Skip to main content
Log in

Yield of colonoscopy after recent CT-proven uncomplicated acute diverticulitis: a comparative cohort study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Current guidelines recommend routine follow-up colonoscopy after acute diverticulitis to confirm the diagnosis and exclude malignancy. Its value, however, has recently been questioned because of contradictory study results. Our objective was to compare the colonoscopic detection rate of advanced colonic neoplasia (ACN), comprising colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenoma (AA), in patients after a CT-proven primary episode of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis with average risk participants in a primary colonoscopy CRC screening program.

Methods

A retrospective comparison was performed of prospectively collected data from cohorts derived from two multicenter randomized clinical trials executed in the Netherlands between 2009 and 2013. 401 uncomplicated diverticulitis patients and 1,426 CRC screening participants underwent colonic evaluation by colonoscopy. Main outcome was the diagnostic yield for ACN, calculated as number of diverticulitis patients and screening participants with ACN relative to their totals, with differences expressed as odds ratios (OR). The histopathology outcome of removed lesions during colonoscopy was used as definitive diagnosis.

Results

AA detection was similar [5.5 vs. 8.7 %; OR 0.62 (95 % CI 0.38–1.01); P = 0.053]. CRC was detected in 1.2 % (5/401) of diverticulitis patients versus 0.6 % (9/1,426) of screening participants [OR 1.30 (95 % CI 0.39–4.36); P = 0.673]. ACN was diagnosed in 6.7 % (27/401) of diverticulitis patients versus 9.1 % (130/1,426) of screening participants [OR 0.71 (95 % CI 0.45–1.11); P = 0.134]. ORs were adjusted for age, family history of CRC, smoking, BMI, and cecal intubation rate.

Conclusions

ACN detection does not differ significantly between patients with recent uncomplicated diverticulitis and average risk screening participants. Routine follow-up colonoscopy after primary CT-proven uncomplicated left-sided acute diverticulitis can be omitted; these patients can participate in CRC screening programs. Follow-up colonoscopy may be beneficial when targeted at high-risk patients, but such an approach first needs prospective evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rafferty J, Shellito P, Hyman NH, Buie WD, Standards Committee of American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (2006) Practice parameters for sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 49:939–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fozard JB, Armitage NC, Schofield JB, Jones OM, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (2011) ACPGBI position statement on elective resection for diverticulitis. Colorectal Dis 13(Suppl 3):1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersen JC, Bundgaard L, Elbrønd H, Laurberg S, Walker LR, Støvring J, Danish Surgical Society (2012) Danish national guidelines for treatment of diverticular disease. Dan Med J 59:C4453

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Andeweg CS, Mulder IM, Felt-Bersma RJ, Verbon A, van der Wilt GJ, van Goor H, Lange JF, Stoker J, Boermeester MA, Bleichrodt RP (2013) Guidelines of diagnostics and treatment of acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis. Dig Surg 30:278–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stollman NH, Raskin JB (1999) Diagnosis and management of diverticular disease of the colon in adults. Ad hoc practice parameters committee of the american college of gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 94:3110–3121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobs DO (2007) Clinical practice. Diverticulitis. N Engl J Med 357:2057–2066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (2007) SSAT Patient Care Guidelines: Surgical Treatment of Diverticulitis. http://www.ssat.com/cgi-bin/divert.cgi. 2007; Accessed 14 Oct 2013

  8. Agresta F, Ansaloni L, Baiocchi GL, Bergamini C, Campanile FC, Carlucci M, Cocorullo G, Corradi A, Franzato B, Lupo M, Mandalà V, Mirabella A, Pernazza G, Piccoli M, Staudacher C, Vettoretto N, Zago M, Lettieri E, Levati A, Pietrini D, Scaglione M, De Masi S, De Placido G, Francucci M, Rasi M, Fingerhut A, Uranüs S, Garattini S (2012) Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d’Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell’Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 26:2134–2164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Biondo S, Lopez Borao J, Millan M, Kreisler E, Jaurrieta E (2012) Current status of the treatment of acute colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 14:e1–e11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Laméris W, van Randen A, Bipat S, Bossuyt PM, Boermeester MA, Stoker J (2008) Graded compression ultrasonography and computed tomography in acute colonic diverticulitis: meta-analysis of test accuracy. Eur Radiol 18:2498–2511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alatawi A, Pautrat K, Soyer P, Ozenne V, Chaput U, Lo Dico R, Duteil C, Valleur PD, Marteau PR, Dray X (2012) Diagnostic and therapeutic impacts of elective colonoscopy following acute sigmoid diverticulitis. Gastrointest Endosc 75(4S):Mo1385

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elramah MM, Horwitz JP, Einstein MM, Einstein MM, Qureshi J, Leo J, Omballi M, Affi A, Vakil NB (2010) Colonoscopic evaluation after acute diverticulitis: Is there an association with colonic malignancy? Gastrointest Endosc 71(5):ppAB188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kratt T, Stüker D, Meile T, Küper MA, Zdichavsky M, Kirschniak A, Miller S, Fend F (2010) Early elective total colonoscopy in complicated sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 71(5):AB339

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lahat A, Yanai H, Sakhnini E, Menachem Y, Bar-Meir S (2008) Role of colonoscopy in patients with persistent acute diverticulitis. World J Gastroenterol 14:2763–2766

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hjern F, Jonas E, Holmström B, Josephson T, Mellgren A, Johansson C (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy in the follow-up of patients after diverticulitis- a prospective, comparative study. Clin Radiol 62:645–650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sallinen V, Mentula P, Leppäniemi A (2014) Risk of colon cancer after computed tomography-diagnosed acute diverticulitis: is routine colonoscopy necessary? 28:961–966

  17. Brar MS, Roxin G, Yaffe PB, Stanger J, MacLean AR, Buie WD (2013) Colonoscopy following nonoperative management of uncomplicated diverticulitis may not be warranted. Dis Colon Rectum 56:1259–1264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Elmi A, Hedgire SS, Pargaonkar V, Cao K, McDermott S, Harisinghani M (2013) Is early colonoscopy beneficial in patients with CT-diagnosed diverticulitis? AJR Am J Roentgeno 200:1269–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chabok A, Smedh K, Nilsson S, Stenson M, Påhlman L (2013) CT-colonography in the follow-up of acute diverticulitis: patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy. Scand J Gastroenterol 48:979–986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van de Wall BJ, Reuling EM, Consten EC, van Grinsven JH, Schwartz MP, Broeders IA, Draaisma WA (2012) Endoscopic evaluation of the colon after an episode of diverticulitis: a call for a more selective approach. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:1145–1150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schout PJ, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, Groenen MJ (2012) Routine screening for colon cancer after conservative treatment of diverticulitis. Dig Surg 29:408–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmilovitz-Weiss H, Yalunin E, Boaz M, Sehayek-Shabbat V, Levin I, Chervinski A, Atar E, Niv Y, Shirin H (2012) Does a colonoscopy after acute diverticulitis affect its management? A single center experience. J Clin Gastroenterol 46:317–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Westwood DA, Eglinton TW, Frizelle FA (2011) Routine colonoscopy following acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. Br J Surg 98:1630–1634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lau KC, Spilsbury K, Farooque Y, Kariyawasam SB, Owen RG, Wallace MH, Makin GB (2011) Is colonoscopy still mandatory after a CT diagnosis of left-sided diverticulitis: can colorectal cancer be confidently excluded? Dis Colon Rectum 54:1265–1270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lahat A, Yanai H, Menachem Y, Avidan B, Bar-Meir S (2007) The feasibility and risk of early colonoscopy in acute diverticulitis: a prospective controlled study. Endoscopy 39:521–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gavin DR, Valori RM, Anderson JT, Donnelly MT, Williams JG, Swarbrick ET (2013) The national colonoscopy audit: a nationwide assessment of the quality and safety of colonoscopy in the UK. Gut 62:242–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. De Wijkerslooth TR, de Haan MC, Stoop EM, Deutekom M, Fockens P, Bossuyt PM, Thomeer M, van Ballegooijen M, Essink-Bot ML, van Leerdam ME, Kuipers EJ, Dekker E, Stoker J (2010) Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol 10:47

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Unlü C, de Korte N, Daniels L, Consten EC, Cuesta MA, Gerhards MF, van Geloven AA, van der Zaag ES, van der Hoeven JA, Klicks R, Cense HA, Roumen RM, Eijsbouts QA, Lange JF, Fockens P, de Borgie CA, Bemelman WA, Reitsma JB, Stockmann HB, Vrouenraets BC, Boermeester MA, Dutch Diverticular Disease 3D Collaborative Study Group (2010) A multicenter randomized clinical trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies with or without antibiotics for uncomplicated acute diverticulitis (DIABOLO trial). BMC Surg 10:23

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, Bossuyt PM, van Ballegooijen M, Nio CY, van de Vijver MJ, Biermann K, Thomeer M, van Leerdam ME, Fockens P, Stoker J, Kuipers EJ, Dekker E (2012) Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 13:55–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, Hoffman B, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Petersen BT, Safdi MA, Faigel DO, Pike IM, ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy (2006) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101:873–885

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wasvary H, Turfah F, Kadro O, Beauregard W (1999) Same hospitalization resection for acute diverticulitis. Am Surg 65:632–635

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, Borchard F, Cooper HS, Dawsey SM, Dixon MF, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Fléjou JF, Geboes K, Hattori T, Hirota T, Itabashi M, Iwafuchi M, Iwashita A, Kim YI, Kirchner T, Klimpfinger M, Koike M, Lauwers GY, Lewin KJ, Oberhuber G, Offner F, Price AB, Rubio CA, Shimizu M, Shimoda T, Sipponen P, Solcia E, Stolte M, Watanabe H, Yamabe H (2000) The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 47:251–255

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, Tytgat KM, Dees J, Mathus-Vliegen EM, Kuipers EJ, Fockens P, van Leerdam ME, Dekker E (2013) Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal time. Gastrointest Endosc 77:617–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stegeman I, de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, van Leerdam ME, Dekker E, van Ballegooijen M, Kuipers EJ, Fockens P, Kraaijenhagen RA, Bossuyt PM (2013) Colorectal cancer risk factors in the detection of advanced adenoma and colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol 37:278–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bardou M, Barkun AN, Martel M (2013) Obesity and colorectal cancer. Gut 62:933–947

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fabbri M, Zagari RM, Colussi D, N. Garavelli, F. Bazzoli, L. Ricciardiello (2013) Obesity and heavy alcohol consumption are independently associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer: a nested case-control study. Abstract United European Gastroenterology Week 2013, Berlin available at http://www.e-learning.ueg.eu/documents-view.html?no_cache=1&eprs%5Br%5D=20787; Accessed 27 December 2013

  37. Hazewinkel Y, Dekker E (2011) Colonoscopy: basic principles and novel techniques. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:554–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Radaelli F, Meucci G, Sgroi G, Minoli G, Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists (AIGO) (2008) Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators. Am J Gastroenterol 103:1122–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dafnis G, Granath F, Påhlman L, Ekbom A, Blomqvist P (2005) Patient factors influencing the completion rate in colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 37:113–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Loffeld RJ, van der Putten AB (2009) The completion rate of colonoscopy in normal daily practice: factors associated with failure. Digestion 80:267–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Anderson JC, Messina CR, Cohn W et al (2001) Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 54:558–562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jover R, Zapater P, Polanía E, Bujanda L, Lanas A, Hermo JA, Cubiella J, Ono A, González-Méndez Y, Peris A, Pellisé M, Seoane A, Herreros-de-Tejada A, Ponce M, Marín-Gabriel JC, Chaparro M, Cacho G, Fernández-Díez S, Arenas J, Sopeña F, de-Castro L, Vega-Villaamil P, Rodríguez-Soler M, Carballo F, Salas D, Morillas JD, Andreu M, Quintero E, Castells A; COLONPREV study investigators (2013) Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 77:381–389

  43. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL (2006) Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 355:2533–2541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sai VF, Velayos F, Neuhaus J, Westphalen AC (2012) Colonoscopy after CT diagnosis of diverticulitis to exclude colon cancer: a systematic literature review. Radiology 263:383–390

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sharma PV, Eglinton T, Hider P, Frizelle F (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of routine colonic evaluation after radiologically confirmed acute diverticulitis. Ann Surg 259:263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Daniels L, Unlü C, de Wijkerslooth TR, Dekker E, Boermeester MA (2014) Routine colonoscopy after left-sided acute uncomplicated diverticulitis: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 79:378–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Goh V, Halligan S, Taylor SA, Burling D, Bassett P, Bartram CI (2007) Differentiation between diverticulitis and colorectal cancer: quantitative CT-perfusion measurements versus morphologic criteria, initial experience. Radiology 242:456–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Shen SH, Chen JD, Tiu CM, Chou YH, Chiang JH, Chang CY, Lee CH (2005) Differentiating colonic diverticulitis from colon cancer: the value of computed tomography in the emergency setting. J Chin Med Assoc 68:411–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Chintapalli KN, Chopra S, Ghiatas AA, Esola CC, Fields SF, Dodd GD 3rd (1999) Diverticulitis versus colon cancer: differentiation with helical CT findings. Radiology 210:429–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The COCOS trial, from which the screening cohort for this study was derived, was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development of the Dutch Ministry of Health (ZonMw No. 120720012), Centre for Translational Molecular Medicine (CTMM DeCoDe-project), and the Nuts Ohra Foundation (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The DIABOLO trial, from which the diverticulitis patient cohort was derived, was also funded by ZonMw (No. 171002303) and by the Dutch Maag Lever Darm Stichting (MLDS No. WO08-54). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, data interpretation, decision to publish, writing or preparation of the manuscript.

Disclosures

Prof. Boermeester has received grants from Baxter, GSK, LifeCell, Ipsen, and Abbott for work outside this specific paper. Prof. Dekker has received speaker fees from Norgine Spain and Takada and research support and equipment on loan from Olympus for work outside this specific paper. Drs. Daniels, Drs. Ünlü, Dr. de Wijkerslooth, Dr. Stockmann, and Prof. Kuipers have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lidewine Daniels.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daniels, L., Ünlü, Ç., de Wijkerslooth, T.R. et al. Yield of colonoscopy after recent CT-proven uncomplicated acute diverticulitis: a comparative cohort study. Surg Endosc 29, 2605–2613 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3977-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3977-9

Keywords

Navigation