Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term estimation of soil heat flux by single layer soil temperature

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Biometeorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil heat flux is one of the important components of surface energy balance. In this study, long-term estimation of soil heat flux from single layer soil temperature was carried out by the traditional sinusoidal analytical method and the half-order time derivative method of Wang and Bras [Wang and Bras (1999) J Hydrol 216:214–226]. In order to understand the characteristics of soil heat flux and to examine the performances of the two methods, a field experiment was conducted at a temperate and humid grassland in Cork, Ireland. Our results show that the soil heat flux had the same magnitude as the sensible heat flux at this grassland site. It was also demonstrated that the analytical method did not predict the soil heat flux well because the sinusoidal assumption for the temporal variation in soil heat flux was invalid. In contrast, good agreement was found between the soil heat flux measurements and predictions made by the half-order time derivative method. This success suggests that this method could be used to estimate soil heat flux from long-term remotely sensed surface temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Campbell GS, Norman JM (1998) An introduction to environmental biophysics. Bartlett, Marietta, GA, p 286

    Google Scholar 

  • Carslaw HS, Jaeger JC (1986) Conduction of heat in solids. Clarendon, Oxford, p 510

    Google Scholar 

  • Clothier BE, Clawson KL, Pinter PJ Jr., Moran MS, Reginato RJ, Jackson RD (1986) Estimation of soil heat flux from radiation during the growth of alfalfa. Agric For Meteorol 37:319–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idso SB, Aase JK, Jackson RD (1975) Net radiation–soil heat flux relations as influenced by water content variations. Boundary Layer Meteorol 9:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball BA, Jackson RD (1975) Soil heat-flux determination: a null-alignment method. Agric For Meteorol 15:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kustas WP, Daughtry CST (1990) Estimation of the soil heat flux/net radiation ratio from spectral data. Agric For Meteorol 49:205–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malek E (1993) Rapid changes of the surface soil heat flux and its effects on the estimation of evapo-transpiration. J Hydrol 142:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller KS, Ross B (1993) An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogee J, Lamaud E, Brunet Y Berbigier P, Bonnefond JM (2001) A long-term study of soil heat flux under a forest canopy. Agric For Meteorol 106:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, p 666

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Bras RL (1999) Ground heat flux estimated from surface soil temperature. J Hydrol 216:214–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HF, Ge XS, Ye H, Jiao DS (2007) Heat conduction and heat storage characteristics of soils. Appl Thermal Eng 27:369–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. C.-I.H. and C.-W.H. thank the National Science Council, Taiwan for their support of this study. G.K. acknowledges support from the ERTDI program managed by the Irish Environmental Protection Agency and funded by the Irish Government under the National Development Plan, 2000–2006 (CELTICFLUX, 2001-CC-C2-M1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-I Hsieh.

Appendix: Derivation of the half-order time derivative method

Appendix: Derivation of the half-order time derivative method

The algorithm and derivation of the half-order time derivative method was first proposed by Wang and Bras (1999). Here, details of the derivation are provided.

First of all, define two new variables: \(\tilde z = {z \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {z {\sqrt {D_0 } }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\sqrt {D_0 } }}\) and \(\Theta = T - T_0 \), and then transfer Eqs. 7, 9, and 10 to:

$$\frac{{\partial \Theta }}{{\partial t}} = \frac{{\partial ^2 \Theta }}{{\partial \tilde z^2 }}$$
(A1)
$$\Theta = 0,\,{\text{for t = 0,}}\,\tilde z <0$$
(A2)
$$\Theta = 0,\,{\text{for t}}\,{\text{ $>$ }}\,{\text{0,}}\,\tilde z \to - \infty $$
(A3)

Now, take the Laplace transform of both sides of Eq. A1. According to the definition of Laplace transform, \(L\left\{ {\frac{\partial }{{\partial t}}f\left( t \right)} \right\}\left( s \right) = sF\left( s \right) - f\left( 0 \right)\), the left hand side of A1 then becomes \(s\tilde \Theta \left( {\tilde z,s} \right) - \Theta \left( {\tilde z,0} \right) = s\tilde \Theta \left( {\tilde z,s} \right)\) since A2 requires \(\Theta \left( {\tilde z,0} \right) = 0\). The Laplace transform of the right hand side remains the same since the Laplace transform is based on the variable t. Hence, Eq. A1 is transformed to

$$s\tilde \Theta \left( {\tilde z,s} \right) = \frac{{\partial ^2 \tilde \Theta }}{{\partial \tilde z^2 }}$$
(A4)

where \(\tilde \Theta \) is the Laplace transform of \(\Theta \) and defined as:

$$\tilde \Theta \left( {\tilde z,s} \right) = \int\limits_0^\infty {\exp \left( { - st} \right)\,} \Theta \left( {\tilde z,t} \right)dt$$
(A5)

The general solution of Eq. A4 is

$$\tilde \Theta \left( {\tilde z,s} \right) = A\left( s \right)\exp \left( {\tilde z\sqrt s } \right) + B\left( s \right)\exp \left( { - \tilde z\sqrt s } \right)$$
(A6)

where A(s) and B(s) are arbitrary functions of s and can be determined by the boundary conditions. By Eq. A3, B(s) is found to be zero and Eq. A6 then becomes:

$$\tilde \Theta \left( {\tilde z,s} \right) = A\left( s \right)\exp \left( {\tilde z\sqrt s } \right)$$
(A7)

Differentiating both sides of Eq. A7 with respect to \(\tilde z\) gives:

$$\frac{\partial }{{\partial \tilde z}}\tilde \Theta \left( {\tilde z,s} \right) = \sqrt s A\left( s \right)\exp \left( {\tilde z\sqrt s } \right)$$
(A8)

Now, substituting A7 into A8 yields

$$\frac{\partial }{{\partial \tilde z}}\tilde \Theta \left( {\tilde z,s} \right) = \sqrt s \tilde \Theta \left( {\tilde z,s} \right)$$
(A9)

Based on the equation derived by the fractional calculus (Miller and Ross 1993),

$$L\left\{ {D^\nu f\left( t \right)} \right\} = s^\nu F\left( s \right) - \sum\limits_{k = 0}^{m - 1} {s^{m - k - 1} D^{k - m + \nu } f\left( 0 \right)} $$
(A10)

the right hand side of Eq. A9 becomes

$$\sqrt s \tilde \Theta \left( {\tilde z,s} \right) = L\left\{ {\frac{{\partial ^{\frac{1}{2}} }}{{\partial t^{\frac{1}{2}} }}\tilde \Theta \left( {\tilde z,t} \right)} \right\}$$
(A11)

By the initial condition Eq. A2, the last term of Eq. A10, f(0), is found to be zero. Replacing the right hand side of Eq. A9 by Eq. A11, we have

$$\frac{\partial }{{\partial \tilde z}}\tilde \Theta \left( {\tilde z,s} \right) = L\left\{ {\frac{{\partial ^{\frac{1}{2}} }}{{\partial t^{\frac{1}{2}} }}\tilde \Theta \left( {\tilde z,t} \right)} \right\}$$
(A12)

Inverting the Laplace transform of Eq. A12 leads to

$$\frac{\partial }{{\partial \tilde z}}\Theta \left( {\tilde z,t} \right) = \frac{{\partial ^{\frac{1}{2}} }}{{\partial t^{\frac{1}{2}} }}\Theta \left( {\tilde z,t} \right)$$
(A13)

With the definition of Θ, Eq. A13 becomes

$$\frac{\partial }{{\partial z}}T\left( {z,t} \right) = \frac{1}{{\sqrt {D_o } }}\frac{{\partial ^{\frac{1}{2}} }}{{\partial t^{\frac{1}{2}} }}\left[ {T\left( {z,t} \right) - T\left( 0 \right)} \right].$$
(A14)

Now, applying the fractional calculus (Miller and Ross 1993)

$$\frac{{d^\alpha f\left( t \right)}}{{dt^\alpha }} = \frac{1}{{\Gamma \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)}}\frac{d}{{dt}}\int\limits_0^t {\frac{{f\left( s \right)}}{{\left( {t - s} \right)^\alpha }}ds} $$
(A15)

to the right hand side of Eq. A14, we have

$$ \begin{array}{*{20}c} {\frac{\partial } {{\partial z}}T{\left( {z,t} \right)} = \frac{1} {{{\sqrt {\pi D_{0} } }}}{\int\limits_0^t {\frac{{\partial T{\left( {z,s} \right)}}} {{\partial s}}\frac{{ds}} {{{\sqrt {t - s} }}}} }} \\ { = \frac{1} {{{\sqrt {\pi D_{0} } }}}{\int\limits_0^t {\frac{{dT{\left( {z,s} \right)}}} {{{\sqrt {t - s} }}}} }} \\ \end{array} $$
(A16)

Finally, the prognostic result can be evaluated by applying Eq. A16 to Fourier’s law, and then we have

$$G\left( {z,t} \right) = \sqrt {\frac{{k\rho _s c_s }}{\pi }} \int\limits_0^t {\frac{{dT\left( {z,s} \right)}}{{\sqrt {t - s} }}} $$
(A17)

Equation A17 can also be written as:

$$G\left( {z,t} \right) = \sqrt {\frac{{k\rho _s c_s }}{\pi }} \int\limits_0^t {\frac{{\partial T\left( {z,s} \right)}}{{\partial s}}\frac{{ds}}{{\sqrt {t - s} }}} = 2\sqrt {\frac{{k\rho _s c_s }}{\pi }} \int\limits_0^t {\frac{{\partial T\left( {z,s} \right)}}{{\partial s}}} d\sqrt {t - s} $$
(A18)

And its discrete form is

$$G = 2\sqrt {\frac{{k\rho _s c_s }}{\pi }} \sum\limits_{i = 0}^N {\frac{{T_{i + 1} - T_i }}{{t_{i + 1} - t_i }}\left[ {\sqrt {t_N - t_{i + 1} } - \sqrt {t_N - t_i } } \right]} $$
(A19)

where N is the number of intervals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsieh, CI., Huang, CW. & Kiely, G. Long-term estimation of soil heat flux by single layer soil temperature. Int J Biometeorol 53, 113–123 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-008-0198-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-008-0198-8

Keywords

Navigation