Abstract
Background
Due to lower complication rates in comparison to central venous catheter (CVC) arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are now the preferred hemodialysis access. Recommendations for the first access cannulation range from 6 to 12 weeks, which could lead to temporary or even permanent preference for CVC while awaiting the maturation of the newly created AVF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of first cannulation of AVFs on primary (PP) and secondary (SP) patency rates in children on hemodialysis (HD).
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study of 42 pediatric patients with a median age of 14 (range 7–17) years. At the time of surgical AVF creation 21 patients (end-stage renal disease) were still on HD via CVC or peritoneal catheter, while 21 were pre-emptive with initiation of HD expected within a few weeks. All patients received an AVF by the same experienced surgeon between February 1993 and May 2014. Primary failure (PF) was defined as the inability to use the AVF even once due to absent maturation or occlusion within 4 weeks after creation. PP was defined as the interval from time of access placement to any intervention designed to maintain or reestablish patency, to access thrombosis or the time of measurement of patency, while SP was defined as the total lifespan from creation to access abandonment, end of follow-up or loss.
Results
Primary failure was observed in six (14.3 %) of 42 AVFs (all radiocephalic fistulas) within the first 10 days after cannulation. Excluding PF, the PP/SP rates at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were 100/100, 91/99, 86/98, 76/95, 55/85 and 44/77 %, respectively. There was a significant decrease in PP when first cannulation was performed within the first 30 days after creation compared to first cannulation performed after 30 days (p = 0.004). In terms of PP/SP outcome and timing of the first cannulation, there was no significant difference in thee outcome of PP/SP between first cannulation within the first 45 days after creation and that after 45 days (p = 0.091/0.883).
Conclusions
The findings suggest that cannulation of AVF within 30 days after surgical creation reduces PP, while SP may be influenced less by time until cannulation. We also found no significant differences in PP after maturing periods of >45 days.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zaritsky JJ, Salusky IB, Gales B, Ramos G, Atkinson J, Allsteadt A, Brandt ML, Goldstein SL (2008) Vascular access complications in long-term pediatric hemodialysis patients. Pediatr Nephrol 23:2061–2065
Souza RA, Oliveira EA, Silva JM, Lima EM (2011) Hemodialysis vascular access in children and adolescents: a ten-year retrospective cohort study. J Bras Nefrol 33:422–430
Ramage IJ, Bailie A, Tyerman KS, McColl JH, Pollard SG, Fitzpatrick MM (2005) Vascular access survival in children and young adults receiving long-term hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 45:708–714
Fadrowski JJ, Hwang W, Neu AM, Fivush BA, Furth SL (2009) Patterns of use of vascular catheters for hemodialysis in children in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 53:91–98
Bourquelot P (2006) Vascular access in children: the importance of microsurgery for creation of autologous arteriovenous fistulae. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32:696–700
[No authors listed] (2001) III. NKF-K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access: update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 37[1 Suppl 1]:S137–181
Sheth RD, Brandt ML, Brewer ED, Nuchtern JG, Kale AS, Goldstein SL (2002) Permanent hemodialysis vascular access survival in children and adolescents with end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 62:1864–1869
Sidawy AN, Gray R, Besarab A, Henry M, Ascher E, Silva M Jr, Miller A, Scher L, Trerotola S, Gregory RT, Rutherford RB, Kent KC (2002) Recommended standards for reports dealing with arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses. J Vas Surg 35:603–610
Briones L, Diaz Moreno A, Sierre S, Lopez L, Lipsich J, Adragna M (2010) Permanent vascular access survival in children on long-term chronic hemodialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 25:1731–1738
Chand DH, Valentini RP, Kamil ES (2009) Hemodialysis vascular access options in pediatrics: considerations for patients and practitioners. Pediatr Nephrol 24:1121–1128
Matoussevitch V, Taylan C, Konner K, Gawenda M, Kuhr K, Hoppe B, Brunkwall J (2015) AV fistula creation in paediatric patients: outcome is independent of demographics and fistula type reducing usage of venous catheters. J Vasc Access 16:382–387
Wartman SM, Rosen D, Woo K, Gradman WS, Weaver FA, Rowe V (2014) Outcomes with arteriovenous fistulas in a pediatric population. J Vasc Surg 60:170–174
Gradman WS, Lerner G, Mentser M, Rodriguez H, Kamil ES (2005) Experience with autogenous arteriovenous access for hemodialysis in children and adolescents. Ann Vasc Surg 19:609–612
Chand DH, Valentini RP (2008) International pediatric fistula first initiative: a call to action. Am J Kidney Dis 51:1016–1024
Rayner HC, Besarab A, Brown WW, Disney A, Saito A, Pisoni RL (2004) Vascular access results from the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study (DOPPS): performance against kidney disease outcomes quality initiative (K/DOQI) clinical practice guidelines. Am J Kidney Dis 44:22–26
Feldman L, Shani M, Mursi J, Beberashvili I, Bass A, Weissgarten J, Rabin I (2013) Effect of timing of the first cannulation on survival of arteriovenous hemodialysis grafts. Ther Apher Dial 17:60–64
Fadel FI, Abdel Mooty HN, Bazaraa HM, Sabry SM (2008) Central venous catheters as a vascular access modality for pediatric hemodialysis. Int Urol Nephrol 40:489–496
Baracco R, Mattoo T, Jain A, Kapur G, Valentini RP (2014) Reducing central venous catheters in chronic hemodialysis--a commitment to arteriovenous fistula creation in children. Pediatr Nephrol 29:2013–2020
Merouani A, Lallier M, Paquet J, Gagnon J, Lapeyraque AL (2014) Vascular access for chronic hemodialysis in children: arteriovenous fistula or central venous catheter? Pediatr Nephrol 29:2395–2401
Hayes WN, Watson AR, Callaghan N, Wright E, Stefanidis CJ (2012) Vascular access: choice and complications in European paediatric haemodialysis units. Pediatr Nephrol 27:999–1004
Chand DH, Brier M, Strife CF (2005) Comparison of vascular access type in pediatric hemodialysis patients with respect to urea clearance, anemia management, and serum albumin concentration. Am J Kidney Dis 45:303–308
Dagmara Borzych-Duzalka RS, Lim YN, Testa S, Szczepanska M, Ariceta G, Il Ha S, Stefanidis C, Xu H, Bilge I, Ranchin B, Warady B, Schaefer F, Schmitt CP (2015) Vascular access choice and complications in pediatric hemodialysis: findings from the International Pediatric Hemodialysis Network (IPHN). Pediatr Nephrol 30:1551–1552
Rayner HC, Pisoni RL, Gillespie BW, Goodkin DA, Akiba T, Akizawa T, Saito A, Young EW, Port FK (2003) Creation, cannulation and survival of arteriovenous fistulae: data from the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study. Kidney Int 63:323–330
Manook M, Calder F (2013) Practical aspects of arteriovenous fistula formation in the pediatric population. Pediatr Nephrol 28:885–893
Tannuri U, Tannuri AC, Watanabe A (2009) Arteriovenous fistula for chronic hemodialysis in pediatric candidates for renal transplantation: Technical details and refinements. Pediatr Transplant 13:360–364
Shroff R, Ledermann S (2009) Long-term outcome of chronic dialysis in children. Pediatr Nephrol 24:463–474
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
The present work was performed in fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the degree “Dr. med.” for the first author.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Almási-Sperling, V., Galiano, M., Lang, W. et al. Timing of first arteriovenous fistula cannulation in children on hemodialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 31, 1647–1657 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-016-3382-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-016-3382-9