Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bayesian hierarchical models for soil CO2 flux and leak detection at geologic sequestration sites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Proper characterizations of background soil CO2 respiration rates are critical for interpreting CO2 leakage monitoring results at geologic sequestration sites. In this paper, a method is developed for determining temperature-dependent critical values of soil CO2 flux for preliminary leak detection inference. The method is illustrated using surface CO2 flux measurements obtained from the AmeriFlux network fit with alternative models for the soil CO2 flux versus soil temperature relationship. The models are fit first to determine pooled parameter estimates across the sites, then using a Bayesian hierarchical method to obtain both global and site-specific parameter estimates. Model comparisons are made using the deviance information criterion (DIC), which considers both goodness of fit and model complexity. The hierarchical models consistently outperform the corresponding pooled models, demonstrating the need for site-specific data and estimates when determining relationships for background soil respiration. A hierarchical model that relates the square root of the CO2 flux to a quadratic function of soil temperature is found to provide the best fit for the AmeriFlux sites among the models tested. This model also yields effective prediction intervals, consistent with the upper envelope of the flux data across the modeled sites and temperature ranges. Calculation of upper prediction intervals using the proposed method can provide a basis for setting critical values in CO2 leak detection monitoring at sequestration sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Transformations include the logarithm transformation, \( \ln \,{\kern 1pt} [{\text{CO}}_{ 2} \,{\text{flux}}] \), for the simple Q10 and log-quadratic models, and the square-root transformation,\( {\kern 1pt} [{\text{CO}}_{ 2} \,{\text{flux}}]^{1/2} \), for the square-root quadratic model.

References

  • Agarwal DK, Silander JA, Gelfand AE, Dewar RE, Mickelson JG (2005) Tropical deforestation in Madagascar: analysis using hierarchical spatially explicit, Bayesian regression models. Ecol Model 185:105–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachu S (2008) CO2 storage in geological media: role, means, status and barriers to deployment. Progr Energy Combust Sci 34:254–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson SM (2007) Monitoring geological storage of carbon dioxide, carbon capture and geologic sequestration. In: Wilson EJ, Gerard D (eds) Integrating technology, monitoring and regulation. Blackwell, Ames, pp 73–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson SM, Gasperikova E, Hoversten GM (2004) Monitoring protocols and life-cycle costs for geologic storage of carbon dioxide. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies (GHGT-7), Vancouver, 5–9 Sept 2004

  • Berliner LM (2000) Hierarchical Bayesian modeling in the environmental sciences, Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv. J German Stat 84:141–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsuk ME, Higdon D, Stow CA et al (2001) A Bayesian hierarchical model to predict benthic oxygen demand from organic matter loading in estuaries and coastal zones. Ecol Model 143:165–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann N (2000) Biotic and abiotic factors controlling soil respiration rates in Picea abies stands. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1625–1635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable JM, Ogle K, Tyler AP, Pavao-Zuckerman MA, Huxman TE (2009) Woody plant encroachment impacts on soil carbon and microbial processes: results from a hierarchical Bayesian analysis of soil incubation data. Plant Soil 320:153–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle JC, Than UB (1988) Abiotic control of soil respiration beneath an eighteen-year-old pinus radiate stand in south-eastern Australia. J Ecol 76:654–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colosimo BM, Del Castillo E (eds) (2007) Bayesian process monitoring, control and optimization. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, London/Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortis A, Oldenburg CM, Benson SM (2008) The role of optimality in characterizing CO2 seepage from geologic carbon sequestration sites. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2:640–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Belk E, Boone RD (1998) Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Glob Change Biol 4:217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Verchotl LV, Cattânio JH, Ackerman IL, Carvalho JEM (2000) Effects of soil water content on soil respiration in forests and cattle pastures of eastern Amazonia. Biogeochemistry 48:53–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, Janssens IA, Luo Y (2006) On the variability of respiration in terrestrial ecosystems: moving beyond Q10. Glob Change Biol 12:154–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Coninck H, Stephens JC, Metz B (2009) Global learning on carbon capture and storage: a call for strong international cooperation on CCS demonstration. Energy Policy 37:2161–2165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downes BJ, Barmuta LA, Fairweather PG, Faith DP, Keough MJ, Lake PS, Mapstone BD, Quinn GP (2002) Monitoring ecological impacts: concepts and practice in flowing waters. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fang C, Moncrieff JB (2001) The dependence of soil CO2 efflux on temperature. Soil Biol Biochem 33:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Hill J (2006) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2003) Bayesian data analysis, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal A, Small MJ, von Stackelberg K, Burmistrov D, Jones N (2005) Estimation of fugitive lead emission rates from secondary lead facilities using hierarchical Bayesian models. Environ Sci Technol 39:4929–4937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson PJ, Edwards NT, Garten CT, Andrew JA (2000) Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry 48:115–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy RW, Striegl RG, Russell TF, Hutchinson GL, Livingston GP (1996) Numerical evaluation of Static-chamber measurements of soil–atmosphere gas exchange: identification of physical processes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:740–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepple RP, Benson SM (2005) Geologic storage of carbon dioxide as a climate change mitigation strategy: performance requirements and the implications of surface seepage. Environ Geol 47:576–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard KA, Law BE, Reichstein M (2005) An analysis of soil respiration across northern hemisphere temperate ecosystems. Biogeochemistry 73:29–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jassal RS, Black TA, Drewitt GB, Novak MD, Gaumont-Guay D, Nesic Z (2004) A model of the production and transport of CO2 in soil: predicting soil CO2 concentrations and CO2 efflux from a forest floor. Agric Forest Meteorol 124:219–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jassal RS, Black TA, Novak MD, Gaumont-Guay D, Nesic Z (2008) Effect of soil water stress on soil respiration and its temperature sensitivity in an 18-year-old temperate Douglas-fir stand. Glob Change Biol 14:1305–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klusman RW (2003) Evaluation of leakage potential from a carbon dioxide EOR/sequestration project. Energy Convers Manage 44:1921–1940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuning R, Etheridge D, Luhar A, Dunse B (2008) Atmospheric monitoring and verification technologies for CO2 geosequestration. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2(3):401–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki JL, Oldenburg CM, Dobeck L, Spangler L (2007) Surface CO2 leakage during two shallow subsurface CO2 releases. Geophys Res Lett 34:L24402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd J, Taylor JA (1994) On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Funct Ecol 8:315–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JR, Schervish MJ, Gurian P, Small MJ (2001) Characterization of arsenic occurrence in US drinking water treatment facility source waters. J Am Stat Assoc 96:1184–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JR, Schervish MJ, Gurian P, Small MJ (2004) Analysis of contaminant co-occurrence in community water systems. J Am Stat Assoc 99:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D (2000) WinBUGS—a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comput 10:325–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moncrieff JB, Fang C (1999) A model for soil CO2 production and transport 2: application to a Florida Pinus elliottii plantation. Agric Forest Meteorol 95:237–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell AM (1990) Microbial decomposition (respiration) of litter in eucalypt forests of South-Western Australia: an empirical model based on laboratory incubations. Soil Biol Biochem 22:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg CM, Lewicki JL, Hepple RP (2003) Near-surface monitoring strategies for geologic carbon dioxide storage verification. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBNL-54089

  • Patrick LD, Ogle K, Tissue DT (2009) A hierarchical Bayesian approach for estimation of photosynthetic parameters of C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ 32:1695–1709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pumpanena J, Ilvesniemib H, Kulmala L, Siivola E, Laakso H, Kolari P, Helenelund C, Laakso M, Uusimaa M, Hari P (2008) Respiration in boreal forest soil as determined from carbon dioxide concentration profile. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:1187–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raich JW, Schlesinger WH (1992) The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus B 44:81–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichstein M, Rey A, Freibauer A et al (2003) Modelling temporal and large-scale spatial variability of soil respiration from soil water availability, temperature and vegetation productivity indices. Global Biogeochem Cycle 17(4):15.1–15.15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reth S, Reichstein M, Falge E (2005) The effect of soil water content, soil temperature, soil pH-value and the root mass on soil CO2 efflux—a modified model. Plant Soil 268:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson AD, Braswell BH, Hollinger DY, Prabir Burman P, Davidson EA, Evans RS, Flanagan LB, Munger JW, Savage K, Urbanski SP, Wofsy SC (2006) Comparing simple respiration models for eddy flux and dynamic chamber data. Agric Forest Meteorol 141:219–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KA, Ball T, Conen F, Dobbie KE, Massheder J, Rey A (2003) Exchange of greenhouse gases between soil and atmosphere: interactions of soil physical factors and biological processes. Eur J Soil Sci 54:779–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J Roy Stat Soc B 64:583–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strazisar BR, Wells AW, Diehl JR, Hammack RW, Veloski GA (2009) Near-surface monitoring for the ZERT shallow CO2 injection project. Int J Greenh Gas Control 3:736–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiamyrtzis P, Hawkins DM (2005) A Bayesian scheme to detect changes in the mean of a short run process. Technometrics 47:446–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Statistical Analysis of Groundwater Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities—Unified Guidance, EPA 530-R-09-007, March. http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/correctiveaction/resources/guidance/sitechar/gwstats/index.htm

  • van Alphen K, Hekkert MP, Turkenburg WC (2009) Comparing the development and deployment of carbon capture and storage technologies in Norway, the Netherlands, Australia, Canada and the United States—an innovation system perspective. Energy Proced 1:4591–4599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Feng J, Oikawa T (2009) Contribution of root and microbial respiration to soil CO2 efflux and their environmental controls in a humid temperate grassland of Japan. Pedosphere 19(1):31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikle CK (2003) Hierarchical models in environmental science. Int Stat Rev 71:181–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EJ, Friedmann SJ, Pollack MF (2007) Research for deployment: incorporating risk, regulation, and liability for carbon capture and sequestration. Environ Sci Technol 41:5945–5952

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted as part of the Carnegie Mellon–West Virginia University project, Statistical Methods for Integrating Near-Surface CO2 Migration Modeling with Monitoring Network Analysis, supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), through the DOE University Based Environmental Science Division Support program for Monitoring, Measurement, and Verification (MMV) Statistics, Subtask TSK.41817.606.04.03. Donald Gray, Egemen Ogretim, and Gavin Liu at West Virginia University provided useful suggestions in the development of this paper. We would also like to thank the AmeriFlux scientists for the soil respiration data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ya-Mei Yang.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 225 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, YM., Small, M.J., Junker, B. et al. Bayesian hierarchical models for soil CO2 flux and leak detection at geologic sequestration sites. Environ Earth Sci 64, 787–798 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-0903-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-0903-5

Keywords

Navigation