Erratum to: Trees DOI 10.1007/s00468-017-1590-y
In the original publication the captions of Figs. 7 and 8 had unfortunately been swapped. The correct figure captions are given below:
Fig. 7 Coefficients and statistical significance of the frost variables in the dummy model (Eq. 1). Small symbols represent statistically non-significant and large symbols significant coefficients (p < 0.05). The down-facing triangles represent negative and up-facing triangles positive coefficients. Note that some random variation has been added to the site coordinates so that symbols of nearby sites would not cover each other. See the exact locations of sites in Fig. 1. The non-significant symbols are always drawn on top of the significant ones.
Fig. 8 Results for the slope model (Eq. 2): Coefficients for the slope of the frost variables during extreme years. The size of the symbol describes whether the slope model was significantly improved compared with the dummy model (p < 0.05, likelihood ratio test results). The down-facing triangles represent negative and up-facing triangles positive coefficients. Note that some random variation has been added to the site coordinates so that symbols of nearby sites would not cover each other. See the exact locations of sites in Fig. 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-017-1590-y.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suvanto, S., Henttonen, H.M., Nöjd, P. et al. Erratum to: Connecting potential frost damage events identified from meteorological records to radial growth variation in Norway spruce and Scots pine. Trees 31, 2035 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-017-1617-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-017-1617-4