Abstract
A flexible actuator finite element is developed and applied for the modelling of spatial mechanisms present in several industrial applications. A total Lagrangian framework is employed for the development of the finite deformation dynamic equilibrium using solid-like shell and 3D frame finite elements. Exploiting the total Lagrangian aspect of the formulation, the actuator motion is imposed by controlling the element reference configuration. It has the advantage of retaining the actuated bar flexibility, an important factor when simulating flexible mechanisms, and not requiring special treatments as constraint enforcement impositions. As the employed elements use alternative nodal parameters such as positions and generalized vectors to describe their kinematics, a treatment on the introduction of rotational connections—spherical, revolute and pinned joints—largely present in actuated mechanisms, is developed. The nonlinear equations of motion are solved by the Newton–Raphson method. Examples are presented to evaluate the proposed flexible actuator finite element regarding its dynamical behaviour in mechanisms where its use is of importance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Coda HB, Paccola RR (2011) A FEM procedure based on positions and unconstrained vectors applied to non-linear dynamic of 3D frames. Finite Elem Anal Des 47:319–333
Coda HB, Paccola RR, Sampaio MDSM (2013) Positional description applied to the solution of geometrically non-linear plates and shells. Finite Elem Anal Des 67:66–75
Thomson MW (1999) The AstroMesh deployable reflector. In: IEEE antennas and propagation society international symposium: wireless technologies and information networks, APS 1999—Held in conjunction with USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting. IEEE, pp 1516–1519
Takano T, Miura K, Natori M et al (2004) Deployable antenna with 10-m maximum diameter for space use. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 52:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2003.820968
Meguro A, Shintate K, Usui M, Tsujihata A (2009) In-orbit deployment characteristics of large deployable antenna reflector onboard Engineering Test Satellite VIII. Acta Astronaut 65:1306–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.052
Mitsugi J, Ando K, Senbokuya Y, Meguro A (2000) Deployment analysis of large space antenna using flexible multibody dynamics simulation. Acta Astronaut 47:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-5765(00)00014-X
Madeira RH, Coda HB (2016) Kelvin viscoelasticity and lagrange multipliers applied to the simulation of nonlinear structural vibration control. Lat Am J Solids Struct 13:964–991. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78252624
Cardona A, Géradin M (1989) Time integration of equations of motion in mechanism analysis. Comput Struct 33:801–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(89)90255-1
Jelenic G, Crisfield MA (2001) Dynamic analysis of 3D beams with joints in presence of large rotations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:4195–4230. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-7825(00)00344-3
Gebhardt CG, Hofmeister B, Hente C, Rolfes R (2019) Nonlinear dynamics of slender structures: a new object-oriented framework. Comput Mech 63:219–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1592-7
Gay Neto A (2017) Simulation of mechanisms modeled by geometrically-exact beams using Rodrigues rotation parameters. Comput Mech 59:459–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-016-1355-2
Ibrahimbegović A, Mamouri S (2000) On rigid components and joint constraints in nonlinear dynamics of flexible multibody systems employing 3D geometrically exact beam model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 188:805–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-7825(99)00363-1
Crisfield MA, Moita GF (1996) A unified co-rotational framework for solids, shells and beams. Int J Solids Struct 33:2969–2992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(95)00252-9
Teh LH, Clarke MJ (1999) Plastic-zone analysis of 3D steel frames using beam elements. J Struct Eng 125:1328–1337. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:11(1328)
Cardona A (2000) Superelements modelling in flexible multibody dynamics. Multibody Syst Dyn 4:245–266
Wasfy TM, Noor AK (1996) Modeling and sensitivity analysis of multibody systems using new solid, shell and beam elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 138:187–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01113-9
Coda HB, Paccola RR (2009) Unconstrained finite element for geometrical nonlinear dynamics of shells. Math Probl Eng 2009:1–32. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/575131
Simo JC, Vu-Quoc L (1986) On the dynamics of flexible beams under large overall motions—the plane case. I. J Appl Mech 53:849–854
Simo JC, Vu-Quoc L (1986) On the dynamics of flexible beams under large overall motions—the plane case. II. J Appl Mech 53:855–863
Holzapfel GA (2000) Nonlinear solid mechanics: a continuum approach for engineering. Wiley, Chichester
Lanczos C (1970) The variational principles of mechanics. Dover Publications, New York
Siqueira TM, Coda HB (2017) Total Lagrangian FEM formulation for nonlinear dynamics of sliding connections in viscoelastic plane structures and mechanisms. Finite Elem Anal Des 129:63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2016.12.005
Ogden RW (1984) Non-linear elastic deformations. Ellis Horwood, Chichester
Nocedal J, Wright SJ (1999) Numerical optimization. Springer, New York
Bonet J, Wood RD, Mahaney J, Heywood P (2000) Finite element analysis of air supported membrane structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:579–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-7825(99)00428-4
Coda HB, Paccola RR (2007) An alternative positional FEM formulation for geometrically non-linear analysis of shells: curved triangular isoparametric elements. Comput Mech 40:185–200
Bischoff M, Ramm E (2000) On the physical significance of higher order kinematic and static variables in a three-dimensional shell formulation. Int J Solids Struct 37:6933–6960
Coda HB (2009) A solid-like FEM for geometrically non-linear 3D frames. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:3712–3722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2009.08.001
Coda HB, Paccola RR (2010) Improved finite element for 3D laminate frame analysis including warping for any cross-section. Appl Math Model 34:1107–1137
Géradin M, Cardona A (2001) Flexible multibody dynamics: a finite element approach. Wiley, Chichester
Ota NSN, Wilson L, Gay Neto A et al (2016) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of creased shells. Finite Elem Anal Des 121:64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FINEL.2016.07.008
Simo JC (1993) On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part VII: shell intersections with 5/6-DOF finite element formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 108:319–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(93)90008-L
Betsch P, Sänger N (2009) On the use of geometrically exact shells in a conserving framework for flexible multibody dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:1609–1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2009.01.016
Warburton GB (1976) The dynamical behaviour of structures, 2nd edn. Pergamon Press, New York
Sokolov A, Xirouchakis P (2007) Dynamics analysis of a 3-DOF parallel manipulator with R-P-S joint structure. Mech Mach Theory 42:541–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.05.004
Dasgupta B, Mruthyunjaya TS (2000) Stewart platform manipulator: a review. Mech Mach Theory 35:15–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-114X(99)00006-3
Camarillo DB, Milne CF, Carlson CR et al (2008) Mechanics modeling of tendon-driven continuum manipulators. IEEE Trans Robot 24:1262–1273. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2008.2002311
NASA (2015) Reference guide to the International Space Station. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Johnson Space Center, Houston
NASA Integrated Truss Structure. In: Natl. Aeronaut. Sp. Adm. https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/structure/elements/its.html#.W60aRXtKiUn. Accessed 27 Sept 2018
Wikipedia Contributors (2018) Integrated truss structure. In: Wikipedia, Free Encycl. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Integrated_Truss_Structure&oldid=857684272. Accessed 27 Sept 2018
NASA (2006) Space ISS Spacewalk 2. AP Archive. In: Natl. Aeronaut. Sp. Adm. TV. http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/youtube/4cadb37392aec1c1f1ad3219b09f7753. Accessed 27 Sept 2018
Williams S (2007) ISS STS-120 Radiator Deployment. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWZRhg0iez0. Accessed 27 Sept 2018
Siqueira TM, Coda HB (2016) Development of sliding connections for structural analysis by a total Lagrangian FEM formulation. Lat Am J Solids Struct. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78252494
Laursen TA, Puso MA, Sanders J (2012) Mortar contact formulations for deformable-deformable contact: past contributions and new extensions for enriched and embedded interface formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 205–208:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CMA.2010.09.006
Gay Neto A, Wriggers P (2019) Computing pointwise contact between bodies: a class of formulations based on master–master approach. Comput Mech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01680-9
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP-2016/00622-0 and FAPESP-2018/18321-1) for the research grant. This study was also financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
The Stewart platform motion, as described in the example, is imposed by varying the actuators lengths calculated from the following displacements of the control points in Fig. 12a. The central point G displacements is:
where the z-axis amplitude is \({{h}_{0}}=0.30\,\text {m}\) and the parametric radius evolution is written as:
with the maximum radius being \({{R}_{\max }}=0.30\,\text {m}\). The angle evolution function is adopted as:
The displacements of the other control points are:
and
in which \(\ell =1.0\,\text {m}\) and \(h=\sqrt{3}/2\,\text {m}\) are the A-B-C equilateral triangle side and height. Equations (55)–(57) are valid for the following rotation angles evolution around the z-axis, \(\gamma \), and x-axis, \(\beta \), adopted as:
and
Known the control points proposed displacements, the i-leg length variation \(\varDelta {{L}_{i}}\) can be calculated as:
in which the initial length is \({{L}_{i0}}=1.0513\,\text {m}\), \({{\mathbf {p}}_{i}}\) is the leg base coordinates, \({{\mathbf {p}}_{\text {X0}}}\) the initial coordinates of the associated platform control point and \({{\mathbf {d}}_{\text {X}}}\) its displacement as calculated above.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siqueira, T.M., Coda, H.B. Flexible actuator finite element applied to spatial mechanisms by a finite deformation dynamic formulation. Comput Mech 64, 1517–1535 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01732-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01732-0