Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical modeling of the thickness dependence of zinc die-cast materials

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Zinc die casting alloys show varying material properties over the thickness in their final solid state, which causes a change in the mechanical response for specimens with different thicknesses. In this article, we propose a modeling concept to account for the varying porosity in the constitutive modeling. The material properties are effectively incorporated by combining a partial differential equation describing the distribution of the pores by a structural parameter with the Mori–Tanaka approach for linear elasticity. The distribution of the porosity is determined by polished cut images, for which the procedure is explained in detail. Finite element simulations of the coupled system incorporating the thickness dependence show the applicability of this approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buffiere JY, Savelli S, Jouneau P, Maire E, Fougeres R (2001) Experimental study of porosity and its relation to fatigue mechanisms of model Al–Si7–Mg0.3 cast Al alloys. Mater Sci Eng 316:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Diebels S, Steeb H (2002) The size effect in foams and its theoretical and numerical investigation. Proc R Soc Lond 458:2869–2883

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dippel B, Johlitz M, Lion A (2014) Ageing of polymer bonds: a coupled chemomechanical modelling approach. Contin Mech Thermodyn 26:247–257

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Erbts P, Hartmann S, Düster A (2015) A partitioned solution approach for electro-thermo-mechanical problems. Arch Appl Mech 85:1075–1101

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gelfi M, Bontempi E, Pola A, Roberti R, Rollez D, Depero LE (2004) Microstructural and mechanical properties of zinc die casting. Adv Eng Mater 6:818–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gross D, Seelig T (2011) Bruchmechanik: Mit einer Einführung in die Mikromechanik (German edn). Springer

  7. Gutman E, Unigovski Y, Levkovitch M, Koren Z (1998) Influence of porosity and casting conditions on creep of die-cast Mg alloy. J Mater Sci Lett 17:1787–1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes TJR (1987) The finite element method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. IZA (2016) Zinc diecasting alloys—mechanical properties. The International Zinc Association www.zinc.org

  10. Johlitz M, Diebels S, Jan B, Steeb H, Wulff P (2008a) Size effects in polyurethane bonds: experiments, modelling and parameter identification. J Mater Sci 43:4768–4779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johlitz M, Steeb H, Jänicke R, Diebels S (2008b) Effective properties and size effects in filled polymers. GAMM-Mitt

  12. Klusemann B, Böhm HJ, Svendsen B (2012) Homogenization methods for multi-phase elastic composites with non-elliptical reinforcements: comparisons and benchmarks. Eur J Mech A Solids 34:21–37

  13. Leis W, Kallien LH (2011) Ageing of zinc alloys. Int Foundry Res 64(1):2–23

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mori T, Tanaka K (1973) Average stress in matrix and average elastic energy of materials with misfitting inclusions. Acta Metall 21:571–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nemat-Nasser S, Hori M (1993) Micromechanics: overall properties of heterogeneous materials. North-Holland Series in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, vol. 37. Academic Press, Elsevier

  16. Rothe S, Erbts P, Düster A, Hartmann S (2015) Monolithic and partitioned coupling schemes for thermo-viscoplasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 293:375–410

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Steeb H, Diebels S (2004) Modeling thin films applying an extended continuum theory based on scalar-valued order parameter. Part I: isothermal case. Int J Solids Struct 41:5071–5085

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Svendsen B (1999) On the thermodynamics of thermoelastic materials with additional scalar degrees of freedom. Contin Mech Thermodyn 4:247–262

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Wriggers P (2001) Nichtlineare Finite-Elemente Methoden. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. ZD (2016) Zinc-diecasting www.zinc-diecasting.info

  21. Zuh H, Zbib MH, Aifantis EC (1997) Strain gradients and continuum modeling of size effect in metal matrix composites. Acta Mech 121:165–176

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the German Research Foundation (DFG, Grant No. HA 2024/18-1). Furthermore, we would like to thank Professor Babette Tonn, Institute of Metallurgy, Clausthal University of Technology, for providing the microscopical images.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Hartmann.

Appendix: Porosity determination

Appendix: Porosity determination

In Fig. 3a, one can recognize a non-homogeneous distribution of the porosity through the thickness of the specimen. If we define a cylindrical coordinate system with the center in the revolution axis of the cylindrical specimen, we can express this dependence as \(\varPhi = {\hat{\varPhi }}(r)\). For the porosity evaluation, a script in Matlab is used. At first, the micro-graph is converted into a gray-level image with the resolution \(m \times n\) and a pixel-density of 6000 ppi. This image is processed as a matrix \({{\mathbf {\mathsf{{{P}}}}}}_{\text {GL}}\in \mathbb {N}^{m \times n}\), where the (xy)-position and the gray-value \(p_{ij} = {0,\ldots ,255}\) of the pixel is stored. In the next step, the position of every pixel in the \((r,\varphi )\)-coordinate system is determined. Then, the pixels of one image are evaluated as “pores” (\(p_{ij} > 175\)) or “not pores” (\(p_{ij} < 175\)) in intervals \(\varDelta r = {4.233}{\upmu }\)m over the discretized radial coordinate \(r_{k+1} = r_k + \varDelta r\). The radial coordinate has the limits \(r_i\) and \(r_o\), and we evaluate the pores within the angles \(\varphi _{\text {min}}\) and \(\varphi _{\text {max}}\). For each coordinate position, the porosity can be calculated with Eq. (2), where \(A_H(r_k)\) is equal to the number of pixels considered as pores in a certain radial interval \(r_k\) multiplied with the area of a pixel. Finally, the average value of the porosity of all the sectors for every radial interval is calculated. Figure 3b represents the development of the porosity through the thickness of the specimen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Page, M.A.M., Ruf, M. & Hartmann, S. Numerical modeling of the thickness dependence of zinc die-cast materials. Comput Mech 62, 655–667 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1519-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1519-8

Keywords

Navigation