Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A consistent strain-based beam element with quaternion representation of rotations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a novel consistent singularity-free strain-based finite element formulation for the analysis of three-dimensional frame-like structures. Our model is based on a geometrically exact finite-strain beam theory, quaternion parametrization of spatial rotations, assumption that the strain measures are constant along the length of the element and a proper choice of basis for the translational strain vector representation. As it is common for strain-based elements, the present formulation does not suffer from shear locking. A comparison of our results with the results from the literature and a commercial finite element analysis software demonstrates the advantages of the proposed formulation, especially when the structure is subjected to larger shear deformations. This stems from the fact that our model ensures a mathematically consistent updating procedure for all the quantities describing the beam. This aspect is often overlooked, since most of the numerical cases from other studies on this topic engage rather small-shear strains for which the consistent update is not crucial as the number of elements is increased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hover FS (1997) Simulation of stiff massless tethers. Ocean Eng 24(8):765–783

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nazmy AS, Abdel-Ghaffar AM (1990) Three-dimensional nonlinear static analysis of cable-stayed bridges. Comput Struct 34(2):257–271

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coleman BD, Swigon D (2000) Theory of supercoiled elastic rings with self-contact and its application to DNA plasmids. J Elast 60(3):173–221

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakano A (1999) A rigid-body-based multiple time scale molecular dynamics simulation of nanophase materials. Int J High Perform Comput 13(2):154–162

    Google Scholar 

  5. Spillman J, Teschner M (2008) Cosserat nets. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 15(2):325–338

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gilles B, Bousquet G, Faure F, Pai DK (2011) Frame-based elastic models. ACM Trans Graph 30(2):15:1–15:12

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horn BKP (1987) Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. J Opt Soc Am A 4(4):629–642

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trivedi D, Lotfi A, Rahn CD (2008) Geometrically exact models for soft robotic manipulators. IEEE Trans Robot 24(4):773–780

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reissner E (1972) On one-dimensional finite-strain beam theory: the plane problem. Z Angew Math Phys 23(5):795–804

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Antman SS (2005) Nonlinear problems of elasticity. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Reissner E (1981) On finite deformations of space-curved beams. Z Angew Math Phys 32(6):734–744

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Simo JC (1985) A finite strain beam formulation. The three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I. Comput Method Appl Mech 49(1):55–70

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Simo JC, Vu-Quoc L (1986) A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: computational aspects. Comput Method Appl Mech 58(1):79–116

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Cardona A, Géradin M (1988) A beam finite element non-linear theory with finite rotations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 26(11):2403–2438

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ibrahimbegović A (1995) On finite element implementation of geometrically nonlinear Reissner’s beam theory: three-dimensional curved beam elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech 22(1–2):11–26

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Jelenić G, Saje M (1995) A kinematically exact space finite strain beam model—finite element formulation by generalized virtual work principle. Comput Methods Appl Mech 120(1–2):131–161

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Smoleński WM (1999) Statically and kinematically exact nonlinear theory of rods and its numerical verification. Comput Methods Appl Mech 178(1–2):89–113

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Argyris J (1982) An excursion into large rotations. Comput Methods Appl Mech 32(1–3):85–155

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Argyris J, Poterasu VF (1993) Large rotations revisited application of Lie algebra. Comput Methods Appl Mech 103(1–2):11–42

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Géradin M, Rixen D (1995) Parametrization of finite rotations in computational dynamics: a review. Revue Européenne des Eléments Finis 4(5–6):497–553

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Spring KW (1986) Euler parameters and the use of quaternion algebra in the manipulation of finite rotations: a review. Mech Mach Theory 21(5):365–373

    Google Scholar 

  22. Atluri SN, Cazzani A (1995) Rotations in computational solid mechanics. Arch Comput Methods Eng 2(1):49–138

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Zupan E, Saje M, Zupan D (2009) The quaternion-based three-dimensional beam theory. Comput Methods Appl Mech 198(49–52):3944–3956

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Češarek P, Saje M, Zupan D (2012) Kinematically exact curved and twisted strain-based beam. Int J Solids Struct 49(13):1802–1817

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zupan D, Saje M (2003) Finite-element formulation of geometrically exact three-dimensional beam theories based on interpolation of strain measures. Int J Solids Struct 192(49–50):5209–5248

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Stuelpnagel J (1964) On the parametrization of the three-dimensional rotation group. SIAM Rev 6(4):422–430

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Pimenta PM, Campello EMB, Wriggers P (2008) An exact conserving algorithm for nonlinear dynamics with rotational DOFs and general hyperelasticity. Part 1: rods. Comput Mech 42(5):715–732

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Neto AG, Martins CA, Pimenta PM (2014) Static analysis of offshore risers with a geometrically-exact 3D beam model subjected to unilateral contact. Comput Mech 53(1):125–145

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Ibrahimbegović A (1997) On the choice of finite rotation parameters. Comput Methods Appl Mech 149(1–4):49–71

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Crisfield MA, Jelenić G (1999) Objectivity of strain measures in the geometrically exact three-dimensional beam theory and its finite-element implementation. Proc Roy Soc Lond A Math 455(1–4):1125–1147

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Battini JM, Pacoste C (2002) Co-rotational beam elements with warping effects in instability problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech 191(17–18):1755–1789

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. McRobie FA, Lasenby J (1999) Simo–Vu Quoc rods using Clifford algebra. Int J Numer Methods Eng 45(4):377–398

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Zupan E, Saje M, Zupan D (2013) Dynamics of spatial beams in quaternion description based on the Newmark integration scheme. Comput Mech 51(1):47–64

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Zupan E, Zupan D (2016) Velocity-based approach in non-linear dynamics of three-dimensional beams with enforced kinematic compatibility. Comput Methods Appl Mech 310:406–428

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Zupan E, Zupan D (2019) On conservation of energy and kinematic compatibility in dynamics of nonlinear velocity-based three-dimensional beams. Nonlinear Dyn 95(2):1379–1394

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Tabarrok B, Farshad M, Yi H (1988) Finite element formulation of spatially curved and twisted rods. Comput Methods Appl Mech 70(3):275–299

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Zupan D, Saje M (2006) The linearized three-dimensional beam theory of naturally curved and twisted beams: the strain vectors formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech 195(33–36):4557–4578

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Ward JP (2012) Quaternions and Cayley numbers: algebra and applications. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Zupan E, Zupan D (2014) On higher order integration of angular velocities using quaternions. Mech Res Commun 55:77–85

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Zupan E, Saje M, Zupan D (2013) On a virtual work consistent three-dimensional Reissner–Simo beam formulation using the quaternion algebra. Acta Mech 224(8):1709–1729

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Room TG (1952) The composition of rotations in Euclidean three-space. Am Math Mon 59(10):688–692

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. The Mathworks, Inc (2019) MATLAB version 9.6.0.1150989 (R2019a). Natick, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  43. ANSYS, Inc. (2019) Academic research mechanical, release R2 2019. Help system, element reference

  44. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. (2019) ABAQUS documentation 6.13, Providence, RI, USA

  45. Ibrahimbegović A, Taylor RL (2002) On the role of frame-invariance in structural mechanics models at finite rotations. Comput Methods Appl Mech 191(45):5159–5176

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Slovenian Research Agency through Grants P2-0263 and J2-8170. The support is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva 6, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Damjan Lolić & Miha Brojan

  2. Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Jamova 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Dejan Zupan

Authors
  1. Damjan Lolić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dejan Zupan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miha Brojan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miha Brojan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lolić, D., Zupan, D. & Brojan, M. A consistent strain-based beam element with quaternion representation of rotations. Comput Mech 65, 1397–1412 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01826-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-020-01826-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation