Skip to main content
Log in

Colonoscopy follow-up for acute diverticulitis: a multi-centre review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 31 October 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

To investigate the value of routine colonoscopy, post-computed tomography (CT) confirmed diverticulitis. The current practice is to scope patients 6–8 weeks post an episode of acute diverticulitis. We hypothesise that this practice has a relatively low value.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients presenting acute diverticulitis n = 1680 (uncomplicated = 1005, complicated = 675) between January 2017 and July 2019 at three tertiary hospitals in Perth. The National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) positive cases were the reference group (n = 1800). Data were analysed using SPSS v.27.

Results

One thousand two hundred seventy-two patients had a subsequent colonoscopy during the follow-up period, of which 24% (n = 306) were uncomplicated diverticulitis, 34% (n = 432) complicated diverticulitis, and 42% (n = 534) as the reference cohort. Patient demographics were similar between centres and subgroups. Incidence of primary colorectal cancer (CRC) was n = 3 (1.0%), n = 9 (2.1%), and n = 10 (1.9%) for uncomplicated diverticulitis, complicated diverticulitis, and NBCSP, respectively (p = 0.50). Subgroup analysis by age revealed a statistically significant higher rate of negative colonoscopy in uncomplicated diverticulitis patients aged over 50.

Conclusion

Routine colonoscopy for patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis is not a cost-effective strategy for colorectal cancer screening patients over 50 years. These patients should participate in the NBCSP with biennial FOBT instead. We suggest continuing routine endoscopic evaluation for patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis under 50 years and all patients admitted with complicated diverticulitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Stollman N, Raskin JB (2004) Diverticular disease of the colon. Lancet 363:631–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferzoco LB, Raptopoulos V, Silen W (1998) Acute diverticulitis. N Engl J Med 338:1521–1526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shahedi K, Fuller G, Bolus R, Cohen E, Vu M, Shah R, Agarwal N, Kaneshiro M, Atia M, Sheen V, Kurzbard N, van Oijen MGH, Yen L, Hodgkins P, Erder MH, Spiegel B (2013) Long-term risk of acute diverticulitis among patients with incidental diverticulosis found during colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:1609–1613

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Stollman N, Smalley W, Hirano I (2015) American gastroenterological association institute guideline on the management of acute diverticulitis. Gastroenterology 149:1944–1949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hall J, Hardiman K, Lee S, Lightner A, Stocchi L, Paquette IM, Steele SR, Feingold DL (2020) The American society of colon and rectal surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of left-sided colonic diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 63:728–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2019) Diverticular disease: diagnosis and management.

  7. Health AIo, Welfare (2021) Cancer in Australia 2021. AIHW, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schreuders EH, Ruco A, Rabeneck L, Schoen RE, Sung JJY, Young GP, Kuipers EJ (2015) Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes. Gut 64:1637–1649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. John JS, Grogan P (2016) Compelling new data on the effectiveness of Australia’s National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: a model for best practice? Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol 12:7–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pignone MP, Flitcroft KL, Howard K, Trevena LJ, Salkeld GP, St John DJB (2011) Costs and cost-effectiveness of full implementation of a biennial faecal occult blood test screening program for bowel cancer in Australia. Med J Aust 194:180–185

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Australian Govt Dept H, Australian Inst Hlth W, Australian Institute of Health and W, Australian Government Department of H (2016) Analysis of colorectal cancer outcomes for the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program. Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol 12:22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cenin DR, St John DJB, Ledger MJN, Slevin T, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I (2014) Optimising the expansion of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program. Med J Aust 201:456–461

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma PV, Eglinton T, Hider P, Frizelle F (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of routine colonic evaluation after radiologically confirmed acute diverticulitis. Ann Surg 259:263–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sakhnini E, Lahat A, Melzer E, Apter S, Simon C, Natour M, Bardan E, Bar-Meir S (2004) Early colonoscopy in patients with acute diverticulitis: results of a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy 36:504–507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmilovitz-Weiss H, Yalunin E, Boaz M, Sehayek-Shabbat V, Levin I, Chervinski A, Atar E, Niv Y, Shirin H (2012) Does a colonoscopy after acute diverticulitis affect its management? A single center experience. J Clin Gastroenterol 46:317–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van de Wall BJM, Reuling EMBP, Consten ECJ, van Grinsven JHJ, Schwartz MP, Broeders IAMJ, Draaisma WA (2012) Endoscopic evaluation of the colon after an episode of diverticulitis: a call for a more selective approach. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:1145–1150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ng ZQ, Moe KS, Wijesuriya R (2019) Routine colonoscopy after acute diverticulitis: is it warranted? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 29:462–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goh YL, Goh EL, Goh YM, Magee CJ, Wilson J (2016) Incidence of colorectal neoplasia after CT—confirmed diverticulitis—yes to colonoscopy: no to flexible sigmoidoscopy. Int J Surgery (London, England) 36:S71–S71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Elramah MM, Horwitz JP, Einstein MM, Qureshi J, Leo J, Omballi M, Affi A, Vakil NB (2010) S1538: colonoscopic evaluation after acute diverticulitis: is there an association with colonic malignancy? Gastrointest Endosc 71:AB188–AB188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lahat A, Yanai H, Menachem Y, Avidan B, Bar-Meir S (2007) The feasibility and risk of early colonoscopy in acute diverticulitis: a prospective controlled study. Endoscopy 39:521–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cerdán Santacruz C, Muriel Álvarez P, Roig Ferreruela G, Merichal Resina M, Pinillos Somalo AI, Mestres Petit N, Sierra Grañón JE, Olsina Kissler JJ (2021) Interval colonoscopy following acute diverticulitis should not be discouraged yet: results from a retrospective cohort. Surg Endosc 35:6819–6826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Studniarek A, Kochar K, Warner C, Eftaiha S, Naffouj S, Borsuk DJ, Mellgren A, Park JJ, Cintron J, Harrison J (2019) Findings on colonoscopy after diverticulitis: a multicenter review. Am Surg 85:1381–1385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lau KC, Spilsbury K, Farooque Y, Kariyawasam SB, Owen RG, Wallace MH, Makin GB (2011) Is colonoscopy still mandatory after a CT diagnosis of left-sided diverticulitis: can colorectal cancer be confidently excluded? Dis Colon Rectum 54:1265–1270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to extend our thanks and gratitude to the following individuals and organisations: Michael Dufton – Business & Activity Analyst (SMHS); SMHS – HREC Committee; Governance Office SMHS; PIMS Officers (SMHS, EMHS, NMHS).

Funding

No external funding was received for this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brodie D. Laurie.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Brodie Laurie, Mary Teoh, Alfredo Noches-Garcia, and Munyaradzi Nyandoro have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article was updated to add the acknowledgements.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laurie, B.D., Teoh, M.M.K., Noches-Garcia, A. et al. Colonoscopy follow-up for acute diverticulitis: a multi-centre review. Surg Endosc 37, 1756–1760 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09671-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09671-3

Keywords

Navigation