Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improving accuracy of optical methods in estimating leaf area index through empirical regression models in multiple forest types

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Trees Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Key message

We developed the empirical regression models relating the direct LAI and optical LAI from initial leaf out to the leaf fall in different forest types in China.

Abstract

Optical methods have usually been used to estimate the leaf area index (LAI) in a forest stand because of rapidity and reduced labor requirements. However, few studies have reportedly improved the accuracy of the optical LAI estimates for seasonal dynamics using empirical models in different forest types. In the present study, we directly measured the seasonal dynamics of LAI from leaf out to leaf fall based on litter collection (defined as direct LAI) in a mixed evergreen–deciduous forest, an evergreen forest and a deciduous forest. Meanwhile, the effective LAI was estimated using digital hemispherical photography (DHP) and LAI-2000 instruments. Our main objective was to explore the seasonal changes in the relationship between direct LAI and effective LAI values and to find the best LAI empirical estimation model in different forest types. The season-dependent models relating direct LAI and effective LAI in each period were developed through a power function regression model in several forest types. Then, significance tests were applied to compare the different season-dependent models. The analysis showed that the season-dependent models can be merged into different aggregated models depending on forest types and optical methods. We confirm that the seasonal changes in LAI in different forest types can be fully estimated through aggregated models using both DHP and LAI-2000 methods with accuracies of more than 87 and 92 %, respectively. Meanwhile, our results suggest that the forest type (i.e., species composition of forest stand) and optical method should be seriously considered to correctly and quickly estimate the seasonal changes of LAI through the aggregated models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asner GP, Scurlock JMO, Hicke JA (2003) Global synthesis of leaf area index observations: implications for ecological and remote sensing studies. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay H, Trofymow J, Leach R (2000) Assessing bias from boles in calculating leaf area index in immature Douglas-fir with the LI-COR canopy analyzer. Agric Forest Meteorol 100:255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckschäfer P, Seidel D, Kleinn C, Xu J (2013) On the exposure of hemispherical photographs in forests. iForest-Biogeosci Forest 6:228–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behera SK, Srivastava P, Pathre UV, Tuli R (2010) An indirect method of estimating leaf area index in Jatropha curcas L. using LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer. Agric Forest Meteorol 150:307–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bequet R, Campioli M, Kint V, Vansteenkiste D, Muys B, Ceulemans R (2011) Leaf area index development in temperate oak and beech forests is driven by stand characteristics and weather conditions. Trees Struct Funct 25:935–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bréda NJJ (2003) Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. J Exp Bot 54:2403–2417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chason JW, Baldocchi DD, Huston MA (1991) A comparison of direct and indirect methods for estimating forest canopy leaf area. Agric Forest Meteorol 57:107–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JM (1996) Optically-based methods for measuring seasonal variation of leaf area index in boreal conifer stands. Agric Forest Meteorol 80:135–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JM, Black TA (1992) Defining leaf area index for non-flat leaves. Plant Cell Environ 15:421–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JM, Rich PM, Gower ST, Norman JM, Plummer S (1997) Leaf area index of boreal forests: theory, techniques, and measurements. J Geophys Res 102:29429–29443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JM, Govind A, Sonnentag O, Zhang Y, Barr A, Amiro B (2006) Leaf area index measurements at Fluxnet-Canada forest sites. Agric Forest Meteorol 140:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chianucci F, Cutini A (2012) Digital hemispherical photography for estimating forest canopy properties: current controversies and opportunities. iForest-Biogeosci Forest 5:290–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chianucci F, Cutini A (2013) Estimation of canopy properties in deciduous forests with digital hemispherical and cover photography. Agric Forest Meteorol 168:130–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chianucci F, Cutini A, Corona P, Puletti N (2014) Estimation of leaf area index in understory deciduous trees using digital photography. Agric Forest Meteorol 198–199:259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland EE, Chuine I, Menzel A, Mooney HA, Schwartz MD (2007) Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends Ecol Evol 22:357–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cutini A, Matteucci G, Mugnozza G (1998) Estimation of leaf area index with the Li-Cor LAI 2000 in deciduous forests. Forest Ecol Manage 105:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deblonde G, Penner M, Royer A (1994) Measuring leaf area index with the LI-COR LAI-2000 in pine stands. Ecology 75:1507–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufrêne E, Bréda N (1995) Estimation of deciduous forest leaf area index using direct and indirect methods. Oecologia 104:156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson H, Eklundh L, Hall K, Lindroth A (2005) Estimating LAI in deciduous forest stands. Agric Forest Meteorol 129:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonsamo A, Chen JM (2014) Continuous observation of leaf area index at Fluxnet-Canada sites. Agric Forest Meteorol 189:168–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonsamo A, Pellikka P (2009) The computation of foliage clumping index using hemispherical photography. Agric Forest Meteorol 149:1781–1787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower ST, Norman JM (1991) Rapid estimation of leaf area index in conifer and broad-leaf plantations. Ecology 72:1896–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower ST, Kucharik CJ, Norman JM (1999) Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, f (APAR), and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sens Environ 70:29–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iio A, Hikosaka K, Anten NPR, Nakagawa Y, Ito A (2014) Global dependence of field-observed leaf area index in woody species on climate: a systematic review. Global Ecol Biogeogr 23:274–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara MI, Hiura T (2011) Modeling leaf area index from litter collection and tree data in a deciduous broadleaf forest. Agric Forest Meteorol 151:1016–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii H, Asano S (2010) The role of crown architecture, leaf phenology and photosynthetic activity in promoting complementary use of light among coexisting species in temperate forests. Ecol Res 25:715–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonckheere I, Fleck S, Nackaerts K, Muys B, Coppin P, Weiss M, Baret F (2004) Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination: part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography. Agric Forest Meteorol 121:19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonckheere I, Muys B, Coppin P (2005) Allometry and evaluation of in situ optical LAI determination in Scots pine: a case study in Belgium. Tree Physiol 25:723–732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalácska M, Calvo-Alvarado JC, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA (2005) Calibration and assessment of seasonal changes in leaf area index of a tropical dry forest in different stages of succession. Tree Physiol 25:733–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc SG, Chen JM, Fernandes R, Deering DW, Conley A (2005) Methodology comparison for canopy structure parameters extraction from digital hemispherical photography in boreal forests. Agric Forest Meteorol 129:187–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LI-COR (2010) An appliation for processing data generated by LAI-2000 and LAI-2200 Plant Canopy Analzers. Li-Cor, Bioscinces Inc, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZL, Chen JM, Jin GZ, Qi YJ (2015a) Estimation of seasonal variations of leaf area index using both litterfall collection and optical methods in four mixed evergreen-deciduous forests. Agric Forest Meteorol 209:36–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZL, Wang CK, Chen JM, Wang XC, Jin GZ (2015b) Empirical models for tracing seasonal changes in leaf area index in deciduous broadleaf forests by digital hemispherical photography. Forest Ecol Manag 351:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZL, Jin GZ, Chen JM, Qi YJ (2015c) Evaluating optical measurements of leaf area index against litter collection in a mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest in China. Trees Struct Funct 29:59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maass JM, Vose JM, Swank WT, Martinezyrizar A (1995) Seasonal changes of leaf area index (LAI) in a tropical deciduous forest in west Mexico. Forest Ecol Manag 74:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane C, Hoffman M, Eamus D, Kerp N, Higginson S, McMurtrie R, Adams M (2007) Estimation of leaf area index in eucalypt forest using digital photography. Agric Forest Meteorol 143:176–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane C, Ryu Y, Ogden GN, Sonnentag O (2014) Digital canopy photography: exposed and in the raw. Agric Forest Meteorol 197:244–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majasalmi T, Rautiainen M, Stenberg P, Lukeš P (2013) An assessment of ground reference methods for estimating LAI of boreal forests. Forest Ecol Manag 292:10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason EG, Diepstraten M, Pinjuv GL, Lasserre J-P (2012) Comparison of direct and indirect leaf area index measurements of Pinus radiata D. Don. Agric Forest Meteorol 166–167:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin X, Roy J, Sonie L, Chuine I (2010) Changes in leaf phenology of three European oak species in response to experimental climate change. New Phytol 186:900–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nasahara KN, Muraoka H, Nagai S, Mikami H (2008) Vertical integration of leaf area index in a Japanese deciduous broad-leaved forest. Agric Forest Meteorol 148:1136–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivas PC, Oberbauer SF, Clark DB, Clark DA, Ryan MG, O’Brien JJ, Ordoñez H (2013) Comparison of direct and indirect methods for assessing leaf area index across a tropical rain forest landscape. Agric Forest Meteorol 177:110–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi YJ, Jin GZ, Liu ZL (2013) Optical and litter collection methods for measuring leaf area index in an old-growth temperate forest in northeastern China. J Forest Res 18:430–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson AD, Keenan TF, Migliavacca M, Ryu Y, Sonnentag O, Toomey M (2013) Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agric Forest Meteorol 169:156–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross J (1981) The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands. Junk, The Hague, p 391

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu Y, Sonnentag O, Nilson T, Vargas R, Kobayashi H, Wenk R, Baldocchi DD (2010) How to quantify tree leaf area index in an open savanna ecosystem: a multi-instrument and multi-model approach. Agric Forest Meteorol 150:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu Y, Lee G, Jeon S, Song Y, Kimm H (2014) Monitoring multi-layer canopy spring phenology of temperate deciduous and evergreen forests using low-cost spectral sensors. Remote Sens Environ 149:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song G-ZM, Doley D, Yates D, Chao K-J, Hsieh C-F (2013) Improving accuracy of canopy hemispherical photography by a constant threshold value derived from an unobscured overcast sky. Can J Forest Res 44:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag O, Talbot J, Chen JM, Roulet NT (2007) Using direct and indirect measurements of leaf area index to characterize the shrub canopy in an ombrotrophic peatland. Agric Forest Meteorol 144:200–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprintsin M, Cohen S, Maseyk K, Rotenberg E, Grünzweig J, Karnieli A, Berliner P, Yakir D (2011) Long term and seasonal courses of leaf area index in a semi-arid forest plantation. Agric Forest Meteorol 151:565–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillack A, Clasen A, Kleinschmit B, Förster M (2014) Estimation of the seasonal leaf area index in an alluvial forest using high-resolution satellite-based vegetation indices. Remote Sens Environ 141:52–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gardingen PR, Jackson GE, Hernandez-Daumas S, Russell G, Sharp L (1999) Leaf area index estimates obtained for clumped canopies using hemispherical photography. Agric Forest Meteorol 94:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitford K, Colquhoun I, Lang A, Harper B (1995) Measuring leaf area index in a sparse eucalypt forest: a comparison of estimates from direct measurement, hemispherical photography, sunlight transmittance and allometric regression. Agric Forest Meteorol 74:237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Chen JM, Miller JR (2005) Determining digital hemispherical photograph exposure for leaf area index estimation. Agric Forest Meteorol 133:166–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou J, Yan G, Zhu L, Zhang W (2009) Woody-to-total area ratio determination with a multispectral canopy imager. Tree Physiol 29:1069–1080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Prof. Jing M. Chen of the University of Toronto for the comments on the manuscript. The authors also acknowledge the editor and anonymous reviewers that helped improve the quality of this manuscript. The work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (LC2016006) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (No. 2016M590271).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Ecological Research, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China

    Zhili Liu & Guangze Jin

Authors
  1. Zhili Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guangze Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangze Jin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by E. Prisack.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Z., Jin, G. Improving accuracy of optical methods in estimating leaf area index through empirical regression models in multiple forest types. Trees 30, 2101–2115 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1437-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1437-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation