Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of fluid balance after neonatal cardiac surgery: a description of intake/output vs. weight-based methods

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Fluid overload associates with poor outcomes after neonatal cardiac surgery, but consensus does not exist for the most clinically relevant method of measuring fluid balance (FB). While weight change-based FB (FB-W) is standard in neonatal intensive care units, weighing infants after cardiac surgery may be challenging. We aimed to identify characteristics associated with obtaining weights and to understand how intake/output-based FB (FB-IO) and FB-W compare in the early postoperative period in this population.

Methods

Observational retrospective study of 2235 neonates undergoing cardiac surgery from 22 hospitals comprising the NEonatal and Pediatric Heart and Renal Outcomes Network (NEPHRON) database.

Results

Forty-five percent (n = 998) of patients were weighed on postoperative day (POD) 2, varying from 2 to 98% among centers. Odds of being weighed were lower for STAT categories 4 and 5 (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.53–0.98), cardiopulmonary bypass (0.59; 0.42–0.83), delayed sternal closure (0.27; 0.19–0.38), prophylactic peritoneal dialysis use (0.58; 0.34–0.99), and mechanical ventilation on POD 2 (0.23; 0.16–0.33). Correlation between FB-IO and FB-W was weak for every POD 1–6 and within the entire cohort (correlation coefficient 0.15; 95% CI 0.12–0.17). FB-W measured higher than paired FB-IO (mean bias 12.5%; 95% CI 11.6–13.4%) with wide 95% limits of agreement (− 15.4–40.4%).

Conclusions

Weighing neonates early after cardiac surgery is uncommon, with significant practice variation among centers. Patients with increased severity of illness are less likely to be weighed. FB-W and FB-IO have weak correlation, and further study is needed to determine which cumulative FB metric most associates with adverse outcomes.

Graphical abstract

A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hassinger AB, Wald EL, Goodman DM (2014) Early postoperative fluid overload precedes acute kidney injury and is associated with higher morbidity in pediatric cardiac surgery patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med 15:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000000043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hazle MA, Gajarski RJ, Yu S, Donohue J, Blatt NB (2013) Fluid overload in infants following congenital heart surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med 14:44–49. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182712799

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Seguin J, Albright B, Vertullo L, Lai P et al (2014) Extent, risk factors, and outcome of fluid overload after pediatric heart surgery. Crit Care Med 42:2591–2599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lex DJ, Toth R, Czobor NR, Alexander SI et al (2016) Fluid overload is associated with higher mortality and morbidity in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med 17:307–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilder NS, Yu S, Donohue JE, Goldberg CS, Blatt NB (2016) Fluid overload is associated with late poor outcomes in neonates following cardiac surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med 17:420–427

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mah K, Hao S, Sutherland S, Kwiatkowski DM et al (2018) Fluid overload independent of acute kidney injury predicts poor outcomes in neonates following congenital heart surgery. Pediatr Nephrol 33:511–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-017-3818-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Selewski DT, Cornell TT, Heung M, Troost JP et al (2014) Validation of the KDIGO acute kidney injury criteria in a pediatric critical care population. Intensive Care Med 40:1481–1488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3391-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Selewski DT, Cornell TT, Blatt NB, Han YY et al (2012) Fluid overload and fluid removal in pediatric patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation requiring continuous renal replacement therapy. Crit Care Med 40:2694–2699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rajalingam Y, Tourney S, McFarlane HJ (2001) Insensible fluid loss during cardiac surgery. Crit Care 5:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Young R (2012) Perioperative fluid and electrolyte management in cardiac surgery: a review. J Extracorpor Technol 44:20–26

    Google Scholar 

  11. Selewski DT, Charlton JR, Jetton JG, Guillet R et al (2015) Neonatal acute kidney injury. Pediatrics 136:e463–e473. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-3819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Starr MC, Charlton JR, Guillet R, Reidy K, Tipple TE, Jetton JG, Kent AL, Abitbol CL, Ambalavanan N, Mhanna MJ, Askenazi DJ, Selewski DT, Harer MW, Board NKC (2021) Advances in neonatal acute kidney injury. Pediatrics 148:e2021051220. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-051220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Testani JM, Brisco MA, Kociol RD, Jacoby D et al (2015) Substantial discrepancy between fluid and weight loss during acute decompensated heart failure treatment. Am J Med 128:776–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.12.020

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gist KM, Blinder JJ, Bailly D, Borasino S et al (2019) Neonatal and Paediatric Heart and Renal Outcomes Network: design of a multi-centre retrospective cohort study. Cardiol Young 29:511–518. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951119000210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Datta D 2017 blandr: a Bland-Altman method comparison package for R. https://github.com/deepankardatta/blandr

  17. Selewski DT, Akcan-Arikan A, Bonachea EM, Gist KM et al (2019) The impact of fluid balance on outcomes in critically ill near-term/term neonates: a report from the AWAKEN study group. Pediatr Res 85:79–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-018-0183-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bailly DK, Alten JA, Gist KM, Mah KE et al (2022) Fluid accumulation after neonatal congenital cardiac operation: clinical implications and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.12.078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaies M, Cooper DS, Tabbutt S, Schwartz SM et al (2015) Collaborative quality improvement in the cardiac intensive care unit: development of the Paediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium (PC4). Cardiol Young 25:951–957. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951114001450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the data collection teams at all of the participating centers.

NEPHRON Investigators (Contributing authors)

The following individuals served as collaborators and site investigators for the NEPHRON study and are collaborators on this manuscript and should be indexed in PubMed as collaborators on this manuscript:

Parthak Prodhan, MDa, Xiomara Garcia, MDa, Shannon Ramer, BSN, RNCa, Mindy Albertson, RNa, Michael Gaies, MD, MPH, MSb, David S. Cooper, MD, MPHb, Zahidee Rodriquez, MDb, Mary Lukacsb, Dominic Zanaboni, MDc, Joan Sanchez de Toledo, MD, PhDd, Yuliya A. Domnina, MDd, Lucas Saenz, MDd, Tracy Baust, BAd, Jane Kluck, RN, BSNe, Linda Duncan, RN, BSNe, Joshua D. Koch, MDf, Joshua Freytagg, Amanda Sammonsg, Hideat Abrahag, John Butcherg, Jun Sasaki, MDh, Rebecca A. Bertrandt, MDi, Jason R. Buckley, MDj, Luke Schroeder, MDj, Aanish Raees, MBBSk, Lisa J. Sosa, ARNPl, Natasha S. Afonso, MD, MPHm, Erika R. O’Neal, MDm, Javier J. Lasa, MDm, Patrick A. Phillipsn, Amy Ardisanao, Kim Gonzalezo, Tammy Domano, Suzanne Vierso, Wenying Zhang, MSp, Kristal M. Hock, MSN, RN, CNLq, Santiago Borasino, MD, MPHq, Joshua J. Blinder, MDr

aArkansas Children’s Hospital, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas; bDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, The Heart Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; cDivision of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia/Critical Care, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; dDepartment of Critical Care Medicine and Pediatrics, UMPC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburg, University of Pittsburg School of Medicine, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania; eChildren’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; fDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Medical Center of Dallas, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas; gCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; hDivision of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Nicklaus Children’s Hospital, Miami, Florida; iDivision of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; jMedical University of South Carolina Children’s Hospital, Charleston, South Carolina; kMonroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt, Vanderbilt, Tennessee; lNicklaus Children’s Hospital, Miami, Florida; mPediatric Critical Care, Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; nChildren’s of Alabama, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; oCS Mott Children’s Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; pCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; qSection of Cardiac Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; rLucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, California.

Funding

This study is financially supported by Castin’ ‘N Catchin’ Charity Organization and Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Heart Institute Research Core.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tara M. Neumayr.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Graphical Abstract (pptx 275 KB)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 469 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neumayr, T.M., Alten, J.A., Bailly, D.K. et al. Assessment of fluid balance after neonatal cardiac surgery: a description of intake/output vs. weight-based methods. Pediatr Nephrol 38, 1355–1364 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-022-05697-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-022-05697-w

Keywords

Navigation