Abstract
Background
Surgeons who favor the laparoscopic repair of groin hernias are under pressure to contain the additional hospital costs associated with this technique, which is not universally acknowledged to be superior to less expensive open repairs. The purpose of this study was to compare costs and quality for TEP (total extraperitoneal) herniorrhaphy performed with and without balloon dissection and disposable cannulas.
Methods
We studied 92 TEP patients. The first 36 patients (group 1) were repaired using balloon dissection and disposable cannulas. The next 37 patients (group 2) were repaired with nondisposable access cannulas, without balloon dissection and with disposable working ports. The final 19 patients (group 3) were repaired just as in group 2 except that all cannulas were nondisposable.
Results
The demographic data and complications were comparable for all three groups. The average hospital cost per case for group 1 procedures was $2,099; for group 2, it was $1,920; and for group 3, it was $1,607. Costs for patients decreased comparably but for different reasons. Also reviewed were 20 patients who underwent Lichtenstein repairs during the study period. The average hospital cost for these repairs was $1,556. This group was not randomized with TEP groups, and the selection criteria were different; hence, data comparing the Lichtenstein and TEP procedures were not analyzed statistically.
Conclusion
Costs can be significantly reduced and quality maintained when performing TEP herniorrhaphy without balloon dissection using nondisposable cannulas.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barry MK, Donohue JH, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup DM (1998) Transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: assessment of initial experience. Mayo Clin Proc 73: 717–723
Brooks DC (1994) A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and tension-free open herniorrhaphy. Arch Surg 129: 361–366
Felix E, Scott S, Crafton B, Geis P, Duncan T, Sewell R, McKernan B (1998) Causes of recurrence after laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 12: 226–231
Filipi CJ., Gaston-Johansson F, McBride PJ, Murayama K, Gerhardt J, Cornet DA (1996) An assessment of pain and return to normal activity: laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair. Surg Endosc 10: 983–986
Filipi CJ (1998) Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: a most helpful procedure. Mayo Clin Proc 73: 806–808
Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Camps J, Cornet DA, Nguyen NX, Litke BS, Annibali R, Salerno GM (1998) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: results of a multicenter trial. Ann Surg 221: 3–13
Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) A cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit. Surg Endosc 12: 1199–1203
Liem MSL, van der Graaf Y, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, Stassen LPS, Vente JP, Weidema WF, Schrijvers AJP, van Vroonhoven TJMV (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336: 1541–1547
Leim MLS, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU (1996) The learning curve for totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 171: 281–285
McKernan JB, Laws HL (1993) Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias using a totally extraperitoneal prosthetic approach. Surg Endosc 7: 26–28
Nyhus LM (1993) Individualization of hernia repair: a new era. Surgery 114: 1–2
Payne JH Jr, Grininger LM, Izawa MT, Podoll EF, Lindahl PJ, Balfour J (1994) Laparoscopic or open herniorrhaphy? A randomized prospective trial. Arch Surg 129: 973–979
Stoker DL, Spiegelhalter DJ, Singh R, Wellwood JM (1994) Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomized prospective trial. Lancet 343: 1243–1245
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Farinas, L.P., Griffen, F.D. Cost containment and totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc 14, 37–40 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900007
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900007