Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effectiveness of subsurface pressure monitoring for brine leakage detection in an uncertain CO2 sequestration system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work evaluates the detection sensitivity of deep subsurface pressure monitoring within an uncertain carbon dioxide sequestration system by linking the output of an analytical reduced-order model and first-order uncertainty analysis. A baseline (non-leaky) modeling run was compared against 10 different leakage scenarios, where the cap rock permeability was increased by factors of 2–100 (cap rock permeability from 10−3 to 10−1 millidarcy). The uncertainty variance outputs were used to develop percentile estimates and detection sensitivity for pressure throughout the deep subsurface as a function of space (lateral distance from the injection wells and vertical orientation within the reservoir) and time (years since injection), or P(x, z, t). Conditional probabilities were computed for combinations of x, z, and t, which were then used to generate power curves for detecting leakage scenarios. The results suggest that measurements of the absolute change in pressure within the target injection aquifer would not be able to distinguish small leakage rates (i.e., less than 50 × baseline) from baseline conditions, and that only large leakage rates (i.e., >100 × baseline) would be discriminated with sufficient statistical power (>99 %). Combining measurements, for example by taking the ratio of formation pressure in Aquifer 2/Aquifer 1, provides better statistical power for distinguishing smaller leakage rates at earlier times in the injection program. Detection sensitivity for pressure is a function of space and time. Therefore, design of an adequate monitoring network for subsurface pressure should account for this space–time variability to ensure that the monitoring system performs to the necessary design criteria, e.g., specific false-negative and false-positive rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apps JA, Zheng L, Spycher N, Birkholzer JT, Kharaka Y, Thordsen J, Kakourosb E, Trautz R et al (2011) Transient changes in shallow groundwater chemistry during the MSU ZERT CO2 injection experiment. Energy Procedia 4:3231–3238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bierkens MFP (2006) Designing a monitoring network for detecting groundwater pollution with stochastic simulation and a cost model. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 20(5):335–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkholzer JT, Zhou Q, Tsang CF (2009) Large-scale impact of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers: a sensitivity study on the pressure response in stratified systems. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 3(2):181–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cihan A, Zhou Q, Birkholzer JT (2011) Analytical solutions for pressure perturbation and fluid leakage through aquitards and wells in multilayered aquifer systems. Water Resour Res 47:W10504. doi:10.1029/2011WR010721

    Google Scholar 

  • Cihan A, Birkholzer JT, Zhou Q (2012) Pressure buildup and brine migration during CO2 storage in multilayered aquifers. Ground Water. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00972.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Court B, Celia MA, Nordbotten JM, Dobossy M, Elliot TR, Bandilla K (2011) Modeling options to answer practical questions for CO2 sequestration operations. Princeton-Bergen series on carbon storage, Retrieved March 22, 2013, from http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01rf55z769f

  • CREWES (2012) CREWES fluid property calculator, Accessed 1 Mar 2013, from http://www.crewes.org/ResearchLinks/ExplorerPrograms/FlProp/FluidProp.htm

  • Dagan G (1987) Theory of solute transport by groundwater. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 19:183–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damen K, Faaij A, Turkenburg W (2006) Health, safety, and environmental risks of underground CO2 storage—Overview of mechanisms and current knowledge. Clim Change 74(1–3):289–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DOE (2009) Best practices for: monitoring, verification, and accounting of CO2 stored in deep geologic formations. US Department of Energy, DOE/NETL-311/081508

  • DOE (2011) Best practices for: risk analysis and simulation for geologic storage of CO2. US Department of Energy, DOE/NETL-2011/1459

  • Ezekwe N (2011) Petroleum reservoir engineering practice. Pearson Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelhar LW (1993) Stochastic subsurface hydrology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 390 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert RO (1987) Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring. Wiley, New York p 320

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne RN (1995) Modern well test analysis: a computer-aided approach, Second Edition. Petroway, Inc., p 257

  • IPCC (2005). IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. In: Metz BO, Davidson HC, de Coninck ML, Meyer LA (eds) Prepared by working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 442

  • Kim KH, Lee KK (2007) Optimization of groundwater-monitoring networks for identification of the distribution of a contaminant plume. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 21(6):785–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limpert E, Stahel WA, Abbt M (2001) Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues. Bioscience 51(5):341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little MG, Jackson RB (2010) Potential impacts of leakage from deep CO2 geosequestration on overlying freshwater aquifers. Environ Sci Technol 44:9225–9232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minitab 14 Statistical Software (2010) [Computer software]. State College, PA: Minitab, Inc. (www.minitab.com)

  • Nicot JP, Oldenburg CM, Bryant SL, Hovorka SD et al (2009) Pressure perturbations from geologic carbon sequestration: area-of-review boundaries and borehole leakage driving forces. Energy Procedia 1(1):47–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nitao JJ (1998) Reference manual for the NUFT flow and transport code, version 3.0. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-MA-130651-REV-1

  • Nogues JP, Nordbotten JM, Celia MA et al (2011) Detecting leakage of brine or CO2 through abandoned wells in a geological sequestration operation using pressure monitoring wells. Energy Procedia 4:3620–3627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nordbotten J, Celia M, Bachu S (2004) Analytical solutions for leakage rates through abandoned wells. Water Resources Research, 40

  • Pruess K (2005) ECO2N: a TOUGH2 fluid property module for mixtures of water, NaCl, and CO2. Report LBNL-57952. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley

  • Pruess K, Oldenburg CM, Moridis G (1999) TOUGH2 user’s guide, version 2.0. Report LBNL-43134. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley

  • Ramaswami A, Milford JB, Small MJ (2005) Integrated environmental modeling: pollutant transport, fate, and risk in the environment. Wiley, New Jersey. Chapter 14: Tools for evaluation, analysis, and optimization of environmental models

  • Rubin Y (2003) Applied stochastic hydrogeology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlumberger (2010) ECLIPSE technical description

  • Schlumberger (2012) WellWatcher Quartz: NLQG, NMQG, NPQG, NHQG multidrop pressure and temperature gauges. Downloaded on October 1, 2012 from: http://www.slb.com/~/media/Files/completions/product_sheets/quartzgauge_ps.pdf

  • Seto CJ, McRae GJ (2011) Reducing risk in basin scale CO2 sequestration: a framework for integrated monitoring design. Environ Sci Technol 45:845–859

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siirila ER, Navarre-Sitchler AK, Maxwell RM, McCray JE et al (2010) A quantitative methodology to assess the risks to human health from CO2 leakage into groundwater. Adv Water Resour 36:146–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2008) Vulnerability evaluation framework for geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide: technical support document. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA430-R-08-009

  • White MD, Oostrom M (1997) STOMP: subsurface transport over multiple phases. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Report PNNL-11218, Richland, WA

  • Wilkin RT, DiGiulio DC (2010) Geochemical impacts to groundwater from geologic carbon sequestration: controls on pH and inorganic carbon concentrations from reaction path and kinetic modeling. Environ Sci Technol 44:4821–4827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang YM, Small MJ, Ogretim EO, Gray DD, Bromhal GS, Strazisar BR, Wells AW et al (2011a) Probabilistic design of a near-surface CO2 leak detection system. Environ Sci Technol 45:6380–6387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang YM, Small MJ, Junker B, Bromhal GS, Strazisar BR, Wells AW et al (2011b) Bayesian hierarchical models for soil CO2 flux and leak detection at geologic sequestration sites. Environ Earth Sci 64(3):787–798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang YM, Small MJ, Ogretim EO, Gray DD, Wells AW, Bromhal GS, Strazisar BR et al (2012) A Bayesian belief network (BBN) for combining evidence from multiple CO2 leak detection technologies. Greenhouse Gases Sci Technol 2(3):185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yortsos YC (2000) Permeability variogram from pressure transients of multiple wells. In: Zhang D, Winter CL (eds) Theory, modeling, and field investigation in hydrogeology: a special volume in honor of Shlomo P. Neuman’s 60th birthday: Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America Special Paper 348, p 19–23

  • Zhou Q, Birkholzer JT, Rutqvist J, Tsang CF (2007) Sensitivity study of CO2 storage capacity in brine aquifers with closed boundaries: dependence on hydrogeologic properties. In: proceedings of sixth annual conference on carbon capture and sequestration, U.S. DOE-NETL, May 7–10, 2007

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the US Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory. The authors would like to thank Dr. Abdullah Cihan of the Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for sharing both the FORTRAN model and support for running the model over different scenarios.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas A. Azzolina.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Azzolina, N.A., Small, M.J., Nakles, D.V. et al. Effectiveness of subsurface pressure monitoring for brine leakage detection in an uncertain CO2 sequestration system. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28, 895–909 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0788-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0788-9

Keywords

Navigation