR, Wilhelmi OV (2019) The growing threat of heat disasters. Environ Res Lett 14(5):054006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab0bb9
Schwingshackl C, Sillmann J, Vicedo-Cabrera AM, Sandstad M, Aunan K (2021) Heat stress indicators in cmip6: estimating future trends and exceedances of impact-relevant thresholds. Earth’s Future 9 (3):e2020EF001885. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001885, https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2020EF001885
Seneviratne SI, Donat MG, Pitman AJ, Knutti R, Wilby RL (2016) Allowable co 2 emissions based on regional and impact-related climate targets. Nature 529(7587):477–483
Seneviratne SI, Nicholls N, Easterling D, Goodess CM, Kanae S, Kossin J, Lou Y, Marengo J, Mcinnes K, Rahimi M, Reichstein M, Sonteberg A, Vera C, Zhang X (2012) Changes in climate extremes and their impacts on the natural physical environment. In: Field C B, V Barros T F, Stocker D, Qin D J, Dokken K L, Ebi M D, Mastrandrea K J, Mach G K, Plattner S K, Allen M (eds) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 109–230
Sherwood SC, Huber M (2010) An adaptability limit to climate change due to heat stress. Proc Nat Acad Sci 107(21):9552–9555
Sillmann J, Kharin VV, Zwiers FW, Zhang X, Bronaugh D (2013) Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 2. Future climate projections. J Geophys Res: Atmos 118(6):2473–2493
Simon H (1993) Hyperthermia. N Engl J Med 329(7):483–487
Steadman RG (1984) A universal scale of apparent temperature. J Clim Appl Meteorol 23 (12):1674–1687. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<1674:AUSOAT>2.0.CO;2
Sun Q, Miao C, Hanel M, Borthwick A GL, Duan Q, Ji D, Li H (2019) Global heat stress on health, wildfires, and agricultural crops under different levels of climate warming. Environ Int 128:125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.025
Suzuki-Parker A, Kusaka H (2016) Future projections of labor hours based on wbgt for Tokyo and Osaka, Japan, using multi-period ensemble dynamical downscale simulations. Int J Biometeorol 60(2):307–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-015-1001-2
Sylla MB, Faye A, Giorgi F, Diedhiou A, Kunstmann H (2018) Projected heat stress under 1.5 c and 2 c global warming scenarios creates unprecedented discomfort for humans in West Africa. Earth’s Fut 6(7):1029–1044
Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of cmip5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93(4):485–498
Thom EC (1959) The discomfort index. Weatherwise 12(2):57–61
Tran H, Uchihama D, Ochi S, Yasuoka Y (2006) Assessment with satellite data of the urban heat island effects in asian mega cities. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform 8(1):34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2005.05.003
Uejio CK, Wilhelmi OV, Golden JS, Mills DM, Gulino SP, Samenow JP (2011) Intra-urban societal vulnerability to extreme heat: The role of heat exposure and the built environment, socioeconomics, and neighborhood stability. Health Place 17(2):498–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.005, Geographies of Care
United Nations Development Programme (2010) Human Development Report 2010. Tech. rep., United Nations
United Nations Development Programme (2019) Human Development Report 2019,. Tech. rep., United Nations
van Ruijven BJ, De Cian E, Wing IS (2019) Amplification of future energy demand growth due to climate change. Nat Commun 10(1):1–12
Varela R, Rodríguez-Díaz L, deCastro M (2020) Persistent heat waves projected for middle east and north africa by the end of the 21st century. PLOS ONE 15(11):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242477
Voldoire A, Sanchez-Gomez E, Salas y Mélia D, Decharme B, Cassou C, Sénési S, Valcke S, Beau I, Alias A, Chevallier M, Déqué M, Deshayes J, Douville H, Fernandez E, Madec G, Maisonnave E, Moine MP, Planton S, Saint-Martin D, Szopa S, Tyteca S, Alkama R, Belamari S, Braun A, Coquart L, Chauvin F (2012) The CNRM-CM5.1 global climate model: description and basic evaluation. Clim Dyn 40(9–10):2091–2121
Volodin EM, Dianskii NA, Gusev AV (2010) Simulating present-day climate with the INMCM4.0 coupled model of the atmospheric and oceanic general circulations. Izvestiya, Atmos Ocean Phys 46(4):414–431
Watanabe M, Suzuki T, O’ishi R, Komuro Y, Watanabe S, Emori S, Takemura T, Chikira M, Ogura T, Sekiguchi M, Takata K, Yamazaki D, Yokohata T, Nozawa T, Hasumi H, Tatebe H, Kimoto M (2010) Improved climate simulation by MIROC5: mean states, variability, and climate sensitivity. J Climate 23(23):6312–6335
Watanabe S, Hajima T, Sudo K, Nagashima T, Takemura T, Okajima H, Nozawa T, Kawase H, ABE M, Yokohata T, Ise T, Sato H, Kato E, Takata K, Emori S, Kawamiya M (2011) MIROC-ESM 2010: model description and basic results of CMIP5-20c3m experiments. Geosci Model Dev 4(4):845–872
Williams IN, Pierrehumbert RT (2017) Observational evidence against strongly stabilizing tropical cloud feedbacks. Geophys Res Lett 44(3):1503–1510
Williams IN, Pierrehumbert RT, Huber M (2009) Global warming, convective threshold and false thermostats. Geophys Res Lett 36(21):L21805
Wouters H, De Ridder K, Poelmans L, Willems P, Brouwers J, Hosseinzadehtalaei P, Tabari H, Vanden Broucke S, van Lipzig NPM, Demuzere M (2017) Heat stress increase under climate change twice as large in cities as in rural areas: a study for a densely populated midlatitude maritime region. Geophys Res Lett 44(17):8997–9007. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074889
Xin X-G, Tong-Wen WU, Jie Z (2013) Introduction of CMIP5 experiments carried out with the climate system models of Beijing climate center. Adv Clim Chang Res 4(1):41–49
Yukimoto S, Adachi Y, Hosaka M, Sakami T, Yoshimura H, Hirabara M, Tanaka TY, Shindo E, Tsujino H, Deushi M, Mizuta R, Yabu S, Obata A, Nakano H, Koshiro T, Ose T, Kitoh A (2012) A new global climate model of the meteorological research institute: MRI-CGCM3–model description and basic performance. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 90A(0):23–64
Zhao Y, Ducharne A, Sultan B, Braconnot P, Vautard R (2015) Estimating heat stress from climate-based indicators: present-day biases and future spreads in the CMIP5 global climate model ensemble. Environ Res Lett 10(8):084013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084013
Zittis G, Hadjinicolaou P, Almazroui M, Bucchignani E, Driouech F, El Rhaz K, Kurnaz L, Nikulin G, Ntoumos A, Ozturk T et al (2021) Business-as-usual will lead to super and ultra-extreme heatwaves in the Middle East and North Africa. npj Clim Atmos Sci 4(1):1–9
Zscheischler J, Westra S, Van Den Hurk Bart JJM, Seneviratne SI, Ward PJ, Pitman A, AghaKouchak A, Bresch DN, Leonard M, Wahl T et al (2018) Future climate risk from compound events. Nat Clim Chang 8(6):469–477
Dr Parkes is the recipient of the Ekpe Research Impact Fellowship in the Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering at The University of Manchester. Dr Buzan thanks computing resources support comes from the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) under project ID s906. Dr Huber acknowledges support from NSF AccelNet Award 2020635.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Parkes, B., Buzan, J.R. & Huber, M. Heat stress in Africa under high intensity climate change. Int J Biometeorol 66, 1531–1545 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-022-02295-1
- Heat stress
- Climate change
- Evaporative coolers