Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopically assisted transsacral resection of rectal cancer with primary anastomosis

A preliminary review

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The management of rectal cancer has been changing to include more sphincter-sparing procedures. We report our initial experience with a new technique incorporating laparoscopy and a transsacral approach for low or midlevel rectal cancer. Here, we tried to determine whether this sphincter-sparing method could produce acceptable morbidity and recurrence rates.

Methods: Patients with rectal cancer 4 to 8 cm from the dentate line underwent laparoscopically-assisted transsacral resection (LTR) with primary anastomosis. With this technique, the rectosigmoid is mobilized via laparoscopy while the patient is in the supine position. Next, the patient is placed in the prone jackknife position, and a segment of rectum is resected by a transsacral approach. Age, estimated blood loss, length of time in the operating room, length of stay, and postoperative complications were noted. Aspects of the tumor pathology regarding stage, lymph nodes, tumor size, and presence of tumor at resection margins also were recorded.

Results: A total of 13 patients, ages 26 to 70 years (mean, 52.5 years), underwent the procedure. No perioperative deaths occurred. The mean hospital stay was 9.6 days. The average size of the rectal lesion was 4.3 cm in the largest dimension. The average specimen contained 11.5 total, and 2.0 metastatic lymph nodes. Postoperative complications included two anastomotic breakdowns and two other wound complications. Late follow-up evaluation ranged from 10 to 30 months, with 11 of 13 patients alive (85% survival). Two local recurrences and three distant recurrences were noted at long-term follow-up assessment.

Conclusions: In selected patients with low or midlevel rectal cancer, LTR may be a viable option. Further experience is necessary to define its oncologic efficacy and whether routine temporary diverting colostomy is indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adloff M, Oilier JC, Arnaud JM (1983) L’abord posterior du rectum: techniques, indications, complications: a propos de 41 observations J Chir 120: 205–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnaud A, Fretes IR, Joly A, Sarles JC (1991) Posterior approach to the rectum for the treatment of selected benign lesions Int J Colorectal Dis 6: 100–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Balslev IB, Peterson M, Teglbjaerg P (1986) Postoperative radiotherapy in Dukes B and C carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid Cancer 58: 22–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bleday R, Breen E, Jessup JM, Burgess A, Sentovich SM, Steele G Jr (1997) Prospective evaluation of local excision for small rectal cancers Dis Colon Rectum 40: 388–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Breen E, Bleday R (1997) Preservation of the anus in the therapy of distal rectal cancers Surg Clin North Am 77: 71–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fielding GA, Lumley J, Nathanson L, Hewitt P, Rhodes M, Stite R (1997) Laparoscopic colectomy Laparoscopic colectomy Surg Endosc 11: 745–749 DOI: 10.1007/s004649900441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goligher JC, Dukes CE, Bussey HJR (1951) Local recurrences after sphincter-saving excisions for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid Br J Surg 39: 199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hugier M, Chastang C, Houry S, Martin-Fernandez M, Milsom JW, Church JM (1997) Sphincter-sparing resection or not, for cancer of the midrectum. Am J Surg 174: 11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huscher CSG, Lirici MM, Angelini L (1997) Laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 11: 875–876 DOI: 10.1007/s004649900475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jessup JM, Bleday R, Busse P (1993) Conservative management of rectal carcinoma: the efficacy of a multimodality approach. Semin Surg Oncol 9: 39–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirkegaard P, Madsen PV (1982) Ugeskrift for Laeger. 144: 3832–3834

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kraske P (1985) Zur extirpation hochsitzender mastdarmkrebse. Ver dt Ges Chir 14: 464

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lavery IC, Lopez-Kostner F, Fazio VW (1997) Chances of cure are not compromised with sphincter-saving procedures for cancer of the lower third of the rectum. Surgery 122: 779–785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Localio SA, Stahl NM (1969) Simultaneous abdominotranssacral resection and anastomoses for midrectal cancer. Am J Surg 117: 282–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mason AY (1974) Trans-sphincteric surgery of the rectum. Prog Surg 13: 66–97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Miles WE (1908) A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet 2: 1812–1813

    Google Scholar 

  17. Minsky BD, Coia L, Haller DG (1998) Radiation therapy for rectosigmoid and rectal cancer: results of the 1992–1994 Patterns of Care process survey. J Clin Oncol 16: 2542–2547

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Molenaar CBH, Bijnen AB, de Ruiter P (1998) Indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 12: 42–45 DOI: 10.1007/S004649900589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Murray JJ, Stahl TM (1993) Sphincter-saving alternatives for treatment of adenocarcinoma involving distal rectum. Surg Clin North Am 73: 131–144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ng AK, Recht A, Busse PM (1997) Sphincter preservation therapy for distal rectal carcinoma: a review. Cancer 79: 671–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Parks AG, Percy JP (1982) Resection and sutured coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 69: 301–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Senagore AJ (1994) Intrarectal and intraanal ultrasonography in the evaluation of colorectal pathology. Surg Clin North Am 74: 1465–1472

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Steele G, Busse P (1993) Conservative management of rectal carcinoma: the efficacy of a multimodality approach. Semin Surg Oncol 9: 39–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wexner SD, Cohen SM (1995) Port-site metastasis after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 82: 295–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wolmark N, Fisher B (1993) An analysis of survival and treatment failure following abdominoperineal and sphincter-saving resection in Dukes B and C rectal carcinoma: a report of the NSABP clinical trials. Ann Surg 204: 480–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yeatman T, Bland K (1989) Sphincter-saving procedures for distal carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg 209: 1–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Online publication: 12 July 2000

Work performed entirely at Wayne State University

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weaver, D.W., Eachempati, S.R. Laparoscopically assisted transsacral resection of rectal cancer with primary anastomosis. Surg Endosc 14, 703–707 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640020085

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640020085

Key words

Navigation