Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes based on induction regimens in pediatric kidney transplantation: a NAPRTCS and PHIS collaborative study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 03 July 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Induction agent used at the time of kidney transplant is often based upon center practice and recipient characteristics. We evaluated outcomes across induction therapies among children enrolled in the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS) transplant registry with data in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS).

Methods

This is a retrospective study of merged data from NAPRTCS and PHIS. Participants were grouped by induction agent: interleukin-2 receptor blocker (IL-2 RB), anti-thymocyte/anti-lymphocyte globulin (ATG/ALG), and alemtuzumab. Outcomes assessed included 1-, 3-, and 5-year allograft function and survival, rejection, viral infections, malignancy, and death.

Results

A total of 830 children transplanted between 2010 and 2019. At 1 year post-transplant, the alemtuzumab group had higher median eGFR (86 ml/min/1.73 m2) compared to IL-2 RB and ATG/ALG (79 and 75 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively; P < 0.001); at 3 and 5 years, there was no difference. Adjusted eGFR over time was similar across all induction agents. Rejection rates were lower among the alemtuzumab group vs. IL-2RB and ATG (13.9% vs. 27.3% and 24.6%, respectively; P = 0.006). Adjusted ATG/ALG and alemtuzumab had higher hazard ratio for time to graft failure compared to IL-2 RB (HR 2.48 and HR 2.11, respectively; P < 0.05). Incidence of malignancy, mortality, and time to first viral infection was similar.

Conclusion

Although rejection and allograft loss rates were distinct, the incidences of viral infection and malignancy were comparable across induction agents. By 3 years post-transplant, there was no difference in eGFR.

Graphical abstract

A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Dataset is available upon request from authors and registry approval.

Change history

Abbreviations

ALG:

Anti-lymphocyte globulin

ATG:

Anti-thymocyte globulin

BK:

BK polyoma virus

CMV:

Cytomegalovirus

CPT:

Current procedural terminology

EBV:

Epstein-Barr virus

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

HLA:

Human leukocyte antigen

HR:

Hazard ratio

ICD:

International classification of diseases

IL-2 RB:

Interleukin-2 receptor blocker

IQR:

Interquartile range

NAPRTCS:

North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies

OPTN:

Organ Procurement Transplant Network

PHIS:

Pediatric Health Information Systems

PTLD:

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

SRTR:

Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients

References

  1. Dharnidharka VR, Naik AS, Axelrod DA, Schnitzler MA, Zhang Z, Bae S, Segev DL, Brennan DC, Alhamad T, Ouseph R, Lam NN, Nazzal M, Randall H, Kasiske BL, McAdams-Demarco M, Lentine KL (2018) Center practice drives variation in choice of US kidney transplant induction therapy: a retrospective analysis of contemporary practice. Transpl Int 31:198–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Riad S, Jackson S, Chinnakotla S, Verghese P (2021) Primary pediatric live-donor-kidney transplant-recipient’s outcomes by immunosuppression induction received in the United States. Pediatr Transplant 25:e13925

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baron PW, Ojogho ON, Yorgin P, Sahney S, Cutler D, Ben-Youssef R, Baqai W, Weissman J, Franco E, Zuppan C, Concepcion W (2008) Comparison of outcomes with low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin, basiliximab or no induction therapy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective study. Pediatr Transplant 12:32–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mincham CM, Wong G, Teixeira-Pinto A, Kennedy S, Alexander S, Larkins N, Lim WH (2017) Induction therapy, rejection, and graft outcomes in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 101:2146–2151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta P, Richardson T, Hall M, Bertoch D, Hebbar KB, Fortenberry JD, Wetzel RC (2016) Effect of inhaled nitric oxide on outcomes in children with acute lung injury: propensity matched analysis from a linked database. Crit Care Med 44:1901–1909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Redpath Mahon AC, Richardson T, Neu AM, Warady BA, SCOPE Investigators (2019) Factors associated with high-cost hospitalization for peritonitis in children receiving chronic peritoneal dialysis in the United States. Pediatr Nephrol 34:1049–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Godown J, Hall M, Thompson B, Thurm C, Jabs K, Gillis LA, Hafberg ET, Alexopoulos S, Karp SJ, Soslow JH (2019) Expanding analytic possibilities in pediatric solid organ transplantation through linkage of administrative and clinical registry databases. Pediatr Transplant 23:e13379

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Supe-Markovina K, Melquist JJ, Connolly D, DiCarlo HN, Waltzer WC, Fine RN, Darras FS (2014) Alemtuzumab with corticosteroid minimization for pediatric deceased donor renal transplantation: a seven-yr experience. Pediatr Transplant 18:363–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaabak MM, Babenko NN, Shapiro R, Maschan AA, Zokoev AK, Schekaturov SV, Vyunkova JN, Dymova OV (2017) Eight-year follow-up in pediatric living donor kidney recipients receiving alemtuzumab induction. Pediatr Transplant 21(5):e12941. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.12941

  10. Guthoff M, Berger K, Althaus K, Muhlbacher T, Bakchoul T, Steurer W, Nadalin S, Konigsrainer A, Heyne N (2020) Low-dose alemtuzumab induction in a tailored immunosuppression protocol for sensitized kidney transplant recipients. BMC Nephrol 21:178–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim IK, Choi J, Vo AA, Kang A, Patel M, Toyoda M, Mirocha J, Kamil ES, Cohen JL, Louie S, Galera O, Jordan SC, Puliyanda DP (2017) Safety and efficacy of alemtuzumab induction in highly sensitized pediatric renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 101:883–889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Vo AA, Wechsler EA, Wang J, Peng A, Toyoda M, Lukovsky M, Reinsmoen N, Jordan SC (2008) Analysis of subcutaneous (SQ) alemtuzumab induction therapy in highly sensitized patients desensitized with IVIG and rituximab. Am J Transplant 8:144–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li L, Chaudhuri A, Chen A, Zhao X, Bezchinsky M, Concepcion W, Salvatierra O, Sarwal MM (2010) Efficacy and safety of thymoglobulin induction as an alternative approach for steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric renal transplantation. Transplantation 90:1516–1520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Warejko JK, Hmiel SP (2014) Single-center experience in pediatric renal transplantation using thymoglobulin induction and steroid minimization. Pediatr Transplant 18:816–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sutherland AI, Akhtar MZ, Zilvetti M, Brockmann J, Ruse S, Fuggle SV, Sinha S, Harden P, Friend PJ (2014) Alemtuzumab and sirolimus in renal transplantation: six-year results of a single-arm prospective pilot study. Am J Transplant 14:677–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Knechtle SJ, Pascual J, Bloom DD, Torrealba JR, Jankowska-Gan E, Burlingham WJ, Kwun J, Colvin RB, Seyfert-Margolis V, Bourcier K, Sollinger HW (2009) Early and limited use of tacrolimus to avoid rejection in an alemtuzumab and sirolimus regimen for kidney transplantation: clinical results and immune monitoring. Am J Transplant 9:1087–1098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Flechner SM, Friend PJ, Brockmann J, Ismail HR, Zilvetti M, Goldfarb D, Modlin C, Mastroianni B, Savas K, Devaney A, Simmonds M, Cook DJ (2005) Alemtuzumab induction and sirolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil maintenance for CNI and steroid-free kidney transplant immunosuppression. Am J Transplant 5:3009–3014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hill P, Cross NB, Barnett AN, Palmer SC, Webster AC (2017) Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD004759

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Riad S, Jackson S, Chinnakotla S, Verghese P (2021) Primary pediatric live-donor-kidney transplant-recipients’ outcomes by immunosuppression induction received in the United States. Pediatr Transplant 25:e13925

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. LaMattina JC, Mezrich JD, Hofmann RM, Foley DP, D’Alessandro AM, Sollinger HW, Pirsch JD (2012) Alemtuzumab as compared to alternative contemporary induction regimens. Transpl Int 25:518–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Farney AC, Doares W, Rogers J, Singh R, Hartmann E, Hart L, Ashcraft E, Reeves-Daniels A, Gautreaux M, Iskandar SS, Moore P, Adams PL, Stratta RJ (2009) A randomized trial of alemtuzumab versus antithymocyte globulin induction in renal and pancreas transplantation. Transplantation 88:810–819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Korneffel K, Gehring B, Rospert D, Rees M, Ortiz J (2020) BK virus in renal transplant patients using alemtuzumab for induction immunosuppression. Exp Clin Transplant 18:557–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Riad S, Jackson S, Chinnakotla S, Verghese P (2021) Primary pediatric deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients outcomes by immunosuppression induction received in the United States. Pediatr Transplant 25:e13928

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Opelz G, Dohler B (2004) Lymphomas after solid organ transplantation: a collaborative transplant study report. Am J Transplant 4:222–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dharnidharka VR, Stevens G (2005) Risk for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after polyclonal antibody induction in kidney transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 9:622–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the NAPRTCS study group and participants for making this research possible.

Funding

The study was funded through the Ancillary study grant program of NAPRTCS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniella Levy Erez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: Affiliation 2 was corrected and the word alemtuzumab was replaced with IL-2 RB in the Results section.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Graphical Abstract (PPTX 107 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erez, D.L., Pizzo, H., Rodig, N. et al. Outcomes based on induction regimens in pediatric kidney transplantation: a NAPRTCS and PHIS collaborative study. Pediatr Nephrol 38, 3455–3464 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-023-05955-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-023-05955-5

Keywords

Navigation