Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of sensor measurement error on sensor positioning in water quality monitoring networks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of sensor measurement error on designing a water quality monitoring network for a river system, and shows that robust sensor locations can be obtained when an optimization algorithm is combined with a statistical process control (SPC) method. Specifically, we develop a possible probabilistic model of sensor measurement error and the measurement error model is embedded into a simulation model of a river system. An optimization algorithm is used to find the optimal sensor locations that minimize the expected time until a spill detection in the presence of a constraint on the probability of detecting a spill. The experimental results show that the optimal sensor locations are highly sensitive to the variability of measurement error and false alarm rates are often unacceptably high. An SPC method is useful in finding thresholds that guarantee a false alarm rate no more than a pre-specified target level, and an optimization algorithm combined with the thresholds finds a robust sensor network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bierkens MFP (2006) Designing a monitoring network for detecting groundwater pollution with stochastic simulation and a cost model. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 20(5):335–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2001) The precision and accuracy of environmental measurements for the building assessment survey and evaluation program. Tech. rep., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Health and Engineering Inc

  • Kim S-H, Alexopoulosc C, Tsui KL, Wilson JR (2007) A distribution-free tabular CUSUM chart for autocorrelated data. IIE Trans 39(3):317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2009) Introduction to statistical quality control. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson BL (2010) Optimization via simulation over discrete decision variables. Tutor Oper Res 7:193–207

    Google Scholar 

  • North GR, Nakamoto S (1989) Formalism for comparing rain estimation designs. J Atmos Ocean Technol 6(6):985–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park C, Kim S-H (2015) Penalty function with memory for discrete optimization via simulation with stochastic constraints. Oper Res 63:1195–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park C, Telci I, Kim S-H, Aral MM (2014) Designing an optimal water quality monitoring network for river systems using constrained discrete optimization via simulation. Eng Optim 46(1):107–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi L, Ólafsson S (2000) Nested partitions method for stochastic optimization. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 2(3):271–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strobl R, Robillard R (2008) Network design for water quality monitoring of surface freshwaters: a review. J Environ Manag 87(4):639–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey MV, Gaag B, Burns BP (2011) Advances in on-line drinking water quality monitoring and early warning systems. Water Res 45:741–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Telci I, Aral MM (2011) Contaminant source location identification in river networks using water quality monitoring systems for exposure analysis. Water Qual Expo Health 2(3):205–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Telci I, Nam K, Guan J, Aral MM (2008) Real time optimal monitoring network design in river networks. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008, Environmental And Water Resources Institute (EWRI) of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Honolulu, Hawaii, pp 1–10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Telci I, Nam K, Guan J, Aral MM (2009) Optimal water quality monitoring network design for river systems. J Environ Manag 90:2987–2998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo C (2000) On the sampling errors from raingauges and microwave attenuation. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 14:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Harrison KW (2000) Bayesian approach to contaminant source characterization in water distribution systems: adaptive sampling framework. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27(8):1921–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by NSF under Grants CMMI-0644837 and CMMI-1538746 and Hanyang University under Grant HY-2014000000465. All data we used to derive measurement error model and parameters can be obtained from EPA (2001). For a detailed explanation of data used to form rain patterns, we refer readers to Telci and Aral (2011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuljin Park.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 1,962 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, SH., Aral, M.M., Eun, Y. et al. Impact of sensor measurement error on sensor positioning in water quality monitoring networks. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 31, 743–756 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1210-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1210-1

Keywords

Navigation