Skip to main content
Log in

The short peritoneal equilibration test in pediatric peritoneal dialysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The peritoneal equilibration test (PET) is the gold standard method for defining peritoneal membrane permeability and for prescribing peritoneal dialysis (PD) therapy on an individual basis. However, it is laborious, consumes nursing time, and requires many hours to be performed. Therefore, several authors have attempted to validate a short PET protocol, with controversial results. To evaluate the concordance between the 2-h (short) and 4-h (classical) peritoneal equilibrium test, a prospective observational protocol was applied in three PD centers (Mexico, Chile, and Uruguay) between July 1, 2008 and July 31 2009. PET protocol: the night prior to the test, each patient received five exchanges, 1 h each, at the same glucose concentration as previously used. Afterwards, a 2.5% glucose dialysis solution was used for a dwell time of 4 h. Exchange fill volume was 1,100 ml/m2 body surface area. The next morning, the 4-h dwell was drained, and Dianeal 2.5% was infused. Three dialysate samples at 0, 2, and 4 h were obtained. A single blood sample was obtained at 120 min. Creatinine D/P and glucose D/D0 ratios were calculated at hours 0, 2, and 4. Patients were categorized as low, low average, high average, or high transporters according creat D/P and gluc D/D0 results. Pearson and Kappa test were used for numerical and categorical correlations, respectively, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Eighty-seven PET studies were evaluated in 74 patients, 33 males, age 11.1 ± 5.05 years old. A positive linear correlation of 92% between 2 and 4-h creat D/P and 80% between 2 and 4-h gluc D/D0 (p < 0.001) was founded. The Kappa test showed a significant concordance between creat D/P and gluc D/D0 categories at 2 and 4 h (p < 0.001). When analyzing cut-off-value categories, creat D/P was founded to be lower and gluc D/D0 higher than other experiences. This multicentric prospective study strongly suggests that PET obtained at 2 h and 4 h, based on either creatinine or glucose transport, provides identical characterization of peritoneal membrane transport capacity in PD children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Warady B (1990) Optimizing dialysis in pediatric patients. In: Nissenson AR, Fine RN, Gentile DE (eds) Clinical dialysis, 2nd edn. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT, pp 189–202

    Google Scholar 

  2. Warady B, Alexander S, Watkins S, Kohaut E, Harmon W (1999) Optimal care of the pediatric ESRD patient on dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 33:567–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. National Kidney Foundation (1997) NKF–DOQI clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy. Am J Kidney Dis 3(Suppl 2):S67–S136

    Google Scholar 

  4. Warady B, Fivush B, Andreoli S (1999) Longitudinal evaluation of transport kinetics in children receiving peritoneal dialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 13:571–576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander S (1994) Peritoneal dialysis. In: Holliday M, Barrat M, Avner E (eds) Textbook of pediatric nephrology, 2nd edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 1654–1659

    Google Scholar 

  6. Twardowski ZJ, Nolph KD, Khanna R, Prowant BF, Ryan LP, Moore HL, Nielsen MP (1987) Peritoneal equilibration test. Peritoneal Dialysis Bull 3:138–147

    Google Scholar 

  7. Twardowski ZJ (1989) Clinical value of standardized equilibration test in CAPD patients. Blood Purif 7:95–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Warady B, Alexander S, Hossli S, Vonesh E, Geary D, Watkins S, Salusky I, Kohaut E (1996) Peritoneal membrane transport function in children receiving long-term dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 7:2385–2391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schaefer F, Lagenbeck D, Heckert H, Scharer K, Mehls O (1992) Evaluation of peritoneal solute transfer by the peritoneal equilibration test in children. Adv Perit Dial 8:410–415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Geary DF, Harvey E, MacMillan J, Goodman Y, Scott M, Balfe J (1992) The peritoneal equilibration test in children. Kidney Int 42:102–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sliman G, Klee K, Gall-Holden B, Watkins S (1994) Peritoneal equilibration test curves and adequacy of dialysis in children on automated peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 24:813–818

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. KDOQI (2006) Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for peritoneal dialysis adequacy, update 2006. Am J Kidney Dis 48(Suppl 1):S98–S129

    Google Scholar 

  13. Twardowski ZJ (1990) The fast peritoneal equilibration test (1990). Semin Dial 3:141–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Twardowski ZJ, Prowant B, Moore H, Lou L, White E, Farris K (2003) Short peritoneal equilibration test: impact of preceding dwell time. Adv Perit Dial 19:59–61

    Google Scholar 

  15. Warady B, Jennings J (2007) The short PET in pediatrics. Perit Dial Int 27:441–445

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cuevas M, Zambrano P, Cano F (2008) Short PET in pediatric peritoneal dialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 23:1853–1858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaefer F, Klaus G, Mehls O (1999) Peritoneal transport properties and dialysis dose affect growth and nutritional status in children on chronic peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:1786–1792

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heaf J (1995) CAPD adequacy and dialysis morbidity: detrimental effect of a high peritoneal equilibration rate. Ren Fail 17:575–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mendley S, Majkowski N (1995) Peritoneal equilibration test results are different in infants, children and adults. J Am Soc Nephrol 6:1309–1312

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fischbach M, Dheu C, Seugé-Dargnies L, Delobbe J (2007) Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis in children: consider the membrane for optimal prescription. Perit Dial Int 27:S167–S170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Warady B (2001) Should the DOQI Adequacy Guidelines be used to standardize peritoneal dialysis in children? Perit Dial Int 21:s174–s178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Warady BA, Alexander S, Hossli S, Vonesh E, Geary D, Kohaut E (1995) The relationship between intraperitoneal volume and solute transport in pediatric patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 5:1935–1939

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Cano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cano, F., Sanchez, L., Rebori, A. et al. The short peritoneal equilibration test in pediatric peritoneal dialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 25, 2159–2164 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-010-1566-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-010-1566-2

Keywords

Navigation