Skip to main content
Log in

Adhesion formation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: In laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair controversy exists concerning the most appropriate repair method and implant material to use if intraabdominal adhesions are to be minimized.

Methods. In 108 pigs, we implanted three different types of mesh by both the TAPP (transabdominal preperitoneal) and Onlay (prosthesis placed directly upon the peritoneum) methods. Specimens were harvested in three time periods and adhesion formation was compared.

Results. Average adhesions at 3 days were TAPP 18% and Onlay 49% (p < 0.001). At 3 weeks average adhesions were TAPP 8% and Onlay 23% (p < 0.04). Three-month figures were TAPP 1% and Onlay 13% (p < 0.001). In contrast, there were no differences in adhesion formation due to material type in any of the three time periods (all p > 0.17).

Conclusions: A peritoneal covering over a laparoscopic inguinal implant significantly reduced adhesions. Prosthetic material type did not affect adhesion formation in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 22 August 1996/Accepted: 13 November 1996

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vader, V., Vogt, D., Zucker, K. et al. Adhesion formation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 11, 825–829 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900463

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900463

Navigation