Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate whether urine levels of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (uMMP9) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (uTIMP1) are novel biomarkers of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and to determine the optimal cut-off levels of these enzymes to predict VUR in children. The study group consisted of 67 children with VUR and 20 healthy children. Urine MMP9 and TIMP1 levels were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Children with VUR had significantly higher uMMP9 (1,539.8 vs. 256.4 pg/mL; p = 0.0001) and uTIMP1 (182 vs. 32.6 pg/mL; p = 0.0001) levels than healthy children. For the prediction of VUR, the sensitivity of uMMP9 was 67%, with a specificity of 85% [cut-off value 1,054 pg/mL; area under the curve (AUC) 0.77], and the sensitivity of uTIMP1 was 74%, with a specificity of 65% (cut-off value 18.7 pg/mL; AUC 0.73). Both uMMP9 and uTIMP1 levels were significantly higher in patients with renal scar (uMMP9: 3,117.3 vs. 1,234.15 pg/mL; p = 0.0001; uTIMP1: 551.05 vs. 128.64 pg/mL; p = 0.0001). Urine MMP9 levels had a sensitivity of 81.2%, with a specificity of 85% to predict renal scar in the VUR group (cut-off 1,054 pg/mL; AUC 0.88). The sensitivity of uTIMP1 was 75%, with a specificity of 90% to predict renal scar (cut-off 243.7 pg/mL; AUC 0.82). Based on these results, we suggest that uTIMP1 may be a useful marker to predict renal scarring with a different cut-off value from VUR and a high specificity at this cut-off point. Although uMMP9 seemingly cannot distinguish renal scar from VUR, the simultaneous increase in the level of both markers may indicate ongoing renal injury due to VUR.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mattoo TK, Mathews R (2009) Pediatric nephrology, 6th edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg
Sirin A, Emre S, Alpay H, Nayir A, Bilge I, Tanman F (1995) Etiology of chronic renal failure in Turkish children. Pediatr Nephrol 9:549–552
Bek K, Akman S, Bilge I, Topaloğlu R, Calişkan S, Peru H, Cengiz N, Söylemezoğlu O (2009) Chronic kidney disease in children in Turkey. Pediatr Nephrol 24:797–806
Bilge I, Emre S, Sirin A, Yuruk Z, Akinci N, Sucu A, Tanman F (2008) Changing pattern of chronic kidney disease. In: Turkish children: A 35-year single center study. Third Southeast European Pediatric Nephrology Working Group Meeting (SEPNWG). Cappadocia
Becker GJ, Kincaid-Smith P (1993) Reflux nephropathy: the glomerular lesion and progression of renal failure. Pediatr Nephrol 7:365–369
Liu Y (2006) Renal fibrosis: new insights into the pathogenesis and therapeutics. Kidney Int 69:213–217
Cai G, Zhang X, Hong Q, Shao F, Shang X, Fu B, Feng Z, Lin H, Wang J, Shi S, Yin Z, Chen X (2008) Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 exacerbated renal interstitial fibrosis through enhancing inflammation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:1861–1875
Chromek M, Tullus K, Hertting O, Jaremko G, Khalil A, Li YH, Brauner A (2003) Matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 in acute pyelonephritis and renal scarring. Pediatr Res 53:698–705
Visse R, Nagase H (2003) Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases: structure, function, and biochemistry. Circ Res 92:827–839
Davies M, Martin J, Thomas GJ, Lovett DH (1992) Proteinases and glomerular matrix turnover. Kidney Int 41:671–678
Mathews R, Mattoo TK (2008) Comprehensive pediatric nephrology, 1st edn. Mosby Elsevier, Philadephia
Pesce MA (2007) Nelson textbook of pediatrics, 18th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia
National Kidney Foundation (2002) K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 39:S1–S266
Piepsz A, Colarinha P, Gordon I, Hahn K, Olivier P, Roca I, Sixt R, van Velzen J (2001) Paediatric Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine Guidelines for 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy in children. Eur J Nucl Med 28:BP37–BP41
Turecky L, Uhlikova E (2003) Diagnostic significance of urinary enzymes in nephrology. Bratisl Lek Listy 104:27–31
Müller GA, Zeisberg M, Strutz F (2000) The importance of tubulointerstitial damage in progressive renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15[Suppl 6]:76–77
Lelongt B, Bengatta S, Delauche M, Lund LR, Werb Z, Ronco PM (2001) Matrix metalloproteinase 9 protects mice from anti-glomerular basement membrane nephritis through its fibrinolytic activity. J Exp Med 193:793–802
Bengatta S, Arnould C, Letavernier E, Monge M, de Préneuf HM, Werb Z, Ronco P, Lelongt B (2009) MMP9 and SCF protect from apoptosis in acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 20:787–797
Endo T, Nakabayashi K, Sekiuchi M, Kuroda T, Soejima A, Yamada A (2006) Matrix metalloproteinase-2, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in the peripheral blood of patients with various glomerular diseases and their implication in pathogenetic lesions: study based on an enzyme-linked assay and immunohistochemical staining. Clin Exp Nephrol 10:253–261
Sanders JS, Huitema MG, Hanemaaijer R, van Goor H, Kallenberg CG, Stegeman CA (2007) Urinary matrix metalloproteinases reflect renal damage in anti-neutrophil cytoplasm autoantibody-associated vasculitis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 293:F1927–F1934
Qin YH, Zhou TB, Lei FY, Huang WF, Zhao YJ, Lin FQ, Su LN (2011) Cut-off values for serum matrix metalloproteinase-9: is there a threshold to predict renal involvement for Henoch-Schonlein purpura in children? Nephrology (Carlton) 16:93–99
Oswald J, Schwentner C, Brenner E, Deibl M, Fritsch H, Bartsch G, Radmayr C (2004) Extracellular matrix degradation and reduced nerve supply in refluxing ureteral endings. J Urol 172:1099–1102
Acknowledgments
This study was presented in The 15th Congress of the International Pediatric Nephrology Association and supported by Istanbul University Scientific Research Project Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yilmaz, A., Bilge, I., Kiyak, A. et al. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 in vesicoureteral reflux. Pediatr Nephrol 27, 435–441 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-011-2026-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-011-2026-3