Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of geostatistical interpolation methods for modeling sampled data with non-stationary mean

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The measured ozone pollution peak in the atmosphere of Mexico City region was considered in order to study the effect of a non-stationary mean of the sampled data in geostatistics interpolation methods. With this objective the local mean value of the sampled data was estimated through a linear regression analysis of their values on the monitoring station’s coordinates. The residuals obtained by removing the data trend are considered as a set of stationary random variables. Several interpolation methods used in geostatistics, such as inverse distance weighted, kriging, and artificial neural networks techniques were considered. In an effort to optimize and evaluate its performance, we fit interpolated values to sampled data, obtaining optimal values for the parameters defining the used model, that means, the values of the parameters that give the lowest mean RMSE between the interpolated value and measured data at 20 stations at 1500 hours for a set of 21 days of December 2001, which was chosen as the training set. The training set is conformed by all the days in December 2001 excepting the days (3,6,9,12,...,27,30) which were considered as the testing set. Once the optimal model is obtained, it is used to interpolate the values at the stations at 1500 hours for the testing days. The RMSE between interpolated and measured values at monitoring stations was also evaluated for these testing values and is shown as a percentage in Table 2. These values and the defined generalization parameter G, can be used to evaluate the performance and the ability of the models to predict and reproduce the peak of ozone concentrations. Scatter plots for testing data are presented for each interpolation method. An interpretation of the ozone pollution levels obtained at 1500 hours at December 21 was given using the wind field that prevailed in the region 1 h before the same day.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barone JB, Cahill RA, Eldred RA, Flocchini RG, Shadoan DJ, Dietz TM (1978) A multivariate statistical analysis of visibility degradation at four California Cities. Atmos Environ 12:2213–2221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boznar M, Lesjak M, Mlakar P (1993) A neural network-based method for the short-term predictions of ambient SO2 concentrations in highly polluted industrial areas of complex terrain . Atmos Environ B27:221–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilès JP, Delfiner P (1999) Geostatistics, modeling spatial uncertainty. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Comisión Ambiental Metropolitana (2002) Programa para mejorar la calidad del aire de la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de México 2002–2010, Mexico

  • Comrie AC (1997) Comparing neural networks and regression models for ozone forecastings . J Air Waste Manage 47:653–663

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N (1991) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • De Leeuw FAAM, Van Zantvoort EG (1997) Mapping of exceedances of ozone critical levels for crops and forest trees in the Netherlands: preliminary results. Environ Pollut 96:89–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diem JE, Comrie AC (2002) Predictive mapping of air pollution involving sparse spatial observations. Environ Pollut 119:99–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dowla FU, RogersLL (1996) Solving problems in environmental engineering and geosciences with artificial neural networks. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Falke SR, Husar RB (1996) Uncertainty in the spatial interpolation of ozone monitoring data. http://www.capita.wustl.edu/CAPITA/CapitaReports/O3Interp/O

  • Gardner MW, Dorling SR (1999) Neural network modeling and prediction of hourly NO x and NO2 concentrations in urban air in London. Atmos Environ 33:709–719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner MW, Dorling SR (1998) Artificial neural networks (The multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. Atmos Environ 32:2627–2636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos PG, Seinfeld JH (1982) Statistical distributions of air pollutant concentrations. Environ Sci Technol 16:401A–416A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert RO (1987) Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson MZ (2000) Fundamentals of atmospheric modeling. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakidis PC, Journel AG (1999) Geostatistical space-time models: a review. Math Geol 31:651–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leenaers H, Okx J P, Burrough PA (1990) Comparison of spatial prediction methods for mapping flood plain soil pollution. Catena 17:535–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu LJS, Rossini AJ (1996) Use of kriging models to predict 12-hours means ozone concentrations in metropolitan Toronto-a pilot study. Environ Int 22:677–692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland JA, Butler AJ, Wilkinson JG., Rusell AG (1998) Temporal and spatial distributions of ozone in atlanta: regulatory and epidemiologic implications. Air Waste Manage Assoc 48:418–426

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oran ES, Boris JP (1987) Numerical simulation of reactive flow. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips DL, Tingey DT, Lee EH., Herstrom AA, Hogsett WE (1997) Use of auxiliary data for spatial interpolation of ozone exposure in southeastern forest. Environmetrics 8:43–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (1998) Atmospheric chemistry and physics. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson RW, Layton AP (1983) Forecasting peak ozone levels. Atmos Environ 17:1649–1654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sistema de Monitoreo Atmosférico de la Ciudad de México, http://www.sma.df.gob.mx/simat/mediciones/

  • Schmidt W, Raudys S, Kraaijweld M, Skurikhina M, Duin R (1993) Initializations, back-propagation and generalization of feed-forward classifiers. Proc 1993 IEEE Int Conf Neural Networ 1:598–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivikrama SR, Samson PI, Pedadda AR (1976) Spectral analysis approach to the dyanamics of air pollutants. Atmos Environ 10:375–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel H (2003) Multivariate geostatistics. 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi J, Prybutok R (1996) A neural network model forecasting for prediction of daily maximum ozone concentration in an industrialized urban area. Environ Pollut 92:349–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported in part by Mexico’s CONACYT under contract Nr. 880146-2. The data and other information used in this work were supplied by the Red Automática de Monitoreo Atmosférico RAMA of Mexico City. We would like to sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions that improved the quality of this manuscript considerably. We thank Mr. Kelley for corrections in the English language which improved the fluidity of the manuscipt.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darío Rojas-Avellaneda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rojas-Avellaneda, D., Silván-Cárdenas, J.L. Performance of geostatistical interpolation methods for modeling sampled data with non-stationary mean. Stoch Environ Res Ris Assess 20, 455–467 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0038-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0038-5

Keywords

Navigation