Abstract
This study aimed to estimate the number of generations and cycle duration of the southern red mite, coffee berry borer, and coffee leaf miner using the thermal index to assist in controlling these main coffee pests in the state of Paraná, Brazil. The data of maximum and minimum air temperature (°C) and precipitation (mm) of all municipalities in the state from 1984 to 2018 were collected from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resources (NASA/POWER). The reference evapotranspiration was estimated using the (Camargo Campinas IAC Boletim 116:9, 1971) method and the water balance was calculated using the method of ( Thornthwaite C, Mather J (1955) The water balance publications in climatology, 8 (1). DIT, Laboratory of climatology, Centerton, NJ, USA). The basal temperature of each pest minus the average temperature of the years was used to calculate the degrees-day, the duration of the pest cycle, and the number of generations per year. The influence of altitude on the development of coffee pests was measured using the Pearson correlation. The thermal index is able to estimate the damage caused by coffee pests in the state of Pará, Brazil. Coffee pests show greater severity in the north of Paraná, in the regions with the highest temperatures. It is the same region that concentrates most of the coffee production of the state. The results of the life cycle and number of generations were interpolated for the entire state using the kriging method. Coffee pests showed the highest severity in the north region of the state of Paraná, more specifically in the Northwest, North Central, and West Central mesoregions. These regions have concentrated most of the state’s coffee production. Mesoregions with the highest coffee production in the state showed higher susceptibility to coffee pests. Altitude showed a high correlation (r > 0.6) with the cycle variability and number of generations of coffee pests. The average cycles of the coffee berry borer, coffee leaf miner, and southern red mite are 24.13 (± 8.34), 45.64 (± 18.61), and 21.51 (± 3.51) days, respectively. The average annual generation was 16.67 (± 4.77), 9.02 (± 2.75), and 17.32 (± 2.63) generations, for the coffee berry borer, the coffee red mite, and the southern red mite, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agegnehu E, Dawa D (2015) Potential impact of climate change on dynamics of coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampi Ferrari) in Ethiopia. Open Access Libr J 2:1
Alba-Alejandre I, Alba-Tercedor J, Vega FE (2018) Observing the devastating coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) inside the coffee berry using micro-computed tomography. Sci Rep 8:17033. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35324-4
Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, de MoraesGonçalves JL (2013) Modeling monthly mean air temperature for Brazil. Theor Appl Climatol 113:407–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0796-6
Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, et al (2013a) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/schweiz/mz/2013a/00000022/00000006/art00008. Accessed 14 May 2020
Androcioli HG, Hoshino AT, Menezes Júnior A de O, et al (2018) Coffee leaf miner incidence and its predation by wasp in coffee intercropped with rubber trees
Aristizábal L, Bustillo A, Arthurs S (2016) Integrated pest management of coffee berry borer: strategies from Latin America that could be useful for coffee farmers in Hawaii. Insects 7:6. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects7010006
Atalla T, Gualdi S, Lanza A (2018) A global degree days database for energy-related applications. Energy 143:1048–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.134
Augustinus B, Sun Y, Beuchat C, et al (2020) Predicting impact of a biocontrol agent: integrating distribution modeling with climate‐dependent vital rates. Ecol Appl 30: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2003
Azrag AGA, Murungi LK, Tonnang HEZ et al (2017) Temperature-dependent models of development and survival of an insect pest of African tropical highlands, the coffee antestia bug Antestiopsis thunbergii (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J Therm Biol 70:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2017.10.009
Barreto C, Branfireun BA, McLaughlin JW, Lindo Z (2021) Responses of oribatid mites to warming in boreal peatlands depend on fen type. Pedobiologia 89:150772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2021.150772
Batista LA, Guimarães RJ, Pereira FJ et al (2010) Anatomia foliar e potencial hídrico na tolerância de cultivares de café ao estresse hídrico. Rev Ciênc Agron 41:475–481. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902010000300022
Bohl MT, Gross C, Souza W (2019) The role of emerging economies in the global price formation process of commodities: evidence from Brazilian and US coffee markets. Int Rev Econ Financ 60:203–215
Brazil (1981) RADAMBRASIL Project
Camargo AP (1971) Water balance in the state of São Paulo. Campinas IAC Boletim 116:9
Camargo ÂPD, Camargo MBPD (2001) Definição e esquematização das fases fenológicas do cafeeiro arábica nas condições tropicais do Brasil. Bragantia 60:65–68. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052001000100008
Campera M, Budiadi B, Adinda E et al (2021) Fostering a wildlife-friendly program for sustainable coffee farming: the case of small-holder farmers in Indonesia. Land 10:121
Caramori P, Caviglione J, Wrege M et al (2001) Climatic risk zoning for coffee (Coffea arabica L.) in Paraná state Brazil. Rev Bras De Agrometeorologia 9:486–494
Carneiro ALC, Silva LDB, and Faulin MSAR (2021) Artificial intelligence for detection and quantification of rust and leaf miner in coffee crop. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.11241.
Carvalho CF, Carvalho SM, Souza B (2019) Coffee. In: Souza B, Vázquez LL, Marucci RC (eds) Natural enemies of insect pests in neotropical agroecosystems. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 277–291
Castro-Moretti FR, Cocuron J-C, Vega FE, Alonso AP (2020) Differential metabolic responses caused by the most important insect pest of coffee worldwide, the coffee berry borer ( Hypothenemus hampei ). J Agric Food Chem 68:2597–2605. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b07363
Chaloner TM, Gurr SJ, Bebber DP (2021) Plant pathogen infection risk tracks global crop yields under climate change. Nat Clim Chang 11:710–715. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01104-8
CONAB CNDAC (2021) Acompanhamento da safra brasileira: café
Costa JF, da Silva TGF (2016) Prospecção do Nordeste brasileiro para a incidência da mosca-das-frutas em cenários de mudanças climáticas. Rev Brasileira De Geogr Física 9:2148–2163
da Consolação RM, de Araújo GJ, Pallini A, Venzon M (2021) Cover crop intercropping increases biological control in coffee crops. Biol Control 160:104675
da Costa GV, Neves CSVJ, Telles TS (2020) Spatial dynamics of orange production in the state of Paraná. Brazil. Rev Bras Frutic 42:e-525. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452020525
da Costa SL, José JV, Bender FD et al (2020) Climate change in the Paraná state, Brazil: responses to increasing atmospheric CO2 in reference evapotranspiration. Theor Appl Climatol 140:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-03057-7
DaMatta FM, Ronchi CP, Maestri M, Barros RS (2007) Ecophysiology of coffee growth and production. Braz J Plant Physiol 19:485–510
Dantas J, Motta IO, Vidal LA et al (2021) A comprehensive review of the coffee leaf miner leucoptera coffeella (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae)—a major pest for the coffee crop in Brazil and others neotropical countries. Insects 12:1130. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12121130
de Camargo MBP (2010) The impact of climatic variability and climate change on arabic coffee crop in Brazil. Bragantia 69:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052010000100030
de VasconcellosViana R, Medeiros PMA Rodrigues (2017) A economia cafeeira no Brasil e a importância das inovações para essa cadeia. A Economia em Revista-AERE 25:1–12
de Carvalho HP, de Melo B, Rabelo PG et al (2011) Bioclimatic indices for the coffee crop. Rev Bras de Engenharia Agríc e Ambient 15:601–606. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662011000600010
de OlivieraAparecido LE, de Souza Rolim G, Richetti J et al (2016) Köppen, Thornthwaite and Camargo climate classifications for climatic zoning in the State of Paraná, Brazil. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 40:405–417. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-70542016404003916
de Souza Tuelher E, de Oliveira E, Guedes R, Magalhaes L (2003) Occurrence of coffee leaf-miner (Leucoptera coffeella) influenced by season and altitude. Acta Scientiarum-Agronomy 25:119–124
F de Macedo Soares Guimarães (1942) Divisão regional do Brasil. Serviço gráfico do instituto Brasileiro de geografia e estatística
de Souza Rolim G, de Oliveira Aparecido LE, de Souza PS, et al (2020) Climate and natural quality of Coffea arabica L. drink. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 1–12
Dhooria MS (2016) Fundamentals of applied acarology. Springer
dos Santos Renato N, Silva JBL, Sediyama GC, Pereira EG (2013) Influência dos métodos para cálculo de graus-dia em condições de aumento de temperatura para as culturas de milho e feijão. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia 28:382–388
Duarte YCN, Sentelhas PC (2020) Intercomparison and performance of maize crop models and their ensemble for yield simulations in Brazil. Int J Plant Prod 14:127–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-019-00073-5
Escobar-Ramírez S, Grass I, Armbrecht I, Tscharntke T (2019) Biological control of the coffee berry borer: main natural enemies, control success, and landscape influence. Biol Control 136:103992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.05.011
Escola JPL, Guido RC, da Silva IN et al (2020) Automated acoustic detection of a cicadid pest in coffee plantations. Comput Electron Agric 169:105215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105215
Esgario JGM, de Castro PBC, Tassis LM, Krohling RA (2021) An app to assist farmers in the identification of diseases and pests of coffee leaves using deep learning. Inf Process Agric S2214317321000044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2021.01.004
Fand BB, Nagrare V, Bal S et al (2021) Degree day-based model predicts pink bollworm phenology across geographical locations of subtropics and semi-arid tropics of India. Sci Rep 11:1–18
Fragoso DB, Jusselino-Filho P, Guedes RNC, Proque R (2001) Seletividade de inseticidas a vespas predadoras de Leucoptera coffeella (Guér.-Mènev.) (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae). Neotrop Entomol 30:139–143. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2001000100020
Gomes LC, Bianchi FJJA, Cardoso IM et al (2020) Agroforestry systems can mitigate the impacts of climate change on coffee production: a spatially explicit assessment in Brazil. Agr Ecosyst Environ 294:106858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.106858
Gouveia NM (1984) Estudo da diferenciação e crescimento de gemas florais de Coffea arabica L. observações sobre antese e maturação dos frutos
Gusmão MR, Picanço M, Gonring AHR, Moura MF (2000) Seletividade fisiológica de inseticidas a Vespidae predadores do bicho-mineiro-do-cafeeiro. Pesq Agrop Brasileira 35:681–686
Hajjar R, Newton P, Adshead D et al (2019) Scaling up sustainability in commodity agriculture: transferability of governance mechanisms across the coffee and cattle sectors in Brazil. J Clean Prod 206:124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.102
IBGE IBDGEE (2020) Sistema IBGE de Recuperação Automática - SIDRA: Produção Agrícola Municipal. In: Sistema IBGE de Recuperação Automática. https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/pesquisa/ppm/quadros/brasil/2020. Accessed 28 Jan 2021
ICO (2021) International Coffee Organization. Historical data on the global coffee trade. http://www.ico.org/new_historical.asp. Accessed 18 Aug 2021
Jeran N, Grdiša M, Varga F et al (2021) Pyrethrin from Dalmatian pyrethrum (Tanacetum cinerariifolium (Trevir.) Sch. Bip.): biosynthesis, biological activity, methods of extraction and determination. Phytochem Rev 20:875–905
Kath J, Byrareddy VM, Craparo A et al (2020) Not so robust: robusta coffee production is highly sensitive to temperature. Glob Change Biol 26:3677–3688. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15097
Kogo BK, Kumar L, Koech R (2021) Climate change and variability in Kenya: a review of impacts on agriculture and food security. Environ Dev Sustain 23:23–43
Krige DG (1951) A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 52:119–139
Leite SA, Santos MPD, Resende-Silva GA et al (2020) Area-wide survey of chlorantraniliprole resistance and control failure likelihood of the neotropical coffee leaf miner Leucoptera coffeella Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae. J Econ Entomol toaa017. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaa017
Mauri R, Coelho RD, Fraga Junior EF et al (2017) Water relations at the initial sugarcane growth phase under variable water deficit. Eng Agríc 37:268–276. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v37n2p268-276/2017
Melo EF, Fernandes-Brum CN, Pereira FJ et al (2014) Anatomic and physiological modifications in seedlings of Coffea arabica cultivar Siriema under drought conditions. Ciênc Agrotec 38:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542014000100003
Mendes LO (1949) Determinação do potencial biótico da" broca do café": Hypothenemus Hampei (Ferr.)-E considerações sôbre o crescimento de sua população. II-A importância da diminuição do índice inicial de infestação no grau final de frutos de café atacados pela praga. Bragantia 9:203–214
Mendonça AP, Nonato JVA, Andrade VT et al (2016) Coffea arabica clones resistant to coffee leaf miner. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 16:42–47. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332016v16n1a7
Merle I, Tixier P, de MeloVirginioFilho E et al (2020) Forecast models of coffee leaf rust symptoms and signs based on identified microclimatic combinations in coffee-based agroforestry systems in Costa Rica. Crop Prot 130:105046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.105046
Mesquita CM de, REZENDE J de, Carvalho J, et al (2016) Manual do café: distúrbios fisiológicos, pragas e doenças do cafeeiro (Coffea arabica L.). Belo Horizonte: EMATER-MG 22–42
Mitiku F, de Mey Y, Nyssen J, Maertens M (2017) Do private sustainability standards contribute to income growth and poverty alleviation? A comparison of different coffee certification schemes in Ethiopia. Sustain 9:246. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020246
Moreto VB, Rolim GDS (2015) Agrometeorological models for groundnut crop yield forecasting in the Jaboticabal, São Paulo State region. Brazil Acta Sci Agron 37:403. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v37i4.19766
Morris JR, Perfecto I (2016) Testing the potential for ant predation of immature coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) life stages. Agric, Ecosystems Environ 233:224–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.09.018
Morris JR, Vandermeer J, Perfecto I (2015) A keystone ant species provides robust biological control of the coffee berry borer under varying pest densities. PLoS ONE 10:e0142850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142850
Motta IO, Dantas J, Vidal L et al (2021) The coffee leaf miner, Leucoptera coffeella (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae): identification of the larval instars and description of male and female genitalia. Rev Bras Entomol 65:e20200122. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9665-rbent-2020-0122
Neves AD, Oliveira RF, Parra JR (2006) A new concept for insect damage evaluation based on plant physiological variables. An Acad Bras Ciênc 78:821–835
Oliveira CM, Auad AM, Mendes SM, Frizzas MR (2014) Crop losses and the economic impact of insect pests on Brazilian agriculture. Crop Prot 56:50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.10.022
Pantoja-Gomez LM, Corrêa AS, de Oliveira LO, Guedes RNC (2019) Common origin of Brazilian and Colombian populations of the neotropical coffee leaf miner, Leucoptera coffeella (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae). J Econ Entomol 112:924–931. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toy416
PARANÁ G do E (2006) Instituto Paranaense de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social–IPARDES. Os Vários Paranás: linhas de ação para as dimensões econômica, social e institucional: subsídios à política de desenvolvimento regional Curitiba: IPARDES
Parra J (1985) Biologia comparada de Perileucoptera coffeella (Guérin-Mèneville, 1842)(Lepidoptera, Lyonetiidae) visando ao seu zoneamento ecológico no Estado de São Paulo. Rev Brasileira De Entomologia 29:45–76
Pathak TB, Maskey ML, Rijal JP (2021) Impact of climate change on navel orangeworm, a major pest of tree nuts in California. Sci Total Environ 755:142657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142657
Pezzopane JRM, da Silveira Castro F, Pezzopane JEM et al (2010) Zoneamento de risco climático para a cultura do café Conilon no Estado do Espírito Santo. Revista Ciência Agronômica 41:341–348
Plata-Rueda A, Martínez LC, Costa NCR et al (2019) Chlorantraniliprole–mediated effects on survival, walking abilities, and respiration in the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 172:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.01.063
Polanczyk RA, Celestino FN, Ferreira LS et al (2011) Desenvolvimento de Oligonychus ilicis em Coffea canephora sob diferentes temperaturas. Bragantia 70:370–374. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052011000200017
Reis PR, Chiavegato LG, Moraes GJ et al (1998) Seletividade de agroquímicos ao ácaro predador Iphiseiodes zuluagai Denmark & Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae). An Soc Entomol Bras 27:265–274. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0301-80591998000200013
Reis P, de Souza J, Venzon M (2002) Manejo ecológico das principais pragas do cafeeiro. Informe Agropecuário 23:83–99
Rena AB, Maestri M (1986) Fisiologia do cafeeiro. Cultura do cafeeiro: fatores que afetam a produtividade 1–87
Resende NC, Miranda JH, Cooke R et al (2019) Impacts of regional climate change on the runoff and root water uptake in corn crops in Parana, Brazil. Agric Water Manag 221:556–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.05.018
Righi CA, Campoe OC, Bernardes MS et al (2013) Influence of rubber trees on leaf-miner damage to coffee plants in an agroforestry system. Agroforest Syst 87:1351–1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9642-9
Sarmiento-Soler A, Vaast P, Hoffmann MP et al (2020) Effect of cropping system, shade cover and altitudinal gradient on coffee yield components at Mt. Elgon, Uganda. Agric Ecosystems Environ 295:106887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.106887
Schneider L, Comte V, Rebetez M (2021) Increasingly favourable winter temperature conditions for major crop and forest insect pest species in Switzerland. Agric for Meteorol 298–299:108315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108315
Silva EA, Reis PR, Zacarias MS, Marafeli PP (2010) Fitoseídeos (Acari: Phytoseiidae) associados a cafezais e fragmentos florestais vizinhos. Ciênc Agrotec 34:1146–1153. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542010000500010
Sparovek G, De Jong Van Lier Q, Dourado Neto D (2007) Computer assisted Koeppen climate classification: a case study for Brazil. International Journal of Climatology, 27, 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1384
Stackhouse PW, Westberg D, Hoell JM, et al (2015) Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resource (POWER)-agroclimatology methodology-(1.0 latitude by 1.0 longitude spatial resolution). Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resource (POWER)-Agroclimatology methodology-(1.0 latitude by 1.0 longitude spatial resolution).
Thornthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev 38:55–94
Thornthwaite C, Mather J (1955) The water balance publications in climatology, 8 (1). DIT, Laboratory of climatology, Centerton, NJ, USA
Toledo MA, Reis PR, Liska GR, Cirillo MÂ (2018) Biological control of southern red mite, Oligonychus ilicis (Acari: Tetranychidae), in coffee plants. Adv Entomol 6:74
Vega VJ, Mariño YA, Deynes D et al (2020) A beetle in a haystack: are there alternate hosts of the coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) in Puerto Rico? Agron 10:228. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020228
Wojda I (2017) Temperature stress and insect immunity. J Therm Biol 68:96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.12.002
WTO WTO (2020) Statistics on merchandise trade. In: World trade organization. timeseries.wto.org/. Accessed 28 May 2020
Funding
This study was funded by IFMS Campus of Naviraí and IFSULDEMINAS Campus Muzambinho.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Oliveira Aparecido, L.E., Lorençone, P.A., Lorençone, J.A. et al. Coffee pest severity by agrometeorological models in subtropical climate. Int J Biometeorol 66, 957–969 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-022-02252-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-022-02252-y